1
|
Liu JF, Xiong N, Wenham RM, Wahner-Hendrickson A, Armstrong DK, Chan N, O'Malley DM, Lee JM, Penson RT, Cristea MC, Abbruzzese JL, Matsuo K, Olawaiye AB, Barry WT, Cheng SC, Polak M, Swisher EM, Shapiro GI, Kohn EC, Ivy SP, Matulonis UA. A phase 2 trial exploring the significance of homologous recombination status in patients with platinum sensitive or platinum resistant relapsed ovarian cancer receiving combination cediranib and olaparib. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 187:105-112. [PMID: 38759516 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2024] [Revised: 04/27/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Combination cediranib/olaparib has reported activity in relapsed ovarian cancer. This phase 2 trial investigated the activity of cediranib/olaparib in relapsed ovarian cancer and its association with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). METHODS Seventy patients were enrolled to cohorts of either platinum-sensitive or platinum-resistant ovarian cancer and received olaparib tablets 200 mg twice daily and cediranib tablets 30 mg once daily under a continuous dosing schedule. HRD testing was performed on pre-treatment, on-treatment and archival biopsies by sequencing key homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes and by genomic LOH analysis. The primary objective for the platinum-sensitive cohort was the association of HRD, defined as presence of HRR gene mutation, with progression-free survival (PFS). The primary objective for the platinum-resistant cohort was objective response rate (ORR), with a key secondary endpoint evaluating the association of HRD status with activity. RESULTS In platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (N = 35), ORR was 77.1% (95% CI 59.9-89.6%) and median PFS was 16.4 months (95% CI 13.2-18.6). Median PFS in platinum-sensitive HRR-HRD cancers (N = 22) was 16.8 months (95% CI 11.3-18.6), and 16.4 months (95% CI 9.4-NA) in HRR-HR proficient cancers (N = 13; p = 0.57). In platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (N = 35), ORR was 22.9% (95% CI 10.4-40.1%) with median PFS 6.8 months (95% CI 4.2-9.1). Median PFS in platinum-resistant HRR-HRD cancers (N = 7) was 10.5 months (95% CI 3.6-NA) and 5.6 months (95% CI 3.6-7.6) in HRR-HR proficient cancers (N = 18; p = 0.23). CONCLUSIONS Cediranib/olaparib had clinical activity in both platinum-sensitive and -resistant ovarian cancer. Presence of HRR gene mutations was not associated with cediranib/olaparib activity in either setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joyce F Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America.
| | - Niya Xiong
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Robert M Wenham
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States of America
| | | | - Deborah K Armstrong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Nancy Chan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States of America
| | - David M O'Malley
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Jung-Min Lee
- Women's Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - Richard T Penson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Mihaela C Cristea
- Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States of America
| | - James L Abbruzzese
- Department of Medical Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Koji Matsuo
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Alexander B Olawaiye
- Department of OBGYN, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - William T Barry
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Su-Chun Cheng
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Madeline Polak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Elizabeth M Swisher
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Geoffrey I Shapiro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Elise C Kohn
- Women's Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States of America; Clinical Investigations Branch, NCI Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - S Percy Ivy
- Investigational Drug Branch, NCI Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - Ursula A Matulonis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ligibel JA, Zheng Y, Barry WT, Sella T, Ruddy KJ, Greaney ML, Rosenberg SM, Emmons KM, Partridge AH. Effects of an educational physical activity intervention in young women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: Findings from the Young and Strong Study. Cancer 2023. [PMID: 37016839 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obesity and inactivity are poor prognostic factors in breast cancer, but less is known regarding physical activity (PA) and weight patterns in young breast cancer survivors. METHODS The Young and Strong Study was a cluster-randomized trial evaluating education and support interventions for young women (age <45 years) with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Sites were randomized 1:1 to a Young Women's Intervention (YWI) or a contact-time control physical activity intervention (PAI). Changes in PA and weight were compared between groups using general estimating equations to evaluate clustered binary and Gaussian data. RESULTS A total of 467 patients enrolled between July 2012 and December 2013 across 54 sites. Median age at diagnosis was 40 years (range, 22-45). At baseline, median body mass index (BMI) was 25.4 kg/m2 (range, 16.1-61.1), and participants reported a median of 0 minutes (range, 