1
|
Gunn H, Stevens KN, Creanor S, Andrade J, Paul L, Miller L, Green C, Ewings P, Barton A, Berrow M, Vickery J, Marshall B, Zajicek J, Freeman JA. Balance Right in Multiple Sclerosis (BRiMS): a feasibility randomised controlled trial of a falls prevention programme. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2021; 7:2. [PMID: 33390184 PMCID: PMC7780657 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-020-00732-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Balance, mobility impairments and falls are problematic for people with multiple sclerosis (MS). The “Balance Right in MS (BRiMS)” intervention, a 13-week home and group-based exercise and education programme, aims to improve balance and minimise falls. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of undertaking a multi-centre randomised controlled trial and to collect the necessary data to design a definitive trial. Methods This randomised controlled feasibility study recruited from four United Kingdom NHS clinical neurology services. Patients ≥ 18 years with secondary progressive MS (Expanded Disability Status Scale 4 to 7) reporting more than two falls in the preceding 6 months were recruited. Participants were block-randomised to either a manualised 13-week education and exercise programme (BRiMS) plus usual care, or usual care alone. Feasibility assessment evaluated recruitment and retention rates, adherence to group assignment and data completeness. Proposed outcomes for the definitive trial (including impact of MS, mobility, quality of life and falls) and economic data were collected at baseline, 13 and 27 weeks, and participants completed daily paper falls diaries. Results Fifty-six participants (mean age 59.7 years, 66% female, median EDSS 6.0) were recruited in 5 months; 30 randomised to the intervention group. Ten (18%) participants withdrew, 7 from the intervention group. Two additional participants were lost to follow up at the final assessment point. Completion rates were > 98% for all outcomes apart from the falls diary (return rate 62%). After adjusting for baseline score, mean intervention—usual care between-group differences for the potential primary outcomes at week 27 were MS Walking Scale-12v2: − 7.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] − 17.2 to 1.8) and MS Impact Scale-29v2: physical 0.6 (CI − 7.8 to 9), psychological − 0.4 (CI − 9.9 to 9). In total, 715 falls were reported, rate ratio (intervention:usual care) for falls 0.81 (0.41 to 2.26) and injurious falls 0.44 (0.41 to 2.23). Conclusions Procedures were practical, and retention, programme engagement and outcome completion rates satisfied a priori progression criteria. Challenges were experienced in completion and return of daily falls diaries. Refinement of methods for reporting falls is therefore required, but we consider a full trial to be feasible. Trial registration ISRCTN13587999 Date of registration: 29 September 2016
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Gunn
- Faculty of Health, School of Health Professions, Peninsula Allied Health Centre, University of Plymouth, Derriford Road, Plymouth, PL6 8BH, England.
| | - K N Stevens
- Faculty of Health, Medical Statistics Group, Room N15, Plymouth Science Park, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, England.,Peninsula Clinical Trials Unit, University of Plymouth, Room N16, Plymouth Science Park, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, England
| | - S Creanor
- Faculty of Health, Medical Statistics Group, Room N15, Plymouth Science Park, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, England.,University of Exeter Medical School, College of Medicine & Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, England
| | - J Andrade
- Faculty of Health, School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Portland Square Building, Drake Circus Campus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, England
| | - L Paul
- School of Health & Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA, Scotland
| | - L Miller
- Douglas Grant Rehabilitation Unit, Ayrshire Central Hospital, Kilwinning Road, Irvine, KA12 8SS, Scotland
| | - C Green
- University of Exeter Medical School, Health Economics Group, University of Exeter, St. Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, England
| | - P Ewings
- NIHR Research Design Service (South West), Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, TA1 5DA, England
| | - A Barton
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, NIHR Research Design Service South West, ITTC Building, Plymouth Science Park, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, England
| | - M Berrow
- Faculty of Health, Medical Statistics Group, Room N15, Plymouth Science Park, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, England
| | - J Vickery
- Faculty of Health, Medical Statistics Group, Room N15, Plymouth Science Park, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, England
| | - B Marshall
- Faculty of Health, School of Health Professions, Peninsula Allied Health Centre, University of Plymouth, Derriford Road, Plymouth, PL6 8BH, England
| | - J Zajicek
- School of Medicine, Medical and Biological Sciences, University of St. Andrews, North Haugh, St. Andrews, KY16 9TF, Scotland
| | - J A Freeman
- Faculty of Health, School of Health Professions, Peninsula Allied Health Centre, University of Plymouth, Derriford Road, Plymouth, PL6 8BH, England
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Marsden J, Pavlou M, Dennett R, Gibbon A, Knight-Lozano R, Jeu L, Flavell C, Freeman J, Bamiou DE, Harris C, Hawton A, Goodwin E, Jones B, Creanor S. Vestibular rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis comparing customised with booklet based vestibular rehabilitation for vestibulopathy and a 12 month observational cohort study of the symptom reduction and recurrence rate following treatment for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. BMC Neurol 2020; 20:430. [PMID: 33243182 PMCID: PMC7694922 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-020-01983-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Symptoms arising from vestibular system dysfunction are observed in 49–59% of people with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Symptoms may include vertigo, dizziness and/or imbalance. These impact on functional ability, contribute to falls and significant health and social care costs. In people with MS, vestibular dysfunction can be due to peripheral pathology that may include Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV), as well as central or combined pathology. Vestibular symptoms may be treated with vestibular rehabilitation (VR), and with repositioning manoeuvres in the case of BPPV. However, there is a paucity of evidence about the rate and degree of symptom recovery with VR for people with MS and vestibulopathy. In addition, given the multiplicity of symptoms and underpinning vestibular pathologies often seen in people with MS, a customised VR approach may be more clinically appropriate and cost effective than generic booklet-based approaches. Likewise, BPPV should be identified and treated appropriately. Methods/ design People with MS and symptoms of vertigo, dizziness and/or imbalance will be screened for central and/or peripheral vestibulopathy and/or BPPV. Following consent, people with BPPV will be treated with re-positioning manoeuvres over 1–3 sessions and followed up at 6 and 12 months to assess for any re-occurrence of BPPV. People with central and/or peripheral vestibulopathy will be entered into a randomised controlled trial (RCT). Trial participants will be randomly allocated (1:1) to either a 12-week generic booklet-based home programme with telephone support or a 12-week VR programme consisting of customised treatment including 12 face-to-face sessions and a home exercise programme. Customised or booklet-based interventions will start 2 weeks after randomisation and all trial participants will be followed up 14 and 26 weeks from randomisation. The primary clinical outcome is the Dizziness Handicap Inventory at 26 weeks and the primary economic endpoint is quality-adjusted life-years. A range of secondary outcomes associated with vestibular function will be used. Discussion If customised VR is demonstrated to be clinically and cost-effective compared to generic booklet-based VR this will inform practice guidelines and the development of training packages for therapists in the diagnosis and treatment of vestibulopathy in people with MS. Trial registration ISRCTN Number: 27374299 Date of Registration 24/09/2018 Protocol Version 15 25/09/2019 Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12883-020-01983-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Marsden
- School of Health Professions, Faculty of Health: Medicine, Dentistry and Human Science, Peninsula Allied Health Centre, Derriford Rd, Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BH, UK.
