Interfacility Transfer Outcomes Among Children With Complex Chronic Conditions: Associations Between Patient-Level and Hospital-Level Factors and Transfer Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Determine patient- and referring hospital-level predictors of transfer outcomes among children with 1 or more complex chronic conditions (CCCs) transferred to a large academic medical center.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of 2063 pediatric inpatient admissions from 2017 to 2019 with at least 1 CCC defined by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. Charts were excluded if patients were admitted via any route other than transfer from a referring hospital's emergency department or inpatient ward. Patient-level factors were race/ethnicity, payer, and area median income. Hospital-level factors included the clinician type initiating transfer and whether the referring-hospital had an inpatient pediatric ward. Transfer outcomes were rapid response within 24 hours of admission, Pediatric Early Warning Score at admission, and hours to arrival. Regression analyses adjusted for age were used to determine association between patient- and hospital-level predictors with transfer outcomes.

RESULTS

There were no significant associations between patient-level predictors and transfer outcomes. Hospital-level adjusted analyses indicated that transfers from hospitals without inpatient pediatrics wards had lower odds of ICU admission during hospitalization (odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.97) and shorter transfer times (β-coefficient, -2.54; 95% CI, -3.60 to -1.49) versus transfers from hospitals with inpatient pediatrics wards. There were no significant associations between clinician type and transfer outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

For pediatric patients with CCCs, patient-level predictors were not associated with clinical outcomes. Transfers from hospitals without inpatient pediatric wards were less likely to require ICU admission and had shorter interfacility transfer times compared with those from hospitals with inpatient pediatrics wards.

How and why might interprofessional patient- and family-centered rounds improve outcomes among healthcare teams and hospitalized patients? A conceptual framework informed by scoping and narrative literature review methods

Poor communication within healthcare contributes to inefficiencies, medical errors, conflict, and other adverse outcomes. A promising model to improve outcomes resulting from poor communication in the inpatient hospital setting is Interprofessional Patient- and Family-Centered rounds (IPFCR). IPFCR brings two or more health professions together with hospitalized patients and families as part of a consistent, team-based routine to share information and collaboratively arrive at a daily plan of care. A growing body of literature focuses on implementation and outcomes of IPFCR to improve healthcare quality and team and patient outcomes. Most studies report positive changes following IPFCR implementation. However, conceptual frameworks and theoretical models are lacking in the IPFCR literature and represent a major gap that needs to be addressed to move this field forward. The purpose of this two-part review is to propose a conceptual framework of how IPFCR works. The goal is to articulate a framework that can be tested in subsequent research studies. Published IPFCR literature and relevant theories and frameworks were examined and synthesized to explore how IPFCR works, to situate IPFCR in relation to existing models and frameworks, and to postulate core components and underlying causal mechanisms. A preliminary, context-specific, conceptual framework is proposed illustrating interrelationships between four core components of IPFCR (interprofessional approach, intentional patient and family engagement, rounding structure, shared development of a daily care plan), improvements in communication, and better outcomes.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization in children with cerebral palsy

A retrospective cohort of children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) with cerebral palsy was matched 1:3 by age and admission year to determine odds of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal colonization. Adjusted odds of MRSA nasal colonization at PICU admission were 2.6-fold higher among children with cerebral palsy.

Patient- and Family-Centered Hospital Care-The Need for Structural Humility

This Viewpoint discusses communication between clinicians and caregivers of racial and ethnic minoritized groups.

Protective and Unequal? Caregiver Presence During Pediatric Hospitalizations

OBJECTIVES

Describe the association between caregiver presence on hospital day 1 and outcomes related to readmissions, pain, and adverse events (AE).

METHODS

Caregiver presence during general pediatrics rounds on hospital day 1 was recorded, along with demographic data and clinical outcomes via chart review. AE data were obtained from the safety reporting system. χ2 tests compared demographic characteristics between present and absent caregivers. Background elimination determined significant predictors of caregiver presence and their association with outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 324 families were assessed (34.9% non-Hispanic white, 41.4% Black, 17% Hispanic or Latinx, 6.8% other race or ethnicity). Adolescents (aged ≥14 years) had increased odds of not having a caregiver present compared with 6- to 13-year-olds (36.2% vs 10%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 5.11 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.88-13.87]). Publicly insured children were more likely to not have a caregiver present versus privately insured children (25.1% vs 12.4%; aOR 2.38 [95% CI 1.19-4.73]). Compared with having a caregiver present, children without caregivers were more likely to be readmitted at 7 days (aOR 3.6 [95% CI 1.0-12.2]), receive opiates for moderate/severe pain control (aOR 11.5 [95% CI 1.7-75.7]), and have an AE reported (aOR 4.0 [95% CI 1.0-15.1]).

