1
|
Van Der Feltz-Cornelis CM, Varley D, Allgar VL, de Beurs E. Workplace Stress, Presenteeism, Absenteeism, and Resilience Amongst University Staff and Students in the COVID-19 Lockdown. Front Psychiatry 2020; 11:588803. [PMID: 33329135 PMCID: PMC7728738 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.588803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: This study explored how the COVID-19 outbreak and arrangements such as remote working and furlough affect work or study stress levels and functioning in staff and students at the University of York, UK. Methods: An invitation to participate in an online survey was sent to all University of York staff and students in May-June 2020. We measured stress levels [VAS-scale, Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ)], mental health [anxiety (GAD-7), depression (PHQ-9)], physical health (PHQ-15, chronic medical conditions checklist), presenteeism, and absenteeism levels (iPCQ). We explored demographic and other characteristics as factors which may contribute to resilience and vulnerability for the impact of COVID-19 on stress. Results: One thousand and fifty five staff and nine hundred and twenty five students completed the survey. Ninety-eight per cent of staff and seventy-eight per cent of students worked or studied remotely. 7% of staff and 10% of students reported sickness absence. 26% of staff and 40% of the students experienced presenteeism. 22-24% of staff reported clinical-level anxiety and depression scores, and 37.2 and 46.5% of students. Staff experienced high stress levels due to COVID-19 (66.2%, labeled vulnerable) and 33.8% experienced low stress levels (labeled resilient). Students were 71.7% resilient vs. 28.3% non-resilient. Predictors of vulnerability in staff were having children [OR = 2.23; CI (95) = 1.63-3.04] and social isolation [OR = 1.97; CI (95) = 1.39-2.79] and in students, being female [OR = 1.62; CI (95) = 1.14-2.28], having children [OR = 2.04; CI (95) = 1.11-3.72], and social isolation [OR = 1.78; CI (95) = 1.25-2.52]. Resilience was predicted by exercise in staff [OR = 0.83; CI (95) = 0.73-0.94] and in students [OR = 0.85; CI (95) = 0.75-0.97]. Discussion: University staff and students reported high psychological distress, presenteeism and absenteeism. However, 33.8% of staff and 71.7% of the students were resilient. Amongst others, female gender, having children, and having to self-isolate contributed to vulnerability. Exercise contributed to resilience. Conclusion: Resilience occurred much more often in students than in staff, although psychological distress was much higher in students. This suggests that predictors of resilience may differ from psychological distress per se. Hence, interventions to improve resilience should not only address psychological distress but may also address other factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - D. Varley
- Department of Health Sciences, Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Victoria L. Allgar
- Department of Health Sciences, Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, United Kingdom
- Hull York Medical School, York, United Kingdom
| | - Edwin de Beurs
- Social and Behavioral Sciences, Psychology Department, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Allgar VL, Oliver SE, Chen H, Oviasu O, Johnson MJ, Macleod U. Time intervals from first symptom to diagnosis for head and neck cancers: An analysis of linked patient reports and medical records from the UK. Cancer Epidemiol 2019; 59:37-45. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2019.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2018] [Revised: 01/09/2019] [Accepted: 01/10/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
3
|
White C, Noble SIR, Watson M, Swan F, Allgar VL, Napier E, Nelson A, McAuley J, Doherty J, Lee B, Johnson MJ. Prevalence, symptom burden, and natural history of deep vein thrombosis in people with advanced cancer in specialist palliative care units (HIDDen): a prospective longitudinal observational study. Lancet Haematol 2019; 6:e79-e88. [PMID: 30709436 PMCID: PMC6352715 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(18)30215-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2018] [Revised: 11/20/2018] [Accepted: 11/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of deep venous thrombosis in patients with advanced cancer is unconfirmed and it is unknown whether current international thromboprophylaxis guidance is applicable to this population. We aimed to determine prevalence and predictors of femoral deep vein thrombosis in patients admitted to specialist palliative care units (SPCUs). METHODS We did this prospective longitudinal observational study in five SPCUs in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland (four hospices and one palliative care unit). Consecutive adults with cancer underwent bilateral femoral vein ultrasonography on admission and weekly until death or discharge for a maximum of 3 weeks. Data were collected on performance status, attributable symptoms, and variables known to be associated with venous thromboembolism. Patients with a short estimated prognosis (<5 days) were ineligible. The primary endpoint of the study was the prevalence of femoral deep vein thrombosis within 48 h of SPCU admission, analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN97567719. FINDINGS Between June 20, 2016, and Oct 16, 2017, 343 participants were enrolled (mean age 68·2 years [SD 12·8; range 25-102]; 179 [52%] male; mean Australian-modified Karnofsky performance status 49 [SD 16·6; range 20-90]). Of 273 patients with evaluable scans, 92 (34%, 95% CI 28-40) had femoral deep vein thrombosis. Four participants with a scan showing no deep vein thrombosis on admission developed a deep vein thrombosis on repeat scanning over 21 days. Previous venous thromboembolism (p=0·014), being bedbound in the past 12 weeks for any reason (p=0·003), and lower limb oedema (p=0·009) independently predicted deep vein thrombosis. Serum albumin concentration (p=0·43), thromboprophylaxis (p=0·17), and survival (p=0·45) were unrelated to deep vein thrombosis. INTERPRETATION About a third of patients with advanced cancer admitted to SPCUs had a femoral deep vein thrombosis. Deep vein thrombosis was not associated with thromboprophylaxis, survival, or symptoms other than leg oedema. These findings are consistent with venous thromboembolism being a manifestation of advanced disease rather than a cause of premature death. Thromboprophylaxis for SPCU inpatients with poor performance status seems to be of little benefit. FUNDING National Institute for Health Research (Research for Patient Benefit programme).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare White
