1
|
Yu S, Guo A, Wang Z, Liu J, Tan G, Yang Q, Zhang M, Yibulaiyin H, Chen H, Zhang Y, Croop R, Sun Y, Liu Y, Zhao Q, Lu Z. Rimegepant orally disintegrating tablet 75 mg for acute treatment of migraine in adults from China: a subgroup analysis of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial. J Headache Pain 2024; 25:57. [PMID: 38627638 PMCID: PMC11020209 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01731-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rimegepant orally disintegrating tablet (ODT), an oral small-molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, is indicated for acute and preventive treatment of migraine in the United States and other countries. Previously, a large clinical trial assessed the efficacy and safety of rimegepant ODT 75 mg for the acute treatment of migraine in adults living in China or South Korea. A post hoc subgroup analysis of this trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rimegepant for acute treatment of migraine in adults living in China. METHODS Eligible participants were ≥ 18 years of age and had a ≥ 1-year history of migraine, with 2 to 8 attacks of moderate or severe pain intensity per month and < 15 headache days per month during the 3 months before screening. Participants self-administered rimegepant ODT 75 mg or matching placebo to treat a single migraine attack of moderate or severe pain intensity. The co-primary endpoints were pain freedom and freedom from the most bothersome symptom (MBS) at 2 h post-dose. Key secondary endpoints included pain relief at 2 h post-dose, ability to function normally at 2 h post-dose, use of rescue medication within 24 h post-dose, and sustained pain freedom from 2 to 24 h and 2 to 48 h post-dose. All p values were nominal. Safety was assessed via treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), electrocardiograms, vital signs, and routine laboratory tests. RESULTS Overall, 1075 participants (rimegepant, n = 538; placebo, n = 537) were included in the subgroup analysis. Rimegepant was more effective than placebo for the co-primary endpoints of pain freedom (18.2% vs. 10.6%, p = 0.0004) and freedom from the MBS (48.0% vs. 31.8%, p < 0.0001), as well as all key secondary endpoints. The incidence of TEAEs was comparable between the rimegepant (15.2%) and placebo (16.4%) groups. No signal of drug-induced liver injury was observed, and no study drug-related serious TEAEs were reported in the rimegepant group. CONCLUSIONS A single dose of rimegepant 75 mg rimegepant was effective for the acute treatment of migraine in adults living in China, with safety and tolerability similar to placebo. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04574362 Date registered: 2020-10-05.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Aihong Guo
- Xianyang Hospital, Yan'an University, Xianyang, China
| | - Zhen Wang
- Changsha Central Hospital, Changsha, China
| | | | - Ge Tan
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Qian Yang
- Shaanxi Provincial Hospital, Xi'an, China
| | | | - Hasiyeti Yibulaiyin
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Wulumuqi, Xinjiang Province, China
| | - Huisheng Chen
- General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, District, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Yongbo Zhang
- Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | | | - Yanhui Sun
- Pfizer (China) Research and Development Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu Liu
- Pfizer Inc, Beijing, China
| | | | - Zhihong Lu
- Pfizer (China) Research and Development Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schwedt TJ, Myers Oakes TM, Martinez JM, Vargas BB, Pandey H, Pearlman EM, Richardson DR, Varnado OJ, Cobas Meyer M, Goadsby PJ. Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Galcanezumab Versus Rimegepant for Prevention of Episodic Migraine: Results from a Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial. Neurol Ther 2024; 13:85-105. [PMID: 37948006 PMCID: PMC10787669 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-023-00562-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There have been no prior trials directly comparing the efficacy of different calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists for migraine prevention. Reported are the results from the first head-to-head study of two CGRP antagonists, galcanezumab (monoclonal antibody) versus rimegepant (gepant), for the prevention of episodic migraine. METHODS In this 3-month, double-blind, double-dummy study, participants were randomized (1:1) to subcutaneous (SC) galcanezumab 120 mg per month (after a 240 mg loading dose) and a placebo oral disintegrating tablet (ODT) every other day (q.o.d.) or to rimegepant 75 mg ODT q.o.d. and a monthly SC placebo. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with a ≥ 50% reduction in migraine headache days per month from baseline across the 3-month double-blind treatment period. Key secondary endpoints were overall mean change from baseline in: migraine headache days per month across 3 months and at month 3, 2, and 1; migraine headache days per month with acute migraine medication use; Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Role Function-Restrictive domain score at month 3; and a ≥ 75% and 100% reduction from baseline in migraine headache days per month across 3 months. RESULTS Of 580 randomized participants (galcanezumab: 287, rimegepant: 293; mean age: 42 years), 83% were female and 81% Caucasian. Galcanezumab was not superior to rimegepant in achieving a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in migraine headache days per month (62% versus 61% respectively; P = 0.70). Given the pre-specified multiple testing procedure, key secondary endpoints cannot be considered statistically significant. Overall, treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 21% of participants, with no significant differences between study intervention groups. CONCLUSIONS Galcanezumab was not superior to rimegepant for the primary endpoint; however, both interventions demonstrated efficacy as preventive treatments in participants with episodic migraine. The efficacy and safety profiles observed in galcanezumab-treated participants were consistent with previous studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinTrials.gov-NCT05127486 (I5Q-MC-CGBD).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Peter J Goadsby
- NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility and Headache Group, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, Wolfson SPRRC, London, UK
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Younis S, Latysheva NV, Danilov AB, Ashina M. CGRP receptor antagonists (gepants). Handb Clin Neurol 2024; 199:51-66. [PMID: 38307667 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-823357-3.00033-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
Small molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonists are commonly referred to as gepants. The first generation of gepants provided the first line of evidence of CGRP-mediated antimigraine medication in 2004-2011. However, further development was halted due to either lack of oral availability or concerns of hepatotoxicity. More than 15 years later, the first second generation of gepants, ubrogepant and rimegepant, are now approved for the acute treatment of migraine with or without aura. Furthermore, a novel and promising third-generation gepant, zavegepant, has recently been approved as well. In this chapter, we review the evidence supporting the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of gepants for the acute treatment of migraine. Furthermore, we discuss the potential limitations and future directions of this class of migraine-specific medication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samaira Younis
- Danish Headache Center & Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nina V Latysheva
- Department of Neurology, Institute for Professional Education, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Alexey B Danilov
- Department of Neurology, Institute for Professional Education, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Messoud Ashina
- Danish Headache Center & Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Danish Knowledge Center On Headache Disorders, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cho S, Kim BK. Update of Gepants in the Treatment of Chronic Migraine. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2023; 27:561-569. [PMID: 37656319 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-023-01167-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Despite the unmet therapeutic needs of patients with chronic migraine (CM) and/or medication overuse, available treatment options are limited. Recently, four calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists, known as gepants, have been approved for the treatment of migraine. This review focuses on the preventive treatment of CM with gepants and highlights recent findings. RECENT FINDINGS Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown promising results for rimegepant and atogepant as preventive treatments for CM. In an RCT targeting patients with CM, atogepant demonstrated a significant reduction in the mean monthly migraine days, irrespective of acute medication overuse. Moreover, the patients reported no significant safety concerns and exhibited good tolerance to treatment. These findings highlight the potential of gepants as a new and effective therapeutic option for patients with CM and/or medication overuse. Gepant use will help improve the management and quality of life of individuals with this debilitating condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soohyun Cho
- Department of Neurology, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Uijeongbu, Korea
| | - Byung-Kun Kim
