1
|
van Beek PE, Groenendaal F, Onland W, Koole S, Dijk PH, Dijkman KP, van den Dungen F, van Heijst A, Kornelisse RF, Schuerman F, van Westering-Kroon E, Witlox R, Andriessen P, Schuit E. Prognostic model for predicting survival in very preterm infants: an external validation study. BJOG 2021; 129:529-538. [PMID: 34779118 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To perform a temporal and geographical validation of a prognostic model, considered of highest methodological quality in a recently published systematic review, for predicting survival in very preterm infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. The original model was developed in the UK and included gestational age, birthweight and gender. DESIGN External validation study in a population-based cohort. SETTING Dutch neonatal wards. POPULATION OR SAMPLE All admitted white, singleton infants born between 23+0 and 32+6 weeks of gestation between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2019. Additionally, the model's performance was assessed in four populations of admitted infants born between 24+0 and 31+6 weeks of gestation: white singletons, non-white singletons, all singletons and all multiples. METHODS The original model was applied in all five validation sets. Model performance was assessed in terms of calibration and discrimination and, if indicated, it was updated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Calibration (calibration-in-the-large and calibration slope) and discrimination (c statistic). RESULTS Out of 6092 infants, 5659 (92.9%) survived. The model showed good external validity as indicated by good discrimination (c statistic 0.82, 95% CI 0.79-0.84) and calibration (calibration-in-the-large 0.003, calibration slope 0.92, 95% CI 0.84-1.00). The model also showed good external validity in the other singleton populations, but required a small intercept update in the multiples population. CONCLUSIONS A high-quality prognostic model predicting survival in very preterm infants had good external validity in an independent, nationwide cohort. The accurate performance of the model indicates that after impact assessment, implementation of the model in clinical practice in the neonatal intensive care unit could be considered. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT A high-quality model predicting survival in very preterm infants is externally valid in an independent cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P E van Beek
- Department of Neonatology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - F Groenendaal
- Department of Neonatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - W Onland
- Department of Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, VU University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Koole
- The Netherlands Perinatal Registry, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P H Dijk
- Department of Neonatology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - K P Dijkman
- Department of Neonatology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Fam van den Dungen
- Department of Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, VU University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Afj van Heijst
- Department of Neonatology, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - R F Kornelisse
- Department of Paediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Faba Schuerman
- Department of Neonatology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - E van Westering-Kroon
- Department of Neonatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rsgm Witlox
- Department of Neonatology, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - P Andriessen
- Department of Neonatology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.,Department of Applied Physics, School of Medical Physics and Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - E Schuit
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Englezos E, Cosyn J, Koole S, Jacquet W, De Bruyn H. Resective Treatment of Peri-implantitis: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After 2 Years. INT J PERIODONT REST 2018; 38:729-735. [DOI: 10.11607/prd.3386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
3
|
Phlypo I, De Tobel J, Marks L, De Visschere L, Koole S. Integrating community service learning in undergraduate dental education: A controlled trial in a residential facility for people with intellectual disabilities. SPECIAL CARE IN DENTISTRY 2018; 38:201-207. [DOI: 10.1111/scd.12298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2017] [Revised: 04/26/2018] [Accepted: 05/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Inès Phlypo
- Centre of Special Care in Dentistry, PaeCoMeDis; Ghent University; Ghent Belgium
- Department of Community Dentistry and Oral Public Health, PaeCoMeDis; Ghent University; Ghent Belgium
| | - Jannick De Tobel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine; Ghent University; Ghent Belgium
- KU Leuven Department of Oral Health Sciences, Forensic Dentistry and Department of Dentistry; University Hospitals Leuven; Leuven Belgium
- Department of Head, Neck and Maxillofacial Surgery; Ghent University; Ghent Belgium
| | - Luc Marks
- Centre of Special Care in Dentistry, PaeCoMeDis; Ghent University; Ghent Belgium
| | - Luc De Visschere
- Department of Community Dentistry and Oral Public Health, PaeCoMeDis; Ghent University; Ghent Belgium
| | - Sebastiaan Koole
- Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School; Ghent University; Ghent Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Koole S, van Driel W, Kieffer J, Sikorska K, van Leeuwen JS, Schreuder H, Hermans R, de Hingh I, van der Velden J, Arts H, Massuger L, Aalbers A, Verwaal V, Van de Vijver K, Aaronson N, Sonke G. Health-related quality of life after hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for stage III ovarian cancer: Results of the phase III OVHIPEC study. Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx440.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
5
|
Koole S, Van Den Brulle S, Christiaens V, Jacquet W, Cosyn J, De Bruyn H. Competence profiles in undergraduate dental education: a comparison between theory and reality. BMC Oral Health 2017; 17:109. [PMID: 28693545 PMCID: PMC5504562 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-017-0403-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2017] [Accepted: 07/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Competence profiles are purposed to provide a blueprint in support to develop and/or benchmark the learning outcomes of undergraduate dental curricula. This study aims to investigate whether a competence profile as proposed by academic- and clinical experts is able to represent the real clinical reality. Methods A questionnaire was developed including questions about gender and age, perception about required competences, and educational organisation and was distributed among Flemish dentists via email and on paper during a symposium. The data was analysed using descriptive statistics, Chi-square and non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-tests. Results A total of 312 questionnaires were completed (=6.5% of dentist population, with similar gender and age characteristics). All competences in the European competence profile were rated between 7.2 and 9.4 on a 10-point scale. In dentists under 50 years, females rated the importance of identifying/managing anxiety and abnormal patient behaviour; and promoting/improving oral health as significantly higher than males. In dentists of 50 years and above, females rated 8 competences significantly higher than males, including obtaining/recording a complete history; identifying/managing anxiety and abnormal patient behaviour; obtaining/interpreting radiography; identifying temporomandibular and associated disorders; identifying orthodontic needs; awareness of own limitations/when to refer; managing dental urgencies; and basic-life-support/defibrillation. Clinical practice management was most frequently reported as additional competence to address in dental education. Furthermore, the respondents suggested an undergraduate dental curriculum based on 34% theoretical education, 26% preclinical skills training, and 40% clinical education and 86% agreed with a duration of 5 years. Finally, the respondents also illustrated the dynamic nature of dentistry including a reduction of amalgam fillings, a shift from individual practice to group practices, an increased administrative load, and more assertive patients. Conclusion Findings in the present study suggest the validation of the proposed competences for graduating European dentists within the clinical reality of dental professionals in daily practice. Nevertheless, the results have also demonstrated heterogeneity regarding gender and age within the dentist population and emphasised a continuously evolving dental profession and required competences. Hence, to maintain high quality of dental care, a strategy should be developed in which dental curricula are continuously benchmarked against an evolving clinical reality. