1
|
Abstract
In this paper we contrast bounded and ecological rationality with a proposed alternative, generative rationality. Ecological approaches to rationality build on the idea of humans as "intuitive statisticians" while we argue for a more generative conception of humans as "probing organisms." We first highlight how ecological rationality's focus on cues and statistics is problematic for two reasons: (a) the problem of cue salience, and (b) the problem of cue uncertainty. We highlight these problems by revisiting the statistical and cue-based logic that underlies ecological rationality, which originate from the misapplication of concepts in psychophysics (e.g., signal detection, just-noticeable-differences). We then work through the most popular experimental task in the ecological rationality literature-the city size task-to illustrate how psychophysical assumptions have informally been linked to ecological rationality. After highlighting these problems, we contrast ecological rationality with a proposed alternative, generative rationality. Generative rationality builds on biology-in contrast to ecological rationality's focus on statistics. We argue that in uncertain environments cues are rarely given or available for statistical processing. Therefore we focus on the psychogenesis of awareness rather than psychophysics of cues. For any agent or organism, environments "teem" with indefinite cues, meanings and potential objects, the salience or relevance of which is scarcely obvious based on their statistical or physical properties. We focus on organism-specificity and the organism-directed probing that shapes awareness and perception. Cues in teeming environments are noticed when they serve as cues-for-something, requiring what might be called a "cue-to-clue" transformation. In this sense, awareness toward a cue or cues is actively "grown." We thus argue that perception might more productively be seen as the presentation of cues and objects rather than their representation. This generative approach not only applies to relatively mundane organism (including human) interactions with their environments-as well as organism-object relationships and their embodied nature-but also has significant implications for understanding the emergence of novelty in economic settings. We conclude with a discussion of how our arguments link with-but modify-Herbert Simon's popular "scissors" metaphor, as it applies to bounded rationality and its implications for decision making in uncertain, teeming environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teppo Felin
- Jon M. Huntsman School of Business, Utah State University, Logan, UT, United States
- Saïd Business School, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jan Koenderink
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mastrogiorgio A, Felin T, Kauffman S, Mastrogiorgio M. More Thumbs Than Rules: Is Rationality an Exaptation? Front Psychol 2022; 13:805743. [PMID: 35282257 PMCID: PMC8912947 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.805743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The literatures on bounded and ecological rationality are built on adaptationism-and its associated modular, cognitivist and computational paradigm-that does not address or explain the evolutionary origins of rationality. We argue that the adaptive mechanisms of evolution are not sufficient for explaining human rationality, and we posit that human rationality presents exaptive origins, where exaptations are traits evolved for other functions or no function at all, and later co-opted for new uses. We propose an embodied reconceptualization of rationality-embodied rationality-based on the reuse of the perception-action system, where many neural processes involved in the control of the sensory-motor system, salient in ancestral environments have been later co-opted to create-by tinkering-high-level reasoning processes, employed in civilized niches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Teppo Felin
- Huntsman School of Business, Utah State University, Logan, UT, United States.,Saïd Business School, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Stuart Kauffman
- Institute for Systems Biology (ISB), Seattle, WA, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Affiliation(s)
- Teppo Felin
- Saïd Business School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Jan Koenderink
- Department of Physics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.,Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joachim I Krueger
- Department of Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, USA
| | - Denis Noble
- Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - George F R Ellis
- Department of Mathematics, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
|
5
|
Chater N, Felin T, Funder DC, Gigerenzer G, Koenderink JJ, Krueger JI, Noble D, Nordli SA, Oaksford M, Schwartz B, Stanovich KE, Todd PM. Mind, rationality, and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate. Psychon Bull Rev 2018; 25:793-826. [PMID: 28744767 PMCID: PMC5902517 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1333-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nick Chater
- Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Teppo Felin
- Saïd Business School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - David C Funder
- Psychology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA
| | - Gerd Gigerenzer
- Adaptive Behavior and Cognition, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Joachim I Krueger
- Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Denis Noble
- Physiology, Anatomy, and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Samuel A Nordli
- Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Mike Oaksford
- Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck College, University of London, London, UK
| | - Barry Schwartz
- Psychology, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA, USA
- Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Keith E Stanovich
- Applied Psychology and Human Development, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter M Todd
- Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Affiliation(s)
- Teppo Felin
- Saïd Business School, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 1HP, United Kingdom
| | - Todd R. Zenger
- David Eccles School of Business, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
We argue that strategic management in general—and capability theory in particular—suffers from problems of infinite regress that can be traced to an unsatisfactory specification of initial conditions. We argue, first, that this has led to an overemphasis on path dependence, experience, and history, without sufficient attention on initial conditions: more proximate, decision-oriented punctuation points that can be used for better theoretical explanation. Second, we show how the initial conditions of theories are often not distinctively different from what is being explained, which prevents theory from providing credible specifications of causal mechanisms. Third, we highlight how the regress problem has led to a relatively casual borrowing of concepts from neighboring disciplines, which has created a mismatch between the aims of management theory and relevance to practice. We suggest research heuristics for how to deal with infinite regress problems, in order to develop more rigorous and relevant theories of capability and strategic management.