- Department of Neurology, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li D, Abreu J, Tepper SJ. A Brief Review of Gepants. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2023; 27:479-488. [PMID: 37531032 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-023-01142-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Gepants are small molecules that antagonize calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptors. Due to their favorable side effect profile and versatility in treating headaches acutely and preventively, gepants are preferred over triptans. We will cover the indications for the four FDA-approved gepants in adults: rimegepant, atogepant, ubrogepant, and zavegepant. This review will illustrate how gepants will continue to revolutionize the acute and preventive treatment of headaches. RECENT FINDINGS Gepants are now available in oral tablet, dissolving tablet, and intra-nasal spray formulations. Recent studies have shown promising utility in treating the pre-headache or prodromal phase. They have favorable tolerability, no evidence for association with medication overuse, and remain a safer alternative in those who have cerebrovascular risk factors. Additional research is needed to explore occurrence of Raynaud's phenomenon in participants treated with gepants, as it has been associated with CGRP monoclonal antibodies, but are not extensively studied in gepants. Gepants are expected to play a significant role in the next generation of migraine treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Li
- Dartmouth Headache Center, Neurology Department, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
| | - Jessica Abreu
- Dartmouth Headache Center, Neurology Department, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA
| | - Stewart J Tepper
- Dartmouth Headache Center, Neurology Department, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ike E, Kawano T, Takahashi K, Miyasaka T, Takahashi T. Calcitonin Gene-Related peptide receptor antagonist suppresses allergic asthma responses via downregulation of group 2 innate lymphoid cells in mice. Int Immunopharmacol 2023; 122:110608. [PMID: 37441811 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.110608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
Allergic asthma is caused by chronic inflammation and hyper-responsiveness of the airway and is thought to be mediated by adaptive T helper type 2 (Th2)-driven immunity. However, recent studies have demonstrated that neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-mediated activation of group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) may contribute to the development of asthma pathogenesis. Here, we investigated the therapeutic effects of the systemic administration of rimegepant, a CGRP receptor antagonist, on allergic asthma. Hyperplasia of CGRP-immunoreactive pulmonary neuroendocrine cells (PNECs) was observed in ovalbumin (OVA)-induced asthmatic mice. Concomitant with this, we observed an increase in the content of total lung CGRP. Upon antigen challenge, the concentration of plasma CGRP was transiently upregulated, whereas CGRP immunoreactivity within PNECs was intensively downregulated, suggesting that PNECs were the most likely source of CGRP. When rimegepant was administered according to CGRP kinetics, it suppressed asthma phenotypes, including airway hyper-responsiveness, infiltration of inflammatory cells in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), hyperplasia of mucus-producing cells, and production of the Th2 cytokine IL-5. Moreover, we observed a decrease in the number of ILC2s and their capacity for IL-5 release in the presence of IL-33 in rimegepant-treated mice. In the allergic asthma model, rimegepant suppressed the activation of ILC2s mediated by PNEC-derived CGRP and subsequently impaired adaptive Th2-driven immunity, which ameliorated asthmatic phenotypes. Thus, an anti-CGRP signal strategy to target ILC2 will be a novel and attractive approach for treating allergic asthma that is refractory to other treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erina Ike
- Division of Pathophysiology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 4-4-1 Komatsushima, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 981-8558 Japan
| | - Tasuku Kawano
- Division of Pathophysiology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 4-4-1 Komatsushima, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 981-8558 Japan
| | - Kento Takahashi
- Division of Pathophysiology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 4-4-1 Komatsushima, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 981-8558 Japan
| | - Tomomitsu Miyasaka
- Division of Pathophysiology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 4-4-1 Komatsushima, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 981-8558 Japan
| | - Tomoko Takahashi
