Remote diagnostic imaging using artificial intelligence for diagnosing hip dysplasia in infants: Results from a mixed-methods feasibility pilot study

Objectives

Infant hip dysplasia or Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) occurs in 1-2% of births worldwide and leads to hip arthritis if untreated. We sought to evaluate the feasibility of implementing an artificial intelligence-enhanced portable ultrasound tool for infant hip dysplasia (DDH) screening in primary care, through determining its effectiveness in practice and evaluating patient and provider feedback.

Methods

A US-FDA-cleared artificial intelligence (AI) screening device for DDH (MEDO-Hip) was added to routine well-child visits from age 6 to 10 weeks. A total of 306 infants were screened during a 1-year pilot study within three family medicine clinics in Alberta, Canada. Patient and provider satisfaction were quantified using the System Usability Survey (SUS), while provider perceptions were further investigated through semi-structured interviews.

Results

Provider and user surveys commonly identified best features of the tool as immediate diagnosis, offering reassurance/knowledge and avoiding travel, and noted technical glitches most frequently as a barrier. A total of 369 scans of 306 infants were performed from Feb 1, 2021 until Mar 31, 2022. Eighty percent of hips scanned were normal on initial scans, 14% of scans required a follow-up study in the primary care clinic, and DDH cases were identified and treated at the expected 2% rate (6 infants).

Conclusions

It is feasible to implement a point-of-care ultrasound AI screening tool in primary care to screen for infants with DDH. Beyond improved screening and detection, this innovation was well accepted by patients and fee-for-service providers with a culture and history of innovation.

AI aided workflow for hip dysplasia screening using ultrasound in primary care clinics

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a common cause of premature osteoarthritis. This osteoarthritis can be prevented if DDH is detected by ultrasound and treated in infancy, but universal DDH screening is generally not cost-effective due to the need for experts to perform the scans. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the feasibility of having non-expert primary care clinic staff perform DDH ultrasound using handheld ultrasound with artificial intelligence (AI) decision support. We performed an implementation study evaluating the FDA-cleared MEDO-Hip AI app interpreting cine-sweep images obtained from handheld Philips Lumify probe to detect DDH. Initial scans were done by nurses or family physicians in 3 primary care clinics, trained by video, powerpoint slides and brief in-person. When the AI app recommended follow-up (FU), we first performed internal FU by a sonographer using the AI app; cases still considered abnormal by AI were referred to pediatric orthopedic clinic for assessment. We performed 369 scans in 306 infants. Internal FU rates were initially 40% for nurses and 20% for physicians, declining steeply to 14% after ~ 60 cases/site: 4% technical failure, 8% normal at sonographer FU using AI, and 2% confirmed DDH. Of 6 infants referred to pediatric orthopedic clinic, all were treated for DDH (100% specificity); 4 had no risk factors and may not have otherwise been identified. Real-time AI decision support and a simplified portable ultrasound protocol enabled lightly trained primary care clinic staff to perform hip dysplasia screening with FU and case detection rates similar to costly formal ultrasound screening, where the US scan is performed by a sonographer and interpreted by a radiologist/orthopedic surgeon. This highlights the potential utility of AI-supported portable ultrasound in primary care.

Normal variation of infant hip development

Aims

Studies of infant hip development to date have been limited by considering only the changes in appearance of a single ultrasound slice (Graf’s standard plane). We used 3D ultrasound (3DUS) to establish maturation curves of normal infant hip development, quantifying variation by age, sex, side, and anteroposterior location in the hip.

Methods

We analyzed 3DUS scans of 519 infants (mean age 64 days (6 to 111 days)) presenting at a tertiary children’s hospital for suspicion of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Hips that did not require ultrasound follow-up or treatment were classified as ‘typically developing’. We calculated traditional DDH indices like α angle (αSP), femoral head coverage (FHCSP), and several novel indices from 3DUS like the acetabular contact angle (ACA) and osculating circle radius (OCR) using custom software.

Results

α angle, FHC, and ACA indices increased and OCR decreased significantly by age in the first four months, mean αSP rose from 62.2° (SD 5.7°) to 67.3° (SD 5.2°) (p < 0.001) in one- to eight- and nine- to 16-week-old infants, respectively. Mean αSP and mean FHCSP were significantly, but only slightly, lower in females than in males. There was no statistically significant difference in DDH indices observed between left and right hip. All 3DUS indices varied significantly between anterior and posterior section of the hip. Mean 3D indices of α angle and FHC were significantly lower anteriorly than posteriorly: αAnt = 58.2° (SD 6.1°), αPost = 63.8° (SD 6.3°) (p < 0.001), FHCAnt = 43.0 (SD 7.4), and FHCPost = 55.4° (SD 11.2°) (p < 0.001). Acetabular rounding measured byOCR indices was significantly greater in the anterior section of the hip (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

We used 3DUS to show that hip shape and normal growth pattern vary significantly between anterior and posterior regions, by magnitudes similar to age-related changes. This highlights the need for careful selection of the Graf plane during 2D ultrasound examination. Whole-joint evaluation by obtaining either 3DUS or manual ‘sweep’ video images provides more comprehensive DDH assessment. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(11):913–923.

