1
|
Shah D, Gsell W, Wahis J, Luckett ES, Jamoulle T, Preman P, Moechars D, Craessaerts K, Horré K, Hendrickx V, Jaspers T, Wolfs L, Vermaercke B, Fiers M, Holt M, Vegh Z, Thal DR, D'Hooge R, Vandenberghe R, Himmelreich U, Bonin V, de Strooper B. Astrocytes mediate neuronal network hyperactivity in early AD. Alzheimers Dement 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/alz.068629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Disha Shah
- VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
| | | | - Jérôme Wahis
- Laboratory of Glia Biology, VIB, KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
| | - Emma S. Luckett
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
| | - Tarik Jamoulle
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
| | - Pranav Preman
- VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
| | - Daan Moechars
- VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
| | | | - Katrien Horré
- VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
| | | | - Tom Jaspers
- VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
| | - Leen Wolfs
- VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
| | - Ben Vermaercke
- Neuro‐Electronics Research Flanders, KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
| | - Mark Fiers
- VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
| | - Matthew Holt
- Laboratory of Glia Biology, VIB, KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
| | | | | | - Rudi D'Hooge
- Laboratory for Biological Psychology Leuven Belgium
| | - Rik Vandenberghe
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
| | | | - Vincent Bonin
- Neuro‐Electronics Research Flanders, KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shah D, Gsell W, Wahis J, Luckett ES, Jamoulle T, Vermaercke B, Preman P, Moechars D, Hendrickx V, Jaspers T, Craessaerts K, Horré K, Wolfs L, Fiers M, Holt M, Thal DR, Callaerts-Vegh Z, D'Hooge R, Vandenberghe R, Himmelreich U, Bonin V, De Strooper B. Astrocyte calcium dysfunction causes early network hyperactivity in Alzheimer's disease. Cell Rep 2022; 40:111280. [PMID: 36001964 PMCID: PMC9433881 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Dysfunctions of network activity and functional connectivity (FC) represent early events in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Astrocytes regulate local neuronal activity in the healthy brain, but their involvement in early network hyperactivity in AD is unknown. We show increased FC in the human cingulate cortex several years before amyloid deposition. We find the same early cingulate FC disruption and neuronal hyperactivity in AppNL-F mice. Crucially, these network disruptions are accompanied by decreased astrocyte calcium signaling. Recovery of astrocytic calcium activity normalizes neuronal hyperactivity and FC, as well as seizure susceptibility and day/night behavioral disruptions. In conclusion, we show that astrocytes mediate initial features of AD and drive clinically relevant phenotypes. The cingulate cortex of humans and mice shows early functional deficits in AD Astrocyte calcium signaling is decreased before the presence of amyloid plaques Recovery of astrocyte calcium signals mitigates neuronal hyperactivity Recovery of astrocytes normalizes cingulate connectivity and behavior disruptions
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Disha Shah
- Laboratory for the Research of Neurodegenerative Diseases, VIB Center for Brain and Disease Research, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Willy Gsell
- Biomedical MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jérôme Wahis
- Laboratory of Glia Biology, VIB Center for Brain and Disease Research, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Emma S Luckett
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute (LBI), KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tarik Jamoulle
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute (LBI), KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ben Vermaercke
- Neuro-electronics Research Flanders, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pranav Preman
- Laboratory for the Research of Neurodegenerative Diseases, VIB Center for Brain and Disease Research, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Daan Moechars
- Laboratory for the Research of Neurodegenerative Diseases, VIB Center for Brain and Disease Research, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Véronique Hendrickx
- Laboratory for the Research of Neurodegenerative Diseases, VIB Center for Brain and Disease Research, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tom Jaspers
- Laboratory for the Research of Neurodegenerative Diseases, VIB Center for Brain and Disease Research, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Katleen Craessaerts
- Laboratory for the Research of Neurodegenerative Diseases, VIB Center for Brain and Disease Research, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Katrien Horré
- Laboratory for the Research of Neurodegenerative Diseases, VIB Center for Brain and Disease Research, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Leen Wolfs
- Laboratory for the Research of Neurodegenerative Diseases, VIB Center for Brain and Disease Research, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mark Fiers
- Laboratory for the Research of Neurodegenerative Diseases, VIB Center for Brain and Disease Research, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Matthew Holt
- Laboratory of Glia Biology, VIB Center for Brain and Disease Research, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dietmar Rudolf Thal
- Laboratory for Neuropathology, Department of Imaging and Pathology, LBI, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Rudi D'Hooge
- Laboratory of Biological Psychology, KU-Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rik Vandenberghe
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute (LBI), KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Uwe Himmelreich
- Biomedical MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Vincent Bonin