- Northern Ireland Hospice, Belfast, UK,Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Simon I R Noble
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Max Watson
- University of Ulster, Jordanstown, Belfast, UK
| | - Flavia Swan
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Victoria L Allgar
- Hull York Medical School and Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Eoin Napier
- Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Annmarie Nelson
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | | | | | - Miriam J Johnson
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Allgar VL, Chen H, Richfield E, Currow D, Macleod U, Johnson MJ. Psychometric Properties of the Needs Assessment Tool-Progressive Disease Cancer in U.K. Primary Care. J Pain Symptom Manage 2018; 56:602-612. [PMID: 30009964 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2018] [Revised: 07/03/2018] [Accepted: 07/04/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The assessment of patients' needs for care is a critical step in achieving patient-centered cancer care. Tools can be used to assess needs and inform care planning. The Needs Assessment Tool:Progressive Disease-Cancer (NAT:PD-C) is an Australian oncology clinic tool for assessment by clinicians of patients' and carers' palliative care needs. This has not been validated in the U.K. primary care setting. AIM The aim of this study was to test the psychometric properties and acceptability of a U.K. primary care adapted NAT:PD-C. DESIGN Reliability: NAT:PD-C-guided video-recorded consultations were viewed, rated, and rerated by clinicians. Weighted Fleiss' kappa and prevalence- and bias-adjusted kappa statistics were used. Construct: During a consultation, general medical practitioners (GPs) used NAT:PD-C, patient measures (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale; Research Utilisation Group Activities of Daily Living; Palliative care Outcome Score; Australian Karnofsky Performance Scale), and carer measures (Carer Strain Index; Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool). Kendall's Tau-b was used. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS GPs, nurses, patients, and carers were recruited from primary care practices. RESULTS Reliability: All patients' well-being items and four of five items in the carer/family ability to care section showed adequate interrater reliability. There was moderate test-retest reliability for five of six in the patients' well-being section and five of five in the carer/family ability to care section. Construct: There was at least fair agreement for five of six of patients' well-being items; high for daily living (Kendall's Tau-b = 0.57, P < 0.001). The NAT:PD-C has adequate carer construct validity (five of eight) with strong agreement for two of eight patients. Over three-quarters of GPs considered the NAT:PD-C to have high acceptability. CONCLUSION The NAT PD-C is reliable, valid, and acceptable in the UK primary care setting. Effectiveness in reducing patient and carer unmet needs and issues regarding implementation are yet to be evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hong Chen
- Hull York Medical School, Allam Medical Building, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Ed Richfield
- Elderly Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - David Currow
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Una Macleod
- Hull York Medical School, Allam Medical Building, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Miriam J Johnson
- Hull York Medical School, Allam Medical Building, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wright B, McKendree J, Morgan L, Allgar VL, Brown A. Examiner and simulated patient ratings of empathy in medical student final year clinical examination: are they useful? BMC Med Educ 2014; 14:199. [PMID: 25245476 PMCID: PMC4261253 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2014] [Accepted: 08/06/2014] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many medical schools state that empathy is important and have curricular learning outcomes covering its teaching. It is thought to be useful in team-working, good bedside manner, patient perspective taking, and improved patient care. Given this, one might expect it to be measured in assessment processes. Despite this, there is relatively little literature exploring how measures of empathy in final clinical examinations in medical school map onto other examination scores. Little is known about simulated patient (actors) rating of empathy in examinations in terms of inter-rater reliability compared with clinical assessors or correlation with overall examination results. METHODS Examiners in final year clinical assessments in one UK medical school rated 133 students on five constructs in Objective Structured Long Examination Record (OSLER) with real patients: gathering information, physical examination, problem solving, managing the diagnosis, and relationship with the patient. Scores were based on a standardized well-established penalty point system. In separate Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) stations, different examiners used the same penalty point system to score performance in both interactional and procedural stations. In the four interaction-based OSCE stations, examiners and simulated patient actors also independently rated empathy of the students. RESULTS The OSLER score, based on penalty points, had a correlation of -0.38 with independent ratings of empathy from the interactional OSCE stations. The intra-class correlation (a measure of inter-rater reliability) between the observing clinical tutor and ratings from simulated patients was 0.645 with very similar means. There was a significant difference between the empathy scores of the 94 students passing the first part of the sequential examination, based on combined OSCE and OSLER scores (which did not include the empathy scores), and 39 students with sufficient penalty points to trigger attendance for the second part (Cohen's d = 0.81). CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that empathy ratings are related to clinical performance as measured by independent examiners. Simulated patient actors are able to give clinically meaningful assessment scores. This gives preliminary evidence that such empathy ratings could be useful for formative learning, and bolsters the call for more research to test whether they are robust enough to be used summatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barry Wright
