1
|
Mertens JF, Kempen TGH, Koster ES, Deneer VHM, Bouvy ML, van Gelder T. Cognitive processes in pharmacists' clinical decision-making. Res Social Adm Pharm 2024; 20:105-114. [PMID: 37945418 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmacists' clinical decision-making is a core process in pharmaceutical care. However, the practical aspects and effective teaching methods of this process remain largely unexplored. OBJECTIVE To examine the cognitive processes involved in pharmacists' perceptions of how they make clinical decisions in pharmacy practice. METHODS Semi-structured, face-to-face interviews were conducted with pharmacists working in community, outpatient, and hospital care in the Netherlands between August and December 2021. Participants were explicitly asked for examples when asked how they make clinical decisions in practice and how they teach this to others. After transcribing audio-recorded interviews, an inductive thematic analysis was conducted to identify cognitive processes. A theoretical model of clinical decision-making was then used and adapted to structure the identified processes. RESULTS In total, 21 cognitive processes were identified from interviews with 16 pharmacists working in community (n = 5), outpatient (n = 2), and hospital care (n = 9). These cognitive processes were organized into 8 steps of the adapted theoretical model, i.e. problem and demand for care consideration, information collection, clinical reasoning, clinical judgment, shared decision-making, implementation, outcomes evaluation, and reflection. Pharmacists struggled to articulate their clinical decision-making and went back-and-forth in their explanations of this process. All pharmacists emphasized the importance of identifying the problem and described how they collect information through reviewing, gathering, recalling, and investigating. Clinical reasoning entailed various cognitive processes, of which comprehending the problem in the patient's context was deemed challenging at times. Pharmacists seemed least active in evaluating patient outcomes and reflecting on these outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Pharmacists use multiple cognitive processes when making clinical decisions in pharmacy practice, and their back-and-forth explanations emphasize its dynamic nature. This study adds to a greater understanding of how pharmacists make clinical decisions and to the development of a theoretical model that describes this process, which can be used in pharmacy practice and education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J F Mertens
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - T G H Kempen
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - E S Koster
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - V H M Deneer
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Division of Laboratories, Pharmacy, and Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M L Bouvy
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - T van Gelder
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Snijders BMG, Kempen TGH, Aubert CE, Koek HL, Dalleur O, Donzé J, Rodondi N, O'Mahony D, Gillespie U, Knol W. Drug-related readmissions in older hospitalized adults: External validation and updating of OPERAM DRA prediction tool. J Am Geriatr Soc 2023; 71:3848-3856. [PMID: 37615214 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Drug-related readmissions (DRAs) are defined as rehospitalizations with an adverse drug event as their main or significant contributory cause. DRAs represent a major adverse health burden for older patients. A prediction model which identified older hospitalized patients at high risk of a DRA <1 year was previously developed using the OPERAM trial cohort, a European cluster randomized controlled trial including older hospitalized patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy. This study has performed external validation and updated the prediction model consequently. METHODS The MedBridge trial cohort (a multicenter cluster randomized crossover trial performed in Sweden) was used as a validation cohort. It consisted of 2516 hospitalized patients aged ≥65 years. Model performance was assessed by: (1) discriminative power, assessed by the C-statistic with a 95% confidence interval (CI); (2) calibration, assessed by visual examination of the calibration plot and use of the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test; and (3) overall accuracy, assessed by the scaled Brier score. Several updating methods were carried out to improve model performance. RESULTS In total, 2516 older patients were included in the validation cohort, of whom 582 (23.1%) experienced a DRA <1 year. In the validation cohort, the original model showed a good overall accuracy (scaled Brier score 0.03), but discrimination was moderate (C-statistic 0.62 [95% CI 0.59-0.64]), and calibration showed underestimation of risks. In the final updated model, the predictor "cirrhosis with portal hypertension" was removed and "polypharmacy" was added. This improved the model's discriminative capability to a C-statistic of 0.64 (95% CI 0.59-0.70) and enhanced calibration plots. Overall accuracy remained good. CONCLUSIONS The updated OPERAM DRA prediction model may be a useful tool in clinical practice to estimate the risk of DRAs in older hospitalized patients subsequent to discharge. Our efforts lay the groundwork for the future development of models with even better performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birgitta M G Snijders
- Department of Geriatrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas G H Kempen
- Department of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carole E Aubert
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Bern University Hospital, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Huiberdina L Koek