- Division of Pathophysiology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 4-4-1 Komatsushima, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 981-8558 Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jedlowski PM, Jedlowski MF, Fazel M. Medications affecting the IGF-1/Growth Hormone Axis, including teprotumumab, somatostatin analogues and anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies, are associated with an elevated reporting odds of alopecia in women; a pharmacovigilance study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2023:S0190-9622(23)00699-0. [PMID: 37062463 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.03.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick M Jedlowski
- University of Arizona College of Medicine - Tucson, Division of Dermatology, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| | - Mahdieh F Jedlowski
- University of Arizona College of Medicine - Tucson, Division of Dermatology, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Mohammad Fazel
- University of Arizona College of Medicine - Tucson, Division of Dermatology, Tucson, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Powell LC, L'Italien G, Popoff E, Johnston K, O'Sullivan F, Harris L, Croop R, Coric V, Lipton RB. Health State Utility Mapping of Rimegepant for the Preventive Treatment of Migraine: Double-Blind Treatment Phase and Open Label Extension (BHV3000-305). Adv Ther 2023; 40:585-600. [PMID: 36417057 PMCID: PMC9898331 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-022-02369-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The objectives of this study were to (1) report long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes among patients using rimegepant preventatively in BHV3000-305 (NCT03732638) open-label extension (OLE) and (2) map Migraine-Specific Quality of Life questionnaire version 2.1 (MSQv2) to EQ-5D-3L utility values over the double-blind treatment (DBT; 0-12 weeks) and the OLE (13-64 weeks) to assess the influence of treatment on these values. METHODS This was a post hoc analysis using data from a rimegepant study for the prevention of migraine (BHV3000-305). Adult patients with migraine took either rimegepant 75 mg or placebo every other day (EOD) during the DBT phase. All patients received rimegepant during the OLE. MSQv2 was measured at baseline, weeks 12, 24, and 64. A validated algorithm was used to map MSQv2 scores to EQ-5D utilities. RESULTS Baseline data were available for 347 patients treated with placebo and 348 treated with rimegepant in the DBT period, who continued to the OLE. Baseline EQ-5D utilities were similar between trial arms: 0.598 for placebo and 0.614 for rimegepant. EQ-5D improved from baseline to week 12 and utilities increased by + 0.09 for placebo and + 0.10 for rimegepant (p value = 0.011). By 24 weeks, at which point patients who were originally randomized to placebo had received rimegepant 75 mg EOD for 12 weeks, HRQoL measures (MSQv2 and EQ-5D) were similar across groups, demonstrating rapid onset of treatment effect. This HRQoL improvement was durable out to 64 weeks. CONCLUSION Compared to placebo, treatment with rimegepant 75 mg was associated with greater improvement in EQ-5D utilities during the 12-week DBT phase. Patients originally randomized to placebo experienced a similar improvement in EQ-5D utilities after switching to rimegepant during the OLE, demonstrating that benefits are realized within 12 weeks of active treatment. This preventive effect was durable out to 64 weeks and was associated with an additional increase in HRQoL over time. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03732638.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren C Powell
- Broadstreet Health Economics and Outcomes Research, 201-343 Railway Street, Vancouver, BC, V6A 1A4, Canada.
| | | | - Evan Popoff
- Broadstreet Health Economics and Outcomes Research, 201-343 Railway Street, Vancouver, BC, V6A 1A4, Canada
| | - Karissa Johnston
- Broadstreet Health Economics and Outcomes Research, 201-343 Railway Street, Vancouver, BC, V6A 1A4, Canada
| | - Fiona O'Sullivan
- Broadstreet Health Economics and Outcomes Research, 201-343 Railway Street, Vancouver, BC, V6A 1A4, Canada
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Polavieja P, Belger M, Venkata SK, Wilhelm S, Johansson E. Relative efficacy of lasmiditan versus rimegepant and ubrogepant as acute treatments for migraine: network meta-analysis findings. J Headache Pain 2022; 23:76. [PMID: 35790906 PMCID: PMC9258126 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-022-01440-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In the absence of head-to-head trials, comprehensive evidence comparing onset of efficacy of novel agents for acute treatment of migraine is lacking. This study aimed to explore the relative efficacy of lasmiditan (serotonin [5-hydroxytryptamine] 1F receptor agonist) versus rimegepant and ubrogepant (calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonists) for the acute oral treatment of migraine through network meta-analysis (NMA). Methods Data included in the NMA were