Smoking and mental disability : A mixed observational study using a diverse sample of medical-social establishments and services

INTRODUCTION

A multi-center observational study was carried out in ten ESMS, using a mixed methodology (site visits, questionnaire survey, semi-directive group interviews with professionals and individual interviews with users).

PURPOSE OF THE RESEARCH

The aim of this article is to describe the management and prevention of smoking in ESMS for people with mental health disorders, and to characterize and identify the smoking behaviors and representations of ESMS users and the professionals working there.

RESULTS

The study made it possible to distinguish between ESMS in terms of the organization of smoking areas and tobacco prevention initiatives. It also revealed that 37 percent of respondents among the professionals said they smoked tobacco, with some of them explaining that they smoked with users and sometimes gave them cigarettes. With regard to prevention, there was a consensus among professionals that they should help users who wanted to stop smoking. Professionals were divided, however, on the need for more active prevention, citing the users’ freedom and the fact that ESMS are places where people live. Among the users, 47 percent said they were smokers. Of the users who smoked, 55 percent said they wanted to stop. Interviews with the users revealed that twelve of them wanted to quit, with some asking for help and more assistance from professionals.

CONCLUSIONS

This report suggests that intervention research could be developed in ESMS for people with mental health disorders, who could benefit from the smoking prevention actions identified in the facilities and services investigated.

The (De)normalisation of Smoking Among Apprentices: Plurality of Settings, Norms and Vulnerability Levels

When it comes to smoking, apprentices are considered a 'vulnerable' population. They have been the subject of targeted approaches based on the assumption of common characteristics. In contrast to most public health studies, that assume homogeneity of vulnerable groups, this article, based on Lahire's 'theory of the plural individual', aims to examine inter- and intra-individual variability in relation to tobacco exposure. It is based on a secondary analysis of 30 interviews with apprentices in France on the stigma attached to their use in their different living environments. Our study confirms that the family and the Centre de Formation des Apprentis, as a whole, encourage smoking. It also provides a better understanding of the mechanisms by which inequalities are perpetuated (permissive rules, loans and gifts of cigarettes, spillover effects, lack of incentives to quit). Nevertheless, it allows us to observe that, in some families and in some companies, smoking is denormalised, even stigmatised. Several apprentice profiles emerge: those who are protected from tobacco and seem to be able to quit easily; those who are permanently confronted with it and for whom it is difficult to consider quitting or reducing; and those who are confronted with a plurality of norms, who seem ambivalent and whose consumption varies significantly. These results will allow us to adapt the interventions according to the profile of the apprentices and by including their entourage. In particular, it will be necessary to propose a 'go-to' approach that goes beyond the school setting and involves the family and the workplace.

[PLAID-Care: Research into the reduced use of coercion in France]

The use of coercion is a common practice in psychiatry despite its deleterious effects and insufficient evidence of benefits. It is so deeply rooted that the mention of establishments that make little use of it arouses a form of incredulity. However, the history of psychiatry and the international literature provide numerous examples of a psychiatry that is hardly coercive and numerous experiences of a reduction in the use of seclusion and/or restraint in psychiatric facilities. Today, in France, there are also less coercive establishments, which, for example, do not use mechanical restraint, have all their units open, or have reduced their use of seclusion and restraint. With regard to the stated policy objectives of reducing the use of coercion, it is surprising that most of these facilities receive little attention. PLAID-Care research aims to contribute to the visibility and analysis of these institutions and the factors involved in the reduced use of coercion. While these factors have already been identified in the international literature, the research is based on the multiplication of disciplinary perspectives (nursing, sociology, anthropology, geography) and the mobilization of a multi-level analytical framework that allows us to embrace their multiplicity and better understand their articulation. The originality of the research also lies in its historical dimension, which allows us to understand, on the scale of an institution, how a policy and practices aiming at the least recourse emerge and are consolidated. The project timeline is divided in three tasks: firstly, an inventory of "low-coercion" facilities in France; secondly, we will select and research four traditionally "low-coercion" facilities in France; thirdly we will focus on recently emerged "low-coercion" practices. PLAID-Care aims to revitalize French research on this theme which to date has been relatively lagging behind the numerous international studies. It will bring together and articulate the knowledge, tools and forms of organization and collaboration that contribute to making a policy of lesser use of coercion operational.

Stigmatisation et santé publique : le côté obscur des interventions anti-tabac

Tobacco control strategies, considered legitimate and effective, are rarely the subject of critical analysis in France. This is specifically true with regard to their potentially harmful effects, particularly against people who continue to smoke. This article introduces this debate, focusing on the potentially stigmatizing effects of anti-smoking policies. It has been attested by numerous international studies, and by a study in France, that the general process of tobacco denormalization has led to the stigmatization of smokers who then may be subject to discrimination. To the extent that smoking is now concentrated in the most disadvantaged socio-economic populations in France, the latter are thus more exposed to stigma. While underscoring the need to develop targeted interventions against them, this article also warns and calls for vigilance regarding the potential iatrogenic effects of these interventions. It is therefore necessary to develop research and evaluations on this subject in order to accurately measure the effects of these interventions, particularly in terms of stigmatization and self-stigma, and to ensure that public health actors do not generate more problems than they solve.