Obesity-related T cell dysfunction impairs immunosurveillance and increases cancer risk

Obesity is a well-established risk factor for human cancer, yet the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. Immune dysfunction is commonly associated with obesity but whether compromised immune surveillance contributes to cancer susceptibility in individuals with obesity is unclear. Here we use a mouse model of diet-induced obesity to investigate tumor-infiltrating CD8 + T cell responses in lean, obese, and previously obese hosts that lost weight through either dietary restriction or treatment with semaglutide. While both strategies reduce body mass, only dietary intervention restores T cell function and improves responses to immunotherapy. In mice exposed to a chemical carcinogen, obesity-related immune dysfunction leads to higher incidence of sarcoma development. However, impaired immunoediting in the obese environment enhances tumor immunogenicity, making the malignancies highly sensitive to immunotherapy. These findings offer insight into the complex interplay between obesity, immunity and cancer, and provide explanation for the obesity paradox observed in clinical immunotherapy settings.

IL-6 selectively suppresses cDC1 specification via C/EBPβ

Cytokines produced in association with tumors can impair antitumor immune responses by reducing the abundance of type 1 conventional dendritic cells (cDC1), but the mechanism remains unclear. Here, we show that tumor-derived IL-6 generally reduces cDC development but selectively impairs cDC1 development in both murine and human systems through the induction of C/EBPβ in the common dendritic cell progenitor (CDP). C/EBPβ and NFIL3 compete for binding to sites in the Zeb2 -165 kb enhancer and support or repress Zeb2 expression, respectively. At homeostasis, pre-cDC1 specification occurs upon Nfil3 induction and consequent Zeb2 suppression. However, IL-6 strongly induces C/EBPβ expression in CDPs. Importantly, the ability of IL-6 to impair cDC development is dependent on the presence of C/EBPβ binding sites in the Zeb2 -165 kb enhancer, as this effect is lost in Δ1+2+3 mutant mice in which these binding sites are mutated. These results explain how tumor-associated IL-6 suppresses cDC1 development and suggest therapeutic approaches preventing abnormal C/EBPβ induction in CDPs may help reestablish cDC1 development to enhance antitumor immunity.

Enhanced in vitro type 1 conventional dendritic cell generation via the recruitment of hematopoietic stem cells and early progenitors by Kit ligand

In vitro culture of bone marrow (BM) with Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand (Flt3L) is widely used to study development and function of type 1 conventional dendritic cells (cDC1). Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and many progenitor populations that possess cDC1 potential in vivo do not express Flt3 and thus may not contribute to Flt3L-mediated cDC1 production in vitro. Here, we present a KitL/Flt3L protocol that recruits such HSCs and progenitors into the production of cDC1. Kit ligand (KitL) is used to expand HSCs and early progenitors lacking Flt3 expression into later stage where Flt3 is expressed. Following this initial KitL phase, a second Flt3L phase is used to support the final production of DCs. With this two-stage culture, we achieved approximately tenfold increased production of both cDC1 and cDC2 compared to Flt3L culture. cDC1 derived from this culture are similar to in vivo cDC1 in their dependence on IRF8, ability to produce IL-12, and induction of tumor regression in cDC1-deficient tumor-bearing mice. This KitL/Flt3L system for cDC1 production will be useful in further analysis of cDC1 that rely on in vitro generation from BM.

WDFY4 deficiency in NOD mice ameliorates autoimmune diabetes and insulitis

The events that initiate autoimmune diabetes in nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice remain poorly understood. CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are both required to develop disease, but their relative roles in initiating disease are unclear. To test whether CD4+ T cell infiltration into islets requires damage to β cells induced by autoreactive CD8+ T cells, we inactivated Wdfy4 in nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice (NOD.Wdfy4-/--) using CRISPR/Cas9 targeting to eliminate cross-presentation by type 1 conventional dendritic cells (cDC1s). Similar to C57BL/6 Wdfy4-/- mice, cDC1 in NOD.Wdfy4-/- mice are unable to cross-present cell-associated antigens to prime CD8+ T cells, while cDC1 from heterozygous NOD.Wdfy4+/- mice cross-present normally. Further, NOD.Wdfy4-/- mice fail to develop diabetes while heterozygous NOD.Wdfy4+/- mice develop diabetes similarly to wild-type NOD mice. NOD.Wdfy4-/- mice remain capable of processing and presenting major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC-II)-restricted autoantigens and can activate β cell-specific CD4+ T cells in lymph nodes. However, disease in these mice does not progress beyond peri-islet inflammation. These results indicate that the priming of autoreactive CD8+ T cells in NOD mice requires cross-presentation by cDC1. Further, autoreactive CD8+ T cells appear to be required not only to develop diabetes, but to recruit autoreactive CD4+ T cells into islets of NOD mice, perhaps in response to progressive β cell damage.