0-2190) of moderate/vigorous PA/week. PA increased significantly over time in both groups (p < .001), with no difference between groups at any time point. BMI increased modestly but significantly (p < .001) over time in both groups. Provider attention to PA was observed in 74% of participants on PAI and 61% on YWI (p = .145) and correlated with PA at 12 months (median 100 min/week of PA in participants with provider attention to PA vs. 60 min/week in those without, p = .016). CONCLUSIONS In a cohort of young women with breast cancer, rates of obesity and inactivity were high. PA and BMI increased over time and were not impacted by an educational PA intervention. Findings provide important information for developing lifestyle interventions for young breast cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A Ligibel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Yue Zheng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - William T Barry
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tal Sella
- Sheba Medical Center, Tel HaShomer, Israel
| | - Kathryn J Ruddy
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | | | - Karen M Emmons
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Isakoff SJ, Tung NM, Yin J, Tayob N, Parker J, Rosenberg J, Bardia A, Spring L, Park H, Collins M, Barry WT, Severgnini M, Peterkin D, Tolaney SM. Abstract P2-14-17: A phase 1b study of PVX-410 vaccine in combination with pembrolizumab in metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC). Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-p2-14-17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibition is active in mTNBC. Both pembrolizumab and atezolizumab are FDA approved for programmed cell death ligand 1 positive (PDL1+) mTNBC. Vaccines may further induce host immune response and enhance therapeutic activity of checkpoint inhibitors. PVX-410 (PVX) (OncoPep, Inc.) is a novel, HLA-A2 restricted, tetra-peptide vaccine, with 3 of its 4 antigens (XBP1[2 splice variants] and CD138) commonly overexpressed in TNBC. We present results from a phase 1b study evaluating the immune response, safety and tolerability, and clinical activity of PVX and pembrolizumab (PEM) in mTNBC. Methods: Eligibility for this phase 1b multi-center, single-arm study included HLA-A2+, PD-L1 unselected female patients (pts) ≥18 years with metastatic or inoperable locally advanced TNBC, measurable disease, and any number of prior therapies, including prior checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Pts received 6 doses of 800µg PVX emulsified in Montanide ISA 720 VG by subcutaneous injection co-administered with intramuscular Hiltonol weekly for 6 weeks (wks) followed by booster vaccine doses at wks 10 and 28, with concurrent intravenous 200 mg PEM every 3 wks starting with the second PVX dose. Therapy was given until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity or a maximum of 24 months. Blood samples were scheduled for immune response assessment at baseline and at weeks 2, 5, 10, 28, and 52 post-treatment initiation. The primary objective was PVX- specific immune response at week 10. Immune response was defined as a ≥2-fold change over baseline in the proportion of CD3+CD8+ T cells that expressed IFNγ and the proportion of CD3+CD8+ T cells positive for PVX tetramers following an in vitro stimulation of PBMC with PVX peptides using a flow cytometric assay. Secondary objectives were immune response at wk 28, safety and tolerability, and clinical endpoints (RR, CBR, DCR, DoR, PFS, and OS). Results: Between 3/2018 and 8/2020, 19 pts enrolled. Median age was 62 yrs (range 46-79), with median 2 (range 0-9) lines of prior therapy for metastatic disease. Median disease-free interval among 16 pts with prior early TNBC was 3.3 years. Among 19 enrolled patients, 16 were available for analysis at the time of abstract submission. Among the 16, 10 pts were evaluable at week 10 and 7(70%) demonstrated a PVX specific immune response. There were 6 patients who progressed before week 10, of whom 3 (50%) had a positive immune response at the EOT visit. Immune response persisted in all evaluable pts assessed at week 28 (n=4). Immune response data for all evaluable patients will be updated at the presentation. Among 19 patients evaluable for safety analysis, the most common adverse events (AEs) attributable to PVX (grade ≥2) included: fatigue (21%), arthralgia (11%) injection site reaction (5 %) pain (5%) lymphocyte count decreased (5%), maculopapular rash (5%) and skin infection (5%) . There were two grade 3 AEs attributed to PEM (AST elevation, hyponatremia) and one grade 4 AE (ALT elevation). There were no grade 5 AEs. The clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+SD for ≥16 weeks) was 31.6% with no confirmed partial or complete responses. Best overall response was SD in 9 (47%) patients. Analysis of additional clinical endpoints including PFS and OS is ongoing and will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: PVX plus PEM is safe with manageable toxicity in pts with mTNBC. No new unexpected adverse events were identified. Immune response data show PVX induces antigen-specific T cell expansion as observed by increases in PVX tetramer and IFN positive T cells. Clinical disease control was observed with a CBR of 31.6%. Based on these promising immune response results in this pretreated population, a phase 2 study with PVX+PEM in combination with standard chemotherapy in treatment naïve, PD-L1+ mTNBC is underway (NCT04634747).
