Older age should not be a barrier to testing for somatic variants in homologous recombination DNA repair-related genes in patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Somatic pathogenic variants (PVs) in homologous recombination DNA repair (HR)-related genes found in high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSC) are not well-characterised in older patients (≥70 years). This may reflect low testing rates in older patients.

METHODS

Data from 1210 HGSC patients in AACR Project GENIE and 324 patients in an independent dataset INOVATe were analysed. Cases where somatic variants could be distinguished from germline variants were included, and analysis was restricted to those with a somatic TP53 variant, to ensure cases were HGSC.

RESULTS

Of 1210 patients in GENIE, 27% (n = 325) were aged ≥70 years at testing. Patients with somatic-only PVs in BRCA2 were older compared with BRCA1 (median 71 vs 60 years, p = 0.002). Median age for 21 patients with somatic-only PVs in 11 other HR-related genes ranged from 40 to 67 years. In older patients, 7% (n = 22) had somatic BRCA1/2 PVs, and 1% (n = 2) had PVs other HR-related genes; this rate was not significantly different to younger patients (<70 years), 7% (n = 62) BRCA1/2 and 2% (n = 19) other HR-related genes (p = 0.36). The overall frequency of somatic BRCA1/2 PVs was similar in INOVATe (n = 25; 7.7%) and somatic-only BRCA2 PVs were again found in older patients compared with BRCA1 (median age: at testing, 70 vs 63 years; at diagnosis, 68 vs 60 years).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall frequency of somatic-only PVs in HR-related genes was similar in older and younger patients with HGSC, highlighting the importance of somatic testing irrespective of age. Limiting somatic testing by age may exclude patients who could benefit from maintenance poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors.

AB1513 SIROLIMUS INDUCED INFLAMMATORY ARTHROPATHY

Background

Sirolimus is a non-calcineurin immunosuppressant commonly used in patients with organ transplantation to prevent rejection. While various inflammatory syndromes have been described post-sirolimus use, it is uncommon to have inflammatory arthritis to sirolimus1. We present a patient who developed significant joint inflammation following sirolimus use.

Results

Our patient is a 39 year old gentleman who had a heart transplant in 1992 following dilated cardiomyopathy. He was switched to sirolimus after concerns about chronic kidney disease and graft vascular disease. Six weeks later, he developed bilateral foot pain and swelling which prevented him from weight bearing. He had an MRI which showed significant bone marrow oedema in the midfoot tarsal bone and basal metatarsals. He then had a nuclear scan which showed highly increased and symmetrical uptake in both mid feet affecting the cuneiform and second, third and fourth bases of the metatarsals. The appearances showed increased osteoblastic activity with increased vascularity which was more in keeping with bone inflammation/infection and no osteonecrosis. His C-reactive protein was elevated at 148. This improved to 30 after cessation of the sirolimus. Blood cultures were negative.

Of significance in his history, he also suffers from gout and has had previous monoarthritic flares involving his wrist, elbow and index finger. However, he was placed on febuxostat 80 mg in 2018 with excellent response. His serology was negative for anti-CCP and Rheumatoid factor. His urate levels were controlled at 374. He was also found to be HLA-B27 positive, but there was no evidence of inflammatory back pain.

He was placed on a tapering course of prednisolone and coupled with the cessation of the Sirolimus, his pain and swelling resolved. In follow-up clinic appointments, he remained in remission from his inflammatory arthritis and did not require any additional treatment but continued on Mycophenolate Mofetil and Ciclosporin for his cardiac transplant.

Conclusion

There are many studies investigating the use of sirolimus as an anti-inflammatory agent in autoimmune conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis2 and inflammatory bowel disease3. The mechanisms include down regulation of IL-17 and IL-63.

However, the induction of an inflammatory arthritis by sirolimus can paradoxically occur as sirolimus causes a reduction in the STAT 3 and the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-103. There has been raised levels of IL-6 and TNFα in serum of patients with inflammatory sequelae post sirolimus therapy1. This disequilibrium of inflammatory cascade is related to the ability of Sirolimus to inhibit mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) which then subsequently modulates these effects4. In general, these pro-inflammatory sequelae are mild and tend to resolve after cessation of the drug1. Although our patient had severe arthritic manifestations which required steroid therapy, his symptoms were transient after removal of Sirolimus.

References

[1]Buron F, Malvezzi P, Villar E, Chauvet C, Janbon B, et al. (2013) Profiling Sirolimus-Induced Inflammatory Syndrome: A Prospective Tricentric Observational Study. PLOS ONE 8(1): e53078

[2]Wang J, Zhang SX, Hu FY, Zheng XJ, Cheng T, Yu NN, Yang WX, Gao C, Wen HY, Li XF. Sirolimus Treatment in Patients with Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Double-Arm, Open-Label, phase 1/2 Trial. Arthritis Rheumatol, 2018:70 (suppl 10).

[3]Yin H, Li X, Zhang B, et al. Sirolimus ameliorates inflammatory responses by switching the regulatory T/T helper type 17 profile in murine colitis. Immunology. 2013;139(4):494-502.

