Assessing greenhouse gas emissions in Cuban agricultural soils: Implications for climate change and rice (Oryza sativa L.) production

Assessing the impact of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions on agricultural soils is crucial for ensuring food production sustainability in the global effort to combat climate change. The present study delves to comprehensively assess GHG emissions in Cuba's agricultural soil and analyze its implications for rice production and climate change because of its rich agriculture cultivation tradition and diverse agro-ecological zones from the period of 1990-2022. In this research, based on Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) approach the empirical findings depicts that in short run, a positive and significant impact of 1.60 percent % in Cuba's rice production. The higher amount of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) levels improves photosynthesis, and stimulates the growth of rice plants, resulting in greater grain yields. On the other hand, rice production index raising GHG emissions from agriculture by 0.35 % in the short run. Furthermore, a significant and positive impact on rice production is found in relation to the farm machinery i.e., 3.1 %. Conversely, an adverse and significant impact of land quality was observed on rice production i.e., -5.5 %. The reliability of models was confirmed by CUSUM and CUSUM square plot. Diagnostic tests ensure the absence of serial correlation and heteroscedasticity in the models. Additionally, the forecasting results are obtained from the three machine learning models i.e. feed forward neural network (FFNN), support vector machines (SVM) and adaptive boosting technique (Adaboost). Through the % MAPE criterion, it is evident that FFNN has achieved high precision (91 %). Based on the empirical findings, the study proposed the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices and incentives should be given to the farmers so that future generations inherit a world that is sustainable, and healthy.

Are accessory spleen screening and resection in refractory immune cytopenia an effective strategy or a waste of resources?

Splenectomy remains an effective treatment for refractory immune cytopenia (RIC), which encompasses immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) and autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA). Accessory spleens (AS) have been described without identifying specific risk factors. We retrospectively analyzed patients with RIC after splenectomy who underwent splenic scintigraphy (SS) at our institution. Seventy-one patients were included. Sixty-two patients had ITP, five had AIHA, and four had Evans syndrome. Seventy-five percent (n = 53) were women. Eleven patients (15.5%) had an AS detected by SS. A complete response (CR) to first-line steroids (odds ratio (OR) 5.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.37-24.14, p = 0.017) and the absence of Howell-Jolly bodies (HJB) in peripheral blood smear (PBS) (OR 11.37, 95% CI 2.70-47.85, p = 0.001) were found to be risk factors. Patients with both elements had a higher rate of AS (83.3%) when compared to those with one or no factors (p < 0.001). Eight patients (73%) underwent an accessory splenectomy: seven (87.5%) achieved a CR, and none had perioperative complications. The presence of HJB in PBS changed from 25 to 87.5% after accessory splenectomy. We recommend the search for an AS via SS in patients with RIC due to ITP, who had a CR to corticosteroids and the absence of HJB in PBS. Accessory splenectomy is a safe and effective procedure.

Adverse Effects Associated With the Use of Antimalarials During The COVID-19 Pandemic in a Tertiary Care Center in Mexico City

Background: Antimalarial drugs were widely used as experimental therapies against COVID-19 in the initial stages of the pandemic. Despite multiple randomized controlled trials demonstrating unfavorable outcomes in both efficacy and adverse effects, antimalarial drugs are still prescribed in developing countries, especially in those experiencing recurrent COVID-19 crises (India and Brazil). Therefore, real-life experience and pharmacovigilance studies describing the use and side effects of antimalarials for COVID-19 in developing countries are still relevant.

Objective: To describe the adverse effects associated with the use of antimalarial drugs in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia at a reference center in Mexico City.

Methods: We integrated a retrospective cohort with all adult patients hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia from March 13th, 2020, to May 17th, 2020. We compared the baseline characteristics (demographic and clinical) and the adverse effects between the groups of patients treated with and without antimalarial drugs. The mortality analysis was performed in 491 patients who received optimal care and were not transferred to other institutions (210 from the antimalarial group and 281 from the other group).

