Paraffin processing of stented arteries using a postfixation dissolution of metallic and polymeric stents

Studying the morphology of the arterial response to endovascular stent implantation requires embedding the explanted stented artery in rigid materials such as poly(methyl methacrylate) to enable sectioning through both the in situ stent and the arterial wall, thus maintaining the proper anatomic relationships. This is a laborious, time-consuming process. Moreover, the technical quality of stained plastic sections is typically suboptimal and, in some cases, precludes immunohistochemical analysis. Here we describe a novel technique for dissolution of metallic and plastic stents that is compatible with subsequent embedding of "destented" arteries in paraffin, fine sectioning, major staining protocols, and immunohistochemistry.

Automated microfluidic processing platform for multiplexed magnetic bead immunoassays

A microfluidic platform is presented which fully automates all incubation steps of a three-stage, multiplexed magnetic bead immunoassay, such as the Luminex^® xMAP technology. Magnetic actuation is used to transfer the microbeads between co-infused adjacent laminar flow streams to transport the beads into and out of incubation and wash solutions, with extended incubation channels to allow sufficient bead incubation times (1-30 min, commonly 5 min per stage) to enable high-sensitivity. The serial incubation steps of the immunoassay are completed in succession within the device with no operator interaction, and the continuous flow operation with magnetic bead transfer defines the incubation sequencing requiring no external fluidic controls beyond syringe pump infusion. The binding kinetics of the assay is empirically characterized to determine the required incubation times for specific assay sensitivities in the range 1 pg/ml to 100 ng/ml. By using a Luminex^® xMAP duplex assay, concurrent detection of IL-6 and TNF-α was demonstrated on-chip with a detection range 10 pg/ml to 1 ng/ml. This technology enables rapid automation of magnetic microbead assays, and has the potential to perform continuous concentration monitoring.

Tonometry comparison: Goldmann versus Tono-Pen

Tono-Pen and Goldmann tonometers were compared in 152 eyes of healthy subjects (Group A) and 69 eyes of patients after intraocular procedures (Group B). In Group A, the readings from both the tonometers showed no statistically significant difference in the 0 to 15mmHg range. However, the Tono-Pen values were lower in eyes with intraocular pressures between 16 and 30mmHg (P less than .0001). This questions the reliability of Tono-Pen as an adequate screening instrument. The correlation between the two instruments was acceptable in Group B (r = .89), indicating that the Tono-Pen may be used cautiously to determine intraocular pressure in postoperative patients.