1
|
Basak S, Saikia N, Kwun D, Choi UB, Ding F, Bowen ME. Different Forms of Disorder in NMDA-Sensitive Glutamate Receptor Cytoplasmic Domains Are Associated with Differences in Condensate Formation. Biomolecules 2022; 13:4. [PMID: 36671389 PMCID: PMC9855357 DOI: 10.3390/biom13010004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-sensitive glutamate receptor (NMDAR) helps assemble downstream signaling pathways through protein interactions within the postsynaptic density (PSD), which are mediated by its intracellular C-terminal domain (CTD). The most abundant NMDAR subunits in the brain are GluN2A and GluN2B, which are associated with a developmental switch in NMDAR composition. Previously, we used single molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (smFRET) to show that the GluN2B CTD contained an intrinsically disordered region with slow, hop-like conformational dynamics. The CTD from GluN2B also undergoes liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) with synaptic proteins. Here, we extend these observations to the GluN2A CTD. Sequence analysis showed that both subunits contain a form of intrinsic disorder classified as weak polyampholytes. However, only GluN2B contained matched patterning of arginine and aromatic residues, which are linked to LLPS. To examine the conformational distribution, we used discrete molecular dynamics (DMD), which revealed that GluN2A favors extended disordered states containing secondary structures while GluN2B favors disordered globular states. In contrast to GluN2B, smFRET measurements found that GluN2A lacked slow conformational dynamics. Thus, simulation and experiments found differences in the form of disorder. To understand how this affects protein interactions, we compared the ability of these two NMDAR isoforms to undergo LLPS. We found that GluN2B readily formed condensates with PSD-95 and SynGAP, while GluN2A failed to support LLPS and instead showed a propensity for colloidal aggregation. That GluN2A fails to support this same condensate formation suggests a developmental switch in LLPS propensity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sujit Basak
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
| | - Nabanita Saikia
- Department of Chemistry, Navajo Technical University, Crownpoint, NM 87313, USA
| | - David Kwun
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
| | | | - Feng Ding
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634-0978, USA
| | - Mark E. Bowen
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gething C, Ferrar J, Misra B, Howells G, Andrzejewski AL, Bowen ME, Choi UB. Conformational change of Syntaxin-3b in regulating SNARE complex assembly in the ribbon synapses. Sci Rep 2022; 12:9261. [PMID: 35661757 PMCID: PMC9166750 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-09654-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Neurotransmitter release of synaptic vesicles relies on the assembly of the soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) complex, consisting of syntaxin and SNAP-25 on the plasma membrane and synaptobrevin on the synaptic vesicle. The formation of the SNARE complex progressively zippers towards the membranes, which drives membrane fusion between the plasma membrane and the synaptic vesicle. However, the underlying molecular mechanism of SNARE complex regulation is unclear. In this study, we investigated the syntaxin-3b isoform found in the retinal ribbon synapses using single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (smFRET) to monitor the conformational changes of syntaxin-3b that modulate the SNARE complex formation. We found that syntaxin-3b is predominantly in a self-inhibiting closed conformation, inefficiently forming the ternary SNARE complex. Conversely, a phosphomimetic mutation (T14E) at the N-terminal region of syntaxin-3b promoted the open conformation, similar to the constitutively open form of syntaxin LE mutant. When syntaxin-3b is bound to Munc18-1, SNARE complex formation is almost completely blocked. Surprisingly, the T14E mutation of syntaxin-3b partially abolishes Munc18-1 regulation, acting as a conformational switch to trigger SNARE complex assembly. Thus, we suggest a model where the conformational change of syntaxin-3b induced by phosphorylation initiates the release of neurotransmitters in the ribbon synapses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Gething
- Department of Biochemistry, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA
| | - Joshua Ferrar
- Department of Biochemistry, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA
| | - Bishal Misra
- Department of Biochemistry, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA
| | - Giovanni Howells
- Department of Biochemistry, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA
| | | | - Mark E Bowen
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.,Quantum-Si, Inc, Guilford, CT, 06437, USA
| | - Ucheor B Choi
- Department of Biochemistry, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA. .,Quantum-Si, Inc, Guilford, CT, 06437, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Choi UB, Dunleavy K, Matlock H, Gething C, Howells G, Misra B, White KI, Brunger A. Conformational dynamics of SNARE recycling mediated by NSF. FASEB J 2022. [DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.2022.36.s1.0r240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
4
|
Dunleavy KM, Matlock H, Gething C, Howells G, Misra B, White KI, Brunger AT, Choi UB. Conformational dynamics of SNARE recycling mediated by NSF. Biophys J 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.11.1284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
5
|
Gething C, Ferrar J, Misra B, Howells G, Choi UB. Conformational change of syntaxin-3b in regulating SNARE complex assembly in the ribbon synapses. Biophys J 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.11.1595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
|
6
|
van Dorp S, Qiu R, Choi UB, Wu MM, Yen M, Kirmiz M, Brunger AT, Lewis RS. Conformational dynamics of auto-inhibition in the ER calcium sensor STIM1. eLife 2021; 10:66194. [PMID: 34730514 PMCID: PMC8651296 DOI: 10.7554/elife.66194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The dimeric ER Ca2+ sensor STIM1 controls store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE) through the regulated binding of its CRAC activation domain (CAD) to Orai channels in the plasma membrane. In resting cells, the STIM1 CC1 domain interacts with CAD to suppress SOCE, but the structural basis of this interaction is unclear. Using single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (smFRET) and protein crosslinking approaches, we show that CC1 interacts dynamically with CAD in a domain-swapped configuration with an orientation predicted to sequester its Orai-binding region adjacent to the ER membrane. Following ER Ca2+ depletion and release from CAD, cysteine crosslinking indicates that the two CC1 domains become closely paired along their entire length in the active Orai-bound state. These findings provide a structural basis for the dual roles of CC1: sequestering CAD to suppress SOCE in resting cells and propelling it toward the plasma membrane to activate Orai and SOCE after store depletion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stijn van Dorp