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12903-017-0403-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiaan Koole
- Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Shani Van Den Brulle
- Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Véronique Christiaens
- Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Wolfgang Jacquet
- Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jan Cosyn
- Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hugo De Bruyn
- Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Thevissen E, De Bruyn H, Colman R, Koole S. Attitude of dental hygienists, general practitioners and periodontists towards preventive oral care: an exploratory study. Int Dent J 2017; 67:221-228. [PMID: 28303564 DOI: 10.1111/idj.12289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Promoting oral hygiene and stimulating patient's responsibility for his/her personal health remain challenging objectives. The presence of dental hygienists has led to delegation of preventive tasks. However, in some countries, such as Belgium, this profession is not yet legalized. The aim of this exploratory study was to compare the attitude towards oral-hygiene instructions and patient motivational actions by dental hygienists and by general practitioners/periodontists in a context without dental hygienists. MATERIALS AND METHODS A questionnaire on demographics (six items), oral-hygiene instructions (eight items) and patient motivational actions (six items) was distributed to 241 Dutch dental hygienists, 692 general practitioners and 32 periodontists in Flanders/Belgium. Statistical analysis included Fisher's exact-test, Pearson's chi-square test and multiple (multinomial) logistic regression analysis to observe the influence of profession, age, workload, practice area and chair-assistance. RESULTS Significant variance was found between general practitioners and dental hygienists (in 13 of 14 items), between general practitioners and periodontists (in nine of 14 items) and between dental hygienists and periodontists (in five of 14 items). In addition to qualification, chair-assistance was also identified as affecting the attitude towards preventive oral care. CONCLUSION The present study identified divergence in the application of, and experienced barriers and opinions about, oral-hygiene instructions and patient motivational actions between dental hygienists and general practitioners/periodontists in a context without dental hygienists. In response to the barriers reported it is suggested that preventive oriented care may benefit from the deployment of dental hygienists to increase access to qualified preventive oral care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Thevissen
- Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Praktijk voor Parodontologie, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Hugo De Bruyn
- Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Roos Colman
- Biostatistics Unit, Department of Public Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Sebastiaan Koole
- Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Christiaens V, Jacobs R, Dierens M, Vervaeke S, De Bruyn H, Koole S, Cosyn J. Intraoral radiography lacks accuracy for the assessment of peri-implant bone level - a controlled clinical study. Eur J Oral Implantol 2017; 10:435-441. [PMID: 29234750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to compare clinical and radiographic bone level assessments to intra-surgical bone level registration around implants with peri-implantitis and to identify the clinical variables rendering peri-implant bone level assessment accuracy. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study sample included 50 implants with peri-implantitis in 23 patients. Registration methods included probing of the vertical distance between the implant/abutment interface and the bottom of the pocket (= VPD), intraoral radiography, bone sounding without flap elevation and intra-surgically assessed interproximal bone level. The latter was considered the true bone level (gold standard). Twenty clinicians evaluated all radiographs. RESULTS VPD and intraoral radiography resulted in a significant underestimation of the true bone level by 1.0 mm (95% CI: 0.495-1.585; P < 0.001) and 2.3 mm (95% CI: 1.650-2.980; P < 0.013) respectively. Bone sounding without flap elevation did not differ significantly from the true bone level (mean difference 0.2 mm; 95% CI: -0.775 - 0.335; P = 0.429). Duplicate magnification registration of 50 implants resulted in excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability (ICC intra ≤ 0.99; ICC inter = 0.964; P < 0.001). Radiographic underestimation was significantly affected by defect depth (P < 0.001). Variation among clinicians was substantial (mean underestimation range 1.1 mm to 3.8 mm); however, clinical experience had no impact on radiographic underestimation (P = 0.796). CONCLUSIONS Bone sounding without flap elevation was the best predictor of peri-implant bone level, whereas intraoral radiography was the most inferior. Consequently, peri-implantitis may be under-diagnosed if examination is only based on radiographs. Conflict-of-interest statement: Prof Hugo De Bruyn is associated with education and research collaboration agreements with Dentsply Sirona and Southern Implants, on behalf of Ghent University. Prof Cosyn has a collaboration agreement with Nobel Biocare. All other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Collapse
|
8
|
Koole S, Christiaens V, Cosyn J, De Bruyn H. Facilitating Dental Student Reflections: Using Mentor Groups to Discuss Clinical Experiences and Personal Development. J Dent Educ 2016. [DOI: 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2016.80.10.tb06204.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiaan Koole
- Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology; Ghent University; Belgium
| | | | - Jan Cosyn
- Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology; Ghent University; Belgium
- Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology; Free University of Brussels; Belgium
| | - Hugo De Bruyn
- Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology; Ghent University; Belgium
