1
|
Rao AR, Noronha V, Ramaswamy A, Kumar A, Pillai A, Gattani S, Sehgal A, Kumar S, Castelino R, Dhekale R, Krishnamurthy J, Mahajan S, Daptardar A, Sonkusare L, Deodhar J, Ansari N, Vagal M, Mahajan P, Timmanpyati S, Nookala M, Chitre A, Kapoor A, Gota V, Banavali S, Badwe RA, Prabhash K. Correlation of the Geriatric Assessment with Overall Survival in Older Patients with Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2024; 36:e61-e71. [PMID: 37953073 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Global guidelines recommend that all older patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy should undergo a geriatric assessment. However, utilisation of the geriatric assessment is often constrained by its time-intensive nature, which limits its adoption in settings with limited resources and high demand. There is a lack of evidence correlating the results of the geriatric assessment with survival from the Indian subcontinent. Therefore, the aims of the present study were to assess the impact of the geriatric assessment on survival in older Indian patients with cancer and to identify the factors associated with survival in these older patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was an observational study, conducted in the geriatric oncology clinic of the Tata Memorial Hospital (Mumbai, India). Patients aged 60 years and older with cancer who underwent a geriatric assessment were enrolled. We assessed the non-oncological geriatric domains of function and falls, nutrition, comorbidities, cognition, psychology, social support and medications. Patients exhibiting impairment in two or more domains were classified as frail. RESULTS Between June 2018 and January 2022, we enrolled 897 patients. The median age was 69 (interquartile range 65-73) years. The common malignancies were lung (40.5%), oesophagus (31.9%) and genitourinary (12.1%); 54.6% had metastatic disease. Based on the results of the geriatric assessment, 767 (85.4%) patients were frail. The estimated median overall survival in fit patients was 24.3 (95% confidence interval 18.2-not reached) months, compared with 11.2 (10.1-12.8) months in frail patients (hazard ratio 0.54; 95% confidence interval 0.41-0.72, P < 0.001). This difference in overall survival remained significant after adjusting for age, sex, primary tumour and metastatic status (hazard ratio 0.56; 95% confidence interval 0.41-0.74, P < 0.001). In the patients with a performance status of 0 or 1 (n = 454), 365 (80.4%) were frail; the median overall survival in the performance status 0-1 group was 33.0 months (95% confidence interval 24.31-not reached) in the fit group versus 14.4 months (95% confidence interval 12.25-18.73) in the frail patients (hazard ratio 0.50; 95% confidence interval 0.34-0.74, P = 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the geriatric assessment domains that were predictive of survival were function (hazard ratio 0.68; 95% confidence interval 0.52-0.88; P = 0.003), nutrition (hazard ratio 0.64; 95% confidence interval 0.48-0.85, P = 0.002) and cognition (hazard ratio 0.67; 95% confidence interval 0.49-0.91, P = 0.011). DISCUSSION The geriatric assessment is a powerful prognostic tool for survival among older Indian patients with cancer. The geriatric assessment is prognostic even in the cohort of patients thought to be the fittest, i.e. performance status 0 and 1. Our study re-emphasises the critical importance of the geriatric assessment in all older patients planned for cancer-directed therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R Rao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - V Noronha
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - A Ramaswamy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - A Kumar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - A Pillai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - S Gattani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - A Sehgal
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Mumbai, India
| | - S Kumar
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Mumbai, India
| | - R Castelino
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Mumbai, India
| | - R Dhekale
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - J Krishnamurthy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - S Mahajan
- Department of Physiotherapy, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - A Daptardar
- Department of Physiotherapy, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - L Sonkusare
- Department of Psycho-oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - J Deodhar
- Department of Psycho-oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - N Ansari
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - M Vagal
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - P Mahajan
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - S Timmanpyati
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - M Nookala
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Mumbai, India
| | - A Chitre
- Department of Physiotherapy, Mahamana Pandit Madan Mohan Malviya Cancer Center & Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital, Varanasi, India
| | - A Kapoor
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mahamana Pandit Madan Mohan Malviya Cancer Center & Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital, Varanasi, India
| | - V Gota
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Mumbai, India
| | - S Banavali
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - R A Badwe
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - K Prabhash
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Linton A, Cheng YY, Griggs K, Kirschner MB, Gattani S, Srikaran S, Chuan-Hao Kao S, McCaughan BC, Klebe S, van Zandwijk N, Reid G. An RNAi-based screen reveals PLK1, CDK1 and NDC80 as potential therapeutic targets in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Br J Cancer 2014; 110:510-9. [PMID: 24327015 PMCID: PMC3899767 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2013] [Revised: 10/14/2013] [Accepted: 10/25/2013] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive tumour originating in the thoracic mesothelium. Prognosis remains poor with 9- to 12-month median survival, and new targets for treatments are desperately needed. METHODS Utilising an RNA interference (RNAi)-based screen of 40 genes overexpressed in tumours, including genes involved in the control of cell cycle, DNA replication and repair, we investigated potential therapeutic targets for MPM. Following in vitro characterisation of the effects of target silencing on MPM cells, candidates were assessed in tumour samples from 154 patients. RESULTS Gene knockdown in MPM cell lines identified growth inhibition following knockdown of NDC80, CDK1 and PLK1. Target knockdown induced cell-cycle arrest and increased apoptosis. Using small-molecule inhibitors specific for these three proteins also led to growth inhibition of MPM cell lines, and Roscovitine (inhibitor of CDK1) sensitised cells to cisplatin. Protein expression was also measured in tumour samples, with markedly variable levels of CDK1 and PLK1 noted. PLK1 expression in over 10% of cells correlated significantly with a poor prognosis. CONCLUSION These results suggest that RNAi-based screening has utility in identifying new targets for MPM, and that inhibition of NDC80, CDK1 and PLK1 may hold promise for treatment of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Linton
- Asbestos Diseases Research Institute (ADRI), University of Sydney, Concord, NSW 2139, Australia
| | - Y Y Cheng
- Asbestos Diseases Research Institute (ADRI), University of Sydney, Concord, NSW 2139, Australia
| | - K Griggs
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford, SA, Australia
| | - M B Kirschner
- Asbestos Diseases Research Institute (ADRI), University of Sydney, Concord, NSW 2139, Australia
| | - S Gattani
- Asbestos Diseases Research Institute (ADRI), University of Sydney, Concord, NSW 2139, Australia
| | - S Srikaran
- Asbestos Diseases Research Institute (ADRI), University of Sydney, Concord, NSW 2139, Australia
| | - S Chuan-Hao Kao
- Asbestos Diseases Research Institute (ADRI), University of Sydney, Concord, NSW 2139, Australia
| | - B C McCaughan
- Cardiothoracic Surgical Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital; The Baird Institute and Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - S Klebe
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford, SA, Australia
| | - N van Zandwijk
- Asbestos Diseases Research Institute (ADRI), University of Sydney, Concord, NSW 2139, Australia
| | - G Reid
- Asbestos Diseases Research Institute (ADRI), University of Sydney, Concord, NSW 2139, Australia
| |
Collapse
|