identified through a systematic literature search (conducted April 2018, updated May/December 2020) of phase II–IV, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in adults with chronic/episodic migraine with/without aura. Treatments included: lasmiditan 50, 100, 200 mg; rimegepant 75 mg; ubrogepant 25, 50, 100 mg. Pairwise treatment comparisons from Bayesian fixed-effect/random-effects NMA, adjusted by baseline risk where appropriate, were conducted. Comparisons were reported as odds ratios with 95% credible intervals. Early-onset efficacy endpoints included: pain freedom at 2 hours and pain relief at 1 and 2 hours. Adverse drug reaction (ADR) profiles were summarised. Heterogeneity and inconsistency in the network were explored; sensitivity analyses investigated robustness of findings. Results Across 12 RCTs included in the base case, females represented >80% of included patients (mean age 37.9–45.7 years). Odds of achieving both pain freedom and pain relief at 2 hours were higher with lasmiditan 100 and 200 mg versus rimegepant 75 mg and ubrogepant 25 and 50 mg. Results for pain relief at 1 hour were consistent with those at 2 hours, but fewer comparisons were available. There were no statistically significant differences between lasmiditan 50 mg and ubrogepant or rimegepant for any outcome. Sensitivity analyses were in the same direction as base case analyses. Most commonly reported ADRs (incidence ≥2%) were: dizziness, fatigue, paraesthesia, sedation, nausea/vomiting and muscle weakness with lasmiditan; nausea with rimegepant; and nausea, somnolence and dry mouth with ubrogepant. Conclusions The efficacy findings of this indirect comparison indicate that lasmiditan 100 mg or 200 mg might be an appropriate acute treatment option for patients with migraine seeking a fast onset of action. Differently from rimegepant and ubrogepant, lasmiditan use is associated with mainly neurological events, which are mostly mild or moderate in severity and self-limiting. 350/350 words Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-022-01440-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pepa Polavieja
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. .,, Avenida de la Industria 30, 28108, Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Mark Belger
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Harris L, L'Italien G, O'Connell T, Hasan Z, Hutchinson S, Lucas S. A Framework for Estimating the Eligible Patient Population for New Migraine Acute Therapies in the United States. Adv Ther 2021; 38:5087-5097. [PMID: 34057676 PMCID: PMC8478730 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-021-01781-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Migraine is associated with considerable disability for patients not adequately managed with current standards of care. New acute therapies may offer relief for this population of patients; however, population size and associated potential costs of new therapies are unclear. In this study, a conceptual framework was developed to estimate anticipated use of new acute therapies. Methods Targeted literature review (TLR) was conducted to identify factors affecting access to migraine-specific acute therapies, and characteristics of individuals who would be eligible for new acute therapies. Findings from the TLR were combined to create a framework for estimating the size of the eligible patient population. This framework was used to calculate two estimates of the eligible patient population by applying parameters (i) identified in the TLR and (ii) from a recent budget-impact analysis (BIA). Results The primary factors affecting access to migraine-specific acute therapies identified in the TLR were consulting a healthcare professional for headache, receiving a migraine diagnosis, and receiving a prescription for migraine-specific treatment. Characteristics of individuals likely to use new acute therapies reflected in the TLR were contraindication to triptans, or failure to respond to/tolerate at least two oral triptans. Application of the framework suggested that 15–25% of individuals with migraine would be eligible for new acute therapies. Conclusion A limited number of patients currently use migraine-specific acute therapies. Among such patients, a significant proportion do not have adequate symptom control. Accordingly, a minority of individuals with migraine may be expected to use new acute therapies. The framework developed in this study is intended to facilitate estimating the eligible patient population in assessments of costs of new acute therapies. Such assessments should also consider recommendations that patients have access to multiple types of acute therapies, which may yield savings from reduced medication-overuse headache (MOH), progression to chronic migraine, and urgent-care costs. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01781-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Sylvia Lucas
