Relative efficacy of lasmiditan versus rimegepant and ubrogepant as acute treatments for migraine: network meta-analysis findings

Background

In the absence of head-to-head trials, comprehensive evidence comparing onset of efficacy of novel agents for acute treatment of migraine is lacking. This study aimed to explore the relative efficacy of lasmiditan (serotonin [5-hydroxytryptamine] 1F receptor agonist) versus rimegepant and ubrogepant (calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonists) for the acute oral treatment of migraine through network meta-analysis (NMA).

Methods

Data included in the NMA were identified through a systematic literature search (conducted April 2018, updated May/December 2020) of phase II–IV, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in adults with chronic/episodic migraine with/without aura. Treatments included: lasmiditan 50, 100, 200 mg; rimegepant 75 mg; ubrogepant 25, 50, 100 mg. Pairwise treatment comparisons from Bayesian fixed-effect/random-effects NMA, adjusted by baseline risk where appropriate, were conducted. Comparisons were reported as odds ratios with 95% credible intervals. Early-onset efficacy endpoints included: pain freedom at 2 hours and pain relief at 1 and 2 hours. Adverse drug reaction (ADR) profiles were summarised. Heterogeneity and inconsistency in the network were explored; sensitivity analyses investigated robustness of findings.

Results

Across 12 RCTs included in the base case, females represented >80% of included patients (mean age 37.9–45.7 years). Odds of achieving both pain freedom and pain relief at 2 hours were higher with lasmiditan 100 and 200 mg versus rimegepant 75 mg and ubrogepant 25 and 50 mg. Results for pain relief at 1 hour were consistent with those at 2 hours, but fewer comparisons were available. There were no statistically significant differences between lasmiditan 50 mg and ubrogepant or rimegepant for any outcome. Sensitivity analyses were in the same direction as base case analyses. Most commonly reported ADRs (incidence ≥2%) were: dizziness, fatigue, paraesthesia, sedation, nausea/vomiting and muscle weakness with lasmiditan; nausea with rimegepant; and nausea, somnolence and dry mouth with ubrogepant.

Conclusions

The efficacy findings of this indirect comparison indicate that lasmiditan 100 mg or 200 mg might be an appropriate acute treatment option for patients with migraine seeking a fast onset of action. Differently from rimegepant and ubrogepant, lasmiditan use is associated with mainly neurological events, which are mostly mild or moderate in severity and self-limiting.

350/350 words

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-022-01440-w.

Identification and mapping of worldwide sources of generic real-world data

PURPOSE

The demand for real-world data as supportive evidence to traditional clinical studies has increased in the past few years. The present study aimed to identify worldwide generic sources of real-world data and to assess completeness and suitability of selected real-world evidence (RWE) data sources to conduct prespecified research.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted to identify generic (non-disease specific) sources of real-world data in Medline and Embase from January 1, 2010 to September 8, 2015. Data sources used in observational studies were identified and summarized based on their geographical distribution and the type of data. In the next step, the selected data sources were critically evaluated for their completeness.

RESULTS

A total of 10,069 identified publications were screened, leading to 2635 unique data sources across 102 countries. Europe had the maximum number of data sources (n = 1163) followed by United States (n = 578), and Asia, Middle East, and African Countries (n = 374). The most common type of identified data sources across all countries was structured data sources, ie, administrative databases and registries. Of the identified data sources, 300 were selected for further investigation. From the selected databases, ~50% had confirmed information on over 60% of the investigated variables, ~61% were suitable for epidemiological research, and 60% had possibility of linkage.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study applied a systematic literature review approach and identified available generic sources of real-world data worldwide, in addition to the United States and Europe, which are suitable for conducting pre-defined researches and support future RWE studies.