cDC1 Vaccines Drive Tumor Rejection by Direct Presentation Independently of Host cDC1

As a cell-based cancer vaccine, dendritic cells (DC), derived from peripheral blood monocytes or bone marrow (BM) treated with GM-CSF (GMDC), were initially thought to induce antitumor immunity by presenting tumor antigens directly to host T cells. Subsequent work revealed that GMDCs do not directly prime tumor-specific T cells, but must transfer their antigens to host DCs. This reduces their advantage over strictly antigen-based strategies proposed as cancer vaccines. Type 1 conventional DCs (cDC1) have been reported to be superior to GMDCs as a cancer vaccine, but whether they act by transferring antigens to host DCs is unknown. To test this, we compared antitumor responses induced by GMDCs and cDC1 in Irf8 +32-/- mice, which lack endogenous cDC1 and cannot reject immunogenic fibrosarcomas. Both GMDCs and cDC1 could cross-present cell-associated antigens to CD8+ T cells in vitro. However, injection of GMDCs into tumors in Irf8 +32-/- mice did not induce antitumor immunity, consistent with their reported dependence on host cDC1. In contrast, injection of cDC1s into tumors in Irf8 +32-/- mice resulted in their migration to tumor-draining lymph nodes, activation of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells, and rejection of the tumors. Tumor rejection did not require the in vitro loading of cDC1 with antigens, indicating that acquisition of antigens in vivo is sufficient to induce antitumor responses. Finally, cDC1 vaccination showed abscopal effects, with rejection of untreated tumors growing concurrently on the opposite flank. These results suggest that cDC1 may be a useful future avenue to explore for antitumor therapy. See related Spotlight by Hubert et al., p. 918.

Ablation of cDC2 development by triple mutations within the Zeb2 enhancer

The divergence of the common dendritic cell progenitor1-3 (CDP) into the conventional type 1 and type 2 dendritic cell (cDC1 and cDC2, respectively) lineages4,5 is poorly understood. Some transcription factors act in the commitment of already specified progenitors-such as BATF3, which stabilizes Irf8 autoactivation at the +32 kb Irf8 enhancer4,6-but the mechanisms controlling the initial divergence of CDPs remain unknown. Here we report the transcriptional basis of CDP divergence and describe the first requirements for pre-cDC2 specification. Genetic epistasis analysis7 suggested that Nfil3 acts upstream of Id2, Batf3 and Zeb2 in cDC1 development but did not reveal its mechanism or targets. Analysis of newly generated NFIL3 reporter mice showed extremely transient NFIL3 expression during cDC1 specification. CUT&RUN and chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing identified endogenous NFIL3 binding in the -165 kb Zeb2 enhancer8 at three sites that also bind the CCAAT-enhancer-binding proteins C/EBPα and C/EBPβ. In vivo mutational analysis using CRISPR-Cas9 targeting showed that these NFIL3-C/EBP sites are functionally redundant, with C/EBPs supporting and NFIL3 repressing Zeb2 expression at these sites. A triple mutation of all three NFIL3-C/EBP sites ablated Zeb2 expression in myeloid, but not lymphoid progenitors, causing the complete loss of pre-cDC2 specification and mature cDC2 development in vivo. These mice did not generate T helper 2 (TH2) cell responses against Heligmosomoides polygyrus infection, consistent with cDC2 supporting TH2 responses to helminths9-11. Thus, CDP divergence into cDC1 or cDC2 is controlled by competition between NFIL3 and C/EBPs at the -165 kb Zeb2 enhancer.

