1
|
Haider MT, Freytag V, Krause L, Spethmann T, Gosau T, Beine MC, Knies C, Schröder-Schwarz J, Horn M, Riecken K, Lange T. Comparison of ex vivo bioluminescence imaging, Alu-qPCR and histology for the quantification of spontaneous lung and bone metastases in subcutaneous xenograft mouse models. Clin Exp Metastasis 2024; 41:103-115. [PMID: 38353934 PMCID: PMC10972982 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-024-10268-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
Bioluminescence imaging (BLI) is a non-invasive state-of-the-art-method for longitudinal tracking of tumor cells in mice. The technique is commonly used to determine bone metastatic burden in vivo and also suitable ex vivo to detect even smallest bone micro-metastases in spontaneous metastasis xenograft models. However, it is unclear to which extent ex vivo BLI correlates with alternative methods for metastasis quantification. Here, we compared ex vivo BLI, human DNA-based Alu-qPCR, and histology for the quantification of bone vs. lung metastases, which are amongst the most common sites of metastasis in prostate cancer (PCa) patients and spontaneous PCa xenograft models. Data from 93 immunodeficient mice were considered, each of which were subcutaneously injected with luciferase/RGB-labeled human PCa PC-3 cells. The primary tumors were resected at ~ 0.75 cm³ and mice were sacrificed ~ 3 weeks after surgery and immediately examined by ex vivo BLI. Afterwards, the right lungs and hind limbs with the higher BLI signal (BLIHi bone) were processed for histology, whereas the left lung lobes and hind limbs with the lower BLI signal (BLILo bone) were prepared for Alu-qPCR. Our data demonstrate remarkable differences in the correlation coefficients of the different methods for lung metastasis detection (r ~ 0.8) vs. bone metastasis detection (r ~ 0.4). However, the BLI values of the BLIHi and BLILo bones correlated very strongly (r ~ 0.9), indicating that the method per se was reliable under identical limitations; the overall level of metastasis to contralateral bones was astonishingly similar. Instead, the level of lung metastasis only weakly to moderately correlated with the level of bone metastasis formation. Summarized, we observed a considerable discrepancy between ex vivo BLI and histology/Alu-qPCR in the quantification of bone metastases, which was not observed in the case of lung metastases. Future studies using ex vivo BLI for bone metastasis quantification should combine multiple methods to accurately determine metastatic load in bone samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Therese Haider
- Institute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, University Medical Center Hamburg- Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany
| | - Vera Freytag
- Institute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, University Medical Center Hamburg- Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany
| | - Linda Krause
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tanja Spethmann
- Institute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, University Medical Center Hamburg- Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany
| | - Tobias Gosau
- Institute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, University Medical Center Hamburg- Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany
| | - Mia C Beine
- Institute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, University Medical Center Hamburg- Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany
| | - Christine Knies
- Institute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, University Medical Center Hamburg- Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany
| | - Jennifer Schröder-Schwarz
- Institute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, University Medical Center Hamburg- Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany
| | - Michael Horn
- Core Facility In Vivo Optical Imaging, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Mildred Scheel Cancer Career Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kristoffer Riecken
- Research Department Cell and Gene Therapy, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tobias Lange
- Institute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, University Medical Center Hamburg- Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany.
- Institute of Anatomy I, University Hospital Jena, Teichgraben 7, Jena, 07743, Germany.