Interobserver Variability of Hip Dysplasia Indices on Sweep Ultrasound for Novices, Experts, and Artificial Intelligence

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is challenging for nonexperts to perform and interpret. Recording "sweep" images allows more complete hip assessment, suitable for automation by artificial intelligence (AI), but reliability has not been established. We assessed agreement between readers of varying experience and a commercial AI algorithm, in DDH detection from infant hip ultrasound sweeps.

METHODS

We selected a full spectrum of poor-to-excellent quality images and normal to severe dysplasia, in 240 hips (120 single 2-dimensional images, 120 sweeps). For 12 readers (radiologists, sonographers, clinicians and researchers; 3 were DDH subspecialists), and a ultrasound-FDA-cleared AI software package (Medo Hip), we calculated interobserver reliability for alpha angle measurements by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1) and for DDH classification by Randolph Kappa.

RESULTS

Alpha angle reliability was high for AI versus subspecialists (ICC=0.87 for sweeps, 0.90 for single images). For DDH diagnosis from sweeps, agreement was high between subspecialists (kappa=0.72), and moderate for nonsubspecialists (0.54) and AI (0.47). Agreement was higher for single images (kappa=0.80, 0.66, 0.49). AI reliability deteriorated more than human readers for the poorest-quality images. The agreement of radiologists and clinicians with the accepted standard, while still high, was significantly poorer for sweeps than 2D images (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In a challenging exercise representing the wide spectrum of image quality and reader experience seen in real-world hip ultrasound, agreement on DDH diagnosis from easily obtained sweeps was only slightly lower than from single images, likely because of the additional step of selecting the best image. AI performed similarly to a nonsubspecialist human reader but was more affected by low-quality images.

The utility of normative foot floor angle data in assessing toe-walking

Initial heel contact is an important attribute of gait, and failure to complete the heel rocker reduces gait stability. One common goal in treating toe-walking is to restore heel strike and prevent or reduce early heel rise. Foot floor angle (FFA) is a measure of toe-walking that is valuable for quantifying foot orientation at initial contact when using ankle dorsiflexion angle alone is misleading. However, no age-standardized FFA norms exist for clinical evaluation. Our objectives were to: (1) obtain normative FFA in typically developing children; and (2) examine its utility in the example of toe-walking secondary to unilateral cerebral palsy. Gait kinematics were acquired and FFA trajectories computed for 80 typically developing children (4-18 years). They were also obtained retrospectively from 11 children with toe-walking secondary to unilateral cerebral palsy (4-10 years), before and after operative intervention, and compared to 40 age-matched, typically developing children. FFA at initial contact was significantly different (P<.001) between pre-surgery toe-walking (-14.7±9.7°; mean±standard deviation) and typical gait (18.7±2.8°). Following operative lengthening of the gastrocnemius-soleus complex on the affected side, FFA at initial contact (-0.9±5.3°) was significantly improved (P<.001). Furthermore, several cases were identified for which the sole use of ankle dorsiflexion angle to capture toe-walking is misleading. The assessment of FFA is a simple method for providing valuable quantitative information to clinicians regarding foot orientation during gait. The demonstrated limitations of using ankle dorsiflexion angle alone to estimate foot orientation further emphasize the utility of FFA in assessing toe-walking.

Cross-Modality Validation of Acetabular Surface Models Using 3-D Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Normal and Dysplastic Infant Hips