- Neuro-electronics Research Flanders, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bart De Strooper
- Laboratory for the Research of Neurodegenerative Diseases, VIB Center for Brain and Disease Research, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; UK Dementia Research Institute at University College London, WC1E 6BT London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jamoulle T, Ran Q, Meersmans K, Schaeverbeke J, Dupont P, Vandenberghe R. Posterior Intraparietal Sulcus Mediates Detection of Salient Stimuli Outside the Endogenous Focus of Attention. Cereb Cortex 2021; 32:1455-1469. [PMID: 34467392 PMCID: PMC8971085 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhab299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Revised: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Visual consciousness is shaped by the interplay between endogenous selection and exogenous capture. If stimulus saliency is aligned with a subject’s attentional priorities, endogenous selection will be facilitated. In case of a misalignment, endogenous selection may be compromised as attentional capture is a strong and automatic process. We manipulated task-congruent versus -incongruent saliency in a functional magnetic resonance imaging change-detection task and analyzed brain activity patterns in the cortex surrounding the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) within the Julich-Brain probabilistic cytoarchitectonic mapping reference frame. We predicted that exogenous effects would be seen mainly in the posterior regions of the IPS (hIP4–hIP7–hIP8), whereas a conflict between endogenous and exogenous orienting would elicit activity from more anterior cytoarchitectonic areas (hIP1–hIP2–hIP3). Contrary to our hypothesis, a conflict between endogenous and exogenous orienting had an effect early in the IPS (mainly in hIP7 and hIP8). This is strong evidence for an endogenous component in hIP7/8 responses to salient stimuli beyond effects of attentional bottom-up sweep. Our results suggest that hIP7 and hIP8 are implicated in the individuation of attended locations based on saliency as well as endogenous instructions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarik Jamoulle
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Qian Ran
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karen Meersmans
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jolien Schaeverbeke
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Patrick Dupont
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rik Vandenberghe
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Neurology Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ran Q, Jamoulle T, Schaeverbeke J, Meersmans K, Vandenberghe R, Dupont P. Reproducibility of graph measures at the subject level using resting-state fMRI. Brain Behav 2020; 10:2336-2351. [PMID: 32614515 PMCID: PMC7428495 DOI: 10.1002/brb3.1705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Revised: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Graph metrics have been proposed as potential biomarkers for diagnosis in clinical work. However, before it can be applied in a clinical setting, their reproducibility should be evaluated. METHODS This study systematically investigated the effect of two denoising pipelines and different whole-brain network constructions on reproducibility of subject-specific graph measures. We used the multi-session fMRI dataset from the Brain Genomics Superstruct Project consisting of 69 healthy young adults. RESULTS In binary networks, the test-retest variability for global measures was large at low density irrespective of the denoising strategy or the type of correlation. Weighted networks showed very low test-retest values (and thus a good reproducibility) for global graph measures irrespective of the strategy used. Comparing the test-retest values for different strategies, there were significant main effects of the type of correlation (Pearson correlation vs. partial correlation), the (partial) correlation value (absolute vs. positive vs. negative), and weight calculation (based on the raw (partial) correlation values vs. based on transformed Z-values). There was also a significant interaction effect between type of correlation and weight calculation. Similarly as for the binary networks, there was no main effect of the denoising pipeline. CONCLUSION Our results demonstrated that normalized global graph measures based on a weighted network using the absolute (partial) correlation as weight were reproducible. The denoising pipeline and the granularity of the whole-brain parcellation used to define the nodes were not critical for the reproducibility of normalized graph measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Ran
- Laboratory for Cognitive NeurologyDepartment of Neurosciences, KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of RadiologyXinqiao HospitalChongqingChina
| | - Tarik Jamoulle
- Laboratory for Cognitive NeurologyDepartment of Neurosciences, KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Jolien Schaeverbeke
- Laboratory for Cognitive NeurologyDepartment of Neurosciences, KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Alzheimer Research Centre KU LeuvenLeuven Brain Instititute, KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Karen Meersmans
- Laboratory for Cognitive NeurologyDepartment of Neurosciences, KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Rik Vandenberghe
- Laboratory for Cognitive NeurologyDepartment of Neurosciences, KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Alzheimer Research Centre KU LeuvenLeuven Brain Instititute, KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Neurology DepartmentUniversity Hospitals Leuven (UZ Leuven)LeuvenBelgium
| | - Patrick Dupont
- Laboratory for Cognitive NeurologyDepartment of Neurosciences, KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Alzheimer Research Centre KU LeuvenLeuven Brain Instititute, KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| |
Collapse
|