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), Ulm, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Böckelmann LC, Freytag V, Ahlers AK, Maar H, Gosau T, Baranowsky A, Schmitz R, Pantel K, Schumacher U, Haider MT, Lange T. Efficacy of zoledronic acid for the elimination of disseminated tumor cells in a clinically relevant, spontaneously metastatic prostate cancer xenograft model. Bone 2023; 171:116741. [PMID: 36934984 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2023.116741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023]
Abstract
Bone metastases develop in >90 % of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (PCa) through complex interactions between the bone microenvironment and tumor cells. Previous androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), which is known to cause bone loss, as well as anti-resorptive agents such as zoledronic acid (ZA), used to prevent skeletal complications, may influence these interactions and thereby the growth of disseminated tumor cells (DTC) in the bone marrow (BM). Here, a spontaneously metastatic xenograft tumor model of human PCa was further optimized to mimic the common clinical situation of ADT (castration) combined with primary tumor resection in vivo. The effects of these interventions, alone or in combination with ZA treatment, on tumor cell dissemination to the BM and other distant sites were analyzed. Metastatic burden was quantified by human-specific Alu-qPCR, bioluminescence imaging (BLI), and immunohistochemistry. Further, bone remodeling was assessed by static histomorphometry and serum parameters. Initial comparative analysis between NSG and SCID mice showed that spontaneous systemic dissemination of subcutaneous PC-3 xenograft tumors was considerably enhanced in NSG mice. Primary tumor resection and thereby prolonged observational periods resulted in a higher overall metastatic cell load at necropsy and tumor growth alone caused significant bone loss, which was further augmented by surgical castration. In addition, castrated mice showed a strong trend towards higher bone metastasis loads. Weekly treatment of mice with ZA completely prevented castration- and tumor-induced bone loss but had no effect on bone metastasis burden. Conversely, the total lung metastasis load as determined by BLI was significantly decreased upon ZA treatment. These findings provide a basis for future research on the role of ZA not only in preventing skeletal complications but also in reducing metastasis to other organs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Clemens Böckelmann
- Institute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, Center for Experimental Medicine, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Vera Freytag
- Institute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, Center for Experimental Medicine, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ann-Kristin Ahlers
- Institute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, Center for Experimental Medicine, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hanna Maar
- Institute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, Center for Experimental Medicine, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Institute of Anatomy I, Cancer Center Central Germany, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Tobias Gosau
- Institute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, Center for Experimental Medicine, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anke Baranowsky
- Department of Osteology and Biomechanics, Center for Experimental Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Trauma Surgery and Orthopedics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Schmitz
- Institute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, Center for Experimental Medicine, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Klaus Pantel
- Institute of Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Udo Schumacher
- Institute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, Center for Experimental Medicine, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marie-Therese Haider
- Institute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, Center for Experimental Medicine, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tobias Lange