- Department of Geriatrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Olivia Dalleur
- Clinical Pharmacy Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
- Pharmacy Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jacques Donzé
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Bern University Hospital, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Internal Medicine, Neuchatel Hospital Network, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
- Division of internal medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nicolas Rodondi
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Bern University Hospital, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Denis O'Mahony
- Department of Medicine (Geriatrics), University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - Ulrika Gillespie
- Department of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Hospital Pharmacy Department, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Wilma Knol
- Department of Geriatrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kempen TGH, Hedman AN, Hadziosmanovic N, Lindner K, Melhus H, Nielsen EI, Sulku J, Gillespie U. Risk factors for and preventability of drug‐related hospital revisits in older patients: a post‐hoc analysis of a randomised clinical trial. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2022; 89:1575-1587. [PMID: 36454520 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM The aims of this study were (1) to identify older patients' risk factors for drug-related readmissions and (2) to assess the preventability of older patients' drug-related revisits. METHODS Post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial with patients aged ≥65 years at eight wards within four hospitals in Sweden. (1) The primary outcome was risk factors for drug-related readmission within 12 months post-discharge. A Cox proportional hazards model was made with sociodemographic and clinical baseline characteristics. (2) Four hundred trial participants were randomly selected and their revisits (admissions and emergency department visits) were assessed to identify potentially preventable drug-related revisits, related diseases and causes. RESULTS (1) Among 2637 patients (median age 81 years), 582 (22%) experienced a drug-related readmission within 12 months. Sixteen risk factors (hazard ratio >1, P < 0.05) related to age, previous hospital visits, medication use, multimorbidity and cardiovascular, liver, lung and peptic ulcer disease were identified. (2) The 400 patients experienced a total of 522 hospital revisits, of which 85 (16%) were potentially preventable drug-related revisits. The two most prevalent related diseases were heart failure (n = 24, 28%) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n = 13, 15%). The two most prevalent causes were inadequate treatment (n = 23, 27%) and insufficient or no follow-up (n = 22, 26%). CONCLUSION (1) Risk factors for drug-related readmissions in older hospitalized patients were age, previous hospital visits, medication use and multiple diseases. (2) Potentially preventable drug-related hospital revisits are common and might be prevented through adequate pharmacotherapy and continuity of care in older patients with cardiovascular or lung disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas G. H. Kempen
- Department of Pharmacy Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden
- Hospital Pharmacy Department Uppsala University Hospital Uppsala Sweden
| | - Anton N. Hedman
- Hospital Pharmacy Department Uppsala University Hospital Uppsala Sweden
| | | | | | - Håkan Melhus
- Department of Medical Sciences Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden
| | | | | | - Ulrika Gillespie
- Department of Pharmacy Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden
- Hospital Pharmacy Department Uppsala University Hospital Uppsala Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kempen TGH, Bertilsson M, Hadziosmanovic N, Lindner KJ, Melhus H, Nielsen EI, Sulku J, Gillespie U. Effects of Hospital-Based Comprehensive Medication Reviews Including Postdischarge Follow-up on Older Patients' Use of Health Care: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e216303. [PMID: 33929523 PMCID: PMC8087955 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.6303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Importance Suboptimal use of medications is a leading cause of health care-related harm. Medication reviews improve medication use, but evidence of the possible benefit of inpatient medication review for hard clinical outcomes after discharge is scarce. Objective To study the effects of hospital-based comprehensive medication reviews (CMRs), including postdischarge follow-up of older patients' use of health care resources, compared with only hospital-based reviews and usual care. Design, Setting, and Participants The Medication Reviews Bridging Healthcare trial is a cluster randomized crossover trial that was conducted in 8 wards with multiprofessional teams at 4 hospitals in Sweden from February 6, 2017, to October 19, 2018, with 12 months of follow-up completed December 6, 2019. The study was prespecified in the trial protocol. Outcome assessors were blinded to treatment allocation. In total, 2644 patients aged 65 years or older who had been admitted to 1 of the study wards for at least 1 day were included. Data from the modified intention-to-treat population were analyzed from December 10, 2019, to September 9, 2020. Interventions Each ward participated in the trial for 6 consecutive 8-week periods. The wards were randomized to provide 1 of 3 treatments during each period: CMR, CMR plus postdischarge follow-up, and usual care without a clinical pharmacist. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome measure was the incidence of unplanned hospital visits (admissions plus emergency department visits) within 12 months. Secondary outcomes included medication-related admissions, visits with primary care clinicians, time to first unplanned hospital visit, mortality, and costs of hospital-based care. Results Of the 2644 participants, 7 withdrew after inclusion, leaving 2637 for analysis (1357 female [51.5%]; median age, 81 [interquartile range, 74-87] years; median number of medications, 9 [interquartile range, 5-13]). In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, 922 patients received CMR, 823 received CMR plus postdischarge follow-up, and 892 received usual care. The crude incidence rate of unplanned hospital visits was 1.77 per patient-year in the total study population. The primary outcome did not differ between the intervention groups and usual care (adjusted rate ratio, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.89-1.22] for CMR and 1.15 [95% CI, 0.98-1.34] for CMR plus postdischarge follow-up). However, CMR plus postdischarge follow-up was associated with an increased incidence of emergency department visits within 12 months (adjusted rate ratio, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.05-1.59) compared with usual care. There were no differences between treatment groups regarding other secondary outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance In this study of older hospitalized patients, CMR plus postdischarge follow-up did not decrease the incidence of unplanned hospital visits. The findings do not support the performance of hospital-based CMRs as conducted in this trial. Alternative forms of medication reviews that aim to improve older patients' health outcomes should be considered and subjected to randomized clinical trials. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02986425.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas G. H. Kempen
- Hospital Pharmacy Department, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | | | | | - Håkan Melhus
- Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Johanna Sulku
- Pharmacy Department, Region Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden
- Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University/Region Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden
| | - Ulrika Gillespie
- Hospital Pharmacy Department, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kempen TGH, Cam H, Kälvemark A, Lindner KJ, Melhus H, Nielsen EI, Sulku J, Gillespie U. Intervention fidelity and process outcomes of medication reviews including post-discharge follow-up in older hospitalized patients: Process evaluation of the MedBridge trial. J Clin Pharm Ther 2020; 45:1021-1029. [PMID: 32171028 DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.13128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2020] [Accepted: 02/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE Drug-related problems (DRPs) are a growing healthcare burden worldwide. In an ongoing cluster-randomized controlled trial in Sweden (MedBridge), comprehensive medication reviews (CMRs) including post-discharge follow-up have been conducted in older hospitalized patients to prevent and solve DRPs. As part of a process evaluation of the MedBridge trial, this study aimed to assess the intervention fidelity and process outcomes of the trial's interventions. METHODS For intervention delivery, the percentage of patients that received intervention components was calculated per study group. Process outcomes, measured in about one-third of all intervention patients, included the following: the number of identified medication discrepancies, DRPs and recommendations to solve DRPs, correction rate of discrepancies, and implementation rate of recommendations. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The MedBridge trial included 2637 patients (mean age: 81 years). The percentage of intervention patients (n = 1745) that received the intended intervention components was 94%-98% during admission, and 40%-81% upon and after discharge. The percentage of control patients (n = 892) that received at least one unintended intervention component was 15%. On average, 1.1 discrepancies and 2.0 DRPs were identified in 652 intervention patients. The correction and implementation rates were 79% and 73%, respectively. Stop medication was the most frequently implemented recommendation (n = 293) and 77% of the patients had at least one corrected discrepancy or implemented recommendation. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION The intervention fidelity within the MedBridge trial was high for CMRs during hospital stay and lower for intervention components upon and after discharge. The high prevalence of corrected discrepancies and implemented recommendations may explain potential effects of CMRs in the MedBridge trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas G H Kempen
- Hospital Pharmacy Department, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.,Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Henrik Cam
- Hospital Pharmacy Department, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.,Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Amanda Kälvemark
- Hospital Pharmacy Department, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Håkan Melhus
- Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Elisabet I Nielsen
- Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Johanna Sulku
- Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University/Region Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden.,Pharmacy Department, Region Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden
| | - Ulrika Gillespie