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States
| | - Ruoyi Qiu
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States
| | - Ucheor B Choi
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States
| | - Minnie M Wu
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States
| | - Michelle Yen
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States
| | - Michael Kirmiz
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States
| | - Axel T Brunger
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States.,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States
| | - Richard S Lewis
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wilson SC, White KI, Zhou Q, Pfuetzner RA, Choi UB, Südhof TC, Brunger AT. Structures of neurexophilin-neurexin complexes reveal a regulatory mechanism of alternative splicing. EMBO J 2019; 38:e101603. [PMID: 31566781 PMCID: PMC6856630 DOI: 10.15252/embj.2019101603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2019] [Revised: 08/29/2019] [Accepted: 08/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Neurexins are presynaptic, cell-adhesion molecules that specify the functional properties of synapses via interactions with trans-synaptic ligands. Neurexins are extensively alternatively spliced at six canonical sites that regulate multifarious ligand interactions, but the structural mechanisms underlying alternative splicing-dependent neurexin regulation are largely unknown. Here, we determined high-resolution structures of the complex of neurexophilin-1 and the second laminin/neurexin/sex-hormone-binding globulin domain (LNS2) of neurexin-1 and examined how alternative splicing at splice site #2 (SS2) regulates the complex. Our data reveal a unique, extensive, neurexophilin-neurexin binding interface that extends the jelly-roll β-sandwich of LNS2 of neurexin-1 into neurexophilin-1. The SS2A insert of LNS2 augments this interface, increasing the binding affinity of LNS2 for neurexophilin-1. Taken together, our data reveal an unexpected architecture of neurexophilin-neurexin complexes that accounts for the modulation of binding by alternative splicing, which in turn regulates the competition of neurexophilin for neurexin binding with other ligands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven C Wilson
- Department of Molecular and Cellular PhysiologyStanford UniversityStanfordCAUSA
| | - K Ian White
- Department of Molecular and Cellular PhysiologyStanford UniversityStanfordCAUSA
| | - Qiangjun Zhou
- Department of Molecular and Cellular PhysiologyStanford UniversityStanfordCAUSA
| | - Richard A Pfuetzner
- Department of Molecular and Cellular PhysiologyStanford UniversityStanfordCAUSA
| | - Ucheor B Choi
- Department of Molecular and Cellular PhysiologyStanford UniversityStanfordCAUSA
| | - Thomas C Südhof
- Department of Molecular and Cellular PhysiologyStanford UniversityStanfordCAUSA
- Howard Hughes Medical InstituteStanford UniversityStanfordCAUSA
| | - Axel T Brunger
- Department of Molecular and Cellular PhysiologyStanford UniversityStanfordCAUSA
- Howard Hughes Medical InstituteStanford UniversityStanfordCAUSA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
This review summarizes current knowledge of synaptic proteins that are central to synaptic vesicle fusion in presynaptic active zones, including SNAREs (soluble N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor attachment protein receptors), synaptotagmin, complexin, Munc18 (mammalian uncoordinated-18), and Munc13 (mammalian uncoordinated-13), and highlights recent insights in the cooperation of these proteins for neurotransmitter release. Structural and functional studies of the synaptic fusion machinery suggest new molecular models of synaptic vesicle priming and Ca2+-triggered fusion. These studies will be a stepping-stone toward answering the question of how the synaptic vesicle fusion machinery achieves such high speed and sensitivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Axel T Brunger
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Department of Structural Biology, Department of Photon Science, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA;
| | - Ucheor B Choi
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Department of Structural Biology, Department of Photon Science, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA;
| | - Ying Lai
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Department of Structural Biology, Department of Photon Science, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA;
| | - Jeremy Leitz
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Department of Structural Biology, Department of Photon Science, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA;
| | - Qiangjun Zhou
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Department of Structural Biology, Department of Photon Science, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Brunger AT, Choi UB, Lai Y, Leitz J, White KI, Zhou Q. The pre-synaptic fusion machinery. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2019; 54:179-188. [PMID: 30986753 PMCID: PMC6939388 DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2019.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2019] [Revised: 03/02/2019] [Accepted: 03/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Here, we review recent insights into the neuronal presynaptic fusion machinery that releases neurotransmitter molecules into the synaptic cleft upon stimulation. The structure of the pre-fusion state of the SNARE/complexin-1/synaptotagmin-1 synaptic protein complex suggests a new model for the initiation of fast Ca2+-triggered membrane fusion. Functional studies have revealed roles of the essential factors Munc18 and Munc13, demonstrating that a part of their function involves the proper assembly of synaptic protein complexes. Near-atomic resolution structures of the NSF/αSNAP/SNARE complex provide first glimpses of the molecular machinery that disassembles the SNARE complex during the synaptic vesicle cycle. These structures show how this machinery captures the SNARE substrate and provide clues as to a possible processing mechanism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Axel T Brunger