Current imaging diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in infancy relies on 2-D ultrasound (US), which is highly operator-dependent. 3-D US offers more complete, and potentially more reliable, imaging of infant hip geometry. We sought to validate the fidelity of acetabular surface models obtained by 3-D US against those obtained concurrently by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). 3-D US and MRI scans were performed on the same d in 20 infants with normal to severely dysplastic hips (mean age, 57 d; range 13-181 d). 3-D US was performed by two observers using a Philips VL13-5 probe. Coronal 3-D multi-echo data image combination (MEDIC) magnetic resonance (MR) images (1-mm slice thickness) were obtained, usually without sedation, in a 1.5 T Siemens unit. Acetabular surface models were generated for 40 hips from 3-D US and MRI using semi-automated tracing software, separately by three observers. For each hip, the 3-D US and MRI models were co-registered to overlap as closely as possible using Amira software, and the root mean square (RMS) distances between points on the models were computed. 3-D US scans took 3.2 s each. Inter-modality variability was visually minimal. Mean RMS distance between corresponding points on the acetabular surface at 3-D US and MRI was 0.4 ± 0.3 mm, with 95% confidence interval <1 mm. Mean RMS errors for inter-observer and intra-observer comparisons were significantly less for 3-D US than for MRI, while inter-scan and inter-modality comparisons showed no significant difference. Acetabular geometry was reproduced by 3-D US surface models within 1 mm of the corresponding 3-D MRI surface model, and the 3-D US models were more reliable. This validates the fidelity of 3-D US modeling and encourages future use of 3-D US in assessing infant acetabulum anatomy, which may be useful to detect and monitor treatment of hip dysplasia.

An index for diagnosing infant hip dysplasia using 3-D ultrasound: the acetabular contact angle

BACKGROUND

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a common condition that is highly treatable in infancy but can lead to the lifelong morbidity of premature osteoarthritis if left untreated. Current diagnostic methods lack reliability, which may be improved by using 3-D ultrasound.

OBJECTIVE

Conventional 2-D US assessment of DDH has limitations, including high inter-scan variability. We quantified DDH on 3-D US using the acetabular contact angle (ACA), a property of the 3-D acetabular shape. We assessed ACA reliability and diagnostic utility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively collected data from January 2013 to December 2014, including 114 hips in 85 children divided into three clinical diagnostic groups: (1) normal, (2) initially borderline but ultimately normal without treatment and (3) dysplastic requiring treatment. Using custom software, two observers each traced acetabula twice on two 3-D US scans of each hip, enabling automated generation of 3-D surface models and ACA calculation. We computed inter-observer and inter-scan variability of repeatability coefficients and generated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

The 3-D US acetabular contact angle was reproduced 95% of the time within 6° in the same scan and within 9° in different scans of the same hip, vs. 9° and 14° for the 2-D US alpha angle (P < 0.001). Areas under ROC curves for diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip were 0.954 for ACA and 0.927 for alpha angle.

CONCLUSION

The 3-D US ACA was significantly more reliable than 2-D US alpha angle, and the 3-D US measurement predicted the presence of DDH with slightly higher accuracy. The ACA therefore shows promising initial diagnostic utility. Our findings call for further study of 3-D US in the diagnosis and longer-term follow-up of infant hip dysplasia.

Reproducibility of Acetabular Landmarks and a Standardized Coordinate System Obtained from 3D Hip Ultrasound

Two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is limited by variation in acetabular appearance and alpha angle measurements, which change with position of the ultrasound probe. Three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound captures the entire acetabular shape, and a reproducible "standard central plane" may be generated, from two landmarks located on opposite ends of the acetabulum, for measurement of alpha angle and other indices. Two users identified landmarks on 51 3D ultrasounds, with ranging severity of disease, and inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of landmark and "standard plane" locations was compared; landmarks were chosen within 2 mm, and the "standard plane" rotation was reproducible within 10° between observers. We observed no difference in variability between alpha angles measured on the "standard plane" in comparison with 2D ultrasound. Applications of the standardized 3D ultrasound central plane will be to fuse serial ultrasounds for follow-up and development of new indices of 3D deformity.

Ultrasound quantification of acetabular rounding in hip dysplasia: reliability and correlation to treatment decisions in a retrospective study

Currently, acetabular rounding is only subjectively assessed on ultrasound for developmental dysplasia of the hip. We tested whether acetabular rounding can be quantified reliably and can distinguish between hips requiring and not requiring treatment. Consecutive infants (n = 90) suspected of having dysplasia of the hip, seen at a pediatric orthopedic clinic, were separated into four diagnostic categories (normal, borderline but resolved, treated by brace, treated surgically). Acetabular rounding was assessed by semi-quantitative grade (0 = nil, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) by three observers and by direct measurement of acetabular radius of curvature (AROC) by two observers. Inter-observer reliability of rounding grade was poor (κ = 0.30-0.37). AROC had an inter-observer intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.84 and coefficient of variation of 29%-34%. Mean AROC was significantly higher for hips requiring treatment than for those not requiring treatment (3.3 mm vs. 1.6 mm, p = 0.007). AROC reliably quantifies an observation currently being made subjectively by radiologists and surgeons, and may be useful as a supplementary ultrasound index of dysplasia of the hip in future prospective studies.