- Institute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, Center for Experimental Medicine, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Institute of Anatomy I, Cancer Center Central Germany, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Neidhardt M, Gessert N, Gosau T, Kemmling J, Feldhaus S, Schumacher U, Schlaefer A. Force estimation from 4D OCT data in a human tumor xenograft mouse model. Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering 2020. [DOI: 10.1515/cdbme-2020-0022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Minimally invasive robotic surgery offer benefits such as reduced physical trauma, faster recovery and lesser pain for the patient. For these procedures, visual and haptic feedback to the surgeon is crucial when operating surgical tools without line-of-sight with a robot. External force sensors are biased by friction at the tool shaft and thereby cannot estimate forces between tool tip and tissue. As an alternative, vision-based force estimation was proposed. Here, interaction forces are directly learned from deformation observed by an external imaging system. Recently, an approach based on optical coherence tomography and deep learning has shown promising results. However, most experiments are performed on ex-vivo tissue. In this work, we demonstrate that models trained on dead tissue do not perform well in in vivo data. We performed multiple experiments on a human tumor xenograft mouse model, both on in vivo, perfused tissue and dead tissue. We compared two deep learning models in different training scenarios. Training on perfused, in vivo data improved model performance by 24% for in vivo force estimation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Neidhardt
- Institute of Medical Technology and Intelligent Systems, Hamburg University of Technology , Hamburg , Germany
| | - Nils Gessert
- Institute of Medical Technology and Intelligent Systems, Hamburg University of Technology , Hamburg , Germany
| | - Tobias Gosau
- Department of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf , Hamburg , Germany
| | - Julia Kemmling
- Department of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf , Hamburg , Germany
| | - Susanne Feldhaus
- Department of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf , Hamburg , Germany
| | - Udo Schumacher
- Department of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf , Hamburg , Germany
| | - Alexander Schlaefer
- Institute of Medical Technology and Intelligent Systems, Hamburg University of Technology , Hamburg , Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lange T, Oh-Hohenhorst* SJ, Joosse S, Hahn O, Gosau T, Feldhaus S, Maar H, Gehrcke R, Kluth M, Simon R, Schlomm T, Huland H, Schumacher U. MP68-19 DEVELOPMENT AND CHARACTERISATION OF A SPONTANEOUSLY METASTATIC PATIENT-DERIVED XENOGRAFT (PDX) MODEL OF HUMAN PROSTATE CANCER (PCA). J Urol 2019. [DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000557034.25201.d2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
5
|
Lange T, Oh-Hohenhorst SJ, Joosse SA, Pantel K, Hahn O, Gosau T, Dyshlovoy SA, Wellbrock J, Feldhaus S, Maar H, Gehrcke R, Kluth M, Simon R, Schlomm T, Huland H, Schumacher U. Development and Characterization of a Spontaneously Metastatic Patient-Derived Xenograft Model of Human Prostate Cancer. Sci Rep 2018; 8:17535. [PMID: 30510249 PMCID: PMC6277427 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-35695-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2018] [Accepted: 11/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Here we describe the establishment and characterization of an AR+, PSMA+, ERG+, PTEN-/-, CHD1+/- patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model termed 'C5', which has been developed from a 60 years old patient suffering from castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The patient underwent radical prostatectomy, showed early tumor marker PSA recurrence and, one year after surgery, abiraterone resistance. Subcutaneous C5 tumors can be serially transplanted between mice and grow within ~90 days to 1.5-2 cm³ tumors in SCID Balb/c mice (take rate 100%), NOD-scid IL2Rgnull (NSG) mice (100%) and C57BL/6 pfp-/-/rag2-/- mice (66%). In contrast, no tumor growth is observed in female mice. C5 tumors can be cryopreserved and show the same growth characteristics in vivo afterwards. C5 tumor cells do not grow stably in vitro, neither under two- nor three-dimensional cell culture conditions. Upon serial transplantation, some C5 tumors spontaneously disseminated to distant sites with an observable trend towards higher metastatic cell loads in scid compared to NSG mice. Lung metastases could be verified by histology by means of anti-PSMA immunohistochemistry, exclusively demonstrating single disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) and micro-metastases. Upon surgical resection of the primary tumors, such pulmonary foci rarely grew out to multi-cellular metastatic colonies despite doubled overall survival span. In the brain and bone marrow, the metastatic cell load present at surgery even disappeared during the post-surgical period. We provide shallow whole genome sequencing and whole exome sequencing data of C5 tumors demonstrating the copy number aberration/ mutation status of this PCa model and proving genomic stability over several passages. Moreover, we analyzed genomic and transcriptomic alterations during metastatic progression achieved by serial transplantation. This study describes a novel PCa PDX model that enables future research on several aspects of metastatic PCa, particularly for the AR+ , ERG+ , PTEN-/- PCa subtype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Lange