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, USA; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, USA; Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, USA; Department of Photon Science, Stanford University, Stanford, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
| | - Ucheor B Choi
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, USA; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, USA; Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, USA; Department of Photon Science, Stanford University, Stanford, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, USA
| | - Ying Lai
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, USA; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, USA; Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, USA; Department of Photon Science, Stanford University, Stanford, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, USA
| | - Jeremy Leitz
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, USA; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, USA; Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, USA; Department of Photon Science, Stanford University, Stanford, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, USA
| | - Kristopher Ian White
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, USA; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, USA; Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, USA; Department of Photon Science, Stanford University, Stanford, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, USA
| | - Qiangjun Zhou
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, USA; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, USA; Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, USA; Department of Photon Science, Stanford University, Stanford, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Choi UB, Sanabria H, Smirnova T, Bowen ME, Weninger KR. Spontaneous Switching among Conformational Ensembles in Intrinsically Disordered Proteins. Biomolecules 2019; 9:biom9030114. [PMID: 30909517 PMCID: PMC6468417 DOI: 10.3390/biom9030114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2019] [Revised: 03/14/2019] [Accepted: 03/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The common conception of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) is that they stochastically sample all possible configurations driven by thermal fluctuations. This is certainly true for many IDPs, which behave as swollen random coils that can be described using polymer models developed for homopolymers. However, the variability in interaction energy between different amino acid sequences provides the possibility that some configurations may be strongly preferred while others are forbidden. In compact globular IDPs, core hydration and packing density can vary between segments of the polypeptide chain leading to complex conformational dynamics. Here, we describe a growing number of proteins that appear intrinsically disordered by biochemical and bioinformatic characterization but switch between restricted regions of conformational space. In some cases, spontaneous switching between conformational ensembles was directly observed, but few methods can identify when an IDP is acting as a restricted chain. Such switching between disparate corners of conformational space could bias ligand binding and regulate the volume of IDPs acting as structural or entropic elements. Thus, mapping the accessible energy landscape and capturing dynamics across a wide range of timescales are essential to recognize when an IDP is acting as such a switch.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ucheor B Choi
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Department of Structural Biology, Department of Photon Science, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| | - Hugo Sanabria
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA.
| | - Tatyana Smirnova
- Department of Chemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.
| | - Mark E Bowen
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.
| | - Keith R Weninger
- Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
White KI, Zhao M, Choi UB, Pfuetzner RA, Brunger AT. Structural principles of SNARE complex recognition by the AAA+ protein NSF. eLife 2018; 7:38888. [PMID: 30198481 PMCID: PMC6160233 DOI: 10.7554/elife.38888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2018] [Accepted: 08/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The recycling of SNARE proteins following complex formation and membrane fusion is an essential process in eukaryotic trafficking. A highly conserved AAA+ protein, NSF (N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor) and an adaptor protein, SNAP (soluble NSF attachment protein), disassemble the SNARE complex. We report electron-cryomicroscopy structures of the complex of NSF, αSNAP, and the full-length soluble neuronal SNARE complex (composed of syntaxin-1A, synaptobrevin-2, SNAP-25A) in the presence of ATP under non-hydrolyzing conditions at ~3.9 Å resolution. These structures reveal electrostatic interactions by which two αSNAP molecules interface with a specific surface of the SNARE complex. This interaction positions the SNAREs such that the 15 N-terminal residues of SNAP-25A are loaded into the D1 ring pore of NSF via a spiral pattern of interactions between a conserved tyrosine NSF residue and SNAP-25A backbone atoms. This loading process likely precedes ATP hydrolysis. Subsequent ATP hydrolysis then drives complete disassembly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Ian White
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Photon Science, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
| | - Minglei Zhao
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
| | - Ucheor B Choi
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Photon Science, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
| | - Richard A Pfuetzner
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Photon Science, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
| | - Axel T Brunger