Ablation of cDC2 lineage specification by mutations within the −165 kb Zeb2 enhancer

Efforts to determine the unique functions of the two types of classical dendritic cells, cDC1 and cDC2, are hindered by limited understanding of the divergence of the common dendritic cell progenitor (CDP). Some transcription factors act in commitment of already specified progenitors, such as Batf3 which stabilizes Irf8 autoactivation at the +32 kb Irf8 enhancer, but how other factors control CDP divergence remains unknown. Here, we report the transcriptional mechanism of CDP divergence and describe the first requirements for pre-cDC2 specification. Genetic epistasis analysis suggested that Nfil3 acts upstream of Id2, Batf3, and Zeb2 in cDC1 development but has not revealed its mechanism or targets. Analysis of newly generated NFIL3 reporter mice showed extremely transient NFIL3 expression during cDC1 specification. CUT&RUN and ChIP-seq analysis identified NFIL3 binding in the −165 kb Zeb2 enhancer at sites that also bind CCAAT-enhancer-binding proteins (C/EBPs). Mutation of these NFIL3/C/EBP sites by in vivo CRISPR/Cas9 targeting revealed functional redundancy, with C/EBPs and NFIL3 competing in binding these sites to support or repress Zeb2 expression, respectively. Mutation of these three NFIL3/C/EBP sites eliminated Zeb2 expression in myeloid, but not lymphoid progenitors, producing mice that completely lacked pre-cDC2 specification and mature cDC2 in vivo. These mice failed to make an appropriate TH2 response against H. polygyrus infection, consistent with cDC2 supporting TH2 responses to helminths. Notably, Zeb2 expression is not required to maintain cDC2 identity, but acts only to block cDC1 specification. Thus, the competition between C/EBPs and NFIL3 binding at the −165 kb Zeb2 enhancer determines CDP divergence.

Differential usage of transcriptional repressor Zeb2 enhancers distinguishes adult and embryonic hematopoiesis

The transcriptional repressor ZEB2 regulates development of many cell fates among somatic, neural, and hematopoietic lineages, but the basis for its requirement in these diverse lineages is unclear. Here, we identified a 400-basepair (bp) region located 165 kilobases (kb) upstream of the Zeb2 transcriptional start site (TSS) that binds the E proteins at several E-box motifs and was active in hematopoietic lineages. Germline deletion of this 400-bp region (Zeb2Δ-165mice) specifically prevented Zeb2 expression in hematopoietic stem cell (HSC)-derived lineages. Zeb2Δ-165 mice lacked development of plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), monocytes, and B cells. All macrophages in Zeb2Δ-165 mice were exclusively of embryonic origin. Using single-cell chromatin profiling, we identified a second Zeb2 enhancer located at +164-kb that was selectively active in embryonically derived lineages, but not HSC-derived ones. Thus, Zeb2 expression in adult, but not embryonic, hematopoiesis is selectively controlled by the -165-kb Zeb2 enhancer.

Bcl6-Independent In Vivo Development of Functional Type 1 Classical Dendritic Cells Supporting Tumor Rejection

The transcriptional repressor Bcl6 has been reported as required for development of a subset of classical dendritic cell (cDCs) called cDC1, which is responsible for cross-presentation. However, mechanisms and in vivo functional analysis have been lacking. We generated a system for conditional deletion of Bcl6 in mouse cDCs. We confirmed the reported in vitro requirement for Bcl6 in cDC1 development and the general role for Bcl6 in cDC development in competitive settings. However, deletion of Bcl6 did not abrogate the in vivo development of cDC1. Instead, Bcl6 deficiency caused only a selective reduction in CD8α expression by cDC1 without affecting XCR1 or CD24 expression. Normal cDC1 development was confirmed in Bcl6cKO mice by development of XCR1+ Zbtb46-GFP+ cDC1 by rejection of syngeneic tumors and by priming of tumor-specific CD8 T cells. In summary, Bcl6 regulates a subset of cDC1-specific markers and is required in vitro but not in vivo for cDC1 development.