- Department of Prosthodontics; Malmö University; Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Koole S, Christiaens V, Cosyn J, De Bruyn H. Facilitating Dental Student Reflections: Using Mentor Groups to Discuss Clinical Experiences and Personal Development. J Dent Educ 2016; 80:1212-1218. [PMID: 27694295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2016] [Accepted: 04/19/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Despite the consensus on the importance of reflection for dental professionals, a lack of understanding remains about how students and clinicians should develop their ability to reflect. The aim of this study was to investigate dental students' and mentors' perceptions of mentor groups as an instructional method to facilitate students' reflection in terms of the strategy's learning potential, role of the mentor, group dynamics, and feasibility. At Ghent University in Belgium, third- and fourth-year dental students were encouraged to reflect on their clinical experiences and personal development in three reflective mentor sessions. No preparation or reports afterwards were required; students needed only to participate in the sessions. Sessions were guided by trained mentors to establish a safe environment, frame clinical discussions, and stimulate reflection. Students' and mentors' perceptions of the experience were assessed with a 17-statement questionnaire with response options on a five-point Likert scale (1=totally disagree to 5=totally agree). A total of 50 students and eight mentors completed the questionnaire (response rates 81% and 89%, respectively). Both students and mentors had neutral to positive perceptions concerning the learning potential, role of the mentor, group dynamics, and feasibility. The mean ideal total time for sessions in a year was 99 minutes (third-year students), 111 minutes (fourth-year students), and 147 minutes (mentors). Reported reflective topics related to patient management, frustrations, and practice of dentistry. Overall mean appreciation for the experience ranged from 14.50 to 15.14 on the 20-point scale. These findings about students' and mentors' positive perceptions of the experience suggest that mentor groups may be a potentially valuable strategy to promote dental students' reflection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiaan Koole
- Dr. Koole is Educational and Research Coordinator, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Belgium; Dr. Christiaens is Researcher, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Belgium; Dr. Cosyn is Professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Belgium and Visiting Professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Free University of Brussels, Belgium; and Dr. De Bruyn is Professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Belgium and Visiting Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Malmö University, Sweden.
| | - Veronique Christiaens
- Dr. Koole is Educational and Research Coordinator, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Belgium; Dr. Christiaens is Researcher, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Belgium; Dr. Cosyn is Professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Belgium and Visiting Professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Free University of Brussels, Belgium; and Dr. De Bruyn is Professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Belgium and Visiting Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Malmö University, Sweden
| | - Jan Cosyn
- Dr. Koole is Educational and Research Coordinator, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Belgium; Dr. Christiaens is Researcher, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Belgium; Dr. Cosyn is Professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Belgium and Visiting Professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Free University of Brussels, Belgium; and Dr. De Bruyn is Professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Belgium and Visiting Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Malmö University, Sweden
| | - Hugo De Bruyn
- Dr. Koole is Educational and Research Coordinator, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Belgium; Dr. Christiaens is Researcher, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Belgium; Dr. Cosyn is Professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Belgium and Visiting Professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Free University of Brussels, Belgium; and Dr. De Bruyn is Professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Belgium and Visiting Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Malmö University, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Thevissen E, De Bruyn H, Koole S. The provision of oral hygiene instructions and patient motivation in a dental care system without dental hygienists. Int J Dent Hyg 2016; 15:261-268. [PMID: 26932773 DOI: 10.1111/idh.12211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Oral hygiene instructions (OHI) and patient motivation (PM), often provided by dental hygienists, are essential attributes to establishing good oral health in patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the provision of OHI and PM by dental professionals in a dental care system without dental hygienists. METHODS AND MATERIALS A questionnaire, including 22 items (demographics, OHI and PM), was presented to 1037 dental professionals (=21.6% Flemish population). Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the provision of OHI and PM. Additionally, the Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test was used to investigate the influence of qualification (general practitioner/specialist), work experience (< or ≥ 25 years), workload (< or ≥ 30 h), location of practice (rural/urban) and chair-side assistance (with/without). RESULTS Response rate was 75%. Participants reported a single strategy for preventive care and felt their efforts were not in harmony with the results. Lack of time, remuneration and patient interest were reported as complicating factors and participants agreed on allowing assistants to provide preventive care. Significant variance was found based on qualification (12/17 items), work experience (7/17 items), workload (1/17 items), location of practice (2/17 items) and chair-side assistance (15/17 items). CONCLUSION In a context without dental hygienists, OHI and PM appeared non-compliant with current international guidelines. Although dental professionals were concerned with preventive dentistry, they reported barriers including lack of time, remuneration and patient compliance. Almost all participants expressed the need for delegation of in-mouth OHI, suggesting a need for dental hygienists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Thevissen
- Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Praktijk voor Parodontologie, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - H De Bruyn
- Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - S Koole
- Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Koole S, Fine P, De Bruyn H. Using discussion groups as a strategy for postgraduate implant dentistry students to reflect. Eur J Dent Educ 2016; 20:59-64. [PMID: 25845515 DOI: 10.1111/eje.12148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/16/2015] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION More than undergraduates, postgraduate students have the day-to-day clinical experience to reflect upon. Nevertheless, reflection in postgraduate dental education is less well studied. Hence, the purpose was to investigate the attitude towards reflection and the content of reflections in postgraduate implant dentistry education in the UK and Belgium. MATERIALS AND METHODS To investigate the attitude towards reflection, a questionnaire was administered to the 10 postgraduates at UCL Eastman Dental Institute (EDI) and 6 postgraduates at Ghent University (UGent). Additionally, students were invited to attend two reflective sessions (60-90 minutes). The sessions' audio recordings were transcribed and analysed using a thematic approach. RESULTS In total, 16 postgraduate implant dentistry students participated. Although the majority reported prior experience with reflection, there was variation in the provided definitions of reflection. EDI students agreed with reflection being beneficial for professional development/clinical reasoning and were positive about discussing clinical experiences in groups, but were divided about individual/group reflections. Their UGent counterparts were more indecisive (=neutral), but were positive about discussing clinical experiences. Thematic analysis identified recurring themes as individual learning process, learning and clinical experiences, attitude towards implant dentistry and course programme. EDI postgraduates' reflections focussed on specific clinical situations, while UGent postgraduates' reflections described general considerations. CONCLUSION Although students/professionals often report to reflect, it is not clear whether/how they actually reflect, due to the all-purpose word reflection has become. A strategy, using group discussions along with supervision/guidance in how to reflect, demonstrated to expand clinical reasoning into reflections about postgraduate students' clinical actions and professional growth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Koole
- Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - P Fine
- Department of Continuing Professional Development, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, London, UK
| | - H De Bruyn
- Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dental School, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Odontology, School of Dentistry, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Aper L, Veldhuijzen W, Dornan T, van de Ridder M, Koole S, Derese A, Reniers J. "Should I prioritize medical problem solving or attentive listening?": the dilemmas and challenges that medical students experience when learning to conduct consultations. Patient Educ Couns 2015; 98:77-84. [PMID: 25448312 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2013] [Revised: 09/02/2014] [Accepted: 09/19/2014] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Communication skills can be trained alongside clinical reasoning, history taking or clinical examination skills. This is advocated as a solution to the low transfer of communication skills. Still, students have to integrate the knowledge/skills acquired during different curriculum parts in patient consultations at some point. How do medical students experience these integrated consultations within a simulated environment and in real practice when dealing with responsibility? METHODS Six focus groups were conducted with (pre-)/clerkship students. RESULTS Students were motivated to practice integrated consultations with simulated patients and felt like 'real physicians'. However, their focus on medical problem solving drew attention away from improving their communication skills. Responsibility for real patients triggered students' identity development. This identity formation guided the development of an own consultation style, a process that was hampered by conflicting demands of role models. CONCLUSION Practicing complete consultations results in the dilemma of prioritizing medical problem solving above attention for patient communication. Integrated consultation training advances this dilemma to the pre-clerkship period. During clerkships this dilemma is heightened because real patients trigger empathy and responsibility, which invites students to define their role as doctor. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS When training integrated consultations, educators should pay attention to students' learning priorities and support the development of students' professional identity.
Collapse
|
13
|
Koole S, Thevissen E, Lindén U, Klinge B, de Bruyn H. Using clinical cases to stimulate active learning in a short periodontal continuing professional development course. Swed Dent J 2015; 39:1-10. [PMID: 26529837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
A case-based approach was used in a two-day periodontal continuing professional development course as a strategy to stimulate active learning. The present study investigates the outcome of this course format in terms of feasibility, perceived efficiency as a learning approach and reported individual learning goals. The study was performed in five identical courses entitled'risk analysis and treatment in periodontal patients'at Malmö University between 2011-2014. Before the course, clinical cases were used to activate participants' prior knowledge and to attune their focus on the course content. During the course, cases were discussed to synchronise theory with practical application. A pre- and end-course questionnaire were developed to evaluate participants' characteristics (age, clinical expertise, experience and expectations), perceptions on feasibility and instructiveness and emerged individual learning goals. The participants (39 dentists and 78 dental hygienists) reported an average preparation time of 62 minutes (range 2-190) and had positive perceptions on the accessibility, instructiveness and difficulty of cases. Expectations ranged between refreshing, acquiring new knowledge and mastering the course subject. Most reported learning goals were related to daily clinical practice including the development of a treatment plan, when to continue non-surgical treatment or to extract teeth/perform surgery, the approach to periodontitis, how to motivate non-compliant patients and when to refer. Conclusion: The use of clinical cases to stimulate active learning in a short-term continuing professional development periodontal course was positively perceived by the dentists and dental hygienists in terms of feasibility and learning potential.
Collapse
|
14
|
Koole S, Vervaeke S, Cosyn J, De Bruyn H. Exploring the relation between online case-based discussions and learning outcomes in dental education. J Dent Educ 2014; 78:1552-1557. [PMID: 25362697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Online case-based discussions, parallel to theoretical dental education, have been highly valued by students and supervisors. This study investigated the relation between variables of online group discussions and learning outcomes. At Ghent University in Belgium, undergraduate dental students (years two and three) are required to participate in online case-based discussion groups (five students/group) in conjunction with two theoretical courses on basic periodontics and related therapy. Each week, a patient case is discussed under supervision of a periodontist, who authored the case and performed the treatment. Each case includes treatment history and demand, intra- and extraoral images, and full diagnostic information with periodontal and radiographic status. For this retrospective study, data were obtained for all 252 students in forty-three discussion groups between 2009 and 2012. Spearman's rank correlations were calculated to investigate the relation among group dynamics (number of group posts and views), individual student contributions (number of individual posts, newly introduced elements, questions, and reactions to other posts), supervisors' interventions (number of posts and posed questions), and learning outcomes (examination result). The results showed that learning outcomes were significantly related to the number of student posts (Spearman's rho (ρ)=0.19), newly introduced elements (ρ=0.21), reactions to other posts (ρ=0.14), number of supervisors' interventions (ρ=0.12), and supervisors' questions (ρ=0.20). These results suggest that individual student contributions during online case-based discussions and the provided supervision were related to learning outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiaan Koole
- Dr. Koole is Educational Advisor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Belgium; Dr. Vervaeke is Researcher, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Belgium; Dr. Cosyn is Associate Professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Belgium and Visiting Professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Free University of Brussels (VUB), Belgium; and Dr. De Bruyn is Professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Belgium and Visiting Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Malmö University, Sweden.