[4]T Weichhart, G. Costantino, M. Poglitsch, M. Rosner, M. Zeyda, KM. Stuhlmeier, T Kolbe, TM. Stulnig, WH. Horl, M Hengstschlager, M. Muller, and MD. Saemann. The TSC-mTOR Signaling Pathway Regulates the Innate Inflammatory Response. Immunity Volume 29, Issue 4, 17 October 2008, Pages 565-577

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

Cell-free DNA is abundant in ascites and represents a liquid biopsy of ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

Malignant ascites is a common clinical feature of ovarian cancer and represents a readily accessible sample of tumour cells and tumour DNA. This study aimed to characterise the cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in ascites in terms of its size profile, stability and cell-free tumour DNA (cftDNA) content.

METHODS

Cell spheroids, loose cells and cell-free fluid was collected from ascites from 18 patients with ovarian cancer. cfDNA was isolated and assessed for size by electrophoresis, concentration by fluorometry,cftDNA content by methylation specific qPCR of HOXA9 and IFFO1 promoter regions and by targeted sequencing. Stability was assessed after ascites fluid was stored at 4 °C for 24 and 72 h before fractionating.

RESULTS

The concentration of cfDNA in ascites ranged from 6.6 to 300 ng/mL. cfDNA size distribution resembled blood plasma-derived cfDNA, with major peaks corresponding to mono- and di-nucleosome DNA fragments. High molecular weight cfDNA was observed in 7 of 18 patients and appeared to be associated with extracellular vesicles. IFFO1 and HOXA9 methylation was proportionately higher in cfDNA than spheroid- and loose-cell fractions and was not observed in healthy primary cells. Variant allele frequency was highest in cfDNA compared to single cells and spheroids from ascites. Though cancer cell numbers in ascites declined to near zero in recurrent ascites from one patient undertaking chemotherapy, cftDNA could still be sampled. cfDNA size, concentration and tumour content was stable over 72 h.

CONCLUSION

cfDNA in ovarian cancer ascites demonstrates inter-patient variability, yet is consistently a rich source of cftDNA, which is a stable substrate. This supports the wider clinical use of ascites in the molecular analysis of ovarian cancer.

Abstract A48: Antiapoptotic gene expression and sensitivity to BH3-mimetics in chemoresistant, high-grade serous ovarian cancer cell lines

Introduction: The development of chemotherapy resistance is common in relapsed high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). An understanding of mechanisms that are associated with the development of chemotherapy resistance in the clinical setting is needed to improve treatment outcomes. In this study, cell lines newly derived from patients with relapsed HGSOC were characterized at a molecular level to determine associations with response to commonly used chemotherapy drugs. RNA sequencing combined with high-throughput drug library screening was used to determine potential resistance mechanisms and identify drugs and combinations that may be effective in chemoresistant HGSOC.

Methods: Six ovarian cancer cell lines derived from ascites of relapsed HGSOC patients who had developed chemoresistant disease were characterized using multigene panel mutation testing, whole-genome DNA copy number analysis, and RNA sequencing. Drug responses to carboplatin and paclitaxel were determined using the CellTitre 96® AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay (Promega). For two of the resistant cell lines, high-throughput drug screens using three drug libraries—NCI-Approved Oncology Drug set (101 compounds), Kinase Inhibitor Library (210 compounds), and Targeted Agent Library (73 compounds)—were carried out to identify agents with activity in these resistant models. Apoptosis activation was measured using CellPlayer Caspase 3/7 assay (Essen Bioscience). Sensitivity to BH3-mimetics, ABT-737 and navitoclax (ABT-263), was tested in three of the cell lines and in one line, the effects of combining these agents with paclitaxel were assessed using CompuSyn.

Results: TP53 mutations were identified in all cell lines, consistent with high-grade serous histology, and all lines were relatively resistant to carboplatin. AOCS5 and AOCS15 were the most resistant to carboplatin and AOCS5 was also highly resistant to paclitaxel. Drug library screens carried out on both AOCS5 and AOCS15 showed differential sensitivity to a number of drug classes. While AOCS5 was found to be generally resistant to most drugs, it was sensitive to ABT-737. RNA-seq identified relative overexpression of antiapoptotic genes in AOCS5, in particular BCL2L1, BCL2, and BCL2L2, in comparison to the other five cell lines. AOCS5 was more sensitive to navitoclax and ABT-737 compared with cell lines that did not overexpress antiapoptotic genes. Combining BH3-mimetics and paclitaxel showed synergism in the highly paclitaxel-resistant cell line AOCS5.

Conclusion: Inhibition of apoptosis was identified as a potential mechanism of paclitaxel resistance, and overexpression of antiapoptotic genes may constitute a biomarker profile to predict sensitivity to BH3-mimetics in relapsed HGSOC.

Citation Format: Cristina Mapagu, Sivatharsny Srirangan, George Au-Yeung, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Paul R. Harnett, David D. Bowtell, Anna deFazio. Antiapoptotic gene expression and sensitivity to BH3-mimetics in chemoresistant, high-grade serous ovarian cancer cell lines [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research; 2019 Sep 13-16, 2019; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(13_Suppl):Abstract nr A48.