cDC1 prime and are licensed by CD4+ T cells to induce anti-tumour immunity

Conventional type 1 dendritic cells (cDC1)1 are thought to perform antigen cross-presentation, which is required to prime CD8+ T cells2,3, whereas cDC2 are specialized for priming CD4+ T cells4,5. CD4+ T cells are also considered to help CD8+ T cell responses through a variety of mechanisms6-11, including a process whereby CD4+ T cells 'license' cDC1 for CD8+ T cell priming12. However, this model has not been directly tested in vivo or in the setting of help-dependent tumour rejection. Here we generated an Xcr1Cre mouse strain to evaluate the cellular interactions that mediate tumour rejection in a model requiring CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. As expected, tumour rejection required cDC1 and CD8+ T cell priming required the expression of major histocompatibility class I molecules by cDC1. Unexpectedly, early priming of CD4+ T cells against tumour-derived antigens also required cDC1, and this was not simply because they transport antigens to lymph nodes for processing by cDC2, as selective deletion of major histocompatibility class II molecules in cDC1 also prevented early CD4+ T cell priming. Furthermore, deletion of either major histocompatibility class II or CD40 in cDC1 impaired tumour rejection, consistent with a role for cognate CD4+ T cell interactions and CD40 signalling in cDC1 licensing. Finally, CD40 signalling in cDC1 was critical not only for CD8+ T cell priming, but also for initial CD4+ T cell activation. Thus, in the setting of tumour-derived antigens, cDC1 function as an autonomous platform capable of antigen processing and priming for both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and of the direct orchestration of their cross-talk that is required for optimal anti-tumour immunity.

cDC1 prime and receive help from CD4 T cells to promote anti-tumor responses

CD4 T cells are thought to help promote anti-tumour responses by ‘licensing’ antigen presenting cells (APCs) that activate CD8 T cells. Conventional type 1 dendritic cells (cDC1s) are responsible for cross-presentation of tumour-derived antigens to CD8 T cells. Prevailing models presume that the cDC1 is licensed by CD4 T cells that are themselves activated by a distinct cDC subset, the cDC2. The recent finding that neoantigens presented by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules can promote rejection of tumours that lack MHC class II (MHC-II) surface expression is consistent with an indirect action of CD4 T cells, such as cDC1 licensing. However, no study has directly identified the APC that primes the CD4 T cells responsible for licensing or clearly identified the target of CD4 licensing in vivo. Here, we generated cDC1-specific Cre expressing mouse strain to inactivate or induce expression of MHC-I, MHC-II, or CD40 specifically within the cDC1 lineage. Using a tumour model that relies on CD8 T cells and CD4 T cells for rejection, we discovered that priming of CD4 T cells against tumour-derived antigens, in contrast to soluble antigens, relied overwhelmingly on the cDC1 and not the cDC2. cDC1 do not simply transport antigen to lymph nodes for processing by cDC2, since lack of MHC-II expression on cDC1 prevented CD4 T cell priming. We also found that CD40 signaling not only affects licensing of cDC1 for CD8 T cell priming, but is also critical for the activation of CD4 T cells. Thus, in the setting of tumour-derived antigens, cDC1 function as an autonomous platform capable of priming both CD4 and CD8 T cells and orchestrating their cross-talk required for optimal anti-tumour immunity.

Batf3-dependent Dendritic Cells are Required to Present Cell-associated Antigen to CD4 T Cells

Dendritic cells (DCs) are required to prime T cells during an immune response. The dogma in the field is that Batf3-dependent DCs (DC1s) prime CD8 T cells and IRF4-dependent DCs (DC2s) prime CD4 T cells. However, recent studies have shown that DC1s are required for induction of Th1 immune responses and to prime autroreactive CD4 T cells in the NOD mouse model of diabetes. Therefore, this segregation of priming theory is flawed. To further study the contribution of DC1s to CD4 T cell priming, we generated an XCR1-cre mouse and crossed it to the MHC class II floxed mouse to generate MHC class II deficient DC1s. We found that the form of antigen directs the priming of T cells. DC2s are superior at presenting soluble antigen as evidenced by normal CD4 and CD8 OVA specific T cell responses in mice lacking DC1s. However, DC1s are superior at presenting cell-associated antigen as evidenced by a lack of OVA specific CD4 and CD8 T cell priming in mice lacking DC1s. Furthermore, CD4 priming during tumor immune responses is absent when DC1s lack MHC class II. Our findings show that the DC subsets differ in the form of antigen that they present. DC1s present cell-associated material; whereas DC2s present soluble antigen.