- />Hull York Medical School, John Hughlings Jackson Building, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD UK
- />Child Adolescent Mental Health Service, 31 Shipton Lane, York, YO30 5RE UK
| | - Jean McKendree
- />Hull York Medical School, John Hughlings Jackson Building, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Lewys Morgan
- />Hull York Medical School, John Hughlings Jackson Building, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Victoria L Allgar
- />Hull York Medical School, John Hughlings Jackson Building, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Andrew Brown
- />Hull York Medical School, John Hughlings Jackson Building, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Omonbude D, El Masry MA, O'Connor PJ, Grainger AJ, Allgar VL, Calder SJ. Measurement of joint effusion and haematoma formation by ultrasound in assessing the effectiveness of drains after total knee replacement: A prospective randomised study. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2010; 92:51-5. [PMID: 20044678 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.92b1.22121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
We prospectively randomised 78 patients into two groups, 'drains' or 'no drains' to assess the effectiveness of suction drains in reducing haematoma and effusion in the joint and its effect on wound healing after total knee replacement. Ultrasound was used to measure the formation of haematoma and effusion on the fourth post-operative day. This was a semi-quantitative assessment of volume estimation. There was no difference in the mean effusion between the groups (5.91 mm in the drain group versus 6.08 mm in the no-drain, p = 0.82). The mean amount of haematoma in the no-drain group was greater (11.07 mm versus 8.41 mm, p = 0.03). However, this was not clinically significant judged by the lack of difference in the mean reduction in the post-operative haemoglobin between the groups (drain group 3.4 g/dl; no-drain group 3.0 g/dl, p = 0.38). There were no cases of wound infection or problems with wound healing at six weeks in any patient. Our findings indicate that drains do not reduce joint effusion but do reduce haematoma formation. They have no effect on wound healing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Omonbude
- Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, England.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pascoe SW, Neal RD, Heywood PL, Allgar VL, Miles JN, Stefoski-Mikeljevic J. Identifying patients with a cancer diagnosis using general practice medical records and Cancer Registry data. Fam Pract 2008; 25:215-20. [PMID: 18550895 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmn023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The medical records of patients with cancer need to accurately record diagnoses for professionals to provide quality care. Aims. (i) To develop a methodology which identifies medical records of patients with a cancer diagnosis. (ii) To describe the effectiveness of search strategies to identify all patients in primary care with a cancer diagnosis compared with a diagnosis identified by a Cancer Registry. METHODS The design of the study was a retrospective analysis of primary care medical records. Five general practices were recruited in the UK. The completeness and correctness of searches were measured and compared both within the practices and compared with a diagnosis identified by a Cancer Registry. RESULTS One in five of all primary care patients with cancer was not identified when a search for all patients with cancer was conducted using electronic codes for malignancy. One in five patient records with an electronic code for a malignancy that was confirmed by registration with the Cancer Registry actually lacked the necessary documentation to verify the cancer type, date of diagnosis or any other aspect of the malignant condition. Overall, electronic codes for cancer in these medical records have a poor level of completeness (29.4%) and correctness (65.6%) when compared with the Cancer Registry. CONCLUSIONS The electronic codes in five general practices were not able to identify all patients on the practice lists with a cancer diagnosis. Practices will only be able to comply with guidelines and meet quality targets if they can identify all of their current patients with a cancer diagnosis and will require information from a Cancer Registry in order to do this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shane W Pascoe
- Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Neal RD, Allgar VL, Ali N, Leese B, Heywood P, Proctor G, Evans J. Stage, survival and delays in lung, colorectal, prostate and ovarian cancer: comparison between diagnostic routes. Br J Gen Pract 2007; 57:212-9. [PMID: 17359608 PMCID: PMC2042569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Very few studies have reported cancer outcomes of patients referred through different routes, despite the prominence of current UK cancer urgent referral guidance. AIM This study aimed to compare outcomes of cancer patients referred through the urgent referral guidance with those who were not, with respect to stage at diagnosis, survival, and delays in diagnosis. DESIGN OF STUDY Analysis of hospital records. SETTING One hospital trust in England. METHOD The records of 889 patients diagnosed in 2000-2001 with one of four types of cancer were analysed: 409 with lung cancer; 239 with colorectal cancer; 146 with prostate cancer; and 95 with ovarian cancer. Outcome measures were diagnostic stage, survival, referral and secondary care delays. RESULTS For lung cancer, urgent referrals had more advanced TNM (tumor, node, metastasis) stage than patients diagnosed through other routes (P = 0.035) and poorer survival (P = 0.020). There was no difference in stage or survival for the other cancers. For each cancer, a higher proportion of urgent referrals was seen within 2 weeks. Secondary care delays for lung and colorectal cancer were shorter for inter-specialty referrals. CONCLUSION For patients with lung cancer, the guidance appears to be prioritising those in the more advanced stages of disease. This was not the case for the other three cancers. Referral delays were shorter for patients urgently referred, as is the intention of the guidance. The avoidance of delays in outpatient diagnostics probably accounts for shorter secondary care delays for inter-specialty referrals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard D Neal
- Department of General Practice, Centre for Health Sciences Research, North Wales Clinical School, Cardiff University, Wrexhamm, Leeds, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wright NMJ, Sheard L, Tompkins CNE, Adams CE, Allgar VL, Oldham NS. Buprenorphine versus dihydrocodeine for opiate detoxification in primary care: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Fam Pract 2007; 8:3. [PMID: 17210079 PMCID: PMC1774569 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2006] [Accepted: 01/08/2007] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background Many drug users present to primary care requesting detoxification from illicit opiates. There are a number of detoxification agents but no recommended drug of choice. The purpose of this study is to compare buprenorphine with dihydrocodeine for detoxification from illicit opiates in primary care. Methods Open label randomised controlled trial in NHS Primary Care (General Practices), Leeds, UK. Sixty consenting adults using illicit opiates received either daily sublingual buprenorphine or daily oral dihydrocodeine. Reducing regimens for both interventions were at the discretion of prescribing doctor within a standard regimen of not more than 15 days. Primary outcome was abstinence from illicit opiates at final prescription as indicated by a urine sample. Secondary outcomes during detoxification period and at three and six months post detoxification were recorded. Results Only 23% completed the prescribed course of detoxification medication and gave a urine sample on collection of their final prescription. Risk of non-completion of detoxification was reduced if allocated buprenorphine (68% vs 88%, RR 0.58 CI 0.35–0.96, p = 0.065). A higher proportion of people allocated to buprenorphine provided a clean urine sample compared with those who received dihydrocodeine (21% vs 3%, RR 2.06 CI 1.33–3.21, p = 0.028). People allocated to buprenorphine had fewer visits to professional carers during detoxification and more were abstinent at three months (10 vs 4, RR 1.55 CI 0.96–2.52) and six months post detoxification (7 vs 3, RR 1.45 CI 0.84–2.49). Conclusion Informative randomised trials evaluating routine care within the primary care setting are possible amongst drug using populations. This small study generates unique data on commonly used treatment regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nat MJ Wright
- Centre for Research in Primary Care, 71-75 Clarendon Road, Leeds, LS2 9PL, UK
| | - Laura Sheard
- Centre for Research in Primary Care, 71-75 Clarendon Road, Leeds, LS2 9PL, UK
| | | | - Clive E Adams
- Department of Psychiatry, 15 Hyde Terrace, Leeds, LS2 9L, UK
| | - Victoria L Allgar
- Centre for Research in Primary Care, 71-75 Clarendon Road, Leeds, LS2 9PL, UK
| | - Nicola S Oldham
- Formerly of NFA Health Centre for Homeless People, 68 York Street, Leeds, LS9 8AA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Neal RD, Ali N, Atkin K, Allgar VL, Ali S, Coleman T. Communication between South Asian patients and GPs: comparative study using the Roter Interactional Analysis System. Br J Gen Pract 2006; 56:869-75. [PMID: 17132355 PMCID: PMC1927096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The UK South Asian population has poorer health outcomes. Little is known about their process of care in general practice, or in particular the process of communication with GPs. AIM To compare the ways in which white and South Asian patients communicate with white GPs. DESIGN OF STUDY Observational study of video-recorded consultations using the Roter Interactional Analysis System (RIAS). SETTING West Yorkshire, UK. METHOD One hundred and eighty-three consultations with 11 GPs in West Yorkshire, UK were video-recorded and analysed. RESULTS Main outcome measures were consultation length, verbal domination, 16 individual abridged RIAS categories, and three composite RIAS categories; with comparisons between white patients, South Asian patients fluent in English and South Asian patients nonfluent in English. South Asians fluent in English had the shortest consultations and South Asians non-fluent in English the longest consultations (one-way ANOVA F = 7.173, P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in verbal domination scores between the three groups. White patients had more affective (emotional) consultations than South Asian patients, and played a more active role in their consultations, as did their GPs. GPs spent less time giving information to South Asian patients who were not fluent in English and more time asking questions. GPs spent less time giving information to South Asian patients fluent in English compared with white patients. CONCLUSIONS These findings were expected between patients fluent and non-fluent in English but do demonstrate their nature. The differences between white patients and South Asian patients fluent in English warrant further explanation. How much of this was due to systematic differences in behaviour by the GPs, or was in response to patients' differing needs and expectations is unknown. These differences may contribute to differences in health outcomes.
