1
|
Mostefaoui N, Oturan N, Bouafia SC, Hien SA, Gibert-Vilas M, Lesage G, Pechaud Y, Tassin B, Oturan M, Trellu C. Integration of electrochemical processes in a treatment system for landfill leachates based on a membrane bioreactor. Sci Total Environ 2024; 912:168841. [PMID: 38036133 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
The use of electrocoagulation (EC) and anodic oxidation (AO) processes was studied for improving a treatment system for landfill leachates based on a membrane bioreactor (MBR) and a nanofiltration step. The main limitation of the current full-scale system is related to the partial removal of organic compounds that leads to operation of the nanofiltration unit with a highly concentrated feed solution. Application of the EC before the MBR participated in partial removal of the organic load (40 %) with limited energy consumption (2.8 kWh m-3) but with additional production of iron hydroxide sludge. Only AO allowed for non-selective removal of organic compounds. As a standalone process, AO would require a sharp increase of the energy consumption (116 kWh for 81 % removal of total organic carbon). But using lower electric charge and combining AO with EC and MBR processes would allow for achieving high overall removal yields with limited energy consumption. For example, the overall removal yield of total organic carbon was 65 % by application of AO after EC, with an energy consumption of 21 kWh m-3. Results also showed that such treatment strategy might allow for a significant increase of the biodegradability of the effluent before treatment by the MBR. The MBR might then be dedicated to the removal of the residual organic load as well as to the removal of the nitrogen load. The data obtained in this study also showed that the lower electric charge required for integrating AO in a coupled process would allow for strongly decreasing the formation of undesired by-products such as ClO3- and ClO4-.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nabil Mostefaoui
- Université Gustave Eiffel, Laboratoire Géomatériaux et Environnement EA 4508, 77454 Marne-la-Vallée, Cedex 2, France; Laboratory of Reaction Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Process Engineering USTHB, BP 32, El-Allia, Bab-Ezzouar, Algiers 16111, Algeria
| | - Nihal Oturan
- Université Gustave Eiffel, Laboratoire Géomatériaux et Environnement EA 4508, 77454 Marne-la-Vallée, Cedex 2, France
| | - Souad Chergui Bouafia
- Laboratory of Reaction Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Process Engineering USTHB, BP 32, El-Allia, Bab-Ezzouar, Algiers 16111, Algeria
| | - Sié Alain Hien
- Université Gustave Eiffel, Laboratoire Géomatériaux et Environnement EA 4508, 77454 Marne-la-Vallée, Cedex 2, France; Laboratoire des Procédés Industriels, de Synthèse de l'Environnement et des Energies Nouvelles (LAPISEN), Institut National Polytechnique Houphouët-Boigny, BP 1313, Yamoussoukro, Côte d'Ivoire
| | - Màxim Gibert-Vilas
- Université Gustave Eiffel, Laboratoire Géomatériaux et Environnement EA 4508, 77454 Marne-la-Vallée, Cedex 2, France
| | - Geoffroy Lesage
- Institut Européen des Membranes, IEM, UMR 5635, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), University Montpellier, ENSCM, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier, France
| | - Yoan Pechaud
- Université Gustave Eiffel, Laboratoire Géomatériaux et Environnement EA 4508, 77454 Marne-la-Vallée, Cedex 2, France
| | - Bruno Tassin
- Laboratoire Eau Environnement et Systèmes Urbains, LEESU, Ecole des Ponts, Université Paris-Est Créteil, 61 avenue du Général de Gaulle, 94010 Créteil Cedex, France
| | - Mehmet Oturan
- Université Gustave Eiffel, Laboratoire Géomatériaux et Environnement EA 4508, 77454 Marne-la-Vallée, Cedex 2, France
| | - Clément Trellu
- Université Gustave Eiffel, Laboratoire Géomatériaux et Environnement EA 4508, 77454 Marne-la-Vallée, Cedex 2, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hien SA, Trellu C, Oturan N, Assémian AS, Briton BGH, Drogui P, Adouby K, Oturan MA. Comparison of homogeneous and heterogeneous electrochemical advanced oxidation processes for treatment of textile industry wastewater. J Hazard Mater 2022; 437:129326. [PMID: 35714542 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 06/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed at understanding the influence of the generation of oxidants in a heterogeneous way at boron-doped diamond (BDD) anode (anodic oxidation (AO)) or homogeneously in the bulk (electro-Fenton (EF)) during treatment of a textile industry wastewater. Both processes achieved high TOC removal. A yield of 95 % was obtained by combining EF with BDD anode during 6 h of treatment. The EF process was found to be faster and more efficient for discoloration of the effluent, whereas AO was more effective to limit the formation of degradation by-products in the bulk. An advantage of AO was to treat this alkaline effluent without any pH adjustment. Operating these processes under current limitation allowed optimizing energy consumption in both cases. However, using BDD anode led to the formation of very high concentration of ClO3-/ClO4- from Cl- oxidation (even at low current density), which appears as a key challenge for treatment of such effluent by AO. By comparison, EF with Pt anode strongly reduced the formation of ClO3-/ClO4-. Operating EF at low current density even maintained these concentrations below 0.5 % of the initial Cl- concentration. A trade-off should be considered between TOC removal and formation of toxic chlorinated by-products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sié Alain Hien
- Université Gustave Eiffel, Laboratoire Géomatériaux et Environnement EA 4508, 77454 Marne-la-Vallée, Cedex 2, France; Laboratoire des Procédés Industriels, de Synthèse de l'Environnement et des Energies Nouvelles (LAPISEN), Institut National Polytechnique Houphouët-Boigny, BP 1313 Yamoussoukro, Côte d'Ivoire
| | - Clément Trellu
- Université Gustave Eiffel, Laboratoire Géomatériaux et Environnement EA 4508, 77454 Marne-la-Vallée, Cedex 2, France.
| | - Nihal Oturan
- Université Gustave Eiffel, Laboratoire Géomatériaux et Environnement EA 4508, 77454 Marne-la-Vallée, Cedex 2, France
| | - Alain Stéphane Assémian
- Laboratoire de Thermodynamique et Chimie Physique de l'Environnement, Université de Nangui-Abrogoua, 02 BP 801, Abidjan 01, Côte d'Ivoire
| | - Bi Gouessé Henri Briton
- Laboratoire des Procédés Industriels, de Synthèse de l'Environnement et des Energies Nouvelles (LAPISEN), Institut National Polytechnique Houphouët-Boigny, BP 1313 Yamoussoukro, Côte d'Ivoire
| | - Patrick Drogui
- INRS Eau, Terre et Environnement, 490, rue de la Couronne, Québec G1K9A9, Canada
| | - Kopoin Adouby
- Laboratoire des Procédés Industriels, de Synthèse de l'Environnement et des Energies Nouvelles (LAPISEN), Institut National Polytechnique Houphouët-Boigny, BP 1313 Yamoussoukro, Côte d'Ivoire
| | - Mehmet A Oturan
- Université Gustave Eiffel, Laboratoire Géomatériaux et Environnement EA 4508, 77454 Marne-la-Vallée, Cedex 2, France.
| |
Collapse
|