- Department of Neurology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pooventhiran T, Marondedze EF, Govender PP, Bhattacharyya U, Rao DJ, Aazam ES, Kuthanapillil JM, E TJ, Thomas R. Energy and reactivity profile and proton affinity analysis of rimegepant with special reference to its potential activity against SARS-CoV-2 virus proteins using molecular dynamics. J Mol Model 2021; 27:276. [PMID: 34480634 PMCID: PMC8416574 DOI: 10.1007/s00894-021-04885-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Rimegepant is a new medicine developed for the management of chronic headache due to migraine. This manuscript is an attempt to study the various structural, physical, and chemical properties of the molecules. The molecule was optimized using B3LYP functional with 6-311G + (2d,p) basis set. Excited state properties of the compound were studied using CAM-B3LYP functional with same basis sets using IEFPCM model in methanol for the implicit solvent atmosphere. The various electronic descriptors helped to identify the reactivity behavior and stability. The compound is found to possess good nonlinear optical properties in the gas phase. The various intramolecular electronic delocalizations and non-covalent interactions were analyzed and explained. As the compound contain several heterocyclic nitrogen atoms, they have potential proton abstraction features, which was analyzed energetically. The most important result from this study is from the molecular docking analysis which indicates that rimegepant binds irreversibly with three established SARS-CoV-2 proteins with ID 6LU7, 6M03, and 6W63 with docking scores − 9.2988, − 8.3629, and − 9.5421 kcal/mol respectively. Further assessment of docked complexes with molecular dynamics simulations revealed that hydrophobic interactions, water bridges, and π–π interactions play a significant role in stabilizing the ligand within the binding region of respective proteins. MMGBSA-free energies further demonstrated that rimegepant is more stable when complexed with 6LU7 among the selected PDB models. As the pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of this molecule are already established, rimegepant can be considered as an ideal candidate with potential for use in the treatment of COVID patients after clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Pooventhiran
- Department of Chemistry, St Berchmans College (Autonomous), Mahatma Gandhi University, Changanassery, Kerala, India
| | - Ephraim Felix Marondedze
- Department of Chemical Sciences, Doornfontein Campus, University of Johannesburg, P. O. Box 17011, Johannesburg, 2028, South Africa
| | - Penny Poomani Govender
- Department of Chemical Sciences, Doornfontein Campus, University of Johannesburg, P. O. Box 17011, Johannesburg, 2028, South Africa
| | - Utsab Bhattacharyya
- Department of Chemistry, St Berchmans College (Autonomous), Mahatma Gandhi University, Changanassery, Kerala, India
| | - D Jagadeeswara Rao
- Department of Physics, Dr. Lankapalli Bullayya College, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
| | - Elham S Aazam
- Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 23622, Saudi Arabia
| | - Jinesh M Kuthanapillil
- Department of Chemistry, St Berchmans College (Autonomous), Mahatma Gandhi University, Changanassery, Kerala, India
| | - Tomlal Jose E
- Department of Chemistry, St Berchmans College (Autonomous), Mahatma Gandhi University, Changanassery, Kerala, India
| | - Renjith Thomas
- Department of Chemistry, St Berchmans College (Autonomous), Mahatma Gandhi University, Changanassery, Kerala, India.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Rimegepant is an oral calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist developed with a novel quick-dissolve oral tablet formulation for the acute treatment of migraine by Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, under license from Bristol Myers Squibb. The completed phase II and III trials showed its efficacy in terms of pain freedom, pain relief, release of migraine symptoms and lifestyle recovery, with an effect sustained up to 48 h. Significant clinical efficacy has been reported with a rimegepant single dose. Rimegepant was well tolerated and the few adverse events were mild or moderate and did not cause trial discontinuation. It received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval on February 27, 2020, for the acute treatment of migraine headache. Three clinical trials are currently ongoing to evaluate: i) the long-term safety as migraine acute treatment; ii) the efficacy and safety as a preventive treatment for migraine; and iii) the efficacy and safety for refractory trigeminal neuralgia. Future studies should be designed also to evaluate potential drug-drug interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Negro
- Regional Referral Headache Centre, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
| | - P Martelletti
- Regional Referral Headache Centre, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|