Acute pediatric musculoskeletal pain management in North America: a practice variation survey

Children's musculoskeletal (MSK) injury pain remains poorly managed. This survey of pediatric emergency physicians and orthopedic surgeons assessed analgesia administration practices and discharge advice for children with acute MSK pain; 683 responses were received. Ibuprofen was the most commonly reported analgesic used in the emergency department (52%) and at discharge (68%). Most (85%) reported using oral opioids in the previous 6 months. Codeine use was the most commonly reported opioid used in the emergency department (38%) and at home (51%). For equal levels of pain, younger children received less opioids than older children. Younger physicians and recent graduates chose acetaminophen and codeine more than older and more experienced colleagues, who preferred ibuprofen and non-codeine containing opioid compounds (P < .001 and .006, respectively). Orthopedic surgeons reported less ibuprofen use than pediatric emergency physicians (P < .001). Choice of analgesic agents is heterogeneous among physicians and is influenced by pain severity, child's age, and physician characteristics.

Bolus or weekly zoledronic acid administration does not delay endochondral fracture repair but weekly dosing enhances delays in hard callus remodeling

INTRODUCTION

It has been widely assumed that osteoclasts play a pivotal role during the entire process of fracture healing. Bisphosphonates (BPs) are anti-catabolic agents commonly used to treat metabolic bone diseases including osteoporosis, minimizing fracture incidence. Yet, fractures do occur in these patients and the potential for negative effects of BPs on healing has been suggested. We aimed to examine the effect of different dosing regimes of the potent BP zoledronic acid (ZA) on early endochondral fracture repair and later callus remodeling in a normal bone healing environment.

METHODS

Saline, a Bolus dose of 0.1 degrees mg/kg ZA or 5 weekly divided doses of 0.02 degrees mg/kg of ZA commenced 1 week post operatively in a rat closed fracture model. Samples at 1, 2, 4 and 6 weeks post fracture were used to analyze initial fracture union, and 12 and 26 weeks post fracture to investigate the progress of remodeling.

RESULTS

ZA did not alter the rate of endochondral fracture union. All fractures united by 6 weeks, with no difference in the progressive reduction of cartilaginous soft callus between control and treatment groups over time. ZA treatment increased hard callus bone mineral content (BMC), volume and increased callus strength at 6 and 26 weeks post fracture. Hard callus remodeling commenced at 4 weeks post fracture with Bolus ZA treatment but was delayed until after 6 weeks in the Weekly ZA group. By 12 and 26 weeks, Bolus ZA had equivalent callus content of remodeled neo-cortical bone to the Saline controls, whereas Weekly ZA remained reduced compared to Saline controls at these times (P<0.01). Callus material properties such as peak stress were significantly reduced in both ZA groups at 6 weeks. At 26 weeks, Bolus ZA-treated calluses generated peak stress equivalent to control values, whereas Weekly ZA callus peak stress remained significantly reduced, indicating remodeling delay.

CONCLUSIONS

Osteoclast inhibition with ZA does not delay endochondral fracture repair in healthy rats. Bolus ZA treatment increased net callus size and strength at 6 weeks while allowing hard callus remodeling to proceed in the long term, albeit more slowly than control. Prolonged bisphosphonate dosing during repair does not delay endochondral ossification but can significantly affect remodeling long after the drug is ceased.

Decreased bone mineral density in neurofibromatosis type 1: results from a pediatric cohort

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a common genetic disorder affecting 1 in 3000 live births. It is well documented to be associated with bony deformities and other orthopaedic problems. Based on our observation that NF1 patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery often had osteopenic bone, we performed a study to assess the bone mineral density of a cohort of children with NF1 without orthopaedic defects.Twenty-three patients were recruited from the neurofibromatosis clinic. The bone mineral density of the total body, lumbar spine, and proximal femur was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Quantitative ultrasound was used to measure broadband ultrasonic attenuation at both heels. The group's mean dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry sex- and age-matched Z scores were below normal (-0.8 +/- 1.1, -0.8 +/- 1.2, -0.7 +/- 0.8, -0.6 +/- 1.1, -0.6 +/- 0.9, -0.6 +/- 1.1 for the total body, arms, legs, lumbar spine, and right and left femoral neck, respectively; all P < 0.01). Although some individuals had normal bone mass, 30% had total body Z scores below -1.5. The mean heel broadband ultrasonic attenuation Z score was also lower than normal (-0.8 +/- 0.6; P < 0.001). Children with NF1 have a general tendency toward osteopenia, suggesting an abnormal underlying bone phenotype. This may be relevant when considering operative intervention and, if better understood, may partially explain poor bone healing associated with NF1.