| | - M Pavlou
- Academic Department of Physiotherapy, King's College London, Room 3.5 Shepherd's House, Guy's Campus, London, SE1 1UL, UK
| | - R Dennett
- School of Health Professions, Faculty of Health: Medicine, Dentistry and Human Science, Peninsula Allied Health Centre, Derriford Rd, Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BH, UK
| | - A Gibbon
- School of Health Professions, Faculty of Health: Medicine, Dentistry and Human Science, Peninsula Allied Health Centre, Derriford Rd, Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BH, UK
| | - R Knight-Lozano
- School of Health Professions, Faculty of Health: Medicine, Dentistry and Human Science, Peninsula Allied Health Centre, Derriford Rd, Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BH, UK
| | - L Jeu
- Academic Department of Physiotherapy, King's College London, Room 3.5 Shepherd's House, Guy's Campus, London, SE1 1UL, UK
| | - C Flavell
- Academic Department of Physiotherapy, King's College London, Room 3.5 Shepherd's House, Guy's Campus, London, SE1 1UL, UK
| | - J Freeman
- School of Health Professions, Faculty of Health: Medicine, Dentistry and Human Science, Peninsula Allied Health Centre, Derriford Rd, Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BH, UK
| | - D E Bamiou
- EAR Institute University College London, 332 Gray's Inn Rd, London, WC1X 8EE, UK
| | - C Harris
- Royal Eye Infirmary, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, PL6 8DH, UK.,School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Drakes Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK
| | - A Hawton
- Health Economics Group, University of Exeter, South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - E Goodwin
- Health Economics Group, University of Exeter, South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - B Jones
- Medical Statistics Group and Peninsula Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Health: Medicine, Dentistry and Human Science, Plymouth Science Park, 1 Davy Rd, Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK
| | - S Creanor
- Medical Statistics Group and Peninsula Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Health: Medicine, Dentistry and Human Science, Plymouth Science Park, 1 Davy Rd, Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Thompson TP, Horrell J, Taylor AH, Wanner A, Husk K, Wei Y, Creanor S, Kandiyali R, Neale J, Sinclair J, Nasser M, Wallace G. Physical activity and the prevention, reduction, and treatment of alcohol and other drug use across the lifespan (The PHASE review): A systematic review. Ment Health Phys Act 2020; 19:100360. [PMID: 33020704 PMCID: PMC7527800 DOI: 10.1016/j.mhpa.2020.100360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Revised: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this review is to systematically describe and quantify the effects of PA interventions on alcohol and other drug use outcomes, and to identify any apparent effect of PA dose and type, possible mechanisms of effect, and any other aspect of intervention delivery (e.g. key behaviour change processes), within a framework to inform the design and evaluation of future interventions. Systematic searches were designed to identify published and grey literature on the role of PA for reducing the risk of progression to alcohol and other drug use (PREVENTION), supporting individuals to reduce alcohol and other drug use for harm reduction (REDUCTION), and promote abstinence and relapse prevention during and after treatment of alcohol and other drug use (TREATMENT). Searches identified 49,518 records, with 49,342 excluded on title and abstract. We screened 176 full text articles from which we included 32 studies in 32 papers with quantitative results of relevance to this review. Meta-analysis of two studies showed a significant effect of PA on prevention of alcohol initiation (risk ratio [RR]: 0.72, 95%CI: 0.61 to 0.85). Meta-analysis of four studies showed no clear evidence for an effect of PA on alcohol consumption (Standardised Mean Difference [SMD]: 0.19, 95%, Confidence Interval -0.57 to 0.18). We were unable to quantitatively examine the effects of PA interventions on other drug use alone, or in combination with alcohol use, for prevention, reduction or treatment. Among the 19 treatment studies with an alcohol and other drug use outcome, there was a trend for promising short-term effect but with limited information about intervention fidelity and exercise dose, there was a moderate to high risk of bias. We identified no studies reporting the cost-effectiveness of interventions. More rigorous and well-designed research is needed. Our novel approach to the review provides a clearer guide to achieve this in future research questions addressed to inform policy and practice for different populations and settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T P Thompson
- Faculty of Health, Medicine, Dentistry & Human Sciences University of Plymouth, Plymouth Science Park Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK
| | - J Horrell
- Faculty of Health, Medicine, Dentistry & Human Sciences University of Plymouth, Plymouth Science Park Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK
| | - A H Taylor
- Faculty of Health, Medicine, Dentistry & Human Sciences University of Plymouth, Plymouth Science Park Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK
| | - A Wanner
- Faculty of Health, Medicine, Dentistry & Human Sciences University of Plymouth, Plymouth Science Park Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK
| | - K Husk
- Faculty of Health, Medicine, Dentistry & Human Sciences University of Plymouth, Plymouth Science Park Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK
| | - Y Wei
- University of Plymouth, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, School of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK
| | - S Creanor
- Faculty of Health, Medicine, Dentistry & Human Sciences University of Plymouth, Plymouth Science Park Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK
| | - R Kandiyali
- Bristol University, School of Social and Community Medicine, Oakfield Grove, Clifton, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK
| | - J Neale
- King's College London Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8BB, UK
| | - J Sinclair
- University of Southampton, Faculty of Medicine, 4-12 Terminus Terrace, Southampton, SO14 3DT, UK
| | - M Nasser
- Faculty of Health, Medicine, Dentistry & Human Sciences University of Plymouth, Plymouth Science Park Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK
| | - G Wallace