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Photon Science, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Brunger AT, Leitz J, Zhou Q, Choi UB, Lai Y. Ca 2+-Triggered Synaptic Vesicle Fusion Initiated by Release of Inhibition. Trends Cell Biol 2018; 28:631-645. [PMID: 29706534 PMCID: PMC6056330 DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2018.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2018] [Revised: 03/17/2018] [Accepted: 03/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Recent structural and functional studies of the synaptic vesicle fusion machinery suggest an inhibited tripartite complex consisting of neuronal soluble N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (SNAREs), synaptotagmin, and complexin prior to Ca2+-triggered synaptic vesicle fusion. We speculate that Ca2+-triggered fusion commences with the release of inhibition by Ca2+ binding to synaptotagmin C2 domains. Subsequently, fusion is assisted by SNARE complex zippering and by active membrane remodeling properties of synaptotagmin. This additional, inhibitory role of synaptotagmin may be a general principle since other recent studies suggest that Ca2+ binding to extended synaptotagmin C2 domains enables lipid transport by releasing an inhibited state of the system, and that Munc13 may nominally be in an inhibited state, which is released upon Ca2+ binding to one of its C2 domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Axel T Brunger
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Photon Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Jeremy Leitz
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Photon Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Qiangjun Zhou
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Photon Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Ucheor B Choi
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Photon Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Ying Lai
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Photon Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Choi UB, Zhao M, White KI, Pfuetzner RA, Esquivies L, Zhou Q, Brunger AT. NSF-mediated disassembly of on- and off-pathway SNARE complexes and inhibition by complexin. eLife 2018; 7:36497. [PMID: 29985126 PMCID: PMC6130971 DOI: 10.7554/elife.36497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2018] [Accepted: 07/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
SNARE complex disassembly by the ATPase NSF is essential for neurotransmitter release and other membrane trafficking processes. We developed a single-molecule FRET assay to monitor repeated rounds of NSF-mediated disassembly and reassembly of individual SNARE complexes. For ternary neuronal SNARE complexes, disassembly proceeds in a single step within 100 msec. We observed short- (<0.32 s) and long-lived (≥0.32 s) disassembled states. The long-lived states represent fully disassembled SNARE complex, while the short-lived states correspond to failed disassembly or immediate reassembly. Either high ionic strength or decreased αSNAP concentration reduces the disassembly rate while increasing the frequency of short-lived states. NSF is also capable of disassembling anti-parallel ternary SNARE complexes, implicating it in quality control. Finally, complexin-1 competes with αSNAP binding to the SNARE complex; addition of complexin-1 has an effect similar to that of decreasing the αSNAP concentration, possibly differentially regulating cis and trans SNARE complexes disassembly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ucheor B Choi
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Photon Science, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
| | - Minglei Zhao
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
| | - K Ian White
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Photon Science, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
| | - Richard A Pfuetzner
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Photon Science, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
| | - Luis Esquivies
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Photon Science, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
| | - Qiangjun Zhou
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Photon Science, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
| | - Axel T Brunger
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Photon Science, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lai Y, Choi UB, Leitz J, Rhee HJ, Lee C, Altas B, Zhao M, Pfuetzner RA, Wang AL, Brose N, Rhee J, Brunger AT. Molecular Mechanisms of Synaptic Vesicle Priming by Munc13 and Munc18. Neuron 2017; 95:591-607.e10. [PMID: 28772123 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 148] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2016] [Revised: 05/08/2017] [Accepted: 07/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Munc13 catalyzes the transit of syntaxin from a closed complex with Munc18 into the ternary SNARE complex. Here we report a new function of Munc13, independent of Munc18: it promotes the proper syntaxin/synaptobrevin subconfiguration during assembly of the ternary SNARE complex. In cooperation with Munc18, Munc13 additionally ensures the proper syntaxin/SNAP-25 subconfiguration. In a reconstituted fusion assay with SNAREs, complexin, and synaptotagmin, inclusion of both Munc13 and Munc18 quadruples the Ca2+-triggered amplitude and achieves Ca2+ sensitivity at near-physiological concentrations. In Munc13-1/2 double-knockout neurons, expression of a constitutively open mutant of syntaxin could only minimally restore neurotransmitter release relative to Munc13-1 rescue. Together, the physiological functions of Munc13 may be related to regulation of proper SNARE complex assembly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Lai
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Photon Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Ucheor B Choi
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Photon Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Jeremy Leitz
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Photon Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Hong Jun Rhee
- Department of Molecular Neurobiology, Max Planck Institute for Experimental Medicine, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Choongku Lee
- Department of Molecular Neurobiology, Max Planck Institute for Experimental Medicine, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Bekir Altas
- Department of Molecular Neurobiology, Max Planck Institute for Experimental Medicine, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Minglei Zhao
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Photon Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Richard A Pfuetzner
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Photon Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Austin L Wang
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Photon Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Nils Brose