| | - Stijn Vervaeke
- Dr. Koole is Educational Advisor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Belgium; Dr. Vervaeke is Researcher, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Belgium; Dr. Cosyn is Associate Professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Belgium and Visiting Professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Free University of Brussels (VUB), Belgium; and Dr. De Bruyn is Professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Belgium and Visiting Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Malmö University, Sweden
| | - Jan Cosyn
- Dr. Koole is Educational Advisor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Belgium; Dr. Vervaeke is Researcher, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Belgium; Dr. Cosyn is Associate Professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Belgium and Visiting Professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Free University of Brussels (VUB), Belgium; and Dr. De Bruyn is Professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Belgium and Visiting Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Malmö University, Sweden
| | - Hugo De Bruyn
- Dr. Koole is Educational Advisor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Belgium; Dr. Vervaeke is Researcher, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Belgium; Dr. Cosyn is Associate Professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Belgium and Visiting Professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Free University of Brussels (VUB), Belgium; and Dr. De Bruyn is Professor, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Ghent University, Belgium and Visiting Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Malmö University, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiaan Koole
- Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology; Ghent University; Belgium
| | - Stijn Vervaeke
- Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology; Ghent University; Belgium
| | - Jan Cosyn
- Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology; Ghent University; Belgium Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology; Free University of Brussels (VUB); Belgium
| | - Hugo De Bruyn
- Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology; Ghent University Belgium; Department of Prosthodontics; Malmö University; Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
|
17
|
Vandeweghe S, Koole S, Younes F, De Coster P, De Bruyn H. Dental implants placed by undergraduate students: clinical outcomes and patients'/students' perceptions. Eur J Dent Educ 2014; 18 Suppl 1:60-69. [PMID: 24484521 DOI: 10.1111/eje.12077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/07/2013] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Implant dentistry in undergraduate education is predominantly theoretical or prosthetics oriented. Clinical experience with implant surgery could provide students a better understanding of alternatives for tooth replacements. This study describes an implant dentistry programme for undergraduate students, which included surgical placement of implants. The study presents the clinical outcomes of the programme, patients' satisfaction and students' attitudes/perceptions. It reflects on barriers and problems encountered during implementation and provides suggestions for other institutions. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty-six students placed one implant each for a single tooth replacement after careful radiographic assessment and pre-surgical planning. One-stage surgery was performed under one-to-one supervision. Crowns were cemented on individual abutments 3-6 months later. Crestal bone loss was assessed radiographically immediately after surgery, at crown placement and after 1 year of loading. Questionnaires were used to investigate patients' perspectives and students' opinions towards the programme, as well as their perceived level of competence. RESULTS Thirty-six implants were placed in 27 patients; two (5.6%) failed prior to loading; mean bone loss from time of surgery to crown placement was 1.41 mm and remained unchanged thereafter, reflecting implant success. Overall, patients were satisfied and the majority would repeat the treatment by a student. The students thought it was a valuable experience, although they realised that additional education is necessary to perform implant surgery without supervision. CONCLUSION Implant placement by undergraduate students resulted in acceptable clinical outcome parameters, patient satisfaction and positive student perceptions. These findings support the further development of clinical implant education in undergraduate dental curricula.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Vandeweghe
- Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mattheos N, de Bruyn H, Hultin M, Jepsen S, Klinge B, Koole S, Sanz M, Ucer C, Lang NP. Developing implant dentistry education in Europe: the continuum from undergraduate to postgraduate education and continuing professional development. Eur J Dent Educ 2014; 18 Suppl 1:3-10. [PMID: 24484515 DOI: 10.1111/eje.12075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/07/2013] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Implant dentistry is a treatment modality which has mainstream clinical practice of comprehensive care, which however is not adequately represented in the undergraduate dental curricula. A consensus workshop organised by ADEE in 2008, set the benchmarks for the knowledge and competences a modern dental practitioner must possess with regard to implant dentistry, as well as defined undergraduate and postgraduate pathways for the acquisition of these competences. Today, 5 years later, there exist several challenges for the implementation of these benchmarks in both undergraduate curricula but also post-graduation educational pathways. METHODS A consensus workshop was organised by ADEE, bringing together 48 opinion leaders, including academic teachers of all disciplines related to implant dentistry, specialists, representatives of relevant scientific and professional associations, as well as industry delegates. The objectives of the workshop were to evaluate the existing scientific literature, reported experience and best practices in order to identify potential and limitations for the implementation of implant dentistry in the undergraduate curriculum, as well produce recommendations for the optimal educational structures for postgraduate programmes and continuing professional development. RESULTS The scientific committee conducted two European-wide questionnaire surveys to better document the current state of education in implant dentistry. Upon completion of the surveys, reviewers were appointed to produce three scientific review papers, identifying current achievements and future challenges. Finally, during the 3 days of the workshop, all the evidence was reviewed and the main conclusions and recommendations that were adopted by all participants are reported in the present Consensus Paper. CONCLUSIONS Implementation of implant dentistry in the undergraduate curriculum has improved significantly, but still lags behind the benchmarks set in 2008 and the diversity between institutions remains big. At the post-graduation level, there is currently a wide diversity of courses and pathways towards competences related to implant dentistry and there is at present a great need for quality assurance, as well as standardisation and transparency of the learning outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Mattheos
- Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Koole S, Vandeweghe S, Mattheos N, De Bruyn H. Implant dentistry education in Europe: 5 years after the Association for Dental Education in Europe consensus report. Eur J Dent Educ 2014; 18 Suppl 1:43-51. [PMID: 24484519 DOI: 10.1111/eje.12084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/22/2013] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To promote consensus on implant dentistry university education in Europe, a workshop amongst university teachers and opinion leaders was organised in 2008. As a result, guidelines on both under- and postgraduate education were issued. This study aims to investigate the current status of university teaching of implant dentistry and the impact of the recommendations for teaching and assessment, 5 years after the first consensus. Finally, this report attempts to identify future directions in education within the discipline. MATERIALS AND METHODS An online survey was distributed amongst 105 academic leaders in implant education in Europe, and 52 questionnaires were returned (response rate 50%). RESULTS The average amount of implant dentistry in undergraduate curricula has increased to 74 h, compared to 36 h in 2008, and the inclusion of pre-clinical and clinical education has increased. No change occurred with regard to the aimed competence levels. It was suggested that certain implant procedures including surgery should be provided by dentists after attending additional courses, whilst complex treatments will still require specialist training. The 2008 workshop guidelines have been implemented to a varying extent (25-100%) in under- and postgraduate education. Main reported implementation barriers included limited time availability in the curriculum and limited financial/material resources. Future discussions about implant dentistry in Europe should be focused towards integration in current dental curricula, approaches to overcome barriers and the relations with and role of industrial partners. CONCLUSION Implant dentistry is increasingly integrating in undergraduate dental education. Development of the consensus guidelines in 2008 may have facilitated this process. Nevertheless, further progress is needed on all educational levels to align training of professionals to the growing treatment needs of the population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Koole
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Consensus reports recommend that students upon graduation should possess a significant level of knowledge and competence in implant dentistry, including basic competences in diagnostics, treatment planning, restorative, straightforward surgical and maintenance procedures. In response, undergraduate curricula need to integrate implant dentistry. This narrative review explores educational programmes in terms of competences, related research and barriers or reflections, regarding implementation in undergraduate curricula. MATERIALS AND METHODS Publications (2008-2013) were searched systematically in WoS, PubMed and ERIC and screened independently by two authors in four stages: removal of duplicates, title screening, abstract screening and full-text reading. Inclusion criteria encompassed implant dentistry in undergraduate education. RESULTS Finally, 37 of 420 papers were included. Detailed information regarding programme content, number of participants, staff input, logistics/funding issues is scattered. Theoretical education is predominant, and pre-clinical/clinical training is offered minimally, often carried out in elective programmes. However, selected straightforward cases treated by undergraduates yield positive outcomes with low failure rates, few complications, high patient satisfaction and student appreciation. Barriers to implementing implant dentistry in the undergraduate curriculum include funding issues, limitations in time or staff availability/competence and lack of suitable patients. Overcoming these barriers is worthwhile as experience-based implant education affects future practice as well-informed students propose more restorative alternatives to their patients. CONCLUSION Although implant dentistry is increasingly integrated in undergraduate curricula, challenges remain in developing strategies to implement existing competence profiles and the extent of experience-based education. To support further advancement, universities should report comprehensively on their implant programmes to allow comparison and reproduction in other environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Koole
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Turan S, Valcke M, De Maeseneer J, Aper L, Koole S, De Wispelaere C, Deketelaere A, Derese A. A novel Medical Achievement Self-efficacy Scale (MASS): a valid and reliable tool. Med Teach 2013; 35:575-80. [PMID: 23701248 DOI: 10.3109/0142159x.2013.798401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
In search for an instrument to measure overall curriculum impact, we developed a Medical Achievement Self-efficacy Scale (MASS) and presented it to medical students enrolled in the different years of the integrated Ghent curriculum. The research aim was to study the validity and reliability of this new scale. MASS items were constructed based on the end terms of the Ghent curriculum, as it is related to the general competency frameworks of CanMEDs and the Five-star Doctor. The scale includes at least two items for each CanMEDS competency domain. Items were examined by seven experts in view of content and face validity. This resulted in an MASS version, containing 18 items, to be rated on a five-point Likert scale. This version was piloted on 94 undergraduate medical students enrolled at the Catholic University of Leuven. The final version was presented to 1066 undergraduate medical students enrolled at Ghent University. Reliability of the MASS scale was high (α=0.89). As expected, self-efficacy scores increased significantly over the years (F=39.11, p<0.001). In view of determining predictive validity, regression analysis was carried out to predict students' academic achievement from self-efficacy scores. As expected, MASS scores significantly predicted Maastricht Progress Test scores (F=108.18, p<0.001).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sevgi Turan
- Department of Medical Education and Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Sihhiye 06100 Ankara, Turkey.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Koole S, Vanobbergen J, De Visschere L, Aper L, Dornan T, Derese A. The influence of reflection on portfolio learning in undergraduate dental education. Eur J Dent Educ 2013; 17:e93-e99. [PMID: 23279421 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2012.00766.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/15/2012] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Disparity exists between the growing consensus about the positive effects of reflection on performance and the scarcity of empirical evidence demonstrating this effect. Portfolios are considered a useful instrument to assess and supervise competence-based education and to stimulate reflection. The present study describes the introduction of a portfolio in a social dentistry and oral health promotion course and investigates student reflection as a predictor for the acquisition of the other competences in the course. METHODS Fourth year undergraduate dental students (n = 110) in the course 'Society and Health' between 2008 and 2011 collected evidence in their portfolios, demonstrating the acquisition of five competences: the ability to (1) assess the oral health profile of a target group; (2) integrate theoretical models in health promotion; (3) search for and apply scientific evidence; (4) work trans-, multi- and/or trans-disciplinarily; (5) reflect on personal development. Linear regression analysis was used to investigate the predictive value of reflection on the other course related competences. RESULTS Reflection scores proved to significantly predict other course-related competences, when analysing all students between 2008 and 2011 and for each year separately, explaining between 10.7% and 25.5% of the variance in the other competences. CONCLUSION Undergraduate dental students' competences related to social dentistry and oral health promotion were significantly predicted by the reflection scores obtained in a portfolio-based context. In line with the growing consensus about the benefits of reflection for dental students and professionals, results suggest the value to further develop the integration of reflection in dental education and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Koole