- Plymouth City Council, Public Dispensary, Catherine Street, Plymouth, PL1 2AA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Burke FJT, Wilson NHF, Brunton PA, Creanor S. Contemporary dental practice in the UK. Part 1: demography and practising arrangements in 2015. Br Dent J 2019; 226:55-61. [PMID: 30631189 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2019.9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To determine, by means of an anonymous, self-reported questionnaire, the demographic profile and practising details of general dental practitioners in the UK in 2015. Methods A previously-piloted and validated 121-question questionnaire was distributed during 2015 to 500 dentists at UK dental meetings with a request that they complete the questionnaire and return it by post in the reply-paid envelope to the corresponding author. Results Three hundred and eighty-eight useable questionnaires were returned, giving aresponse rate of 77.6%. Of the respondents, 60.2% were male and 39.8% female. Theirmean age since graduation was 19.7 years. Just over half of the respondents (50.9%) replied that they were practice principals, 35.8% were associates and 10.6% were foundation dentists. A quarter of the respondents were in single-handed practices, the remainder being in a partnership or group practice. There was a mean of 4.2 dentists per practice, while the mean number of dental therapists in each practice was 0.3 and 1.2 hygienists. Regarding the first available NHS appointment in the respondents' practices for non-urgent care, 23.4% could provide this on the same day, the equivalent figure for private care being 40.1%. The mean percentage of patients receiving NHS treatment was 50%, with 33.8% receiving private treatment. Just over half of respondents considered that Care Quality Commission inspections were 'valuable for fostering patient trust and confidence in dental care.' The collected data indicated that 55.4% of respondents had an intra-oral camera, while, with regard to recently-introduced concepts and techniques, 80.4% used nickel-titanium files, 47.4% used zirconia-based bridgework and 24.9% used tricalcium silicate. Of great interest, perhaps, is the response to digital radiography/digital imaging, with the results indicating that 74.1% of respondents used this form of radiography. Regarding checking the light output of the light curing units, 53.1% stated that they did check the output, but in some cases this might be at a six-monthly interval. Conclusion Results from this survey indicated that NHS service provision has dropped toapproximately 50% amongst the respondents. Regarding the staffing of dentalpractices, just over half the respondents were practice principals and there was a mean of 4.2 dentists per practice. The results also indicated that UK dentists continue to be innovative in the techniques that they employ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F J T Burke
- Primary Dental Care Research Group, University of Birmingham School of Dentistry, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, 5 Mill Pool Way, Pebble Mill, Birmingham B5 7EG, UK
| | - N H F Wilson
- Emeritus Professor of Dentistry, King's College London
| | - P A Brunton
- Sir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, 310 Great King Street, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand
| | - S Creanor
- Medical Statistics, Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth Science Park, 1 Davy Road, Plymouth, PL6 8BX
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wilson NHF, Burke FJT, Brunton PA, Creanor S, Hosey MT, Mannocci F. Dental practice in the UK in 2015/2016. Part 2: aspects of direct restorations, bleaching, endodontics and paediatric dentistry. Br Dent J 2019; 226:sj.bdj.2019.50. [PMID: 30631156 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2019.50] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- N H F Wilson
- King's College London Dental Institute, London, UK
| | - F J T Burke
- Primary Dental Care Research Group, University of Birmingham School of Dentistry, Birmingham, UK
| | - P A Brunton
- Sir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - S Creanor
- Medical Statistics, Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine & Dentistry, Plymouth, UK
| | - M T Hosey
- Paediatric Dentistry, King's College London Dental Institute, London, UK
| | - F Mannocci
- Endodontology, King's College London Dental Institute, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gunn H, Andrade J, Paul L, Miller L, Stevens K, Creanor S, Green C, Ewings P, Barton A, Berrow M, Vickery J, Marshall B, Marsden J, Freeman J. Balance Right in Multiple Sclerosis (BRiMS): Preliminary results of a randomised controlled feasibility trial. Physiotherapy 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2018.11.281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
7
|
Hendrie W, Dennett R, Jarrett L, Creanor S, Barton A, Hawton A, Marsden J, Freeman J. “I’m in a very good frame of mind”: the experience of standing frame use in people with progressive multiple sclerosis. Physiotherapy 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2018.11.282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
8
|
Freeman J, Hendrie W, Jarrett L, Hawton AM, Barton A, Dennett R, Jones B, Marsden J, Zajicek J, Creanor S. Standing up in people with progressive multiple sclerosis (SUMS): A multi-centre randomised controlled trial evaluating a home-based standing frame programme. Physiotherapy 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2018.11.267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
9
|
Rockett M, Creanor S, Squire R, Barton A, Benger J, Cocking L, Ewings P, Eyre V, Smith JE. The impact of emergency department patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) on the incidence of chronic pain following trauma and non-traumatic abdominal pain. Anaesthesia 2018; 74:69-73. [PMID: 30367688 PMCID: PMC6587467 DOI: 10.1111/anae.14476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The effect of patient-controlled analgesia during the emergency phase of care on the prevalence of persistent pain is unkown. We studied individuals with traumatic injuries or abdominal pain 6 months after hospital admission via the emergency department using an opportunistic observational study design. This was conducted using postal questionnaires that were sent to participants recruited to the multi-centre pain solutions in the emergency setting study. Patients with prior chronic pain states or opioid use were not studied. Questionnaires included the EQ5D, the Brief Pain Inventory and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale. Overall, 141 out of 286 (49% 95%CI 44-56%) patients were included in this follow-up study. Participants presenting with trauma were more likely to develop persistent pain than those presenting with abdominal pain, 45 out of 64 (70%) vs. 24 out of 77 (31%); 95%CI 24-54%, p < 0.001. There were no statistically significant associations between persistent pain and analgesic modality during hospital admission, age or sex. Across both abdominal pain and