CONCLUSIONS

Adolescents and children with public insurance were less likely to have a caregiver present. Not having a caregiver present was associated with increased readmission, opiate prescription, and AE reporting. Further research is needed to delineate whether associations with clinical outcomes reflect differences in quality of care and decrease barriers to caregiver presence.

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Communication Quality During Family-Centered Rounds

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate racial and ethnic differences in communication quality during family centered rounds.

METHODS

We conducted an observational study of family-centered rounds on hospital day 1. All enrolled caregivers completed a survey following rounds and a subset consented to audio record their encounter with the medical team. We applied a priori defined codes to transcriptions of the audio-recorded encounters to assess objective communication quality, including medical team behaviors, caregiver participatory behaviors, and global communication scores. The surveys were designed to measure subjective communication quality. Incident Rate Ratios (IRR) were calculated with regression models to compare the relative mean number of behaviors per encounter time minute by race and ethnicity.

RESULTS

Overall, 202 of 341 eligible caregivers completed the survey, and 59 had accompanying audio- recorded rounds. We found racial and ethnic differences in participatory behaviors: English-speaking Latinx (IRR 0.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3-0.8) Black (IRR 0.6; 95% CI 0.4-0.8), and Spanish-speaking Latinx caregivers (IRR 0.3; 95% CI 0.2-0.5) participated less than white caregivers. Coder-rated global ratings of medical team respect and partnership were lower for Black and Spanish-speaking Latinx caregivers than white caregivers (respect 3.1 and 2.9 vs 3.6, P values .03 and .04, respectively: partnership 2.4 and 2.3 vs 3.1, P values .03 and .04 respectively). In surveys, Spanish-speaking caregivers reported lower subjective communication quality in several domains.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, Black and Latinx caregivers were treated with less partnership and respect than white caregivers.

Pediatric providers and radiology examinations: knowledge and comfort levels regarding ionizing radiation and potential complications of imaging

BACKGROUND

Pediatric providers should understand the basic risks of the diagnostic imaging tests they order and comfortably discuss those risks with parents. Appreciating providers' level of understanding is important to guide discussions and enhance relationships between radiologists and pediatric referrers.

OBJECTIVE

To assess pediatric provider knowledge of diagnostic imaging modalities that use ionizing radiation and to understand provider concerns about risks of imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 6-question survey was sent via email to 390 pediatric providers (faculty, trainees and midlevel providers) from a single academic institution. A knowledge-based question asked providers to identify which radiology modalities use ionizing radiation. Subjective questions asked providers about discussions with parents, consultations with radiologists, and complications of imaging studies.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-nine pediatric providers (43.3% response rate) completed the survey. Greater than 90% of responding providers correctly identified computed tomography (CT), fluoroscopy and radiography as modalities that use ionizing radiation, and ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as modalities that do not. Fewer (66.9% correct, P<0.001) knew that nuclear medicine utilizes ionizing radiation. A majority of providers (82.2%) believed that discussions with radiologists regarding ionizing radiation were helpful, but 39.6% said they rarely had time to do so. Providers were more concerned with complications of sedation and cost than they were with radiation-induced cancer, renal failure or anaphylaxis.

CONCLUSION

Providers at our academic referral center have a high level of basic knowledge regarding modalities that use ionizing radiation, but they are less aware of ionizing radiation use in nuclear medicine studies. They find discussions with radiologists helpful and are concerned about complications of sedation and cost.

Improving the Efficiency of Care for Pediatric Patients Hospitalized With Asthma

BACKGROUND

Asthma exacerbations are a leading cause of hospitalization among children. Despite the existence of national pediatric asthma guidelines, significant variation in care persists. At Duke Children's Hospital, we determined that our average length of stay (ALOS) and cost for pediatric asthma admissions exceeded that of our peers. Our aim was to reduce the ALOS of pediatric patients hospitalized with asthma from 2.9 days to 2.6 days within 12 months by implementing an asthma pathway within our new electronic health record.

METHODS

We convened a multidisciplinary committee charged with reducing variability in practice, ALOS, and cost of inpatient pediatric asthma care, while adhering to evidence-based guidelines. Interventions were tested through multiple "plan-do-study-act" cycles. Control charts of the ALOS were constructed and annotated with interventions, including testing of an asthma score, implementation of order sets, use of a respiratory therapy-driven albuterol treatment protocol, and provision of targeted education. Order set usage was audited as a process measure. Readmission rates were monitored as a balancing measure.

RESULTS

The ALOS of pediatric patients hospitalized with asthma decreased significantly from 2.9 days to 2.3 days. Comparing baseline with intervention variable direct cost data revealed a savings of $1543 per case. Improvements occurred in the context of high compliance with the asthma pathway order sets. Readmission rates remained stable throughout the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of an asthma care pathway based on the electronic health record improved the efficiency and variable direct costs of hospital care, reduced variability in practice, and ensured adherence to high-quality national guidelines.