- Centre for Educational Development, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Koole S, Dornan T, Aper L, Scherpbier A, Valcke M, Cohen-Schotanus J, Derese A. Does reflection have an effect upon case-solving abilities of undergraduate medical students? BMC Med Educ 2012; 12:75. [PMID: 22889271 PMCID: PMC3492041 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-75] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2011] [Accepted: 08/03/2012] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reflection on professional experience is increasingly accepted as a critical attribute for health care practice; however, evidence that it has a positive impact on performance remains scarce. This study investigated whether, after allowing for the effects of knowledge and consultation skills, reflection had an independent effect on students' ability to solve problem cases. METHODS Data was collected from 362 undergraduate medical students at Ghent University solving video cases and reflected on the experience of doing so. For knowledge and consultation skills results on a progress test and a course teaching consultation skills were used respectively. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was used to test the relationship between the quality of case-solving (dependent variable) and reflection skills, knowledge, and consultation skills (dependent variables). RESULTS Only students with data on all variables available (n = 270) were included for analysis. The model was significant (Anova F(3,269) = 11.00, p < 0.001, adjusted R square 0.10) with all variables significantly contributing. CONCLUSION Medical students' reflection had a small but significant effect on case-solving, which supports reflection as an attribute for performance. These findings suggest that it would be worthwhile testing the effect of reflection skills training on clinical competence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiaan Koole
- Centre for Educational Development, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Tim Dornan
- Department of Educational Development and Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Leen Aper
- Centre for Educational Development, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Albert Scherpbier
- Institute for Medical Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Martin Valcke
- Department of Educational Studies, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Janke Cohen-Schotanus
- University of Groningen and University Medical Centre Groningen, Centre for Research and Innovation in Medical Education, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Anselme Derese
- Centre for Educational Development, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Koole S, Dornan T, Aper L, De Wever B, Scherpbier A, Valcke M, Cohen-Schotanus J, Derese A. Using video-cases to assess student reflection: development and validation of an instrument. BMC Med Educ 2012; 12:22. [PMID: 22520632 PMCID: PMC3426495 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2011] [Accepted: 04/20/2012] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reflection is a meta-cognitive process, characterized by: 1. Awareness of self and the situation; 2. Critical analysis and understanding of both self and the situation; 3. Development of new perspectives to inform future actions. Assessors can only access reflections indirectly through learners' verbal and/or written expressions. Being privy to the situation that triggered reflection could place reflective materials into context. Video-cases make that possible and, coupled with a scoring rubric, offer a reliable way of assessing reflection. METHODS Fourth and fifth year undergraduate medical students were shown two interactive video-cases and asked to reflect on this experience, guided by six standard questions. The quality of students' reflections were scored using a specially developed Student Assessment of Reflection Scoring rubric (StARS®). Reflection scores were analyzed concerning interrater reliability and ability to discriminate between students. Further, the intra-rater reliability and case specificity were estimated by means of a generalizability study with rating and case scenario as facets. RESULTS Reflection scores of 270 students ranged widely and interrater reliability was acceptable (Krippendorff's alpha = 0.88). The generalizability study suggested 3 or 4 cases were needed to obtain reliable ratings from 4th year students and ≥ 6 cases from 5th year students. CONCLUSION Use of StARS® to assess student reflections triggered by standardized video-cases had acceptable discriminative ability and reliability. We offer this practical method for assessing reflection summatively, and providing formative feedback in training situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiaan Koole
- Centre for Educational Development, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Tim Dornan
- Department of Educational Development and Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Leen Aper
- Centre for Educational Development, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Bram De Wever
- Department of Educational Studies, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Albert Scherpbier
- Institute for Medical Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Martin Valcke
- Department of Educational Studies, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Janke Cohen-Schotanus
- Centre for Research and Innovation in Medical Education, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen and University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Anselme Derese
- Centre for Educational Development, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Koole S, De Wever B, Aper L, Vervaeke S, Derese A, De Bruyn H. Using online periodontal case-based discussions to synchronize theoretical and clinical undergraduate dental education. Eur J Dent Educ 2012; 16:52-58. [PMID: 22251327 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2011.00719.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical experience is important in undergraduate dental education, but (suitable) patients to learn from are often lacking. Online case-based discussions were introduced to overcome patient dependency and to synchronize theoretical with clinical education. MATERIALS AND METHODS Undergraduate dental students in groups of 5-7 discussed online clinical case reports presenting either minor (2nd year) or complex periodontal pathology (3rd year). Each case consisted of a brief patient history, extra- and intra-oral clinical pictures, periodontal chart, peri-apical and/or orthopantomographic radiographs. Students had to discuss diagnosis and treatment planning. Questionnaires assessed students' and supervisors' general appreciation (score on 20), time investment and opinions about organisation, relation case/course content, future planning, learning effect and online environment (5-point Likert scale). A crossover design with three tests (pre-test, test in between and post-test) was used to investigate whether the frequency of case introduction (one case per week vs. one case element per week) had an effect on learning. Data was analysed with descriptive statistics (questionnaires) and repeated measures ANOVA (crossover design). RESULTS Students (n=119) and supervisors (n=9) highly appreciated the exercise. Students reported spending on average 74 min per week to read a case, prepare and post messages. Supervisors' total time investment was 342 min per semester to create a case, provide online feedback and to prepare a live-discussion. No significant differences in test-scores were found between the two modalities of case introduction. CONCLUSION Online case-based discussions, in conjunction with a theoretical course, are valuable additions to the dental curriculum, especially to reinforce the transition from theory to clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Koole
