Wearable Devices Beyond Activity Trackers in Youth With Obesity: Summary of Options

Background: Current treatment protocols to prevent and treat pediatric obesity focus on prescriptive lifestyle interventions. However, treatment outcomes are modest due to poor adherence and heterogeneity in responses. Wearable technologies offer a unique solution as they provide real-time biofeedback that could improve adherence to and sustainability of lifestyle interventions. To date, all reviews on wearable devices in pediatric obesity cohorts have only explored biofeedback from physical activity trackers. Hence, we conducted a scoping review to (1) catalog other biofeedback wearable devices available in this cohort, (2) document various metrics collected from these devices, and (3) assess safety and adherence to these devices. Methods: This scoping review was conducted adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. Fifteen eligible studies examined the use of biofeedback wearable devices beyond activity trackers in pediatric cohorts, with an emphasis on feasibility of these devices. Results: Included studies varied in sample sizes (15-203) and in ages 6-21 years. Wearable devices are being used to capture various metrics of multicomponent weight loss interventions to provide more insights about glycemic variability, cardiometabolic function, sleep, nutrition, and body fat percentage. High safety and adherence rates were reported among these devices. Conclusions: Available evidence suggests that wearable devices have several applications aside from activity tracking, which could modify health behaviors through real-time biofeedback. Overall, these devices appear to be safe and feasible so as to be employed in various settings in the pediatric age group to prevent and treat obesity.

Late-Onset Isolated Growth Hormone Deficiency

Two male patients, who presented at 13.5 and 13.9 years of age with growth failure and short stature, were ultimately diagnosed with isolated growth hormone deficiency (GHD). Patient 1 was first evaluated when his height declined from -0.67 SD to -1.3 SD. He had a peak growth hormone (GH) concentration to GH stimulation test (GHST) of 16.9 ng/mL (16.9 μg/L) and remained untreated. As puberty advanced, his height decreased further to -1.65 SD. A second GHST while his serum testosterone was 79 ng/dL (2.74 nmol/L) had a peak GH of 5.4 ng/mL (5.4 μg/L), consistent with GHD. He was treated with GH for 4.8 years and reached adult height of 180.5 cm (0.57 SD), gaining 2.22 SDS. Patient 2, height -2.63 SD, had an unstimulated peak GH concentration of 19 ng/mL (19 μg/L). As puberty advanced, his height decreased further to -2.96 SD. Repeat peak GH concentration was 9.2 ng/mL (9.2 μg/L) when serum testosterone was 83.9 ng/dL (2.91 nmol/L). GH treatment resulted in rapid increase of height velocity from 1.8 cm/year to 11.3 cm/year in 6 months, consistent with GHD. Both patients demonstrate that GHD may develop over time and cannot be excluded by a single GHST. Longitudinal monitoring of children with poor growth as puberty progresses is essential to uncover GHD.

Two Cases of Thyroiditis in Adolescents Following COVID-19 Vaccinations

With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and the development of widespread vaccination strategies, there have been case reports in the adult literature suggesting an increase in thyroiditis after COVID-19 vaccination. We herein describe 2 children who presented with thyroiditis after COVID-19 vaccination. Two children who received Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 messenger RNA vaccines later developed symptoms of thyroid hyperactivity, had positive thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin (TSI) levels and received treatment directed toward Graves disease. Our case series is the first to demonstrate Graves disease after COVID-19 vaccination in the pediatric population. Given this possibility, it is important for pediatricians to be watchful for symptoms of thyroiditis post vaccination to prevent treatment delays.