- Department of Molecular Neurobiology, Max Planck Institute for Experimental Medicine, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - JeongSeop Rhee
- Department of Molecular Neurobiology, Max Planck Institute for Experimental Medicine, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Axel T Brunger
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Photon Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wang S, Choi UB, Gong J, Yang X, Li Y, Wang AL, Yang X, Brunger AT, Ma C. Conformational change of syntaxin linker region induced by Munc13s initiates SNARE complex formation in synaptic exocytosis. EMBO J 2017; 36:816-829. [PMID: 28137749 PMCID: PMC5350566 DOI: 10.15252/embj.201695775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2016] [Revised: 01/01/2017] [Accepted: 01/04/2017] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) protein syntaxin-1 adopts a closed conformation when bound to Munc18-1, preventing binding to synaptobrevin-2 and SNAP-25 to form the ternary SNARE complex. Although it is known that the MUN domain of Munc13-1 catalyzes the transition from the Munc18-1/syntaxin-1 complex to the SNARE complex, the molecular mechanism is unclear. Here, we identified two conserved residues (R151, I155) in the syntaxin-1 linker region as key sites for the MUN domain interaction. This interaction is essential for SNARE complex formation in vitro and synaptic vesicle priming in neuronal cultures. Moreover, this interaction is important for a tripartite Munc18-1/syntaxin-1/MUN complex, in which syntaxin-1 still adopts a closed conformation tightly bound to Munc18-1, whereas the syntaxin-1 linker region changes its conformation, similar to that of the LE mutant of syntaxin-1 when bound to Munc18-1. We suggest that the conformational change of the syntaxin-1 linker region induced by Munc13-1 initiates ternary SNARE complex formation in the neuronal system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shen Wang
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics of Ministry of Education, College of Life Science and Technology and the Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Ucheor B Choi
- Departments of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Photon Science, and Structural Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jihong Gong
- Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science, Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Information Analysis and Tumor Diagnosis & Treatment, Laboratory of Membrane Ion Channels and Medicine, College of Biomedical Engineering, College of Life Science, South-Central University for Nationalities, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiaoyu Yang
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics of Ministry of Education, College of Life Science and Technology and the Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yun Li
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics of Ministry of Education, College of Life Science and Technology and the Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Austin L Wang
- Departments of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Photon Science, and Structural Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Xiaofei Yang
- Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science, Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Information Analysis and Tumor Diagnosis & Treatment, Laboratory of Membrane Ion Channels and Medicine, College of Biomedical Engineering, College of Life Science, South-Central University for Nationalities, Wuhan, China
| | - Axel T Brunger
- Departments of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Photon Science, and Structural Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Cong Ma
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics of Ministry of Education, College of Life Science and Technology and the Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Choi UB, Zhao M, Zhang Y, Lai Y, Brunger AT. Complexin induces a conformational change at the membrane-proximal C-terminal end of the SNARE complex. eLife 2016; 5. [PMID: 27253060 PMCID: PMC4927292 DOI: 10.7554/elife.16886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2016] [Accepted: 06/01/2016] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Complexin regulates spontaneous and activates Ca2+-triggered neurotransmitter release, yet the molecular mechanisms are still unclear. Here we performed single molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer experiments and uncovered two conformations of complexin-1 bound to the ternary SNARE complex. In the cis conformation, complexin-1 induces a conformational change at the membrane-proximal C-terminal end of the ternary SNARE complex that specifically depends on the N-terminal, accessory, and central domains of complexin-1. The complexin-1 induced conformation of the ternary SNARE complex may be related to a conformation that is juxtaposing the synaptic vesicle and plasma membranes. In the trans conformation, complexin-1 can simultaneously interact with a ternary SNARE complex via the central domain and a binary SNARE complex consisting of syntaxin-1A and SNAP-25A via the accessory domain. The cis conformation may be involved in activation of synchronous neurotransmitter release, whereas both conformations may be involved in regulating spontaneous release. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16886.001 Nerve cells communicate via electrical signals that travel at high speeds. However, these signals cannot pass across the gaps – called synapses – that separate one nerve cell from the next. Instead, signals pass between nerve cells via molecules called neurotransmitters that are released from the membrane of the first cell and recognized by receptors in the membrane of the next. Prior to being released, neurotransmitters are packaged inside bubble-like structures called vesicles. The synaptic vesicles must fuse with the cell membrane in order to release their contents into the synaptic cleft. Proteins called SNAREs work together with other proteins to allow this membrane fusion to occur rapidly after the electrical signal arrives. Complexin is a synaptic protein that binds tightly to a complex of SNARE proteins to regulate membrane fusion. This protein activates the quick release of neurotransmitters, which is triggered by an increase in calcium ions as the electrical signal reachess the synapse. Complexin also regulates a different type of neurotransmitter release, which is known as “spontaneous release”. The complexin protein is made up of different regions, each of which is required for