Citation Format: Steven J Isakoff, Nadine M. Tung, Jun Yin, Nabihah Tayob, Joanne Parker, Julie Rosenberg, Aditya Bardia, Laura Spring, Hannah Park, Maya Collins, William T. Barry, Mariano Severgnini, Doris Peterkin, Sara M. Tolaney. A phase 1b study of PVX-410 vaccine in combination with pembrolizumab in metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-14-17.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jun Yin
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Harris KM, Smilek DE, Byron M, Lim N, Barry WT, McNamara J, Garcet S, Konrad RJ, Stengelin M, Bathala P, Korman NJ, Feldman SR, Boh EE, Barber K, Laumann AE, Helfrich YR, Krueger GG, Sofen H, Bissonnette R, Krueger JG. Effect of Costimulatory Blockade With Abatacept After Ustekinumab Withdrawal in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: The PAUSE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol 2021; 157:1306-1315. [PMID: 34643650 PMCID: PMC8515260 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.3492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Question Does blockade of CD28/B7 costimulatory signaling with abatacept suppress the psoriasis molecular signature and prevent psoriasis relapse after ustekinumab withdrawal? Findings In this parallel-design, double-blind randomized clinical trial of 91 adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, costimulatory blockade with abatacept did not prevent psoriasis relapse and did not maintain suppression of the pathogenic psoriasis molecular signature following ustekinumab withdrawal. Meaning In this study, abatacept did not prevent psoriasis relapse, which may rely on alternative, compensatory mechanisms of residual T-cell activation in skin. Importance Psoriasis relapse may involve compensatory T-cell activation pathways in the presence of CD28-CD80/CD86 blockade with abatacept. Objective To determine whether costimulatory signaling blockade with abatacept prevents psoriasis relapse after ustekinumab withdrawal. Design, Setting, and Participants Psoriasis Treatment with Abatacept and Ustekinumab: a Study of Efficacy (PAUSE), a parallel-design, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial, was conducted at 10 sites in the US and Canada. Participant enrollment opened on March 19, 2014, and concluded on April 11, 2016. Participants were adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and received ustekinumab in a lead-in phase. Those who responded to ustekinumab at week 12 were randomized 1:1 to either the continued with ustekinumab group (ustekinumab group) or the switched to abatacept group (abatacept group). Treatment was discontinued at week 39, and participants were followed up for psoriasis relapse until week 88. Statistical analyses were performed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and safety samples from May 3, 2018, to July 6, 2021. Interventions Participants received subcutaneous ustekinumab at weeks 0 and 4 (45 mg per dose for those ≤100 kg; 90 mg per dose for those >100 kg). Participants randomized to the abatacept group at week 12 received subcutaneous abatacept, 125 mg weekly, from weeks 12 to 39 and ustekinumab placebo at weeks 16 and 28. Participants randomized to the ustekinumab group received ustekinumab at weeks 16 and 28 and abatacept placebo weekly from weeks 12 to 39. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was the proportion of participants with psoriasis relapse (loss of ≥50% of the initial Psoriasis Area and Severity Index improvement) between weeks 12 and 88. Secondary end points included time to psoriasis relapse, proportion of participants with psoriasis relapse between weeks 12 and 40, and adverse events. The psoriasis transcriptome and serum cytokines were evaluated. Results A total of 108 participants (mean [SD] age, 46.1 [12.1] years; 73 [67.6%] men) were treated with open-label ustekinumab; 91 were randomized to blinded treatment. Similar proportions of participants in the abatacept group and the ustekinumab group relapsed between weeks 12 and 88 (41 of 45 [91.1%] vs 40 of 46 [87.0%]; P = .41). Median time to relapse from the last dose of ustekinumab was similar between groups as well: 36 weeks (95% CI, 36-48 weeks) in the abatacept group vs 32 weeks (95% CI, 28-40 weeks) in the ustekinumab group. Similar numbers and rates of adverse events occurred. Abatacept did not maintain suppression of the pathogenic IL-23-mediated psoriasis molecular signature in lesions after ustekinumab withdrawal, and serum IL-19 levels increased. Conclusions and Relevance This parallel-design, double-blind randomized clinical trial found that abatacept did not prevent psoriasis relapse that occurred after ustekinumab withdrawal because it did not completely block the pathogenic psoriasis molecular pathways that led to relapse. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01999868
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina M Harris
