Knowledge Mapping for Climate Change and Food- and Waterborne Diseases

The authors extracted from the PubMed and ScienceDirect bibliographic databases all articles published between 1998 and 2009 that were relevant to climate change and food- and waterborne diseases. Any material within each article that provided information about a relevant pathogen and its relationship with climate and climate change was summarized as a key fact, entered into a relational knowledge base, and tagged with the terminology (predefined terms) used in the field. These terms were organized, quantified, and mapped according to predefined hierarchical categories. For noncholera Vibrio sp. and Cryptosporidium sp., data on climatic and environmental influences (52% and 49% of the total number of key facts, respectively) pertained to specific weather phenomena (as opposed to climate change phenomena) and environmental determinants, whereas information on the potential effects of food-related determinants that might be related to climate or climate change were virtually absent. This proportion was lower for the other pathogens studied (Campylobacter sp. 40%, Salmonella sp. 27%, Norovirus 25%, Listeria sp. 8%), but they all displayed a distinct concentration of information on general food-and water-related determinants or effects, albeit with little detail. Almost no information was available concerning the potential effects of changes in climatic variables on the pathogens evaluated, such as changes in air or water temperature, precipitation, humidity, UV radiation, wind, cloud coverage, sunshine hours, or seasonality. Frequency profiles revealed an abundance of data on weather and food-specific determinants, but also exposed extensive data deficiencies, particularly with regard to the potential effects of climate change on the pathogens evaluated. A reprioritization of public health research is warranted to ensure that funding is dedicated to explicitly studying the effects of changes in climate variables on food- and waterborne diseases.

Characterization of highly porous polymeric materials with pore diameters larger than 100 nm by mercury porosimetry and X-ray scattering methods

Highly porous polymeric materials with pore sizes ranging from 100 nm to 1 microm are a very challenging class of materials not only to prepare synthetically (due to the high capillary pressures generated upon solvent removal) but also to characterize structurally. Through the examples of three different types of porous compounds synthesized in our laboratory (i) high-density melamine-based "MF-hd" with monomodal pore diameters around 500-900 nm, (ii) low-density melamine-based "MF-ld" with bimodal pore size distribution and average diameters around 2.3 microm and 350 nm, (iii) highly porous polyurethane "PU" with monomodal pore sizes around 150 nm, we confirm the limitations of mercury porosimetry as a means to investigate the architecture of materials with very high porosity (>80 vol %) and low compressive strength. Instead, a combination of high-resolution scanning electron microscopy and small-angle and ultrasmall-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS and USAXS, respectively) studies of these three types of materials helps in determining both the network and the pore structures. This work elucidates the need and applicability of the SAXS/USAXS techniques in characterizing such porous materials. For instance, the polyurethane specimens can only be quantitatively characterized by scattering techniques, the results of which are corroborated by high-resolution scanning electron microscopy observations.

Generation and characterization of test atmospheres with nanomaterials

To ensure the product safety of nanomaterials, BASF has initiated an extensive program to study the potential inhalation toxicity of nanosize particles. As preparation work for upcoming inhalation studies, the following manufactured nanomaterials have been evaluated for their behavior in an exposure system designed for inhalation toxicity studies: titanium dioxide, carbon black, Aerosil R104, Aerosil R106, aluminum oxide, copper(II) oxide, amorphous silicon dioxide, zinc oxide, and zirconium(IV) oxide. As the physicochemical properties and the complex nature of ultrafine aerosols may substantially influence the toxic potential, the particle size, specific surface area, zeta potential, and morphology of each of the materials were determined. Aerosols of each material were generated using a dry powder aerosol generator and by nebulization of particle suspensions. The mass concentration of the particles in the inhalation atmosphere was determined gravimetrically and the particle size was determined using a cascade impactor, an optical particle counter, and a scanning mobility particle sizer. The dispersion techniques used generated fine aerosols with particle size distributions in the respiratory range. However, as a result of the significant agglomeration of nanoparticles in the test materials evaluated, no more than a few mass percent of the materials were present as single nanoparticles (i.e., < 100 nm). Considering the number, a greater percentage of nanoparticles was present. Based on the obtained results and experience with the equipment, a technical setup for inhalation studies with nanomaterials is proposed. Furthermore, a stepwise testing approach is recommended that also could reduce the number of animals used in testing.