traumatic injury groups, participants with persistent pain had lower EQ5D mobility scores, worse overall health and higher anxiety and depression scores (p < 0.05). In the abdominal pain group, 13 out of 50 (26%) patients using patient-controlled analgesia developed persistent pain vs. 11 out of 27 (41%) of those with usual treatment; 95%CI for difference (control - patient-controlled analgesia) -8 to 39%, p = 0.183. Acute pain scores at the time of hospital admission were higher in participants who developed persistent pain; 95%CI 0.7-23.6, p = 0.039. For traumatic pain, 25 out of 35 (71%) patients given patient-controlled analgesia developed persistent pain vs. 20 out of 29 (69%) patients with usual treatment; 95%CI -30 to 24%, p = 0.830. Persistent pain is common 6 months after hospital admission, particularly following trauma. The study findings suggest that it may be possible to reduce persistent pain (at least in patients with abdominal pain) by delivering better acute pain management. Further research is needed to confirm this hypothesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Rockett
- Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Plymouth University Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - S Creanor
- Clinical Trials and Medical Statistics, University of Plymouth, UK
| | - R Squire
- Plymouth University Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - A Barton
- NIHR Research Design Service South West, London, UK
| | - J Benger
- Emergency Care, Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | | | - P Ewings
- NIHR Research Design Service South West, London, UK
| | - V Eyre
- Re:Cognition Health Ltd, Plymouth, UK
| | - J E Smith
- Emergency Medicine, Plymouth University Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gunn H, Andrade J, Paul L, Miller L, Creanor S, Green C, Marsden J, Ewings P, Berrow M, Vickery J, Barton A, Marshall B, Zajicek J, Freeman JA. Balance Right in Multiple Sclerosis (BRiMS): a guided self-management programme to reduce falls and improve quality of life, balance and mobility in people with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: a protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2017; 4:26. [PMID: 28770099 PMCID: PMC5530568 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-017-0168-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2017] [Accepted: 07/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Impaired mobility is a cardinal feature of multiple sclerosis (MS) and is rated by people with MS as their highest priority. By the secondary progressive phase, balance, mobility and physical activity levels are significantly compromised; an estimated 70% of people with secondary progressive MS fall regularly. Our ongoing research has systematically developed 'Balance Right in MS' (BRiMS), an innovative, manualised 13-week guided self-management programme tailored to the needs of people with MS, designed to improve safe mobility and minimise falls. Our eventual aim is to assess the clinical and cost effectiveness of BRiMS in people with secondary progressive MS by undertaking an appropriately statistically powered, multi-centre, assessor-blinded definitive, randomised controlled trial. This feasibility study will assess the acceptability of the intervention and test the achievability of running such a definitive trial. METHODS/DESIGN This is a pragmatic multi-centre feasibility randomised controlled trial with blinded outcome assessment. Sixty ambulant people with secondary progressive MS who self-report two or more falls in the previous 6 months will be randomly allocated (1:1) to either the BRiMS programme plus usual care or to usual care alone. All participants will be assessed at baseline and followed up at 15 weeks and 27 weeks post-randomisation. The outcomes of this feasibility trial include:Feasibility outcomes, including trial recruitment, retention and completionAssessment of the proposed outcome measures for the anticipated definitive trial (including measures of walking, quality of life, falls, balance and activity level)Measures of adherence to the BRiMS programmeData to inform the economic evaluation in a future trialProcess evaluation (assessment of treatment fidelity and qualitative evaluation of participant and treating therapist experience). DISCUSSION The BRiMS intervention aims to address a key concern for MS service users and providers. However, there are several uncertainties which need to be addressed prior to progressing to a full-scale trial, including acceptability of the BRiMS intervention and practicality of the trial procedures. This feasibility trial will provide important insights to resolve these uncertainties and will enable a protocol to be finalised for use in the definitive trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN13587999.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H. Gunn
- Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, School of Health Professions, Plymouth University, Peninsula Allied Health Centre, Derriford Rd, Plymouth, PL6 8BH UK
| | - J. Andrade
- Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, School of Psychology, Portland Square Building, Drake Circus Campus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA UK
| | - L. Paul
- School of Health & Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA UK
| | - L. Miller
- School of Health & Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA UK
- Douglas Grant Rehabilitation Unit, Ayrshire Central Hospital, Kilwinning Road, Irvine, KA12 8SS UK
| | - S. Creanor
- Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Peninsula Clinical Trials Unit at Plymouth University (PenCTU), Room N16, Plymouth Science Park, Plymouth, PL6 8BX UK
- Medical Statistics, Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Room N15, Plymouth Science Park, Plymouth, PL6 8BX UK
| | - C. Green
- University of Exeter Medical School, Health Economics Group, University of Exeter, St Luke’s Campus, Exeter, EX1 2 LU UK
| | - J. Marsden
- Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, School of Health Professions, Plymouth University, Peninsula Allied Health Centre, Derriford Rd, Plymouth, PL6 8BH UK
| | - P. Ewings
- NIHR Research Design Service (South West), Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, TA1 5DA UK
| | - M. Berrow
- Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Peninsula Clinical Trials Unit at Plymouth University (PenCTU), Room N16, Plymouth Science Park, Plymouth, PL6 8BX UK
| | - J. Vickery
- Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Peninsula Clinical Trials Unit at Plymouth University (PenCTU), Room N16, Plymouth Science Park, Plymouth, PL6 8BX UK
| | - A. Barton
- NIHR Research Design Service, Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, ITTC Building, Plymouth Science Park, Plymouth, PL6 8BX UK
| | | | - J. Zajicek
