Comparison of verapamil, diltiazem, and labetalol on the bioavailability and metabolism of imipramine

Twelve healthy male subjects completed this randomized, placebo controlled, four-period crossover trial to determine the effect of verapamil, diltiazem, and labetalol on the bioavailability and metabolism of imipramine. Subjects received a 7-day course of one of four treatments; verapamil (120 mg every 8 hr), diltiazem (90 mg every 8 hr), labetalol (200 mg every 12 hr), or placebo (every 12 hr) during each study period. Imipramine (100 mg) was administered orally on the morning of day 4 of each study period. Plasma and urine samples were collected periodically over the ensuing 96 hours. Samples were assayed by HPLC for imipramine, desipramine, 2-hydroxyimipramine, and 2-hydroxydesipramine. Verapamil, diltiazem, and labetalol increased imipramine area under the plasma concentration time curve (relative bioavailability) as compared with placebo by 15%, 30%, and 53%, respectively. Verapamil and diltiazem did not demonstrate consistent changes in the formation of the measured metabolites. Labetalol caused a significant decrease in the amount of imipramine metabolized to 2-hydroxyimipramine (mean decrease: 22%) and from desipramine to 2-hydroxydesipramine (mean decrease: 8%). The molar ratios of plasma AUC of 2-hydroxyimipramine and 2-hydroxydesipramine to the parent compounds were significantly decreased. Since these metabolic processes are dependent on the cytochrome P450IID6 isozyme, these data suggest that labetalol decreases the oral clearance of imipramine by inhibiting this system. All three of these commonly used agents decreased the oral clearance of imipramine. These drug interactions could lead to elevated imipramine concentrations and have the potential for clinically important adverse events.

Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic interaction between diazepam and ACC-9653 (a phenytoin prodrug) in healthy male volunteers

The protein binding and pharmacokinetics of diazepam, ACC-9653 (a phenytoin prodrug), and phenytoin were evaluated in nine healthy male volunteers following administration of diazepam and ACC-9653, alone or concomitantly, in a randomized crossover design. No significant differences were observed in the fraction unbound or pharmacokinetic parameters of ACC-9653, phenytoin, or diazepam when ACC-9653 was administered alone compared to concomitant administration with diazepam. The phenytoin fraction unbound increased significantly with increased concentrations of ACC-9653, indicating displacement of phenytoin from its binding sites by ACC-9653. ACC-9653 also demonstrated concentration dependent binding. The lack of a significant pharmacokinetic drug interaction between ACC-9653 and diazepam suggests that these drugs may be safely administered together, although this conclusion should be confirmed in the intended patient population.

Correlation of delayed peak concentration with infusion-site irritation following diazepam administration

Diazepam 10 mg/2 mL iv was administered undiluted over five minutes to nine healthy men on two separate occasions. The infusion site was evaluated before and after each infusion by subject assessment of pain on a severity scale of zero (none) to ten (most). Blood samples were collected at 0, 5, 20, 30, 45, and 60 minutes, and periodically for 72 hours postinfusion. Diazepam plasma concentrations were determined by HPLC. Concentrations at five minutes (end of infusion) ranged from 0 to 889 ng/mL. Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was observed at 5 minutes for 10 treatments, at 20 minutes for 7 treatments, and at 30 minutes for 1 treatment. The observed Cmax ranged from 221 to 889 ng/mL. When time to reach peak plasma concentration (tmax) was 5 minutes, the Cmax was significantly greater than when tmax was 20 minutes (670 +/- 87 vs. 267 +/- 40 ng/mL, p less than 0.005). The area under the curve did not differ significantly between these two groups. The pain score at the end of infusion ranged from zero to five and was inversely related to the concentration at five minutes (r2 = 0.45, p = 0.002). The association between venous irritation, a low plasma concentration at the end of the infusion, and a delayed Cmax suggests that diazepam precipitated in the vein.