- Hospital Pharmacy Department, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.,Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kempen TGH, Kälvemark A, Gillespie U, Stewart D. Comprehensive medication reviews by ward-based pharmacists in Swedish hospitals: What does the patient have to say? J Eval Clin Pract 2020; 26:149-157. [PMID: 30834647 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2018] [Revised: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 02/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES Inappropriate medication prescribing and use amongst older patients is a major patient safety and health care problem. To promote appropriate medication prescribing and use, comprehensive medication reviews (CMRs) by ward-based pharmacists, including follow-up telephone calls after hospital discharge, have been conducted in older patients in the context of a randomized controlled trial (RCT). One of the key actors in a CMR is the patient. To support the understanding of the effects of CMRs on patients' health outcomes and improve clinical practice, knowledge about the patient perspective is needed. We therefore aimed to explore older patients' experiences with, and views on, hospital-initiated CMRs and follow-up telephone calls by ward-based clinical pharmacists within an RCT. METHODS We conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with 15 patients (66-94 years) and carers from four hospitals in Sweden. Discussion topics included communication, information, decision-making, and effects on the patient. Interviews took place after discharge, were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed using a framework approach. RESULTS In general, patients' experiences and views were positive. Seven key themes were identified: (a) feeling of being taken care of and heterogenous health effects; (b) the pharmacist is competent; (c) despite the unclear role of pharmacists, their involvement is appreciated; (d) patients rely on health care professionals for decision-making; (e) importance of being informed, but receiving and retaining information is problematic; (f) time, location, and other factors influencing the effectiveness of CMRs; and (g) generic substitution is a problem. CONCLUSIONS Older patients generally have positive experiences with and views on CMRs and follow-up telephone calls. However, some factors, like the unclear role of the ward-based pharmacist and problems with receiving and retaining information, may negatively impact the effectiveness of these interventions. Future initiatives on hospital-initiated CMRs by clinical pharmacists should address these negative factors and utilize the positive views.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas G H Kempen
- Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.,Hospital Pharmacy Department, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Amanda Kälvemark
- Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Ulrika Gillespie
- Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Derek Stewart
- School of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK.,College of Pharmacy, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kempen TGH, Bertilsson M, Lindner KJ, Sulku J, Nielsen EI, Högberg A, Vikerfors T, Melhus H, Gillespie U. Medication Reviews Bridging Healthcare (MedBridge): Study protocol for a pragmatic cluster-randomised crossover trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2017; 61:126-132. [PMID: 28739539 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2017] [Revised: 07/18/2017] [Accepted: 07/20/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mismanaged prescribing and use of medication among elderly puts major pressure on current healthcare systems. Performing a medication review, a structured critical examination of a patient's medications, during hospital stay with active follow-up into primary care could optimise treatment benefit and minimise harm. However, a lack of high quality evidence inhibits widespread implementation. This manuscript describes the rationale and design of a pragmatic cluster-randomised, crossover trial to fulfil this need for evidence. AIM To study the effects of hospital-initiated comprehensive medication reviews, including active follow-up, on elderly patients' healthcare utilisation compared to 1) usual care and 2) solely hospital based reviews. DESIGN Multicentre, three-treatment, replicated, cluster-randomised, crossover trial. SETTING 8 wards with a multidisciplinary team within 4 hospitals in 3 Swedish counties. PARTICIPANTS Patients aged 65years or older, admitted to one of the study wards. EXCLUSION CRITERIA Palliative stage; residing in other than the hospital's county; medication review within the last 30days; one-day admission. INTERVENTIONS 1, comprehensive medication review during hospital stay; 2, same as 1 with the addition of active follow-up into primary care; 3, usual care. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE Incidence of unplanned hospital visits during a 12-month follow-up period. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSES Extraction and collection from the counties' medical record system into a GCP compliant electronic data capture system. Intention-to-treat-analyses using hierarchical models. RELEVANCE This study has a high potential to show a reduction in elderly patients' morbidity, contributing to more sustainable healthcare in the long run.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas G H Kempen
- Pharmacy Department, Uppsala University Hospital, Ing.13 2 tr, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Maria Bertilsson
- Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Johanna Sulku
- Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University/Region Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden; Department of Development, Region Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden
| | - Elisabet I Nielsen
- Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Tomas Vikerfors
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Västerås Hospital, Västerås, Sweden
| | - Håkan Melhus
- Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Ulrika Gillespie
- Pharmacy Department, Uppsala University Hospital, Ing.13 2 tr, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|