[Heart and combined heart-lung transplantation. Indications, chances and risks]

Orthotopic heart transplantation (HTX) is nowadays the worldwide accepted gold standard for the treatment of terminal heart failure. The main indications for HTX are non-ischemic dilatative (54%) and ischemic (37%) heart failure. In the acute phase after HTX the survival rate is approximately 90%. Good short and long-term results with survival rates ranging from 81% after 1 year to more than 50% after 11 years demonstrate that there is currently no real treatment alternative to HTX for treatment of end-stage heart failure. In the case of irreversible pulmonary hypertension in combination with end-stage heart failure or complex congenital heart syndromes, a combined heart and lung transplantation (HLTX) is necessary. Compared with HTX the short-term survival of HLTX is reduced, mostly for technical reasons. Improved long-term results after HTX and HLTX are a result of highly specialized transplantation units and effective immunosuppression. However, a major problem is the shortage of organ donors in Germany and the resulting long waiting times for patients with frequently occurring blood groups of up to 10 months for transplantation. The consequence of the latter is the ever increasing number of implanted cardiac assist devices in patients not only as a bridge to transplant but also as destination therapy.

Successful use of a percutaneous miniaturized extracorporeal life support system as a bridge and assistance to left ventricular assist device implantation in a patient with severe refractory cardiogenic shock

We present a 51-year-old man with cardiogenic shock in whom a percutaneous extracorporeal life support system (ECLS) was inserted to restore cardiopulmonary stability. After successful stabilization, a left ventricular assist device was implanted, using the ECLS without switching to a conventional cardiopulmonary bypass system to reduce its side effects.

Minimized extracorporeal circulation in coronary artery bypass surgery is equivalent to standard extracorporeal circulation in patients with reduced left ventricular function

BACKGROUND

Minimized extracorporeal circulation (MECC) is a promising alternative to standard extracorporeal circulation (ECC) and its use is increasing in routine coronary bypass surgery. We analyzed the clinical outcome of patients with reduced left ventricular function who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery with MECC or with standard ECC.

METHODS

From January 2003 to September 2008, 238 patients with a left ventricular function < 30 % underwent bypass surgery with ECC or MECC. The primary end point of our retrospective observational study was 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints were the transfusion requirements, as well as intensive care and the in-hospital course.

RESULTS

Demographic data, comorbidities and left ventricular function were similar in the study groups. MECC patients had a tendency towards a lower 30-day mortality rate, a better postoperative renal function and reduced ventilation times. Extracorporeal circulation time and postoperative high-dose inotropic support were significantly lower in the MECC group, while the stays in the intensive care unit and in hospital were comparable between the two groups. In our study, age in the ECC group, and previous infarction and New York Heart Association grade IV in the MECC group were preoperative risk factors associated with a higher mortality.

CONCLUSION

Coronary bypass surgery using MECC is feasible and safe for patients with severely impaired left ventricular function. It is a promising alternative to ECC with a low mortality rate and a more favorable postoperative course.