Cervical Myelopathy: An Update on Posterior Decompression

STUDY DESIGN

This was a narrative review.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to discuss current methods and review updated outcome studies regarding posterior decompression in the management of cervical myelopathy.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Progressive myelopathy in the cervical segments is an indication for urgent surgical management. Although nonoperative treatment is an option in mild to moderate cases, the majority of patients will experience deterioration in neurological function requiring surgical decompression.

METHODS

A review of the literature was performed using PubMed to provide updated information regarding posterior cervical decompression in the management of myelopathy.

RESULTS

There are numerous studies comparing outcome data between cervical laminectomy and fusion with laminoplasty. While each technique has advantages and disadvantages, both provide adequate decompression and good long-term outcomes in patients meeting appropriate criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior decompression is an important approach for spine surgeons to have in their toolkits when treating cervical myelopathy.

Metastatic prostate carcinoma: A rare presentation initially misdiagnosed as a rib fracture

Metastatic prostate carcinoma mainly occurs in bone as an osteoblastic lesion or lesions in the pelvis, spine, or chest wall. We present a unique case of a singular metastatic osteolytic lesion in the rib initially misdiagnosed as a fracture in a 61-year-old male. A single rib fracture in a patient with no history of trauma should raise suspicion for metastatic disease. We would encourage prostate cancer to be included in the differential diagnosis for an osteolytic lesion in a male over the age of 40. We review the current literature on this rare presentation of bone metastasis as well as the pathogenesis of metastatic prostate carcinoma as it relates to a solitary metastatic osteolytic lesion.

Halsted's "See One, Do One, and Teach One" versus Peyton's Four-Step Approach: A Randomized Trial for Training of Laparoscopic Suturing and Knot Tying

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Halsted's method "see one, do one, and teach one" with Peyton's Four-Step Approach for teaching intracorporal suturing and knot tying (ICKT).

METHODS

Laparoscopically naïve medical students (n = 60) were randomized to teaching of ICKT with either Halsted's (n = 30) or Peyton's method (n = 30) for 60 minutes. Each student's first 3 and final sutures were evaluated using Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS), procedural implementation, knot quality, total time, and suture placement accuracy.

RESULTS

Performance score and OSATS-PSC always differed significantly in favor of Peyton's group (p = 0.001). OSATS-GRS (p = 0.01) and task time (p = 0.03) differed only in the summary of the first 3 sutures in favor of Peyton's group. There were no significant intergroup differences in knot quality and accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Peyton's Four-Step Approach is the preferable method for learning complex laparoscopic skills like ICKT.