- Biomarker and Discovery Research, Immune Tolerance Network, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Dawn E Smilek
- Clinical Trials Group, Clinical and Translational Medicine, Immune Tolerance Network, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco
| | | | - Noha Lim
- Biomarker and Discovery Research, Immune Tolerance Network, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco
| | | | - James McNamara
- Autoimmunity and Mucosal Immunology Branch, Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Rockville, Maryland
| | | | - Robert J Konrad
- Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | | | | | - Neil J Korman
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Steven R Feldman
- Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Erin E Boh
- Health Sciences Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Kirk Barber
- Department of Medicine (Dermatology), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Anne E Laumann
- Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University, Colorado Springs, Colorado
| | | | - Gerald G Krueger
- Department of Dermatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City
| | - Howard Sofen
- Dermatology, David Geffen UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) School of Medicine, Los Angeles
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ligibel JA, Huebner L, Rugo HS, Burstein HJ, Toppmeyer DL, Anders CK, Ma C, Barry WT, Suman V, Carey LA, Partridge AH, Hudis CA, Winer EP. Physical Activity, Weight, and Outcomes in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer (C40502/Alliance). JNCI Cancer Spectr 2021; 5:pkab025. [PMID: 33981951 PMCID: PMC8103727 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkab025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Revised: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Obesity and inactivity are associated with increased risk of cancer-related and overall mortality in breast cancer, but there are few data in metastatic disease. Methods Cancer and Leukemia Group B 40502 was a randomized trial of first-line taxane-based chemotherapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer. Height and weight were collected at enrollment. After 299 patients enrolled, the study was amended to assess recreational physical activity (PA) at enrollment using the Nurses' Health Study Exercise Questionnaire. Associations with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using stratified Cox modeling (strata included hormone receptor status, prior taxane, bevacizumab use, and treatment arm). All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results A total of 799 patients were enrolled, and at the time of data lock, median follow-up was 60 months. At enrollment, median age was 56.7 years, 73.1% of participants had hormone receptor-positive cancers, 42.6% had obesity, and 47.6% engaged in less than 3 metabolic equivalents of task (MET) hours of PA per week (<1 hour of moderate PA). Neither baseline body mass index nor PA was statistically significantly associated with PFS or OS, although there was a marginally statistically significant increase in PFS (hazard ratio = 0.83, 95% confidence interval = 0.79 to 1.02; P = .08) and OS (hazard ratio = 0.81, 95% confidence interval = 0.65 to 1.02; P = .07) in patients who reported PA greater than 9 MET hours per week vs 0-9 MET hours per week. Conclusions In a trial of first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer, rates of obesity and inactivity were high. There was no statistically significant relationship between body mass index and outcomes. More information is needed regarding the relationship between PA and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A Ligibel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Luke Huebner
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Hope S Rugo
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Harold J Burstein
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Debra L Toppmeyer
- Department of Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Carey K Anders
- Department of Medicine, Duke University, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Cynthia Ma
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Vera Suman
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Lisa A Carey
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Clifford A Hudis