- Institute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Su Jung Oh-Hohenhorst
- Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Simon A Joosse
- Department of Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Klaus Pantel
- Department of Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Hahn
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Robert-Koch-Strasse 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Tobias Gosau
- Institute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sergey A Dyshlovoy
- Laboratory of Experimental Oncology, Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section Pneumology, Hubertus Wald-Tumorzentrum, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,School of Natural Sciences, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russian Federation
| | - Jasmin Wellbrock
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Susanne Feldhaus
- Institute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hanna Maar
- Institute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Renate Gehrcke
- Institute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martina Kluth
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ronald Simon
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Schlomm
- Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Urology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hartwig Huland
- Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Udo Schumacher
- Institute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Petersen H, Tavakoli F, Kruber S, Münscher A, Gliese A, Hansen NO, Uschold S, Eggert D, Robertson WD, Gosau T, Sehner S, Kwiatkowski M, Schlüter H, Schumacher U, Knecht R, Miller RJD. Comparative study of wound healing in rat skin following incision with a novel picosecond infrared laser (PIRL) and different surgical modalities. Lasers Surg Med 2016; 48:385-91. [PMID: 26941063 PMCID: PMC5396142 DOI: 10.1002/lsm.22498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/19/2016] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objective As a result of wound healing the original tissue is replaced by dysfunctional scar tissue. Reduced tissue damage during surgical procedures beneficially affects the size of the resulting scar and overall healing time. Thus the choice of a particular surgical instrument can have a significant influence on the postoperative wound healing. To overcome these problems of wound healing we applied a novel picosecond infrared laser (PIRL) system to surgical incisions. Previous studies indicated that negligible thermal, acoustic, or ionization stress effects to the surrounding tissue results in a superior wound healing. Study Design/Materials and Methods Using the PIRL system as a surgical scalpel, we performed a prospective wound healing study on rat skin and assessed its final impact on scar formation compared to the electrosurgical device and cold steel. As for the incisions, 6 full‐thickness, 1‐cm long‐linear skin wounds were created on the dorsum of four rats using the PIRL, an electrosurgical device, and a conventional surgical scalpel, respectively. Rats were euthanized after 21 days of wound healing. The thickness of the subepithelial fibrosis, the depth and the transverse section of the total scar area of each wound were analyzed histologically. Results After 21 days of wound healing the incisions made by PIRL showed minor scar tissue formation as compared to the electrosurgical device and the scalpel. Highly significant differences (P < 0.001) were noted by comparing the electrosurgical device with PIRL and scalpel. The transverse section of the scar area also showed significant differences (P = 0.043) when comparing PIRL (mean: 141.46 mm2; 95%CI: 105.8–189.0 mm2) with scalpel incisions (mean: 206.82 mm2; 95%CI: 154.8–276.32 mm2). The subepithelial width of the scars that resulted from using the scalpel were 1.3 times larger than those obtained by using the PIRL (95%CI: 1.0–1.6) though the difference was not significant (P < 0.083). Conclusions The hypothesis that PIRL results in minimal scar formation with improved cosmetic outcomes was positively verified. In particular the resection of skin tumors or pathological scars, such as hypertrophic scars or keloids, are promising future fields of PIRL application. Lasers Surg. Med. 48:385–391, 2016. © 2016 The Authors. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannes Petersen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, 20246, Germany
| | - Fatemeh Tavakoli
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, 20246, Germany
| | - Sebastian Kruber
- Max Planck Institute for the Structure and Dynamics of Matter, Hamburg, 22761, Germany
| | - Adrian Münscher
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, 20246, Germany
| | - Alexandra Gliese
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, 20246, Germany
| | - Nils-Owe Hansen
- Max Planck Institute for the Structure and Dynamics of Matter, Hamburg, 22761, Germany
