A simple and reliable method for claustrum localization across age in mice

The anatomical organization of the rodent claustrum remains obscure due to lack of clear borders that distinguish it from neighboring forebrain structures. Defining what constitutes the claustrum is imperative for elucidating its functions. Methods based on gene/protein expression or transgenic mice have been used to spatially outline the claustrum but often report incomplete labeling and/or lack of specificity during certain neurodevelopmental timepoints. To reliably identify claustrum projection cells in mice, we propose a simple immunolabelling method that juxtaposes the expression pattern of claustrum-enriched and cortical-enriched markers. We determined that claustrum cells immunoreactive for the claustrum-enriched markers Nurr1 and Nr2f2 are devoid of the cortical marker Tle4, which allowed us to differentiate the claustrum from adjoining cortical cells. Using retrograde tracing, we verified that nearly all claustrum projection neurons lack Tle4 but expressed Nurr1/Nr2f2 markers to different degrees. At neonatal stages between 7 and 21 days, claustrum projection neurons were identified by their Nurr1-postive/Tle4-negative expression profile, a time-period when other immunolabelling techniques used to localize the claustrum in adult mice are ineffective. Finally, exposure to environmental novelty enhanced the expression of the neuronal activation marker c-Fos in the claustrum region. Notably, c-Fos labeling was mainly restricted to Nurr1-positive cells and nearly absent from Tle4-positive cells, thus corroborating previous work reporting novelty-induced claustrum activation. Taken together, this method will aid in studying the claustrum during postnatal development and may improve histological and functional studies where other approaches are not amenable.

Transduction of inflammation from peripheral immune cells to the hippocampus induces neuronal hyperexcitability mediated by Caspase-1 activation

BACKGROUND

Recent studies report infiltration of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) into the central nervous system (CNS) in epileptic disorders, suggestive of a potential contribution of PBMC extravasation to the generation of seizures. Nevertheless, the underlying mechanisms involved in PBMC infiltrates promoting neuronal predisposition to ictogenesis remain unclear. Therefore, we developed an in vitro model mimicking infiltration of activated PBMCs into the brain in order to investigate potential transduction of inflammatory signals from PBMCs to the CNS.

METHODS

To establish our model, we first extracted PBMCs from rat spleen, then, immunologically primed PBMCs with lipopolysaccharide (LPS), followed by further activation with nigericin. Thereafter, we co-cultured these activated PBMCs with organotypic cortico-hippocampal brain slice cultures (OCHSCs) derived from the same rat, and compared PBMC-OCHSC co-cultures to OCHSCs exposed to PBMCs in the culture media. We further targeted a potential molecular pathway underlying transduction of peripheral inflammation to OCHSCs by incubating OCHSCs with the Caspase-1 inhibitor VX-765 prior to co-culturing PBMCs with OCHSCs. After 24 h, we analyzed inflammation markers in the cortex and the hippocampus using semiquantitative immunofluorescence. In addition, we analyzed neuronal activity by whole-cell patch-clamp recordings in cortical layer II/III and hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons.

RESULTS

In the cortex, co-culturing immunoreactive PBMCs treated with LPS + nigericin on top of OCHSCs upregulated inflammatory markers and enhanced neuronal excitation. In contrast, no excitability changes were detected after adding primed PBMCs (i.e. treated with LPS only), to OCHSCs. Strikingly, in the hippocampus, both immunoreactive and primed PBMCs elicited similar pro-inflammatory and pro-excitatory effects. However, when immunoreactive and primed PBMCs were cultured in the media separately from OCHSCs, only immunoreactive PBMCs gave rise to neuroinflammation and hyperexcitability in the hippocampus, whereas primed PBMCs failed to produce any significant changes. Finally, VX-765 application to OCHSCs, co-cultured with either immunoreactive or primed PBMCs, prevented neuroinflammation and hippocampal hyperexcitability in OCHSCs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows a higher susceptibility of the hippocampus to peripheral inflammation as compared to the cortex, mediated via Caspase-1-dependent signaling pathways. Thus, our findings suggest that Caspase-1 inhibition may potentially provide therapeutic benefits during hippocampal neuroinflammation and hyperexcitability secondary to peripheral innate immunity.

Neurog1 and Neurog2 coordinately regulate development of the olfactory system

Background

Proneural genes encode basic helix–loop–helix transcription factors that specify distinct neuronal identities in different regions of the nervous system. In the embryonic telencephalon, the proneural genes Neurog1 and Neurog2 specify a dorsal regional identity and glutamatergic projection neuron phenotype in the presumptive neocortex, but their roles in cell fate specification in the olfactory bulb, which is also partly derived from dorsal telencephalic progenitors, have yet to be assessed. Given that olfactory bulb development is guided by interactions with the olfactory epithelium in the periphery, where proneural genes are also expressed, we investigated the roles of Neurog1 and Neurog2 in the coordinated development of these two olfactory structures.

Results

Neurog1/2 are co-expressed in olfactory bulb progenitors, while only Neurog1 is widely expressed in progenitors for olfactory sensory neurons in the olfactory epithelium. Strikingly, only a remnant of an olfactory bulb forms in Neurog1^−/−;Neurog2^−/− double mutants, while this structure is smaller but distinguishable in Neurog1^−/− single mutants and morphologically normal in Neurog2^−/− single mutants. At the cellular level, fewer glutamatergic mitral and juxtaglomerular cells differentiate in Neurog1^−/−;Neurog2^−/− double-mutant olfactory bulbs. Instead, ectopic olfactory bulb interneurons are derived from dorsal telencephalic lineages in Neurog1^−/−;Neurog2^−/− double mutants and to a lesser extent in Neurog2^−/− single mutants. Conversely, cell fate specification is normal in Neurog1^−/− olfactory bulbs, but aberrant patterns of cell proliferation and neuronal migration are observed in Neurog1^−/− single and Neurog1^−/−;Neurog2^−/− double mutants, probably contributing to their altered morphologies. Finally, in Neurog1^−/− and Neurog1^−/−;Neurog2^−/− embryos, olfactory sensory neurons in the epithelium, which normally project to the olfactory bulb to guide its morphogenesis, fail to innervate the olfactory bulb.

Conclusions

We have identified a cell autonomous role for Neurog1/2 in specifying the glutamatergic identity of olfactory bulb neurons. Furthermore, Neurog1 (and not Neurog2) is required to guide olfactory sensory neuron innervation of the olfactory bulb, the loss of which results in defects in olfactory bulb proliferation and tissue morphogenesis. We thus conclude that Neurog1/2 together coordinate development of the olfactory system, which depends on tissue interactions between the olfactory bulb and epithelium.