The Effects of Expansion on the Objective and Subjective Performance of Hearing Instrument Users

The present study investigated the effects of expansion on the objective and subjective performance of 20 hearing instrument users fitted binaurally with digital ITE products. Objective performance was evaluated in quiet using the Connected Speech Test and in noise using the Hearing in Noise Test. Subjective performance was evaluated in two ways: (a) by having each participant rate their satisfaction regarding the amount of noise reduction they perceived in each expansion condition on a daily basis and (b) by having each participant indicate which expansion condition they preferred following the completion of a two-week trial. Results indicated that expansion significantly reduced low-level speech perception performance; however, satisfaction and preference ratings significantly increased when using expansion. The effect of degree of hearing loss, expansion kneepoint, and expansion ratio on the effectiveness of expansion for a given listener was discussed.

The subjective evaluation of the expansion time constant in single-channel wide dynamic range compression hearing instruments

The present study investigated the subjective evaluation of expansion time constants in single-channel wide dynamic range compression (WDRC) hearing instruments. Thirty participants utilized binaural WDRC hearing instruments for a two-week trial. Subjective evaluations were conducted by having each participant rate their satisfaction with the expansion time constant on a daily basis and by having each participant indicate their preferred expansion time constant following the completion of the two-week trial. Each change in expansion time constant significantly affected listener satisfaction; however, all time constants resulted in satisfactory performance. Of the users expressing a preference, 75% preferred fast-acting over slow-acting expansion. These findings suggest that dynamic expansion parameters play an important role in determining the effectiveness of the feature for a given listener.

SII and fit-to-target analysis of compression system performance as a function of number of compression channels

This work was undertaken to answer the question, 'How does the speech audibility/fit-to-gain-target provided by compression change with number of channels?' For each of 957 audiograms and a given number of compression channels, the channel crossover frequencies were set either to maximize the SII (speech intelligibility index) for low- and high-level speech spectra, or to optimize the fit-to-gain targets from the Cambridge method for loudness equalization (CAMEQ). The audiograms comprised all common configurations, and losses ranged from mild to severe. Use of these computational procedures allowed the predicted, channel-number-based performance to be determined separately from the effects of other compression parameters. From one to five channels were sufficient to yield predicted speech recognition performance within 5% of maximum for 90% of the 'mild' and 'moderate' audiograms. Three to nine channels were necessary for the same level of predicted performance for 90% of the 'severe' audiograms. Four channels or fewer were sufficient to produce less than 5 dB rms error in fit to CAMEQ targets for 90% of all audiograms.

The objective and subjective evaluation of multichannel expansion in wide dynamic range compression hearing instruments

PURPOSE

The effects of multichannel expansion on the objective and subjective evaluation of 20 listeners fitted binaurally with 4-channel, digital in-the-ear hearing instruments were investigated.

METHOD

Objective evaluations were conducted in quiet using the Connected Speech Test (CST) and in noise using the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) at 40, 50, and 60 dB SPL. Subjective evaluations were conducted by having each participant (a) rate their satisfaction regarding the amount of noise reduction they perceived daily and (b) indicate which expansion condition they preferred overall after a 2-week trial. Three expansion settings were programmed into the hearing aids: 4-channel expansion, expansion restricted to Channels 1 and 2 only, and expansion off.

RESULTS

Listeners performed significantly better in quiet (CST) and in noise (HINT) for the off condition than for either multichannel condition; however, restricting expansion to Channels 1 and 2 improved objective performance in quiet and in noise relative to the 4-channel condition. Conversely, satisfaction ratings were significantly greater for both multichannel conditions than for the off condition; however, satisfaction ratings were similar for the restricted and the 4-channel conditions. Overall, listeners preferred any form of multichannel expansion to no expansion; however, overall preference was similar for the restricted and the 4-channel conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Hearing instrument users prefer the use of multichannel expansion despite the fact multichannel expansion may significantly reduce the recognition of low-level speech in quiet and in noise. Although restricting expansion to Channels 1 and 2 (i.e., 2000 Hz and below) maintained subjective benefit for wide dynamic range compression hearing instrument users, the recognition of low-level speech was not completely preserved.

The effects of expansion time constants on the objective performance of hearing instrument users

The present study investigated the effects of expansion time constants on the objective performance of 20 hearing instrument users fitted binaurally with digital in-the-ear products. Objective performance was evaluated in quiet using the Connected Speech Test and in noise using the Hearing in Noise Test. Results indicated that objective performance in quiet and in noise decreased as the expansion time constant increased. Furthermore, expansion time constants affected the objective performance of listeners with varying degrees of hearing loss in a similar manner.

The effects of high presentation levels on consonant feature transmission

The effect of high speech presentation levels on consonant recognition and feature transmission was assessed in eight participants with normal hearing. Consonant recognition in noise (0 dB signal-to-noise ratio) was measured at five overall speech levels ranging from 65 to 100 dB SPL. Consistent with the work of others, overall percent correct performance decreased as the presentation level of speech increased [e.g., G. A. Studebaker, R. L. Sherbecoe, D. M. McDaniel, and C. A. Gwaltney, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105(4), 2431-2444 (1999)]. Confusion matrices were analyzed in terms of relative percent information transmitted at each speech presentation level, as a function of feature. Six feature sets (voicing, place, nasality, duration, frication, and sonorance) were analyzed. Results showed the feature duration (long consonant duration fricatives) to be most affected by increases in level, while the voicing feature was relatively unaffected by increases in level. In addition, alveolar consonants were substantially affected by level, while palatal consonants were not. While the underlying mechanisms responsible for decreases in performance with level increases are unclear, an analysis of common error patterns at high levels suggests that saturation of the neural response and/or a loss of neural synchrony may play a role.