Collapse
|
11
|
Allgar VL, Neal RD, Ali N, Leese B, Heywood P, Proctor G, Evans J. Urgent GP referrals for suspected lung, colorectal, prostate and ovarian cancer. Br J Gen Pract 2006; 56:355-62. [PMID: 16638251 PMCID: PMC1837844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The UK urgent cancer referral guidance was introduced between 1999-2000. There is a dearth of literature relating to the effectiveness in detecting cancer of urgent suspected cancer referrals and general practitioners' compliance with the guidance. AIMS This paper aims to determine the diagnostic yield from urgent referrals for suspected colorectal, lung, ovarian and prostate cancer, and the proportion of patients with cancer who were urgently referred. Secondary aims are to determine the association of these findings with age, ethnicity, sex and marital status, and to determine the proportions of patients who fulfilled the urgent referral criteria. DESIGN Detailed notes analysis of all urgent referrals and all cancer diagnoses. SETTING One hospital trust in England. METHOD Data regarding all urgent referrals and all cancer diagnoses were obtained from one hospital trust over a 2-year period. Data analysis was undertaken to determine, diagnostic yields and their association with sociodemographic factors, trends over time and fulfilment of the guidance. RESULTS The percentages of urgent referrals diagnosed with cancer were colorectal 11%, lung 42%, ovarian 20%, and prostate 50%. The percentages of patients with cancer referred urgently were colorectal 21%, lung 23%, ovarian 24%, and prostate 32%. Patients who were urgently referred without cancer were younger than those with cancer for all but prostate. There were no significant differences by sex, marital status or ethnicity. For patients with cancer there were no differences for any sociodemographic factors in whether or not they were referred urgently. CONCLUSIONS The predictive power of the referral guidance as a marker for cancer is low, resulting in significant numbers of patients being urgently referred without cancer. A large majority of patients not diagnosed with cancer through the urgent referral route did fulfil the criteria for urgent referral, suggesting that with more widespread use of the guidance the diagnostic yields will be higher. This has implications for patients, on hospital diagnostic systems, and for patients presenting through other pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria L Allgar
- Centre for Research in Primary Care, Institute of Health Sciences and Public Health Research, University of Leeds, Leeds
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Allgar VL, Neal RD. General practictioners' management of cancer in England: secondary analysis of data from the National Survey of NHS Patients-Cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2006; 14:409-16. [PMID: 16274461 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2005.00600.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Relatively little is understood concerning the exact role of general practice in the cancer patients' pre-diagnostic, and post-diagnostic journey. This paper aims to explore this role using data from the National Survey of NHS Patients-Cancer. Data from 65,192 patients relating to five questions from this survey were analysed in detail with particular relevance to differences between the six cancers [breast, colorectal, lung, ovarian, prostate and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL)], and socio-demographic variables (age, gender and social class). There were considerable differences between patients with the six cancers, and the role of general practice in the cancer diagnosis, and post-diagnosis management. The vast majority of patients saw their general practitioner (GP) with symptoms prior to being seen in hospital. A significant minority were told their diagnosis by their GP. About half the sample were told to contact their GP post-discharge, and about half did so. Being told to contact the GP post-discharge was strongly associated with actually seeing the GP. Most patients felt that their GP was given enough information about their treatment or condition. In conclusion, this work has quantified the central role of general practice in cancer diagnosis and management in England. There remain considerable resource, educational and research needs to continue to provide high-quality cancer care in primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V L Allgar
- Centre for Research in Primary Care, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Neal RD, Hussain-Gambles M, Allgar VL, Lawlor DA, Dempsey O. Reasons for and consequences of missed appointments in general practice in the UK: questionnaire survey and prospective review of medical records. BMC Fam Pract 2005; 6:47. [PMID: 16274481 PMCID: PMC1291364 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-6-47] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2005] [Accepted: 11/07/2005] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background Missed appointments are a common occurrence in primary care in the UK, yet little is known about the reasons for them, or the consequences of missing an appointment. This paper aims to determine the reasons for missed appointments and whether patients who miss an appointment subsequently consult their general practitioner (GP). Secondary aims are to compare psychological morbidity, and the previous appointments with GPs between subjects and a comparison group. Methods Postal questionnaire survey and prospective medical notes review of adult patients missing an appointment and the comparison group who attended appointments over a three week period in seven general practices in West Yorkshire. Results Of the 386 who missed appointments 122 (32%) responded. Of the 386 in the comparison group 223 (58%) responded, resulting in 23 case-control matched pairs with complete data collection. Over 40% of individuals who missed an appointment and