Radojkovic M, Ristic S, Colovic M, Mihaljevic B, Cemerikic-Martinovic V. Predictive value of prognostic indices in patients with follicular lymphomas.
Med Oncol 2007;
23:533-42. [PMID:
17303912 DOI:
10.1385/mo:23:4:533]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2006] [Revised: 11/30/1999] [Accepted: 05/31/2006] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE
The aim of this study was to compare which of three indices--International Prognostic Index (IPI), Italian Lymphoma Intergroup (ILI) index, Follicular Lymphoma adapted International Prognostic Index (FLIPI)--is the most useful in predicting outcome in follicular lymphoma (FL) patients and to identify other clinical and laboratory prognostic factors that influence survival.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Clinical and prognostic studies were carried out in 99 patients with FL.
RESULTS
The distribution of patients in IPI risk groups was 44.4%, 19.2%, and 36.4% of cases classified as low, intermediate, and high risk. According to ILI, low-, intermediate-, and high-risk scores were present in 34.3%; 27.3%, and 38.4% of FL patients. After applying the FLIPI index, the patients were divided into three risk groups: low (21.2% of cases), intermediate (39.4%), and high (39.4%) of FL patients. Survival curves demonstrated a high significant difference for the low- and high-risk group according to IPI and FLIPI (log rank=91.13 and 82.17 respectively; p < 0.0001). Difference in overall survival (OS) and failure-free survival (FFS) among low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups according to ILI was statistically significant (log rank test p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION
All three indices are important tools for prognostic evaluation of FL patients, as well as useful in identifying FL patients with poor outcome. IPI and FLIPI classify patients into two risk groups (low/intermediate- and high-risk groups) with significance difference in OS and FFS, but ILI is more reliable in stratifying patients in low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups.
Collapse