- School of Medicine, Medical and Biological Sciences, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, KY16 9TF UK
| | - J. A. Freeman
- Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, School of Health Professions, Plymouth University, Peninsula Allied Health Centre, Derriford Rd, Plymouth, PL6 8BH UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pritchard C, Smith JE, Creanor S, Squire R, Barton A, Benger J, Cocking L, Ewings P, Rockett M. The cost-effectiveness of patient-controlled analgesia vs. standard care in patients presenting to the Emergency Department in pain, who are subsequently admitted to hospital. Anaesthesia 2017; 72:953-960. [PMID: 28547753 DOI: 10.1111/anae.13932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The clinical effectiveness of patient-controlled analgesia has been demonstrated in a variety of settings. However, patient-controlled analgesia is rarely utilised in the Emergency Department. The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of patient-controlled analgesia vs. standard care in participants admitted to hospital from the Emergency Department with pain due to traumatic injury or non-traumatic abdominal pain. Pain scores were measured hourly for 12 h using a visual analogue scale. Cost-effectiveness was measured as the additional cost per hour in moderate to severe pain avoided by using patient-controlled analgesia rather than standard care (the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio). Sampling variation was estimated using bootstrap methods and the effects of parameter uncertainty explored in a sensitivity analysis. The cost per hour in moderate or severe pain averted was estimated as £24.77 (€29.05, US$30.80) (bootstrap estimated 95%CI £8.72 to £89.17) for participants suffering pain from traumatic injuries and £15.17 (€17.79, US$18.86) (bootstrap estimate 95%CI £9.03 to £46.00) for participants with non-traumatic abdominal pain. Overall costs were higher with patient-controlled analgesia than standard care in both groups: pain from traumatic injuries incurred an additional £18.58 (€21.79 US$23.10) (95%CI £15.81 to £21.35) per 12 h; and non-traumatic abdominal pain an additional £20.18 (€23.67 US$25.09) (95%CI £19.45 to £20.84) per 12 h.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Pritchard
- NIHR Research Design Service, South West, UK
| | - J E Smith
- Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK
| | - S Creanor
- Department of Medical Statistics, Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, UK
| | - R Squire
- Emergency Department, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK
| | - A Barton
- NIHR Research Design Service, South West, UK
| | - J Benger
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - L Cocking
- Peninsula Clinical Trials Unit, Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, UK
| | - P Ewings
- NIHR Research Design Service, South West, UK
| | - M Rockett
- Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Smith JE, Squire R, Pritchard C, Ewings P, Barton A, Rockett M, Creanor S, Hayward C, Eyre V, Cocking L, Benger J. THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PATIENT CONTROLLED ANALGESIA VERSUS ROUTINE CARE IN PATIENTS PRESENTING TO THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT IN PAIN, WHO ARE SUBSEQUENTLY ADMITTED TO HOSPITAL. Arch Emerg Med 2016. [DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2016-206402.19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
13
|
Freeman JA, Hendrie W, Creanor S, Jarrett L, Barton A, Green C, Marsden J, Rogers E, Zajicek J. Standing up in multiple sclerosis (SUMS): protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial evaluating the clinical and cost effectiveness of a home-based self-management standing frame programme in people with progressive multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurol 2016; 16:62. [PMID: 27149954 PMCID: PMC4858871 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-016-0581-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2016] [Accepted: 04/28/2016] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an incurable, unpredictable but typically progressive neurological condition. It is the most common cause of neurological disability in young adults. Within 15 years of diagnosis, approximately 50 % of affected people are unable to walk unaided, and over time an estimated 25 % depend on a wheelchair. Typically, people with such limited mobility are excluded from clinical trials. Severely impaired people with MS spend much of their day sitting, often with limited ability to change position. In response, secondary complications can occur including: muscle wasting, pain, reduced skin integrity, spasms, limb stiffness, constipation, and associated psychosocial problems such as depression and lowered self-esteem. Effective self-management strategies, which can be implemented relatively easily and cheaply within people's homes, are needed to improve or maintain mobility and reduce sedentary behaviour. However this is challenging, particularly in the latter stages of disease. Regular supported standing using standing frames is one potential option. METHODS/DESIGN SUMS is a pragmatic multi-centre randomised controlled trial evaluating use of Oswestry standing frames with blinded outcome assessment and full economic evaluation. Participants will be randomly allocated (1:1) to either a home-based, self-management standing programme (with advice and support) along with their usual care or to usual care alone. Those in the intervention group will be asked to stand for a minimum of 30 min three times weekly over 20 weeks. Each participant will be followed-up at 20 and 36 weeks post baseline. The primary clinical outcome is motor function, assessed using the Amended Motor Club Assessment. The primary economic endpoint is quality-adjusted life years. The secondary outcomes include measures of explanatory physical impairments, key clinical outcomes, and health-related quality of life. An embedded qualitative component will explore participant's and carer's experiences of the standing programme. DISCUSSION This is the first large scale multi-centre trial to assess the clinical and cost effectiveness of a home based standing frame programme for people who are severely impaired by MS. If demonstrated to be effective and cost-effective, we will use this evidence to develop recommendations for a health service delivery model which could be implemented across the United Kingdom. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN69614598 DATE OF REGISTRATION: 3.2.16 (retrospectively registered).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Freeman
- Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, School of Health Professions, Plymouth University, Peninsula Allied Health Centre, Derriford Rd, Plymouth, PL6 8BH, England.