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for Educational Development, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Aper L, Reniers J, Koole S, Valcke M, Derese A. Impact of three alternative consultation training formats on self-efficacy and consultation skills of medical students. Med Teach 2012; 34:e500-7. [PMID: 22746968 DOI: 10.3109/0142159x.2012.668627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conducting a consultation is a core competence of medical professionals. Consultation training of medical students centers on clinical, communication, reasoning and reflection skills. The training incorporates practice with a standardized simulated patient and supervising physician, to prepare for real patient encounters. To meet the request for more training, while dealing with an increasing student population and limited staff availability, alternative formats of consultation training were developed and evaluated. AIM To investigate the impact of three consultation training formats on students' self-efficacy beliefs and their consultation skills acquisition. The three formats comprised (1) traditional training with supervising physician, (2) autonomous training with feedback from simulated patients and peers, without direct supervision and (3) online training based on video fragments and answering guiding questions. METHODS A quasi-experimental pre/posttest study was set up, with random assignment of students to a training condition. The differential impact was tested on two dependent measures: self-efficacy and consultation performance. Self-efficacy was tested with a nine-item scale and the cognitive component of consultation performance was tested on the base of responses to a standardized video case. RESULTS The autonomous training has a significant positive effect on students' self-efficacy (p=0.016). The traditional training and the online training did only positively influence the cognitive component of the consultation competence (p<0.001 and p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS Each consultation training contributes to the learning process in a different way. In order to achieve optimum learning effects, medical educators should be aware of the particular impact of specific trainings on the cognitive and motivational side of skills and pursue a balanced mixture of instructional formats.
Collapse
|
27
|
Koole S, Dornan T, Aper L, Scherpbier A, Valcke M, Cohen-Schotanus J, Derese A. Factors confounding the assessment of reflection: a critical review. BMC Med Educ 2011; 11:104. [PMID: 22204704 PMCID: PMC3268719 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2011] [Accepted: 12/28/2011] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reflection on experience is an increasingly critical part of professional development and lifelong learning. There is, however, continuing uncertainty about how best to put principle into practice, particularly as regards assessment. This article explores those uncertainties in order to find practical ways of assessing reflection. DISCUSSION We critically review four problems: 1. Inconsistent definitions of reflection; 2. Lack of standards to determine (in)adequate reflection; 3. Factors that complicate assessment; 4. Internal and external contextual factors affecting the assessment of reflection. SUMMARY To address the problem of inconsistency, we identified processes that were common to a number of widely quoted theories and synthesised a model, which yielded six indicators that could be used in assessment instruments. We arrived at the conclusion that, until further progress has been made in defining standards, assessment must depend on developing and communicating local consensus between stakeholders (students, practitioners, teachers, supervisors, curriculum developers) about what is expected in exercises and formal tests. Major factors that complicate assessment are the subjective nature of reflection's content and the dependency on descriptions by persons being assessed about their reflection process, without any objective means of verification. To counter these validity threats, we suggest that assessment should focus on generic process skills rather than the subjective content of reflection and where possible to consider objective information about the triggering situation to verify described reflections. Finally, internal and external contextual factors such as motivation, instruction, character of assessment (formative or summative) and the ability of individual learning environments to stimulate reflection should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiaan Koole
- Centre for Educational Development, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Tim Dornan
- Department of Educational Development and Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Leen Aper
- Centre for Educational Development, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Albert Scherpbier
- Institute for Medical Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, the Netherlands
| | - Martin Valcke
- Department of Educational Studies, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium
| | - Janke Cohen-Schotanus
- Centre for Research and Innovation in Medical Education, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen and University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Anselme Derese
- Centre for Educational Development, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of the survey was to assess the status of implant dentistry education and addressed various aspects related to competence level, practical implementation and barriers for further development in the field. MATERIALS AND METHODS An e-mail survey was performed amongst 73 opinion leaders from 18 European countries invited to the Association for Dental Education in Europe (ADEE) workshop on implant dentistry. RESULTS Forty-nine surveys were returned (67%) and it was found that theoretical and pre-clinical courses to an average of 36 h are given to undergraduates; 70% reported that students assist or treat patients with prosthetics; 53% reported that students assist with surgery and only 5% is operating patients. In 23% of the schools optional undergraduate courses are available and 90% offer postgraduate training. Barriers for including prosthetics and surgery are lack of time, funding or staff. Partial restorations, including surgery, in the posterior regions may be provided by dentists after attendance at additional courses but complex treatments should be limited to specialists. CONCLUSION This survey confirms that implant dentistry is part of the undergraduate curriculum, albeit with a disparity in time. Whereas implant dentistry is an important part of clinical practice, coverage in the curriculum is limited and when compared with 10 years ago, even stagnating. Priorities within the curriculum should be evaluated depending on demands and treatment needs of the population. To optimise education, learning guidelines should be developed, based on the expected competencies for practicing dentists. Undergraduate education may start the process that must continue through all levels of education, including the postgraduate level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H De Bruyn
- Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental school, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|