1
|
Cass SH, Tobin JWD, Seo YD, Gener-Ricos G, Keung EZ, Burton EM, Davies MA, McQuade JL, Lazar AJ, Mason R, Millward M, Sandhu S, Khoo C, Warburton L, Guerra V, Haydon A, Dearden H, Menzies AM, Carlino MS, Smith JL, Mollee P, Burgess M, Mapp S, Keane C, Atkinson V, Parikh SA, Markovic SN, Ding W, Call TG, Hampel PJ, Long GV, Wargo JA, Ferrajoli A. Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of advanced melanoma in patients with concomitant chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:796-805. [PMID: 37414216 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the management of advanced melanoma (AM). However, data on ICI effectiveness have largely been restricted to clinical trials, thereby excluding patients with co-existing malignancies. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most prevalent adult leukemia and is associated with increased risk of melanoma. CLL alters systemic immunity and can induce T-cell exhaustion, which may limit the efficacy of ICIs in patients with CLL. We, therefore, sought to examine the efficacy of ICI in patients with these co-occurring diagnoses. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this international multicenter study, a retrospective review of clinical databases identified patients with concomitant diagnoses of CLL and AM treated with ICI (US-MD Anderson Cancer Center, N = 24; US-Mayo Clinic, N = 15; AUS, N = 19). Objective response rates (ORRs), assessed by RECIST v1.1, and survival outcomes [overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS)] among patients with CLL and AM were assessed. Clinical factors associated with improved ORR and survival were explored. Additionally, ORR and survival outcomes were compared between the Australian CLL/AM cohort and a control cohort of 148 Australian patients with AM alone. RESULTS Between 1997 and 2020, 58 patients with concomitant CLL and AM were treated with ICI. ORRs were comparable between AUS-CLL/AM and AM control cohorts (53% versus 48%, P = 0.81). PFS and OS from ICI initiation were also comparable between cohorts. Among CLL/AM patients, a majority were untreated for their CLL (64%) at the time of ICI. Patients with prior history of chemoimmunotherapy treatment for CLL (19%) had significantly reduced ORRs, PFS, and OS. CONCLUSIONS Our case series of patients with concomitant CLL and melanoma demonstrate frequent, durable clinical responses to ICI. However, those with prior chemoimmunotherapy treatment for CLL had significantly worse outcomes. We found that CLL disease course is largely unchanged by treatment with ICI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S H Cass
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - J W D Tobin
- Haematology Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba; University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Y D Seo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - G Gener-Ricos
- Department of Leukemia, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - E Z Keung
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - E M Burton
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - M A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - J L McQuade
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - A J Lazar
- Departments of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - R Mason
- Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport
| | | | - S Sandhu
- Peter Macallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne
| | - C Khoo
- Peter Macallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne
| | - L Warburton
- Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup; Future Health Research and Innovation Fund/Raine Clinician Research Fellowship
| | - V Guerra
- Department of Leukemia, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | | | - H Dearden
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney
| | - A M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney; The University of Sydney Charles Perkins Centre, Sydney; The University of Sydney Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney
| | - M S Carlino
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney; Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - J L Smith
- Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - P Mollee
- Haematology Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba; University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - M Burgess
- Haematology Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba; University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - S Mapp
- Haematology Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba; University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - C Keane
- Haematology Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba; University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - V Atkinson
- Haematology Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba; University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | | | - W Ding
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | | | | | - G V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney; The University of Sydney Charles Perkins Centre, Sydney; The University of Sydney Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney
| | - J A Wargo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
| | - A Ferrajoli
- Department of Leukemia, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Reddy YNV, Sundaram V, Tam M, Parikh SA. Spontaneous coronary artery thrombosis in the setting of active lupus mesenteric vasculitis. Lupus 2015; 24:885-8. [DOI: 10.1177/0961203315570167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2014] [Accepted: 01/07/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
A 33-year-old male with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) presented with acute abdominal pain and was found to have lupus mesenteric vasculitis on imaging and during exploratory laparotomy. Post laparotomy he continued to have persistent nausea and dyspepsia and an electrocardiogram showed evidence of an inferior ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Emergency cardiac catheterization showed evidence of thrombotic right coronary artery occlusion. His coronaries were otherwise normal with no evidence of underlying coronary artery disease. Extensive workup with trans-esophageal echo, serologies for antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) and bubble study was negative. This effectively ruled out Libman–Sacks endocarditis, APS-induced arterial thrombus and paradoxical emboli as potential causes of his STEMI. By exclusion of other causes, the etiology of his STEMI was felt to be secondary to in-situ coronary artery thrombosis in the setting of active SLE. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a patient with SLE presenting with both lupus mesenteric vasculitis and in-situ coronary arterial thrombosis in the absence of APS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yogesh N V Reddy
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - V Sundaram
- University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute Division of Cardiovascular Medicine
| | - M Tam
- University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute Division of Cardiovascular Medicine
| | - S A Parikh
- University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute Division of Cardiovascular Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Obstructive atherosclerotic vascular disease stands as one of the greatest public health threats in the world. While a number of therapies have been developed to combat vascular disease, endothelial cell delivery has emerged as a distinct therapeutic modality. In this article, we will review the anatomy of the normal blood vessel and the biology of the intact endothelium, focusing upon its centrality in vascular biology and control over the components of the vascular response to injury so as to understand better the motivation for a cell-based form of therapy. Our discussion of cell delivery for cardiovascular therapy will be divided into surgical and interventional approaches. We will briefly recount the development of artificial grafts for surgical vascular bypass before turning our attention towards endothelial cell seeded vascular grafts, in which endothelial cells effectively provide local delivery of endogenous endothelial secretory products to maintain prosthetic integrity after surgical implantation. New techniques in tissue and genetic engineering of vascular grafts and whole blood vessels will be presented. Methods for percutaneous interventions will be examined as well. We will evaluate results of endoluminal endothelial cell seeding for treatment of restenosis and gene therapy approaches to enhance endogenous re-endothelialization. Finally, we will examine some innovations in endothelial cell delivery that may lead to the development of endothelial cell implants as a novel therapy for controlling proliferative vascular arteriopathy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S A Parikh
- Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
We studied the association between the production of reactive oxygen species, actin organization, and cellular motility. We have used an endothelial cell monolayer-wounding assay to demonstrate that the cells at the margin of the wound thus created produced significantly more free radicals than did cells in distant rows. The rate of incorporation of actin monomers into filaments was fastest at the wound margin, where heightened production of free radicals was detected. We have tested the effect of decreasing reactive oxygen species production on the migration of endothelial cells and on actin polymerization. The NADPH inhibitor diphenylene iodonium and the superoxide dismutase mimetic manganese (III) tetrakis(1-methyl-4-pyridyl)porphyrin (MnTMPyP) virtually abolished cytochalasin D-inhibitable actin monomer incorporation at the fast-growing barbed ends of filaments. Moreover, endothelial cell migration within the wound was significantly retarded in the presence of both diphenylene iodonium and MnTMPyP. We conclude that migration of endothelial cells in response to loss of confluence includes the intracellular production of reactive oxygen species, which contribute to the actin cytoskeleton reorganization required for the migratory behavior of endothelial cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Moldovan
- Heart and Lung Institute and Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|