| | - W Hendrie
- Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, School of Health Professions, Plymouth University, Peninsula Allied Health Centre, Derriford Rd, Plymouth, PL6 8BH, England.,Norwich MS Centre, Alkmaar Way, Norwich, NR6 6BB, England
| | - S Creanor
- Centre for Health Statistics, Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Room 302, Tamar Science Park, Plymouth, PL68BX, England
| | - L Jarrett
- Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, School of Health Professions, Plymouth University, Peninsula Allied Health Centre, Derriford Rd, Plymouth, PL6 8BH, England.,Mardon Neurorehabilitation Centre, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Wonford Rd, Exeter, EX2 4UD, England
| | - A Barton
- Research and Design Service, Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, ITTC Building, Tamar Science Park, Plymouth, PL68BX, England
| | - C Green
- University of Exeter Medical School, Health Economics Group, University of Exeter, Veysey Building, Exeter, Devon, EX24SG, England
| | - J Marsden
- Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, School of Health Professions, Plymouth University, Peninsula Allied Health Centre, Derriford Rd, Plymouth, PL6 8BH, England
| | - E Rogers
- Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, School of Health Professions, Plymouth University, Peninsula Allied Health Centre, Derriford Rd, Plymouth, PL6 8BH, England
| | - J Zajicek
- School of Medicine, Medical and Biological Sciences, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, Scotland, KY169TF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Creanor S, Millward BA, Demaine A, Price L, Smith W, Brown N, Creanor SL. Patients' attitudes towards screening for diabetes and other medical conditions in the dental setting. Br Dent J 2015; 216:E2. [PMID: 24413142 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.1247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/26/2013] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
AIM To determine the attitudes of patients attending routine appointments at primary care dental clinics and general dental practices towards the possibility of chair-side screening for medical conditions, including diabetes, in the dental setting. METHODS A brief, anonymous, self-administered questionnaire distributed to adult patients (≥18 years) attending 2 primary care dental clinics and 16 general dental practices in South-West England. RESULTS One hundred and ninety-seven completed questionnaires were received from patients at primary care dental clinics and 429 from general dental practice patients. Overall, 87% of respondents thought that it was important or very important that dentists screened patients for medical conditions such as diabetes; 79% were very willing to let a dental team member carry out screening. The majority indicated willingness to be screened for various medical conditions during a visit to the dentist, with significantly higher proportions of respondents in the primary care clinics indicating willingness (hypertension: 83% vs 74%; heart disease: 77% vs 66%; diabetes 82% vs 72% [all p <0.02]). Nearly two thirds of primary care clinic respondents and over half of general practice patients indicated that they would be willing to discuss test results with the dental team. Overall, 61% had never knowingly been screened or tested for diabetes; 20% reported that they had been tested within the previous 12 months. CONCLUSION The majority of respondents supported the concept of medical screening in a dental setting and were willing both to have screening tests and discuss their results with the dental team. Patient acceptance is paramount for successful implementation of such screening programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Creanor
- Centre for Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, UK
| | - B A Millward
- Plymouth Diabetes Centre, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK
| | - A Demaine
- Peninsula Medical School, Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, UK
| | - L Price
- Research Design Service South West, ITTC Building, Tamar Science Park, Plymouth, UK
| | - W Smith
- Peninsula Dental Social Enterprise CIC, Plymouth, UK
| | - N Brown
- Peninsula Dental Social Enterprise CIC, Plymouth, UK
| | - S L Creanor
- Peninsula Dental School, Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lai C, Starkie T, Creanor S, Struthers R, Portch D, Erasmus P, Mellor N, Hosie K, Sneyd J, Minto G. Randomized controlled trial of stroke volume optimization during elective major abdominal surgery in patients stratified by aerobic fitness. Br J Anaesth 2015; 115:578-89. [DOI: 10.1093/bja/aev299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
|
16
|
Langford R, Brown I, Vickery J, Mitchell K, Pritchard C, Creanor S. Study protocol for a double blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of continuous subpectoral local anaesthetic infusion for pain and shoulder function following mastectomy: SUB-pectoral Local anaesthetic Infusion following MastEctomy (SUBLIME) study. BMJ Open 2014; 4:e006318. [PMID: 25270861 PMCID: PMC4179566 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Over 16 000 mastectomies are performed in England and Wales annually. Acute postoperative pain and nausea are common. The most frequently occurring long-term complications are chronic pain (up to 50%) and reduced shoulder function (reported at 35%). Regional techniques that improve acute postoperative pain relief may reduce the incidence of these complications. This study assesses the effectiveness of a 24-hour continuous local anaesthetic in the subpectoral plane in improving postoperative pain and quality of life in patients undergoing mastectomy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled, two-centre, parallel group trial in women undergoing mastectomy with or without axillary involvement. One hundred and sixty participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 0.25% levobupivacaine or 0.9% saline by subpectoral infusion postoperatively for 24 h. All participants will be provided with an intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) system. Participants will be followed-up for 24 h in hospital and at approximately 14 days and 6 months postoperatively. Joint primary outcome measures are total morphine consumption and total pain score (captured via patient-recorded visual analogue scale (VAS) 4 hourly) during the first 24 h postoperatively. Primary statistical analysis of total pain is based on the area under the curve of pain versus time graph. Secondary outcomes include PCA attempts in first 24 h; VAS pain scores and shoulder function by goniometry at 24 h, 14 days (approximately) and 6 months; Verbal Rating Scale pain scores in first 24 h; Brief Pain Inventory and Oxford Shoulder Score at 6 months; duration of hospital stay; incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting; cost-effectiveness. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study is approved by the South West England Research Ethics Committee (12/SW/0149). RESULTS will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at local, national and international scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN46621916. EudraCT 2011-005775-16.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Langford