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to suggest a (preliminary) taxonomy and research agenda for the topic of "firms, crowds, and innovation" and to provide an introduction to the associated special issue. We specifically discuss how various crowd-related phenomena and practices-for example, crowdsourcing, crowdfunding, user innovation, and peer production-relate to theories of the firm, with particular attention on "sociality" in firms and markets. We first briefly review extant theories of the firm and then discuss three theoretical aspects of sociality related to crowds in the context of strategy, organizations, and innovation: (1) the functions of sociality (sociality as extension of rationality, sociality as sensing and signaling, sociality as matching and identity), (2) the forms of sociality (independent/aggregate and interacting/emergent forms of sociality), and (3) the failures of sociality (misattribution and misapplication). We conclude with an outline of future research directions and introduce the special issue papers and essays.
Collapse
|
9
|
|
10
|
|
11
|
Abstract
Neoclassical noncooperative game theory is based on a simple, yet powerful synthesis of mathematical and logical concepts: unconditional and immutable preference orderings and individual rationality. Although this structure has proven useful for characterizing competitive multi-player behavior, its applicability to scenarios involving complex social relationships is problematic. In this paper we directly address this limitation by the introduction of a conditional preference structure that permits players to modulate their preference orderings as functions of the preferences of other players. Embedding this expanded preference structure in a formal and graphical framework provides a systematic approach for characterizing a complex society. The result is an influence network that allows conditional preferences to propagate through the community, resulting in an emergent social model which characterizes all of the social relationships that exist and which leads to solution concepts that account for both group and individual interests. The Ultimatum game is presented as an example of how social influence can be modeled with conditional preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wynn C. Stirling
- Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America
| | - Teppo Felin
- Marriott School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
|
13
|
Felin T. Editor’s Introduction. Journal of Management Inquiry 2011. [DOI: 10.1177/1056492611398551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
14
|
Felin T. Editor’s Introduction. Journal of Management Inquiry 2011. [DOI: 10.1177/1056492610389513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
15
|
Felin T. Editor’s Introduction. Journal of Management Inquiry 2010. [DOI: 10.1177/1056492610370083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
16
|
Felin T. Editor’s Introduction. Journal of Management Inquiry 2010. [DOI: 10.1177/1056492609352265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
17
|
King BG, Felin T, Whetten DA. Perspective—Finding the Organization in Organizational Theory: A Meta-Theory of the Organization as a Social Actor. Organization Science 2010. [DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 236] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
18
|
Felin T, Zenger TR, Tomsik J. The knowledge economy: emerging organizational forms, missing microfoundations, and key considerations for managing human capital. Hum Resour Manage 2009. [DOI: 10.1002/hrm.20299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
19
|
|
20
|
|
21
|
King BG, Felin T, Whetten DA. Comparative organizational analysis: An introduction. Studying Differences between Organizations: Comparative Approaches to Organizational Research 2009. [DOI: 10.1108/s0733-558x(2009)0000026002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
22
|
Felin T, Foss N. Individuals and Organizations: Thoughts on a Micro-Foundations Project for Strategic Management and Organizational Analysis. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management 2006. [DOI: 10.1016/s1479-8387(06)03009-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
|