BRAF Mutations in Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer and Response to BRAF Inhibition

Purpose

Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSC) responds poorly to chemotherapy and is characterized by activating mutations in the Ras sarcoma–mitogen-activated protein kinase (RAS-MAPK) pathway, including oncogenic BRAF. However, response to BRAF inhibitors is tumor-type specific. Significant improvement in survival is seen in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma, but other cancer types, such as colorectal cancers, are generally less sensitive. We examined the frequency and characteristics of BRAF-mutated LGSC and described the response to treatment with BRAF inhibitors.

Patients and Methods

Mutations were assessed in LGSC (N = 65) by using targeted, exome, and whole-genome sequencing. Patient characteristics, treatment, and clinical outcome were assessed, and the median follow-up time was more than 5 years. BRAF inhibitors were trialed in two patients with a somatic BRAF V600E mutation: one patient received dabrafenib monotherapy and was monitored clinically, biochemically (cancer antigen [CA]-125 levels), and with positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Expression of the BRAF V600E protein in this patient was assessed by immunohistochemistry.

Results

Among patients with LGSC, nine (13.8%) of 65 had a somatic BRAF mutation. Of the nine patients with BRAF mutation–positive LGSC, four experienced progressive disease that did not respond to conventional chemotherapy. Two of the patients experienced progression quickly and died as a result of disease progression, and two received targeted treatment. Two patients with BRAF V600E mutation received BRAF inhibitors at relapse and both achieved durable responses.

Conclusion

BRAF mutations are not uncommon in patients with LGSC and should be routinely tested, because BRAF inhibitors can be an effective treatment for these patients. The results highlight the need for targeted treatment in this rare tumor type, and a prospective study is needed to formally assess the response rate and clinical benefit.

Abstract 2584: Mutations in low-grade serous ovarian cancer and response to BRAF and MEK inhibitors

Low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSC) responds poorly to platinum based chemotherapy and is characterized by activating RAS-MAPK pathway mutations, including oncogenic BRAF. Drugs that target this pathway are effective in BRAF-mutant melanoma but other cancer types, such as colorectal cancers, are less sensitive. Early phase trials report a 15% response rate to MEK inhibitors in LGSC patients, however it is not known which features may predict response.

We aimed to determine clinical characteristics and treatment response in women with LGSC and to determine whether response to targeted pathway inhibition is associated with specific mutation profiles in LGSC cell lines.

Tumor samples from a cohort of grade 1 and 2 serous ovarian cancer patients were analyzed using targeted, exome or whole genome sequencing. Patient characteristics, treatment and clinical outcome were assessed. Cell lines derived from patients with LGSC with known mutation profiles, AOCS2 (KRAS/BRAF/NRAS wild-type), MPSC1 (BRAFV600L, NRASQ16R), VOA1056 (NRASQ16R) and HCC5075 (KRASG12V), were treated with BRAF (dabrafenib) or MEK inhibitors (trametinib, pimasertib and binimetinib) and response was compared to cell lines derived from high-grade serous cancer (HGSC) and BRAF-mutant melanoma.

Women diagnosed with grade 1 or 2 serous carcinoma between 1994-2015 were identified from 1654 invasive ovarian serous cancer cases in the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study and the GynBiobank. HGSC cases were excluded following histopathology review and TP53 mutation screening. Amongst 65 confirmed LGSC patients, 18 (27.7%) had a KRAS mutation, 9 (13.8%) had a BRAF mutation and 7 (10.8%) had a NRAS mutation. Women with advanced stage LGSC and residual disease following debulking surgery had a similarly poor progression-free and overall-survival compared with HGSC patients. We saw a dramatic response to BRAF inhibition in a patient with BRAFV600E-positive LGSC, however, the LGSC cell lines did not respond to dabrafenib. This is not surprising as the cell lines did not harbour the hot-spot BRAFV600E mutation. MPSC1 has a BRAFV600L and a NRASQ16R mutation, but dabrafenib did not inhibit growth. HCC5075 (KRASG12V) was sensitive to all three MEK inhibitors, but response to MEK inhibition in the other LGSC cell lines was modest. In conclusion, LGSC are generally chemotherapy resistant and molecular analyses can identify targetable mutations. However, LGSC are heterogenous with respect to underlying mutations and response to pathway inhibitors is likely to depend on which mutations and pathways are activated. BRAF mutations are not uncommon in patients with LGSC and should be routinely tested as BRAF inhibitors can be an effective treatment for these patients. MEK inhibitors may also be effective in a subset of cases. The results highlight the need for novel clinical trial design, as traditional clinical trials are unlikely to be effective in rare ovarian cancer sub-types.

Citation Format: Tania Moujaber, Dariush Etemadmoghadam, Cristina Mapagu, Catherine Kennedy, Yoke-Eng Chiew, Casina Kan, Nikilyn Nevins, Sivatharsny Srirangan, Sian Fereday, Nadia Traficante, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study group, David Bowtell, Rosemary Balleine, Paul Harnett, Anna deFazio. Mutations in low-grade serous ovarian cancer and response to BRAF and MEK inhibitors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2584.