participated said that they forgot the appointment and a quarter said that they tried very hard to cancel the appointment or that it was at an inconvenient time. A fifth reported family commitments or being too ill to attend. Over 90% of the patients who missed an appointment subsequently consulted within three months and of these nearly 60% consulted for the stated problem that was going to be presented in the missed consultation. The odds of missing an appointment decreased with increasing age and were greater among those who had missed at least one appointment in the previous 12 months. However, estimates for comparisons between those who missed appointments and the comparison group were imprecise due to the low response rate. Conclusion Patients who miss appointments tend to cite practice factors and their own forgetfulness as the main reasons for doing so, and most attend within three months of a missed appointment. This study highlights a number of implications for future research. More work needs to be done to engage people who miss appointments into research in a meaningful way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard D Neal
- North Wales Clinical School Department of General Practice, University of Cardiff, Wrexham Technology Park, Wrexham LL13 7YP, UK
| | | | - Victoria L Allgar
- Centre for Research in Primary Care, University of Leeds, 71–75 Clarendon Road, Leeds LS2 9PL, UK
| | - Debbie A Lawlor
- Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Road, Bristol, UK
| | - Owen Dempsey
- Lockwood Research Practice, 3 Meltham Road, Lockwood, Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, HD1 3XH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Neal RD, Allgar VL. Sociodemographic factors and delays in the diagnosis of six cancers: analysis of data from the "National Survey of NHS Patients: Cancer". Br J Cancer 2005; 92:1971-5. [PMID: 15900296 PMCID: PMC2361785 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 178] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper aims to explore the relationship between sociodemographic factors and the components of diagnostic delay (total, patient and primary care, referral, secondary care) for these six cancers (breast, colorectal, lung, ovarian, prostate, or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma). Secondary analysis of patient-reported data from the ‘National Survey of NHS patients: Cancer’ was undertaken (65 192 patients). Data were analysed using univariate analysis and Generalised Linear Modelling. With regard to total delay, the findings from the GLM showed that for colorectal cancer, the significant factors were marital status and age, for lung and ovarian cancer none of the factors were significant, for prostate cancer the only significant factor was social class, for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma the only significant factor was age, and for breast cancer the significant factors were marital status and ethnic group. Where associations between any of the component delays were found, the direction of the association was always in the same direction (female subjects had longer delays than male subjects, younger people had longer delays than older people, single and separated/divorced people had longer delays than married people, lower social class groups had longer delays than higher social class groups, and Black and south Asian people had longer delays than white people). These findings should influence the design of interventions aimed at reducing diagnostic delays with the aim of improving morbidity, mortality, and psychological outcomes through earlier stage diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R D Neal
- Department of General Practice, North Wales Clinical School, Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff University, Wrexham Technology Park, Wrexham LL13 7YP, Wales, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to describe and compare components of diagnostic delay (patient, primary care, referral, secondary care) for six cancers (breast, colorectal, lung, ovarian, prostate and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma), and to compare delays in patients who saw their GP prior to diagnosis with those who did not. Secondary data analysis of The National Survey of NHS Patients: Cancer was undertaken (65 192 patients). Breast cancer patients experienced the shortest total delays (mean 55.2 days), followed by lung (88.5), ovarian (90.3), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (102.8), colorectal (125.7) and prostate (148.5). Trends were similar for all components of delay. Compared with patient and primary care delays, referral delays and secondary care delays were much shorter. Patients who saw their GP prior to diagnosis experienced considerably longer total diagnostic delays than those who did not. There were significant differences in all components of delay between the six cancers. Reducing diagnostic delays with the intention of increasing the proportion of early stage cancers may improve cancer survival in the UK, which is poorer than most other European countries. Interventions aimed at reducing patient and primary care delays need to be developed and their effect on diagnostic stage and psychological distress evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V L Allgar
- Centre for Research in Primary Care, University of Leeds, 71-75 Clarendon Road, Leeds LS2 9PL, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
The paper outlines psychosocial problems experienced by cancer patients and the current barriers to service delivery. New models of psychosocial service provision are put forward, emphasizing information, communication and technology aids in an attempt to improve co-ordination of care. The management of cancer patients has evolved greatly over the past decades, and patients are well placed to benefit from the experiences of primary care professionals in the delivery of chronic illness disease management strategies.