Results: We included 626 patients from whom 38% (n = 235) received an antimalarial drug. The mean age was 51.2 ± 13.6 years, and 64% were males. At baseline, compared with the group treated with antimalarials, the group that did not receive antimalarials had more dyspnea (82 vs. 73%, p = 0.017) and cyanosis (5.3 vs. 0.9%, p = 0.009), higher respiratory rate (median of 28 vs. 24 bpm, p < 0.001), and lower oxygen saturation (median of 83 vs. 87%, p < 0.001). In the group treated with antimalarials, 120 patients had two EKG evaluations, from whom 12% (n = 16) prolonged their QTc from baseline in more than 50 ms, and six developed a ventricular arrhythmia. Regarding the trajectories of the liver function tests over time, no significant differences were found for the change in the mean value per day between the two groups. Among patients who received optimal care, the mortality was 16% (33/210) in those treated with antimalarials and 15% (41/281) in those not receiving antimalarials (RR 1.08, 95% 0.75–1.64, and adjusted RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.69–1.82).

Conclusion: The adverse events in patients with COVID-19 treated with antimalarials were similar to those who did not receive antimalarials at institutions with rigorous pharmacological surveillance. However, they do not improve survival in patients who receive optimal medical care.

Cost-effectiveness of the regimen proposed by the International Consortium on Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia for the treatment of newly diagnosed patients with Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia

Introduction

We performed cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses of the modified International Consortium on Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia protocol in Mexico for the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia.

Methods

We performed a three-state Markov analysis: stable disease (first line complete response [CR]), disease event (relapse, second line response and CR) and death. The modified IC-APL protocol is composed of three phases: induction, consolidation and maintenance. Cost and outcomes were used to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs); quality-adjusted life-years were used to calculate incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs).

Results

The CR was achieved in 18 patients (90%), treated with the IC-APL protocol as the first-line option; one patient (5%) died in induction, another one never achieved CR (5%); of the 18 patients that achieved CR, 1 relapsed (5.5%). The median treatment cost of the IC-APL protocol was $21,523 USD. The average life-year in our study was 7.8 years, while the average quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) was 6.1 years. When comparing the ICER between the IC-APL and the all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) plus arsenic trioxide (ATO) protocols, we found the different costs of $6497, $19,133 and $17,123 USD in Italy, the USA and Canada, respectively. In relation to the ICUR, we found the different costs to be $13,955 and $11,979 USD in the USA and Canada, respectively.

Conclusion

Taking into account the similar response rates, lower cost and easy access to the modified IC-APL regimen, we consider it a cost-effective and cost-utility protocol, deeming it the treatment of choice for our population.

Splenic myeloid metaplasia in warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia (wAIHA): a retrospective study

Background

Splenic myeloid metaplasia (SMM) is a kind of extramedullary hematopoiesis, whereas its clinical significance in wAIHA remains unclear. The aim of this study is evaluating the frequency and clinical characteristics of SMM, compared with splenic-congestion (SC).

Methods

We included patients with wAIHA treated in a Mexican tertiary hospital between January 1992 and December 2015. All patients received steroids as first-line treatment and splenectomy as second-line treatment.

Results

Among the thirty-six splenectomized patients, 15 (41.6%) and 21 (58.4%) were diagnosed as SMM and SC, respectively. No differences were found in clinical characteristics between two groups. SMM patients showed lower platelet count (147×10⁹/L vs. 240×10⁹/L, P=0.02) and higher presence of anti-dsDNA antibodies (40% vs. 4.7%, P=0.01) than SC patients. Although the complete response (CR) rate with first-line treatment was lower in SMM patients (13.3% vs. 47.6%; P=0.04), post-splenectomy median disease-free-survival (DFS) was longer (16.2 mo vs. 5.1 mo; P=0.19). Univariate/multivariate analysis showed that achieving CR during first-line treatment (OR 0.3, 95% CI: 0.03–0.94, P=0.03) and higher platelet count (OR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.98–0.99, P=0.03) were protective factors for SMM; and anti-dsDNA titer higher than 9.6 IU/dL was a risk factor for SMM (OR 2.76, 95% CI: 1.48–5.14, P<0.001).