Batf3-Dependent Genes Control Tumor Rejection Induced by Dendritic Cells Independently of Cross-Presentation

The BATF3-dependent cDC1 lineage of conventional dendritic cells (cDC) is required for rejection of immunogenic sarcomas and for rejection of progressive sarcomas during checkpoint blockade therapy. One unique function of the cDC1 lineage is the efficient cross-presentation of tumor-derived neoantigens to CD8+ T cells, but it is not clear that this is the only unique function of cDC1 required for tumor rejection. We previously showed that BATF3 functions during cDC1 lineage commitment to maintain IRF8 expression in the specified cDC1 progenitor. However, since cDC1 progenitors do not develop into mature cDC1s in Batf3 -/- mice, it is still unclear whether BATF3 has additional functions in mature cDC1 cells. A transgenic Irf8-Venus reporter allele increases IRF8 protein concentration sufficiently to allow autonomous cDC1 development in spleens of Batf3 -/- mice. These restored Batf3 -/- cDC1s are transcriptionally similar to control wild-type cDC1s but have reduced expression of a restricted set of cDC1-specific genes. Restored Batf3 -/- cDC1s are able to cross-present cell-associated antigens both in vitro and in vivo However, Batf3 -/- cDC1 exhibit altered characteristics in vivo and are unable to mediate tumor rejection. These results show that BATF3, in addition to regulating Irf8 expression to stabilize cDC1 lineage commitment, also controls expression of a small set of genes required for cDC1-mediated tumor rejection. These BATF3-regulated genes may be useful targets in immunotherapies aimed at promoting tumor rejection.

The macrophages in the pancreatic islets are activated and sense pathogen associated products in blood

Using RNAseq, we examined the transcriptome of endocrine macrophage in the islets of Langerhans in NOD (non-obese diabetic) and in two non-diabetic controls: NOD.Rag1−/− and B6.g7. The NOD mice spontaneously develop diabetes at 20–24 weeks of age. By gene expression analysis we found that at 3 weeks of age the macrophages from all 3 strains of mice were already activated. They expressed high levels of MHC-II, costimulatory molecules, and the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1b, TNF, both at protein and transcript levels. Leveraging the ImmGen database, we found that this activation signature is common for resident macrophages from barrier surfaces of the body, in particular lung and gastrointestinal tract. In addition to the basal level activation found in all islet macrophages at 3 weeks of age, we found an elevated activation signature in NOD when comparing to non-diabetic control. This finding indicates that the diabetic inflammatory process was already underway at as early as 3 weeks of age. These results were confirmed by single cell qRT-PCR that showed a distinct activated population of Cxcl9, Ccl5, Ly6a high (~28%) macrophages in NOD, but not in NOD.Rag1−/−. Additionally, supporting the idea of a barrier phenotype in islet macrophages, we found that they responded to intravenous injection of lipopolysaccharide by rapid upregulation of inflammatory gene expression. In imaging experiments we showed that macrophages were constantly extending filopodias into the blood lumen and capturing microparticles. In conclusion, the islet macrophages are in a highly activated steady state, sense pathogen associated products in blood, and may have a protective barrier function in the endocrine pancreas.

The role of islet antigen presenting cells and the presentation of insulin in the initiation of autoimmune diabetes in the NOD mouse

We have been examining antigen presentation and the antigen presenting cells (APCs) in the islets of Langerhans of the non-obese diabetic (NOD) mouse. The purpose is to identify the earliest events that initiate autoimmunity in this confined tissue. Islets normally have a population of macrophages that is distinct from those that inhabit the exocrine pancreas. Also found in NOD islets is a minor population of dendritic cells (DCs) that bear the CD103 integrin. We find close interactions between beta cells and the two APCs that result in the initiation of the autoimmunity. Even under non-inflammatory conditions, beta cells transfer insulin-containing vesicles to the APCs of the islet. This reaction requires live cells and intimate contact. The autoimmune process starts in islets with the entrance of CD4(+) T cells and an increase in the CD103(+) DCs. Mice deficient in the Batf3 transcription factor never develop diabetes due to the absence of the CD103/CD8α lineage of DCs. We hypothesize that the 12-20 peptide of the beta chain of insulin is responsible for activation of the initial CD4(+) T-cell response during diabetogenesis.

The islet-resident macrophage is in an inflammatory state and senses microbial products in blood

Ferris et al. show that macrophages in pancreatic islets express a gene signature of activation consistent with barrier macrophages. Macrophages are poised to react to blood inflammatory stimuli. In NOD mice, an additional immune activation signature is observed as early as 3 wk of age.