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, UK
| | - I Brown
- Department of Surgery, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, UK
| | - J Vickery
- Peninsula Clinical Trials Unit, Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, UK
| | - K Mitchell
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, UK
| | - C Pritchard
- NIHR Research Design Service (South West), Truro, UK
| | - S Creanor
- Centre for Biostatistics, Bioinformatics & Biomarkers, Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lai C, Minto G, Challand C, Hosie K, Sneyd J, Creanor S, Struthers R. Patients’ inability to perform a preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise test or demonstrate an anaerobic threshold is associated with inferior outcomes after major colorectal surgery. Br J Anaesth 2013; 111:607-11. [DOI: 10.1093/bja/aet193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
18
|
|
19
|
Stewardson D, Creanor S, Thornley P, Bigg T, Bromage C, Browne A, Cottam D, Dalby D, Gilmour J, Horton J, Roberts E, Westoby L, Burke T. The survival of Class V restorations in general dental practice: part 3, five-year survival. Br Dent J 2012; 212:E14. [DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/23/2012] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
20
|
Creanor S, Barton A, Marchbank A. Effectiveness of a gentamicin impregnated collagen sponge on reducing sternal wound infections following cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2012; 94:227-31. [PMID: 22613298 PMCID: PMC3957499 DOI: 10.1308/003588412x13171221590179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/06/2011] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gentamicin impregnated collagen sponges are licensed for use after cardiac surgery in over 50 countries but their effectiveness at preventing sternal wound infections (SWIs) remains uncertain. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the current evidence for effectiveness of such sponges at preventing SWIs in patients after cardiac surgery. METHODS A systematic search of the literature was undertaken and meta-analyses were performed on the results of the identified, eligible studies. Using random effects models, odds ratios (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for all SWIs and deep SWIs for: a) all participants, and b) participants deemed as high risk. RESULTS Three unique randomised controlled trials (published between 2005 and 2010) involving 3,994 participants met the inclusion criteria. There was insufficient evidence of a significant difference between intervention and control groups for all SWIs (all participants: OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.39-1.14; high risk participants: OR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.24-1.52). There was insufficient evidence of a significant benefit of the sponge in deep SWIs across all participants (OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.47-1.10) but some evidence of benefit in terms of reducing the incidence of deep SWIs in high risk participants (OR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.39-0.98). CONCLUSIONS There is insufficient evidence of the effectiveness (or otherwise) of gentamicin impregnated sponges in preventing SWIs following cardiac surgery. However, some evidence does exist that such sponges can reduce the incidence of deep infections in high risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Creanor
- Centre for Health and Environmental Statistics, Plymouth University, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Brunton PA, Burke FJT, Sharif MO, Creanor S, Hosey MT, Mannocci F, Wilson NHF. Contemporary dental practice in the UK in 2008: aspects of direct restorations, endodontics and bleaching. Br Dent J 2012; 212:63-7. [PMID: 22281627 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.46] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/28/2011] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate, by postal questionnaire, aspects of the selection and use of direct restorative materials, endodontic techniques and approaches to bleaching by general dental practitioners in the UK, and to compare and contrast the findings with those of a related study reported in 2004. METHODS A questionnaire comprising 18 questions, each of a number of elements, was sent to 1,000 general dental practitioners in the UK, selected at random from the Dentists Register. Non-responders were sent a second copy of the questionnaire after a period of four weeks had elapsed. RESULTS A total of 662 useable responses were returned, giving a response rate of 66%. Key findings included: dental amalgam was found to be the most commonly used material in the restoration of occlusoproximal cavities in premolar (59% of respondents) and molar teeth (75% of respondents); glass-ionomer cements and related materials were applied extensively in the restoration of deciduous molars (81% of respondents) and for the luting of indirect restorations (67% of respondents); the use of rubber dam was limited, in particular as an adjunct to procedures in operative dentistry (18% of respondents); relatively few respondents used preformed stainless steel crowns, and among the users only occasionally in the restoration of deciduous molars (23%); and bleaching, predominantly home-based (nightguard) vital bleaching (81% of respondents) was widely practised. CONCLUSION It is concluded that, for the practitioners surveyed, factors other than best available evidence influenced various aspects of the use of direct restorative materials and the clinical practice of endodontics. As a consequence, many of the features of general dental practice revealed in the process of the investigation were at variance with teaching in dental schools. Bleaching, in particular home-based (nightguard), vital bleaching, was provided by >80% of respondents, indicating widespread interest among patients in enhanced dental attractiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P A Brunton