Conclusion

The wAIHA patients with SMM have different biological profiles with those without SMM. This study is the first trial evaluating the significance of histopathological spleen findings and their association with rheumatologic profile.

Importance of CD117 in the Assignation of a Myeloid Lineage in Acute Leukemias

The correct classification of acute leukemias (AL) is an essential part in the evaluation of any patient with this disease. Historically, CD117 has been an important asset in the diagnosis of patients with mixed-phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL). In an attempt to simplify the diagnosis of MPAL with fewer and more lineage specific markers, the World Health Organization (WHO) proposed in 2008 a new criteria for the diagnosis of this type of AL, which excluded CD117 from the myeloid markers that are utilized to diagnose MPAL. In order to assess whether CD117 is necessary in the diagnosis of MPAL, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of CD117 for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in 331 patients with AL. The calculated sensitivity of CD117 for AML was 85.88% (103/120), while the specificity was 83.9% (177/211). Besides myeloperoxidase (MPO), which was used as the gold standard in differentiating AML from other type of ALs, the most specific markers for AML in our study were CD14 and CD64 (99.5 and 95.6%). Although the specificity of CD117 in this study is not as high as CD14 and CD64, markers concomitantly used in this this study and in the WHO classification, based on the results of other researches (i.e. the specificity of CD117 for AML was 100% in one study) and due to the fact that its specificity for AML in this study is relatively high, we recommend the use CD117 in assigning a myeloid lineage in MPAL.

Impact of Aberrant Antigens in the Outcome of Patients with Acute Leukemia at a Referral Institution in Mexico City

BACKGROUND

Patients with acute leukemia can express aberrant markers, defined as antigens that are normally restricted to a different lineage. The reported significance and frequency of these markers is inconclusive. We assessed the frequency and impact of aberrant markers in patients with acute leukemia in a referral institution in Mexico City.

METHODS

We included 433 patients, diagnosed and treated between 2005 and 2015 in our institution.

RESULTS

Aberrant markers were expressed in 128 patients (29.6%); CD13 and CD33 were the most frequent aberrant markers in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, while CD7 and CD19 were the most frequent in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. In the univariate analysis, the group with aberrant markers had a lower disease-free survival when compared with the aberrant-free group (8 vs. 13 months) (p = 0.03). Aberrant expression of CD10, CD20, and CD33 correlated with a worse outcome in a statistically significant manner. In the multivariate analysis, male gender, lymphoid lineage, secondary leukemia, high risk at diagnosis, and the presence of aberrant markers had a significantly negative impact on disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

The use of more aggressive treatment strategies could be considered in patients with acute leukemia and an aberrant expression of CD10, CD20, and CD33.

[Adequacy of anticoagulant prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation]

INTRODUCTION

Although there is a consensus about the use of oral anticoagulants (OAC) to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation this treatment is underused in actual practice. Our aim was to determine the proportion of patients with previously known atrial fibrillation who were receiving OAC before stroke onset and their characteristics.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We recruited 50 patients who were admitted with acute stroke and previously known atrial fibrillation over a period of one year. Patients were classified according to the type of antithrombotic treatment they were on. The clinical picture was evaluated by the NIHSS. Functional prognosis was estimated by modified-Rankin score at discharge.

RESULTS

Of 50 patients, 16 (32%) were receiving OAC before stroke. Four variables were associated with prescription of OAC: treatment with digoxin, previous ischemic stroke or transient ischemic accident, congestive heart failure and the type of AF (chronic vs paroxysmal). Age and medical history of arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus or ischemic cardiopathy did not influence the prescription. According to the NIHSS and modified-Rankin scales patients on OAC showed less serious strokes and presented a better functional situation at discharge than those who were not on that treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the need to improve medical education about OAC in patients with atrial fibrillation because only 32% of patients received OAC before stroke although 90% of them should receive it according to current guidelines. Our results suggest that OAC treatment not only prevents stroke but may also contribute to the development of less serious strokes with a better functional prognosis.