one or more of the protein’s activities. However, it is not clear how these regions, or domains, interact with SNAREs and other proteins to enable complexin to perform these roles. Choi et al. have now investigated whether the different activities of mammalian complexin are related to the structure that it adopts when it interacts with the SNARE complex. Complexes of SNARE proteins were assembled with one of the SNARE proteins tethered to a surface for imaging. Next, a light-based imaging technique called single molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (or FRET) was used to monitor how complexin interacts with the SNARE complex. This technique allows individual proteins that have been labeled with fluorescent markers to be followed under a microscope and can show how they interact in real-time. Using this approach, Choi et al. showed that complexin could adopt two different shapes or conformations when it binds to the SNARE complex. In one, complexin interacted closely with the SNARE complex so that it made part of the complex change shape. In the other, complexin was able to bridge two SNARE complexes. Complexin can therefore interact with SNARE complexes in different ways by using different regions of the protein. These findings provide insight into how complexin may regulate membrane fusion via the SNARE complex. In the future, single molecule FRET could be used to study other proteins found at synapses and understand the other steps that regulate the release of neurotransmitters. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16886.002
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ucheor B Choi
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Photon Science, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Structural Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
| | - Minglei Zhao
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Photon Science, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Structural Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
| | - Yunxiang Zhang
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Photon Science, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Structural Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
| | - Ying Lai
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Photon Science, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Structural Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
| | - Axel T Brunger
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Photon Science, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.,Department of Structural Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhang Y, Diao J, Colbert KN, Lai Y, Pfuetzner RA, Padolina MS, Vivona S, Ressl S, Cipriano DJ, Choi UB, Shah N, Weis WI, Brunger AT. Munc18a does not alter fusion rates mediated by neuronal SNAREs, synaptotagmin, and complexin. J Biol Chem 2015; 290:10518-34. [PMID: 25716318 PMCID: PMC4400359 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m114.630772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2014] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Sec1/Munc18 (SM) proteins are essential for membrane trafficking, but their molecular mechanism remains unclear. Using a single vesicle-vesicle content-mixing assay with reconstituted neuronal SNAREs, synaptotagmin-1, and complexin-1, we show that the neuronal SM protein Munc18a/nSec1 has no effect on the intrinsic kinetics of both spontaneous fusion and Ca2+-triggered fusion between vesicles that mimic synaptic vesicles and the plasma membrane. However, wild type Munc18a reduced vesicle association ∼50% when the vesicles bearing the t-SNAREs syntaxin-1A and SNAP-25 were preincubated with Munc18 for 30 min. Single molecule experiments with labeled SNAP-25 indicate that the reduction of vesicle association is a consequence of sequestration of syntaxin-1A by Munc18a and subsequent release of SNAP-25 (i.e. Munc18a captures syntaxin-1A via its high affinity interaction). Moreover, a phosphorylation mimic mutant of Munc18a with reduced affinity to syntaxin-1A results in less reduction of vesicle association. In summary, Munc18a does not directly affect fusion, although it has an effect on the t-SNARE complex, depending on the presence of other factors and experimental conditions. Our results suggest that Munc18a primarily acts at the prefusion stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunxiang Zhang
- From the Departments of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Structural Biology, and Photon Science and
| | - Jiajie Diao
- From the Departments of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Structural Biology, and Photon Science and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
| | - Karen N Colbert
- From the Departments of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Structural Biology, and
| | - Ying Lai
- From the Departments of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Structural Biology, and Photon Science and
| | - Richard A Pfuetzner
- From the Departments of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Structural Biology, and Photon Science and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
| | - Mark S Padolina
- From the Departments of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Structural Biology, and Photon Science and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
| | - Sandro Vivona
- From the Departments of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Structural Biology, and Photon Science and
| | - Susanne Ressl
- From the Departments of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Structural Biology, and Photon Science and
| | - Daniel J Cipriano
- From the Departments of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Structural Biology, and Photon Science and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
| | - Ucheor B Choi
- From the Departments of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Structural Biology, and Photon Science and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
| | | | - William I Weis
- From the Departments of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Structural Biology, and Photon Science and
| | - Axel T Brunger
- From the Departments of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Structural Biology, and Photon Science and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