We examined the transcriptional profiles of macrophages that reside in the islets of Langerhans of 3-wk-old non-obese diabetic (NOD), NOD.Rag1^−/−, and B6.g7 mice. Islet macrophages expressed an activation signature with high expression of Tnf, Il1b, and MHC-II at both the transcript and protein levels. These features are common with barrier macrophages of the lung and gastrointestinal tract. Moreover, injection of lipopolysaccharide induced rapid inflammatory gene expression, indicating that blood stimulants are accessible to the macrophages and that these macrophages can sense them. In NOD mice, the autoimmune process imparted an increased inflammatory signature, including elevated expression of chemokines and chemokine receptors and an oxidative response. The elevated inflammatory signature indicates that the autoimmune program was active at the time of weaning. Thus, the macrophages of the islets of Langerhans are poised to mount an immune response even at steady state, while the presence of the adaptive immune system elevates their activation state.

Macrophages and dendritic cells in islets of Langerhans in diabetic autoimmunity: a lesson on cell interactions in a mini-organ

Islets of Langerhans of all species harbor a small number of resident macrophages. These macrophages are found since birth, do not exchange with blood monocytes, and are maintained by a low level of replication. Under steady state conditions, the islet macrophages are in an activated state. Islet macrophages have an important homeostatic role in islet physiology. At the start of the autoimmune process in the NOD mouse, a small number of CD103+ dendritic cells (DC) are found at about the same time that CD4+ T cells also appear in islets. In the absence of the CD103+ DC in the Batf3 deficient mice, autoimmunity never develops. We discuss the interactions among the two phagocytes and beta cells that result in autoimmune diabetes in NOD mice.

Antigen presentation events during the initiation of autoimmune diabetes in the NOD mouse

This is a brief summary of our studies of NOD autoimmune diabetes examining the events during the initial stage of the process. Our focus has been on antigen presentation events and the antigen presenting cells (APC) inside islets. Islets of non-diabetic mice contain resident macrophages that are developmentally distinct from those in the inter-acinar stroma. The autoimmune process starts with the entrance of CD4+ T cells together with a burst of a subset of dendritic cells (DC) bearing CD103. The CD103+ DC develop under the influence of the Batf3 transcription factor. Batf3 deficient mice do not develop diabetes and their islets are uninfiltrated throughout life. Thus, the CD103+ DC are necessary for the progression of autoimmune diabetes. The major CD4+ T cell response in NOD are the T cells directed to insulin. In particular, the non-conventional 12-20 segment of the insulin B chain is presented by the class II MHC molecule I-A(g7) and elicits pathogenic CD4+ T cells. We discuss that the diabetic process requires the CD103+ DC, the CD4+ T cells to insulin peptides, and NOD specific I-Ag(7) MHC-II allele. Finally, our initial studies indicate that beta cells transfer insulin containing vesicles to the local APC in a contact-dependent reaction. Live images of beta cells interactions with the APC and electron micrographs of islet APCs also show the transfer of granules.

The pancreas anatomy conditions the origin and properties of resident macrophages

Calderon et al. define the origin, turnover, and functional characteristics of pancreatic macrophages at both the exocrine and endocrine sites under noninflammatory conditions.

We examine the features, origin, turnover, and gene expression of pancreatic macrophages under steady state. The data distinguish macrophages within distinct intrapancreatic microenvironments and suggest how macrophage phenotype is imprinted by the local milieu. Macrophages in islets of Langerhans and in the interacinar stroma are distinct in origin and phenotypic properties. In islets, macrophages are the only myeloid cells: they derive from definitive hematopoiesis, exchange to a minimum with blood cells, have a low level of self-replication, and depend on CSF-1. They express Il1b and Tnfa transcripts, indicating classical activation, M1, under steady state. The interacinar stroma contains two macrophage subsets. One is derived from primitive hematopoiesis, with no interchange by blood cells and alternative, M2, activation profile, whereas the second is derived from definitive hematopoiesis and exchanges with circulating myeloid cells but also shows an alternative activation profile. Complete replacement of islet and stromal macrophages by donor stem cells occurred after lethal irradiation with identical profiles as observed under steady state. The extraordinary plasticity of macrophages within the pancreatic organ and the distinct features imprinted by their anatomical localization sets the base for examining these cells in pathological conditions.

