1
|
Baillot A, St-Pierre M, Bernard P, Burkhardt L, Chorfi W, Oppert JM, Bellicha A, Brunet J. Exercise and bariatric surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the feasibility and acceptability of exercise and controlled trial methods. Obes Rev 2022; 23:e13480. [PMID: 35695385 DOI: 10.1111/obr.13480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the feasibility and acceptability of exercise and controlled trial methods in adults awaiting or having undergone bariatric surgery (BS). Search methods used to identify relevant articles were inclusion of articles identified in a systematic review, new database search of articles published 2019-2021, and hand searching reference lists. Titles/abstracts and full-texts were screened by two reviewers independently against inclusion criteria: adults awaiting or having undergone BS, controlled trial, exercise group compared with a comparison group without exercise. Twenty-eight articles were reviewed; most interventions were supervised, performed after BS, and lasted ≤13 weeks. Pooled data for exercise intervention attendance and dropout rates were 84% (k = 10) and 5% (k = 19), respectively, though possibly misestimated due to poor/selective reporting. Median study and recruitment duration were 18 weeks and 24 months, respectively, with a pooled enrollment rate of 2.5 participants/month. Pooled data for refusal to participate, enrollment, and retention rates were 23% (k = 16), 43% (k = 18), and 87% (k = 26), respectively. Despite the lack of data available in studies included, exercise and controlled trial methods seem feasible and acceptable for adults awaiting or having undergone BS. To better identify methodological or practical challenges, and assess bias, better reporting of feasibility and acceptability indicators is needed in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurélie Baillot
- Nursing Department, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, Québec, Canada.,Institut du savoir de l'hôpital Montfort-recherche, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Centre de Recherche en Médecine Psychosociale, Centre Intégré de Santé et Services Sociaux de l'Outaouais, Gatineau, Québec, Canada
| | - Maxime St-Pierre
- Basic science department, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, Québec, Canada
| | - Paquito Bernard
- Department of Physical Activity Sciences, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.,Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Laura Burkhardt
- Nursing Department, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, Québec, Canada
| | - Wafaa Chorfi
- Nursing Department, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, Québec, Canada
| | - Jean-Michel Oppert
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Pitié-Salpêtrière hospital, Department of Nutrition, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Alice Bellicha
- Sorbonne Paris Nord University, Inserm U1153, Inrae U1125, Cnam, Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center - University of Paris (CRESS), Bobigny, France
| | - Jennifer Brunet
- Institut du savoir de l'hôpital Montfort-recherche, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Cancer Therapeutic Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|