Collapse
|
17
|
Wright NMJ, Roberts AJ, Allgar VL, Tompkins CNE, Greenwood DC, Laurence G. Impact of the CSM advice on thioridazine on general practitioner prescribing behaviour in Leeds: time series analysis. Br J Gen Pract 2004; 54:370-3. [PMID: 15113522 PMCID: PMC1266173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
In December 2000, the Committee for Safety of Medicines (CSM) advised that thioridazine may prolong QT intervals risking arrhythmias. We investigated the impact on general practitioner prescribing of thioridazine using a time series analysis. Numbers of items and costs of antipsychotics and benzodiazepines prescribed in Leeds from May 1999 until April 2002 were collated. Post-advice, thioridazine prescriptions dropped by 810 items per month (95% confidence interval = 420 to 1200, P < 0.001) but others increased slightly in response. Costs mimicked these changes. Fresh criteria are proposed for appraising the quality of evidence needed to inform future urgent facsimile transmissions.
Collapse
|
18
|
Pascoe SW, Neal RD, Allgar VL. Open-access versus bookable appointment systems: survey of patients attending appointments with general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract 2004; 54:367-9. [PMID: 15113521 PMCID: PMC1266172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Access to consultations with general practitioners (GPs) is an important health policy issue. One method of providing 24-hour access is through the provision of open-access surgeries. The study aimed to compare patients' perceptions of 'bookable' and 'non-bookable' (open-access) appointments. A cross-sectional survey design was used and recruited 834 patients in a general practice. There were statistically significant differences between the bookable and the non-bookable appointments for the questions on 'choice of doctor', 'whether able to see the doctor in the time they needed to', and 'convenience of the appointment'. More patients with bookable appointments saw their doctor of choice. One-fifth of patients, equally distributed between the two groups, did not feel that they were seen within the time they needed to be. Almost three-fifths of patients, equally distributed between the two groups, reported that it was either 'easy' or 'very easy' to make the appointment. Greater convenience was reported by those with bookable appointments. These findings support the hypothesis that within a single practice, there is scope for a combined appointment system in which patients can self-select, with equal satisfaction, the type of appointment that they prefer, dependent upon their own preferences or needs at the time.
Collapse
|
19
|
Affiliation(s)
- Richard D Neal
- Department of General Practice, University of Wales College of Medicine, Wrexham Technology Park, Wrexham LL13 7YP, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Receptionists act as gatekeepers to GPs, and thus are often placed in situations of conflict. However, there is a lack of research in this area. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to identify the incidence and associations of verbal and physical abuse against primary care receptionists, both pre- and post-'zero tolerance'. METHODS A postal questionnaire was designed, piloted and sent to all reception staff in 50 randomly selected general practices in Leeds. The primary purpose was to identify any verbal or physical abuse experienced in the 12 months prior to the survey and assess the association between abuse experienced and deprivation. RESULTS Seventy percent of receptionists completed and returned the questionnaire. Over two-thirds of receptionists had experienced verbal abuse in the last year. During the same time period, 60% reported telephone abuse and 55% reported face to face abuse. The incidence of abuse was higher in the year prior to the study than in the preceding period. Practice deprivation was identified as a significant factor for verbal abuse (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION Verbal abuse against receptionists is significantly associated with the level of deprivation of the practice area. There is no evidence that 'zero tolerance' led to a reduction in abuse experienced by primary care receptionists. All primary care receptionists should receive adequate training on managing abuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine A J Dixon
- Stockwell Road Surgery, Knaresborough, NFA Health Centre for Homeless People and Centre for Research in Primary Care, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Allgar VL, Neal RD, Pascoe SW. Cancer patients consultation patterns in primary care and levels of psychological morbidity: findings from the Health Survey for England. Psychooncology 2004; 12:736-40. [PMID: 14502598 DOI: 10.1002/pon.692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
AIM To determine the consultations patterns in general practice, for people with cancer and other chronic illnesses, and to assess the levels of psychological morbidity. METHODS The following questions from the 1999 Health Survey for England were analysed: presence of a self-reported long-standing illness and its nature, numbers of contacts with general practitioner (GP) in the previous 2 weeks, contact with a GP in the previous year for anxiety/depression or a mental, nervous or emotional problem, presence of a self-reported long-standing illness of mental illness, anxiety or depression, and GHQ12 scores. For comparison purposes, data from respondents reporting having asthma, arthritis, diabetes, other long-standing illness, and no long-standing illness are presented. RESULTS A third of respondents with cancer had contact with a GP in the last 2 weeks, which was slightly higher than the other illness group, however the pattern of attendances for those respondents who did consult were similar between groups. A quarter of people with cancer had spoken to a GP in the last year about being anxious/depressed, or about a mental, nervous or emotional problem. A third of cancer respondents reported high GHQ12 scores, but self-reported long-standing illness of 'mental illness/anxiety/depression' was low (4%). CONCLUSION The findings suggest that psychological morbidity may be unrecognised in some cancer patients. There is potential for these symptoms to be identified and treated in primary care, especially given the ongoing nature of the patient-doctor relationship and the easy access primary care affords.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria L Allgar