B cell antigen presentation is sufficient to drive neuroinflammation in an animal model of multiple sclerosis

B cells are increasingly regarded as integral to the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis, in part as a result of the success of B cell-depletion therapy. Multiple B cell-dependent mechanisms contributing to inflammatory demyelination of the CNS have been explored using experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a CD4 T cell-dependent animal model for multiple sclerosis. Although B cell Ag presentation was suggested to regulate CNS inflammation during EAE, direct evidence that B cells can independently support Ag-specific autoimmune responses by CD4 T cells in EAE is lacking. Using a newly developed murine model of in vivo conditional expression of MHC class II, we reported previously that encephalitogenic CD4 T cells are incapable of inducing EAE when B cells are the sole APC. In this study, we find that B cells cooperate with dendritic cells to enhance EAE severity resulting from myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) immunization. Further, increasing the precursor frequency of MOG-specific B cells, but not the addition of soluble MOG-specific Ab, is sufficient to drive EAE in mice expressing MHCII by B cells alone. These data support a model in which expansion of Ag-specific B cells during CNS autoimmunity amplifies cognate interactions between B and CD4 T cells and have the capacity to independently drive neuroinflammation at later stages of disease.

A minor subset of Batf3-dependent antigen-presenting cells in islets of Langerhans is essential for the development of autoimmune diabetes

Autoimmune diabetes is characterized by inflammatory infiltration; however, the initiating events are poorly understood. We found that the islets of Langerhans in young nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice contained two antigen-presenting cell (APC) populations: a major macrophage and a minor CD103(+) dendritic cell (DC) population. By 4 weeks of age, CD4(+) T cells entered islets coincident with an increase in CD103(+) DCs. In order to examine the role of the CD103(+) DCs in diabetes, we examined Batf3-deficient NOD mice that lacked the CD103(+) DCs in islets and pancreatic lymph nodes. This led to a lack of autoreactive T cells in islets and, importantly, no incidence of diabetes. Additional examination revealed that presentation of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I epitopes in the pancreatic lymph nodes was absent with a partial impairment of MHC class II presentation. Altogether, this study reveals that CD103(+) DCs are essential for autoimmune diabetes development.

Ly49-dependent NK cell licensing and effector inhibition involve the same interaction site on MHC ligands

NK cells become functionally competent to be triggered by their activation receptors through the interaction of NK cell inhibitory receptors with their cognate self-MHC ligands, an MHC-dependent educational process termed "licensing." For example, Ly49A(+) NK cells become licensed by the interaction of the Ly49A inhibitory receptor with its MHC class I ligand, H2D(d), whereas Ly49C(+) NK cells are licensed by H2K(b). Structural studies indicate that the Ly49A inhibitory receptor may interact with two sites, termed site 1 and site 2, on its H2D(d) ligand. Site 2 encompasses the α1/α2/α3 domains of the H2D(d) H chain and β(2)-microglobulin (β2m) and is the functional binding site for Ly49A in effector inhibition. Ly49C functionally interacts with a similar site in H2K(b). However, it is currently unknown whether this same site is involved in Ly49A- or Ly49C-dependent licensing. In this study, we produced transgenic C57BL/6 mice expressing wild-type or site 2 mutant H2D(d) molecules and studied whether Ly49A(+) NK cells are licensed. We also investigated Ly49A- and Ly49C-dependent NK licensing in murine β2m-deficient mice that are transgenic for human β2m, which has species-specific amino acid substitutions in β2m. Our data from these transgenic mice indicate that site 2 on self-MHC is critical for Ly49A- and Ly49C-dependent NK cell licensing. Thus, NK cell licensing through Ly49 involves specific interactions with its MHC ligand that are similar to those involved in effector inhibition.

Randomized comparison of hemostasis techniques after invasive cardiovascular procedures

BACKGROUND

The arterial access required during most invasive vascular procedures provides a common source of complications and morbidity. This problem has been made worse by recent trends in earlier ambulation and more aggressive antihemostatic drug regimens. Despite these trends, no randomized trials have been reported comparing the 3 most commonly used techniques in achieving hemostasis at the arterial puncture site.