McCann JJ, Choi UB, Bowen ME. Reconstitution of multivalent PDZ domain binding to the scaffold protein PSD-95 reveals ternary-complex specificity of combinatorial inhibition. Structure 2014; 22:1458-66. [PMID: 25220472 DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2014.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2014] [Revised: 08/01/2014] [Accepted: 08/09/2014] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Multidomain scaffold proteins serve as hubs in the signal transduction network. By physically colocalizing sequential steps in a transduction pathway, scaffolds catalyze and direct incoming signals. Much is known about binary interactions with individual domains, but it is unknown whether "scaffolding activity" is predictable from pairwise affinities. Here, we characterized multivalent binding to PSD-95, a scaffold protein containing three PDZ domains connected in series by disordered linkers. We used single molecule fluorescence to watch soluble PSD-95 recruit diffusing proteins to a surface-attached receptor cytoplasmic domain. Different ternary complexes showed unique concentration dependence for scaffolding despite similar pairwise affinity. The concentration dependence of scaffolding activity was not predictable based on binary interactions. PSD-95 did not stabilize specific complexes, but rather increased the frequency of transient binding events. Our results suggest that PSD-95 maintains a loosely connected pleomorphic ensemble rather than forming a stereospecific complex containing all components.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James J McCann
- Department of Physiology & Biophysics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
| | - Ucheor B Choi
- Department of Physiology & Biophysics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
| | - Mark E Bowen
- Department of Physiology & Biophysics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Choi UB, Kazi R, Stenzoski N, Wollmuth LP, Uversky VN, Bowen ME. Modulating the intrinsic disorder in the cytoplasmic domain alters the biological activity of the N-methyl-D-aspartate-sensitive glutamate receptor. J Biol Chem 2013; 288:22506-15. [PMID: 23782697 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m113.477810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The NMDA-sensitive glutamate receptor is a ligand-gated ion channel that mediates excitatory synaptic transmission in the nervous system. Extracellular zinc allosterically regulates the NMDA receptor by binding to the extracellular N-terminal domain, which inhibits channel gating. Phosphorylation of the intrinsically disordered intracellular C-terminal domain alleviates inhibition by extracellular zinc. The mechanism for this functional effect is largely unknown. Proline is a hallmark of intrinsic disorder, so we used proline mutagenesis to modulate disorder in the cytoplasmic domain. Proline depletion selectively uncoupled zinc inhibition with little effect on receptor biogenesis, surface trafficking, or ligand-activated gating. Proline depletion also reduced the affinity for a PDZ domain involved in synaptic trafficking and affected small molecule binding. To understand the origin of these phenomena, we used single molecule fluorescence and ensemble biophysical methods to characterize the structural effects of proline mutagenesis. Proline depletion did not eliminate intrinsic disorder, but the underlying conformational dynamics were changed. Thus, we altered the form of intrinsic disorder, which appears sufficient to affect the biological activity. These findings suggest that conformational dynamics within the intrinsically disordered cytoplasmic domain are important for the allosteric regulation of NMDA receptor gating.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ucheor B Choi
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Stamou D, Christensen SM, Ehrlich N, Tkach V, Sakon JJ, Choi UB, Weninger KR. Cooperative All-Or-None Recruitment of Synaptotagmin C2AB on Single Vesicles Explains Why Ca2+ Regulates the Amplitude of SNARE Mediated Vesicle Fusion. Biophys J 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.11.1750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
21
|
Choi UB, McCann JJ, Weninger KR, Bowen ME. Beyond the random coil: stochastic conformational switching in intrinsically disordered proteins. Structure 2011; 19:566-76. [PMID: 21481779 DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2011.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2010] [Revised: 01/21/2011] [Accepted: 01/26/2011] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) participate in critical cellular functions that exploit the flexibility and rapid conformational fluctuations of their native state. Limited information about the native state of IDPs can be gained by the averaging over many heterogeneous molecules that is unavoidable in ensemble approaches. We used single molecule fluorescence to characterize native state conformational dynamics in five synaptic proteins confirmed to be disordered by other techniques. For three of the proteins, SNAP-25, synaptobrevin and complexin, their conformational dynamics could be described with a simple semiflexible polymer model. Surprisingly, two proteins, neuroligin and the NMDAR-2B glutamate receptor, were observed to stochastically switch among distinct conformational states despite the fact that they appeared intrinsically disordered by other measures. The hop-like intramolecular diffusion found in these proteins is suggested to define a class of functionality previously unrecognized for IDPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ucheor B Choi
- Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Choi UB, Xiao S, Wollmuth LP, Bowen ME. Effect of Src kinase phosphorylation on disordered C-terminal domain of N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor subunit GluN2B protein. J Biol Chem 2011; 286:29904-12. [PMID: 21712388 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m111.258897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
NMDA receptors are ligand-gated ion channels with a regulatory intracellular C-terminal domain (CTD). In GluN2B, the CTD is the largest domain in the protein but is intrinsically disordered. The GluN2B subunit is the major tyrosine-phosphorylated protein in synapses. Src kinase phosphorylates the GluN2B CTD, but it is unknown how this affects channel activity. In disordered proteins, phosphorylation can tip the balance between order and disorder. Transitions can occur in both directions, so it is not currently possible to predict the effects of phosphorylation. We used single molecule fluorescence to characterize the effects of Src phosphorylation on GluN2B. Scanning fluorescent labeling sites throughout the domain showed no positional dependence of the energy transfer. Instead, efficiency only scaled with the separation between labeling sites suggestive of a relatively featureless conformational energy landscape. Src phosphorylation led to a general expansion of the polypeptide, which would result in greater exposure of known protein-binding sites and increase the physical separation between contiguous sites. Phosphorylation makes the CTD more like a random coil leaving open the question of how Src exerts its effects on the NMDA receptor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ucheor B Choi