- Centre for Research in Primary Care, University of Leeds, Nuffield Institute for Health, Leeds, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Tompkins CNE, Wright NMJ, Sheard L, Allgar VL. Associations between migrancy, health and homelessness: a cross-sectional study. Health Soc Care Community 2003; 11:446-452. [PMID: 14498842 DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2003.00448.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
There is limited awareness of the link between differing health problems and migrancy of homeless people. The present cross-sectional study sought to quantify the extent of migrancy of homeless people from their place of birth (PLOB) and evaluate whether a history of problematic drug use, alcohol misuse or enduring mental health problems were associated with migrancy from their PLOB. The work was conducted at an inner-city health centre for the homeless in the north of England. Place of birth was created as an entry on the computerised registration records. The PLOB was collected and recorded for each homeless person registering with the service over the study period. Information was also extracted regarding diagnoses of problematic illicit drug use, problematic alcohol use and enduring mental health problems for each homeless person. The study identified statistically significant differences for the migration of homeless people from their PLOB for age, problematic drug use and problematic alcohol use. Problematic alcohol use is independently associated with an increased likelihood of migration from the PLOB. Conversely, a history of illicit drug use is associated with a reduced possibility of migration from the PLOB when accessing primary healthcare services. There was no significant difference for migration from the PLOB for mental health. Not all homeless people migrate from their PLOB and health problems of drug use, mental health or alcohol use are independently associated with different patterns of migration. Understanding the migrancy of homeless people is important when planning and targeting appropriate health and social services to address their varying health, social and psychological needs.
Collapse
|
23
|
Allgar VL, Neal RD, Pascoe SW. Grading referrals to specialist breast units. Guidance on referral needs to be evidence based. BMJ 2002; 325:392. [PMID: 12183322 PMCID: PMC1123901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/26/2023]
|
24
|
Miall LS, Henderson MJ, Turner AJ, Brownlee KG, Brocklebank JT, Newell SJ, Allgar VL. Plasma creatinine rises dramatically in the first 48 hours of life in preterm infants. Pediatrics 1999; 104:e76. [PMID: 10586010 DOI: 10.1542/peds.104.6.e76] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Published data show that plasma creatinine falls steadily during the first 28 days of life and that creatinine levels in the neonatal period are higher in more premature infants. However, the best reference data commence on day 2 of life. The objective of this study was to document how plasma creatinine changes in the first 48 hours of life and to examine the reason for the apparently high levels of creatinine in preterm infants, compared with maternal levels. DESIGN A prospective observational study on a regional neonatal intensive care unit. PATIENTS A total of 42 preterm infants, mean gestational age of 29.4 weeks (range: 23-35), mean birth weight of 1.42 kg (.55-2.77), divided into 4 gestation groups: 23 to 26 weeks (n = 9), 27 to 29 weeks (n = 13), 30 to 32 weeks (n = 12), and 33 to 35 weeks (n = 8). INTERVENTIONS Measurement of plasma creatinine and urea concentration in cord blood and in serial samples taken for routine arterial blood gas analysis. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Changes in creatinine concentration with time and relationship to gestational age, birth weight, and illness severity. RESULTS Mean creatinine at birth was 73 micromol/L (95% confidence interval [CI]: 68-79 micromol/L). Plasma creatinine rose significantly over the first 48 hours. Mean peak creatinine in the most preterm infants (23-26 weeks) was 221 micromol/L (CI: 195-247 micromol/L). Peak plasma creatinine was inversely related to gestation (Spearman's coefficient: -.73) and birth weight (Spearman's coefficient: -.76). Significant differences in creatinine concentration were seen among different gestational groups at 24 and 48 hours of life. Peak creatinine correlated with a high Clinical Risk Index for Babies score (Spearman's coefficient:. 64). The fall in creatinine began later in more premature infants. All 38 surviving infants had normal renal function; their mean plasma creatinine at discharge was 52 micromol/L (CI: 46-58 micromol/L). CONCLUSIONS Rather than falling steadily from birth, creatinine rises dramatically in the first 48 hours of life, especially in infants of <30 weeks' gestation. Even large rises in creatinine in the first 48 hours may be expected and should not be used in isolation to diagnose renal failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L S Miall
- Regional Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, St. James's University Hospital, The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|