METHODS

A cohort of 400 patients undergoing catheterization laboratory procedures were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups of arterial compression: manual compression, mechanical clamp, and pneumatic compression device. Standard requirements of the trial included uniformity in initial compression times, patient instructions, nursing follow-up, and timing of ambulation as well as a structured interview and physical examination at 24 hours.

RESULTS

Prolonged compression was required in 13% of the manual group, 20% of the clamp group, and 35% of the pneumatic group (P <.0001). In-lab bleeding was more common in the pneumatic group (3%, 4%, and 16%, respectively, P <.0001), as was the need for an alternate compression technique (1%, 1%, and 27%, P <.0001). The groups also differed in respect to mean hematoma size (3.9 cm(2), 7.8 cm(2), and 19.8 cm(2), P =.036) and level of discomfort during compression (1.9, 2.2, and 3.1 on a 1- to 10-point scale, P <.0001). Comparable findings were observed in the subgroup of patients eligible for outpatient procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the pneumatic compression device leads to longer compression times, greater discomfort, more bleeding, and larger hematomas. Differences between manual compression and the mechanical clamp were more subtle but tend to favor use of the manual technique.

Maintenance of hemostasis after invasive cardiac procedures: implications for outpatient catheterization

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the efficacy of four different methods of arterial puncture site management during recovery from invasive cardiac procedures. The primary goals were less patient discomfort and improved clinical outcome.

BACKGROUND

The increasing use of outpatient catheterization, large interventional devices and potent periprocedural anticoagulation regimens has made the reduction of groin complications a high priority. Despite these trends, there are no randomized trials comparing commonly used techniques in treating the catheter entry site for the first few hours after the procedure.

METHODS

Four-hundred consecutive patients undergoing catheterization laboratory procedures were randomly assigned to one of four dressing techniques applied after achieving hemostasis: a sandbag placed over the site; a pressure dressing constructed from surgical gauze and elastic tape; a commercially available compression device; and no use of compressive dressing. Of these 400 patients, 171 would have been eligible for outpatient procedures in the absence of geographic constraints. The dressings were removed, and ambulation was encouraged 5 h after sheath removal. Uniform initial compression times, patient instructions, nursing follow-up and a structured interview and physical examination at 24 h were used.

RESULTS

The level of patient discomfort before and after dressing removal, as well as site tenderness at 24-h follow-up, was statistically similar in all four groups. Hematomas (typically small) and areas of ecchymosis were observed in 58 and 122 patients, respectively, but both their frequency and size were equally represented in each group. Important adverse events were confined to bleeding, rated as mild in 5.8%, moderate in 0.8% and severe in 0.6% of patients. Again, all four groups were statistically similar. Comparable findings were observed in the subgroup of patients eligible for outpatient procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite an increase in inconvenience and expense, none of the three compression techniques that were investigated improved patient satisfaction or outcome. Therefore, the routine use of compression dressings after invasive cardiac procedures cannot be recommended.

Long-term reproducibility of respiratory gas exchange measurements during exercise in patients with stable cardiac failure

Present-day technology has greatly facilitated the monitoring of respiratory gas exchange in the clinical exercise laboratory. Despite the growing use of these techniques to assess the severity and progression of disease or therapeutic response in patients with heart failure, the long-term reproducibility of oxygen uptake (VO2), carbon dioxide production, minute ventilation, heart rate (HR), and blood pressure at rest and during incremental exercise in such patients, to our knowledge, has not been evaluated. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to quantify the reproducibility of these variables along with exercise duration, maximum VO2 (VO2max) and anaerobic threshold in a group of 16 patients (61 +/- 7 years, 14 male) with chronic, stable cardiac failure of varying severity and etiology who had five or more incremental treadmill exercise tests over a period of time that ranged from 3 to 22 months. For each variable, reproducibility was represented by the coefficient of variation (CVAR). Except for exercise duration, CVAR was not a function of the severity of heart failure and, for all variables, patient-to-patient variation in CVAR was approximately 9 percent. The maximum CVAR for HR, systolic blood pressure, VO2, and VO2max was generally below 10.5 percent and for exercise duration and anaerobic threshold it was less than 12.5 percent. Based on this retrospective analysis, it is concluded that reproducible respiratory gas exchange and HR exercise responses are obtainable over extended periods of time in patients with stable, chronic cardiac failure. Exercise duration, however, is less reproducible in patients with moderate to severe failure.