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794-8661, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Choi UB, Bowen ME. Native State Conformational Dynamics of Disordered Protein Respond to Chemical Environment. Biophys J 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.12.529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
|
24
|
McCann JJ, Choi UB, Zheng L, Weninger K, Bowen ME. Optimizing methods to recover absolute FRET efficiency from immobilized single molecules. Biophys J 2010; 99:961-70. [PMID: 20682275 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.04.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2009] [Revised: 04/22/2010] [Accepted: 04/26/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Microscopy-based fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) experiments measure donor and acceptor intensities by isolating these signals with a series of optical elements. Because this filtering discards portions of the spectrum, the observed FRET efficiency is dependent on the set of filters in use. Similarly, observed FRET efficiency is also affected by differences in fluorophore quantum yield. Recovering the absolute FRET efficiency requires normalization for these effects to account for differences between the donor and acceptor fluorophores in their quantum yield and detection efficiency. Without this correction, FRET is consistent across multiple experiments only if the photophysical and instrument properties remain unchanged. Here we present what is, to our knowledge, the first systematic study of methods to recover the true FRET efficiency using DNA rulers with known fluorophore separations. We varied optical elements to purposefully alter observed FRET and examined protein samples to achieve quantum yields distinct from those in the DNA samples. Correction for calculated instrument transmission reduced FRET deviations, which can facilitate comparison of results from different instruments. Empirical normalization was more effective but required significant effort. Normalization based on single-molecule photobleaching was the most effective depending on how it is applied. Surprisingly, per-molecule gamma-normalization reduced the peak width in the DNA FRET distribution because anomalous gamma-values correspond to FRET outliers. Thus, molecule-to-molecule variation in gamma has an unrecognized effect on the FRET distribution that must be considered to extract information on sample dynamics from the distribution width.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James J McCann
- Department of Pharmacology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Choi UB, Strop P, Vrljic M, Chu S, Brunger AT, Weninger KR. Single-molecule FRET-derived model of the synaptotagmin 1-SNARE fusion complex. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2010; 17:318-24. [PMID: 20173763 PMCID: PMC2922927 DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.1763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 164] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2009] [Accepted: 12/11/2009] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Synchronous neurotransmission is triggered when Ca(2+) binds to synaptotagmin 1 (Syt1), a synaptic-vesicle protein that interacts with SNAREs and membranes. We used single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between synaptotagmin's two C2 domains to determine that their conformation consists of multiple states with occasional transitions, consistent with domains in random relative motion. SNARE binding results in narrower intrasynaptotagmin FRET distributions and less frequent transitions between states. We obtained an experimentally determined model of the elusive Syt1-SNARE complex using a multibody docking approach with 34 FRET-derived distances as restraints. The Ca(2+)-binding loops point away from the SNARE complex, so they may interact with the same membrane. The loop arrangement is similar to that of the crystal structure of SNARE-induced Ca(2+)-bound Syt3, suggesting a common mechanism by which the interaction between synaptotagmins and SNAREs aids in Ca(2+)-triggered fusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ucheor B Choi
- Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
McCann JJ, Choi UB, Zheng L, Weninger K, Bowen ME. Recovering Absolute Fret Efficiency from Single Molecules: Comparing Methods of Gamma Correction. Biophys J 2010. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.12.998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
|
27
|
Weninger K, Bowen ME, Choi UB, Chu S, Brunger AT. Accessory proteins stabilize the acceptor complex for synaptobrevin, the 1:1 syntaxin/SNAP-25 complex. Structure 2008; 16:308-20. [PMID: 18275821 DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2007.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 136] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2007] [Revised: 12/13/2007] [Accepted: 12/17/2007] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Syntaxin/SNAP-25 interactions precede assembly of the ternary SNARE complex that is essential for neurotransmitter release. This binary complex has been difficult to characterize by bulk methods because of the prevalence of a 2:1 dead-end species. Here, using single-molecule fluorescence, we find the structure of the 1:1 syntaxin/SNAP-25 binary complex is variable, with states changing on the second timescale. One state corresponds to a parallel three-helix bundle, whereas other states show one of the SNAP-25 SNARE domains dissociated. Adding synaptobrevin suppresses the dissociated helix states. Remarkably, upon addition of complexin, Munc13, Munc18, or synaptotagmin, a similar effect is observed. Thus, the 1:1 binary complex is a dynamic acceptor for synaptobrevin binding, and accessory proteins stabilize this acceptor. In the cellular environment the binary complex is actively maintained in a configuration where it can rapidly interact with synaptobrevin, so formation is not likely a limiting step for neurotransmitter release.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith Weninger
- Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8202, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|