- Restorative Dentistry, Leeds Dental Institute, Clarendon Way, Leeds LS2 9LU.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Smith AJ, Lockhart DEA, McDonald E, Creanor S, Hurrell D, Bagg J. Design of dental surgeries in relation to instrument decontamination. J Hosp Infect 2010; 76:340-4. [PMID: 20888669 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2009] [Accepted: 06/02/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Recent guidelines advise that the decontamination of dental instruments should be undertaken outwith the treatment area. The aim of this study was to determine the physical area of rooms in dental surgeries that decontaminate instruments within and outwith the treatment area respectively, and other factors relating to practice layout and ventilation. Data were collected by interview and observation of dental healthcare workers in dental practice in Scotland, UK. Room layouts were recorded and measured at floor, benchtop and above benchtop heights. Thirteen surgeries with instrument decontamination processes occurring in the treatment area and seven surgeries with instrument decontamination outwith the treatment area were selected at random for detailed analysis of room dimensions. Of the 179 dental surgeries surveyed, 55% were located in converted residential premises and most practitioners (91%) did not share premises with other healthcare providers. The median number of rooms in the practices was 8 (range: 2-21) and the median number of surgeries present was 3 (range: 1-6). Regardless of whether instrument decontamination facilities were housed within the treatment area or not, the average treatment area room size for both was 15.8m(2) (range: 7.3-23.9) (P=0.862), with 20% of the room area available as work surfaces. The median size of the seven instrument decontamination rooms (local decontamination units) was 7.6m(2) (range: 2.9-16.0), with, on average, 63% of the room used for work surfaces. This survey suggests that the historical location of dental surgeries in converted residential properties places many restrictions on appropriate design for healthcare premises.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J Smith
- Infection & Immunity Research Group, Glasgow Dental Hospital and School, Faculty of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Smith GWG, Smith AJ, Creanor S, Hurrell D, Bagg J, Lappin DF. Survey of the decontamination and maintenance of dental handpieces in general dental practice. Br Dent J 2009; 207:E7; discussion 160-1. [DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/01/2009] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
24
|
Saleem S, Mani V, Chadwick MA, Creanor S, Ayling RM. A prospective study of causes of haemolysis during venepuncture: tourniquet time should be kept to a minimum. Ann Clin Biochem 2009; 46:244-6. [PMID: 19389888 DOI: 10.1258/acb.2009.008228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Haemolysis is defined as the release of cellular components of erythrocytes and other blood cells into the extracellular space of blood. These cellular components can cause interference in laboratory measurements, potassium being a commonly measured analyte to be affected. A number of factors have been implicated in the aetiology of haemolysis. We undertook this study to enable us to identify and hence rectify causes of haemolysis in samples from patients on acute medical and surgical wards. METHODS We performed a prospective study of 353 blood sampling events during February and March 2007. A proforma was used to obtain detailed information of each blood-taking episode. Information from the proforma was linked to the incidence of haemolysis obtained from the hospital computer system. RESULTS The incidence of haemolysis among the samples studied was 6.5%. While staff group, method of sampling, tourniquet time and number of attempts at venepuncture were each univariately associated with haemolysis, stepwise logistic regression resulted in a final model which only included tourniquet time (odds ratio for haemolysis if tourniquet time >1 min was 19.5 [95% confidence interval [CI] 5.6-67.4%]). CONCLUSION Tourniquet time of more than a minute is associated with a significant increase in risk of haemolysis. Advice on tourniquet time is included in phlebotomy training within the hospital; hence a campaign of appropriately channelled continuing education on this issue may be successful in reducing the haemolysis rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Saleem
- Department of Surgery, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth PL6 8DH, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Smith A, Creanor S, Hurrell D, Bagg J, McCowan M. Management of infection control in dental practice. J Hosp Infect 2009; 71:353-8. [PMID: 19162375 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2008.11.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2008] [Accepted: 11/07/2008] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
This was an observational study in which the management policies and procedures associated with infection control and instrument decontamination were examined in 179 dental surgeries by a team of trained surveyors. Information relating to the management of a wide range of infection control procedures, in particular the decontamination of dental instruments, was collected by interview and by examination of practice documentation. This study found that although the majority of surgeries (70%) claimed to have a management policy on infection control, only 50% of these were documented. For infection control policies, 79% of surgeries had access to the British Dental Association Advice Sheet A12. Infection control policies were claimed to be present in 89% of surgeries, of which 62% were documented. Seventy-seven per cent of staff claimed to have received specific infection control training, but for instrument decontamination this was provided mainly by demonstration (97%) or observed practice (88%). Many dental nurses (74%) and dental practitioners (57%) did not recognise the symbol used to designate a single-use device. Audit of infection control or decontamination activities was undertaken in 11% of surgeries. The majority of surgeries have policies and procedures for the management of infection control in dental practice, but in many instances these are not documented. The training of staff in infection control and its documentation is poorly managed and consideration should be given to development of quality management systems for use in dental practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Smith
- Infection Research Group, University of Glasgow Dental School, Faculty of Medicine, Glasgow, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Elgalaid T, Creanor S, Creanor S, Hall A. The permeability of artificial dentine carious lesions. Arch Oral Biol 2008; 53:744-50. [DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2008.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2007] [Revised: 03/09/2008] [Accepted: 03/20/2008] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
27
|
Nicol A, Creanor S, Hall A, Macpherson L. A Randomised, Observer-Blind, Clinical Study Investigating the Effect of Fluoridated Milk on Artificially Created Early Enamel Caries Using Transverse Microradiography. Caries Res 2008; 42:305-11. [DOI: 10.1159/000148163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2007] [Accepted: 06/02/2008] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
28
|
Creanor S, Conway D. Food labelling. Br Dent J 2005; 199:188. [PMID: 16127381 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4812659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|