| | - Stephanie Uschold
- Max Planck Institute for the Structure and Dynamics of Matter, Hamburg, 22761, Germany
| | - Dennis Eggert
- Heinrich-Pette-Institute, Leibnitz Institute of Experimental Virology, Hamburg, 20246, Germany
| | - Wesley D Robertson
- Max Planck Institute for the Structure and Dynamics of Matter, Hamburg, 22761, Germany
| | - Tobias Gosau
- Department of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, 20246, Germany
| | - Susanne Sehner
- Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, 20246, Germany
| | - Marcel Kwiatkowski
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, 20246, Germany
| | - Hartmut Schlüter
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, 20246, Germany
| | - Udo Schumacher
- Department of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, 20246, Germany
| | - Rainald Knecht
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, 20246, Germany
| | - R J Dwayne Miller
- Max Planck Institute for the Structure and Dynamics of Matter, Hamburg, 22761, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chekanov S, Derrick M, Krakauer D, Loizides JH, Magill S, Miglioranzi S, Musgrave B, Repond J, Yoshida R, Mattingly MCK, Antonioli P, Bari G, Basile M, Bellagamba L, Boscherini D, Bruni A, Bruni G, Cara Romeo G, Cifarelli L, Cindolo F, Contin A, Corradi M, De Pasquale S, Giusti P, Iacobucci G, Margiotti A, Montanari A, Nania R, Palmonari F, Pesci A, Sartorelli G, Zichichi A, Aghuzumtsyan G, Bartsch D, Brock I, Goers S, Hartmann H, Hilger E, Irrgang P, Jakob HP, Kind O, Meyer U, Paul E, Rautenberg J, Renner R, Stifutkin A, Tandler J, Voss KC, Wang M, Weber A, Bailey DS, Brook NH, Cole JE, Heath GP, Namsoo T, Robins S, Wing M, Capua M, Mastroberardino A, Schioppa M, Susinno G, Kim JY, Kim YK, Lee JH, Lim IT, Pac MY, Caldwell A, Helbich M, Liu X, Mellado B, Ning Y, Paganis S, Ren Z, Schmidke WB, Sciulli F, Chwastowski J, Eskreys A, Figiel J, Galas A, Olkiewicz K, Stopa P, Zawiejski L, Adamczyk L, Bołd T, Grabowska-Bołd I, Kisielewska D, Kowal AM, Kowal M, Kowalski T, Przybycień M, Suszycki L, Szuba D, Szuba J, Kotański A, Słomiński W, Adler V, Behrens U, Bloch I, Borras K, Chiochia V, Dannheim D, Drews G, Fourletova J, Fricke U, Geiser A, Göttlicher P, Gutsche O, Haas T, Hain W, Hillert S, Kahle B, Kötz U, Kowalski H, Kramberger G, Labes H, Lelas D, Lim H, Löhr B, Mankel R, Melzer-Pellmann IA, Nguyen CN, Notz D, Nucio-Quiroz AE, Polini A, Raval A, Rurua L, Schneekloth U, Stösslein U, Wolf G, Youngman C, Zeuner W, Schlenstedt S, Barbagli G, Gallo E, Genta C, Pelfer PG, Bamberger A, Benen A, Karstens F, Dobur D, Vlasov NN, Bell M, Bussey PJ, Doyle AT, Ferrando J, Hamilton J, Hanlon S, Saxon DH, Skillicorn IO, Gialas I, Carli T, Gosau T, Holm U, Krumnack N, Lohrmann E, Milite M, Salehi H, Schleper P, Stonjek S, Wichmann K, Wick K, Ziegler A, Ziegler A, Collins-Tooth C, Foudas C, Gonçalo R, Long KR, Tapper AD, Cloth P, Filges D, Kataoka M, Nagano K, Tokushuku K, Yamada S, Yamazaki Y, Barakbaev AN, Boos EG, Pokrovskiy NS, Zhautykov BO, Son D, Piotrzkowski K, Barreiro F, Glasman C, González O, Labarga L, del Peso J, Tassi E, Terrón J, Vázquez M, Zambrana M, Barbi M, Corriveau F, Gliga S, Lainesse J, Padhi S, Stairs DG, Walsh R, Tsurugai T, Antonov A, Danilov P, Dolgoshein BA, Gladkov D, Sosnovtsev V, Suchkov S, Dementiev RK, Ermolov PF, Golubkov YA, Katkov II, Khein LA, Korzhavina IA, Kuzmin VA, Levchenko BB, Lukina OY, Proskuryakov AS, Shcheglova LM, Zotkin SA, Coppola N, Grijpink S, Koffeman E, Kooijman P, Maddox E, Pellegrino A, Schagen S, Tiecke H, Velthuis JJ, Wiggers L, de Wolf E, Brümmer N, Bylsma B, Durkin LS, Ling TY, Cooper-Sarkar AM, Cottrell A, Devenish RCE, Foster B, Grzelak G, Gwenlan C, Patel S, Straub PB, Walczak R, Bertolin A, Brugnera R, Carlin R, Dal Corso F, Dusini S, Garfagnini A, Limentani S, Longhin A, Parenti A, Posocco M, Stanco L, Turcato M, Heaphy EA, Metlica F, Oh BY, Whitmore JJ, Iga Y, D’Agostini G, Marini G, Nigro A, Cormack C, Hart JC, McCubbin NA, Heusch C, Park IH, Pavel N, Abramowicz H, Gabareen A, Kananov S, Kreisel A, Levy A, Kuze M, Fusayasu T, Kagawa S, Kohno T, Tawara T, Yamashita T, Hamatsu R, Hirose T, Inuzuka M, Kaji H, Kitamura S, Matsuzawa K, Ferrero MI, Monaco V, Sacchi R, Solano A, Arneodo M, Ruspa M, Koop T, Martin JF, Mirea A, Butterworth JM, Hall-Wilton R, Jones TW, Lightwood MS, Sutton MR, Targett-Adams C, Ciborowski J, Ciesielski R, Łużniak P, Nowak RJ, Pawlak JM, Sztuk J, Tymieniecka T, Ukleja A, Ukleja J, Żarnecki AF, Adamus M, Plucinski P, Eisenberg Y, Gladilin LK, Hochman D, Karshon U, Riveline M, Kçira D, Lammers S, Li L, Reeder DD, Rosin M, Savin AA, Smith WH, Deshpande A, Dhawan S, Bhadra S, Catterall CD, Fourletov S, Hartner G, Menary S, Soares M, Standage J. Erratum: Bottom photoproduction measured using decays into muons in dijet events inepcollisions ats=318 GeV[Phys. Rev. D70, 012008 (2004)]. Int J Clin Exp Med 2006. [DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.74.059906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|