Effects of single-band syllabic amplitude compression on temporal speech information in nonsense syllables and in sentences

The effects of single-band amplitude compression on the use by subjects with normal hearing of temporal speech information were assessed using speech stimuli that had been processed to remove most spectral information before being compressed. The resulting signal-related-noise (SRN) stimuli isolated the effects of compression on the temporal information in speech by making it impossible for subjects to identify stimulus items on the basis of spectral speech information. Subjects with normal hearing listened to /aCa/ SRN disyllables that had been subjected to single-band compression at various combinations of compression ratio (CR) and time constants (TC). Performance was reduced only in the most severe compression condition (CR = 8; TC = 50), and then only slightly. Additional testing showed that subjects could use both periodicity and compression-overshoot artifactual information--in addition to envelope information--to identify the compressed /aCa/ stimuli. When a list of 10 context-controlled sentences was converted to SRN and compressed at CR = 8 and TC = 50, the ability of subjects with normal hearing to identify the sentences was significantly affected. Results established that (a) subjects with normal hearing differ widely in their abilities to use temporal information for speech identification, even after training; (b) subjects can learn to use both temporal envelope and periodicity information for identification if disyllables, even though; (c) subjects with normal hearing need envelope but not periodicity information to identify SRN sentences in a closed set. These results suggest that single-band compression at CR = 8 and TC = 50 would be undesirable for persons with limited ability to resolve speech spectral information. It is currently not known how less severe compression conditions would affect envelope information in sentences.

Robust adaptive microphone array processing for hearing aids: realistic speech enhancement

The problem of combining the outputs of an array of microphones as a single input for a hearing aid is investigated. Emphasis is placed on the conservative prediction of realistically achievable performance gains provided by the array over a single microphone. Performance improvement is measured as a change in the speech reception threshold (SRT) between single microphone and multimicrophone conditions. Consistent with previous work, predictions of this change in SRT using intelligibility averaged gain, [symbol: see text] are shown to be good. Consequently, this measure is used, along with changes in signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), to evaluate array performance. The results presented include the effects of acoustic headshadow, small room reverberation, microphone placement uncertainty, and desired speaker location uncertainty. It is in this context that realistic predictions of speech enhancement provided by robust adaptive microphone array processors are discussed. Performance improvements are demonstrated relative to the "best" single microphone in the array for three types of spatial filters: Fixed, robust block processed, and robust adaptive. The performance of the robust block processed arrays is shown to be attainable with adaptive implementations. One fundamental criterion employed in robust beamformer design directly limits the amount of cancellation of the desired signal that can occur.

A Revised Speech Intelligibility Rating (RSIR) test: listeners with normal hearing

Two experiments were conducted to examine the intelligibility of 72 passages of connected discourse prepared by Cox and McDaniel in their development of the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) test. Intelligibility was assessed with a method-of-adjustment (MOA) procedure in which listeners adjusted the level of a multi-talker babble until they could just understand 50% of a passage; the measure of intelligibility was the signal-to-babble ratio, dB S/B. The objective was to develop a Revised Speech Intelligibility Rating (RSIR) test that would comprise a large number of equivalent passages that produce reliable intelligibility measures. In experiment 1, the S/B ratio was based on the overall root-mean-square (rms) levels of speech and babble, as represented by the average level of frequent peaks observed on a VU meter. Across all 72 passages, mean intelligibility was -1.43 dB S/B, and the measure of intelligibility for 42 passages was within +/- 0.5 dB of the overall mean for all 72 passages. In experiment 2, the S/B ratio was based on long-term rms levels of speech and babble measured in 16 one-third-octave bands, with center frequencies from 160 to 5000 Hz. In an effort to achieve greater equivalence in intelligibility among passages, the overall rms level of each passage was attenuated by the difference between SB16-band for an individual passage and S/B16-band for a reference passage. Mean intelligibility across all 72 passages was -8.06 dB, and the measure of intelligibility was within +/- 0.5 dB of the overall mean for 64 of the 72 passages. For those 64 passages, the 95% critical difference for five MOAs was 0.72 dB, which corresponds to an estimated percentage critical difference of 10.8%.

Frequency-importance functions for words in high- and low-context sentences

The relative importance and absolute contributions of various spectral regions to speech intelligibility under conditions of either neutral or predictable sentential context were examined. Specifically, the frequency-importance functions for a set of monosyllabic words embedded in a highly predictive sentence context versus a sentence with little predictive information were developed using Articulation Index (AI) methods. Forty-two young normal-hearing adults heard sentences presented at signal-to-noise ratios from -8 to +14 dB in a noise shaped to conform to the peak spectrum of the speech. Results indicated only slight differences in 1/3-octave importance functions due to differences in semantic context, although the crossovers differed by a constant 180 Hz. Methodological and theoretical aspects of parameter estimation in the AI model are discussed. The results suggest that semantic context, as defined by these conditions, may alter frequency-importance relationships in addition to the dynamic range over which intelligibility rises.