- American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric P Winer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Parsons HA, Macrae ER, Guo H, Li T, Barry WT, Tayob N, Wulf GM, Isakoff SJ, Krop IE. Phase II Single-Arm Study to Assess Trastuzumab and Vinorelbine in Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With HER2-Negative Tumors and HER2-Positive Circulating Tumor Cells. JCO Precis Oncol 2021; 5:896-903. [PMID: 34994617 PMCID: PMC9848583 DOI: 10.1200/po.20.00461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-directed treatments improve outcomes for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Current identification of patients with HER2-positive disease relies on tumor tissue testing, which can be inaccurate because of tumor heterogeneity or tumor evolution. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are often present in patients with cancer. We hypothesized that HER2 assessment of CTCs in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer could identify a subset of patients with HER2-positive CTCs who could benefit from HER2-directed treatments. METHODS This was a single-arm, two-stage, phase II trial. Patients with HER2-negative progressive MBC with HER2-positive CTC (defined as HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥ 2.0 by fluorescence in situ hybridization), ≥ 1 prior chemotherapy regimen for MBC, and no prior vinorelbine received trastuzumab in combination with vinorelbine on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 21-day cycle. The primary end point was objective response rate. RESULTS From January 2013 to June 2014, we prospectively screened CTCs from patients with HER2-negative MBC. CTCs were detected in 201 of 311 patients (65%). The median number of CTCs was 10 (interquartile range, 3-57). Sixty-nine of 311 patients (22%) had HER2+ CTCs, with a median of three HER2+ CTCs (range 1-21). Twenty patients with HER2+ CTCs were treated on study. At data cutoff (January 13, 2017), no patients remained on study therapy. The objective response rate was 5% (95% CI, 0.1 to 24.9), with one of 20 patients experiencing a partial response. The clinical benefit rate was 20.0% (1 partial response and 3 stable diseases > 24 weeks, 95% CI, 5.7% to 43.7%). The median progression-free survival was 2.7 months. CONCLUSION CTC analysis of patients with HER2-negative MBC identifies a subset with HER2-amplified CTCs. However, clinical activity of an HER2-directed regimen in this population was low. The functional significance of HER2-positive CTCs remains uncertain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather A. Parsons
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Currently Hao Guo at IQVIA Biotech, Morrisville, NC; Currently William T. Barry
at Rho Inc, Durham, NC
| | - Erin R. Macrae
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Currently Hao Guo at IQVIA Biotech, Morrisville, NC; Currently William T. Barry
at Rho Inc, Durham, NC
| | - Hao Guo
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Currently Hao Guo at IQVIA Biotech, Morrisville, NC; Currently William T. Barry
at Rho Inc, Durham, NC
| | - Tianyu Li
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Currently Hao Guo at IQVIA Biotech, Morrisville, NC; Currently William T. Barry
at Rho Inc, Durham, NC
| | - William T. Barry
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Currently Hao Guo at IQVIA Biotech, Morrisville, NC; Currently William T. Barry
at Rho Inc, Durham, NC
| | - Nabihah Tayob
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Currently Hao Guo at IQVIA Biotech, Morrisville, NC; Currently William T. Barry
at Rho Inc, Durham, NC
| | | | | | - Ian E. Krop
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Currently Hao Guo at IQVIA Biotech, Morrisville, NC; Currently William T. Barry
at Rho Inc, Durham, NC,Ian E. Krop, MD, PhD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline
Ave, Boston, MA 02215; e-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tolaney SM, Ziehr DR, Guo H, Ng MR, Barry WT, Higgins MJ, Isakoff SJ, Brock JE, Ivanova EV, Paweletz CP, Demeo MK, Ramaiya NH, Overmoyer BA, Jain RK, Winer EP, Duda DG. Phase II and Biomarker Study of Cabozantinib in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients. Oncologist 2021; 26:e1483. [PMID: 33978307 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
8
|
Magbanua MJM, Hendrix LH, Hyslop T, Barry WT, Winer EP, Hudis C, Toppmeyer D, Carey LA, Partridge AH, Pierga JY, Fehm T, Vidal-Martínez J, Mavroudis D, Garcia-Saenz JA, Stebbing J, Gazzaniga P, Manso L, Zamarchi R, Antelo ML, Mattos-Arruda LD, Generali D, Caldas C, Munzone E, Dirix L, Delson AL, Burstein HJ, Qadir M, Ma C, Scott JH, Bidard FC, Park JW, Rugo HS. Serial Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells in Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving First-Line Chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 113:443-452. [PMID: 32770247 PMCID: PMC8023821 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djaa113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Revised: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We examined the prognostic significance of circulating tumor cell (CTC) dynamics during treatment in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients receiving first-line chemotherapy. METHODS Serial CTC data from 469 patients (2202 samples) were used to build a novel latent mixture model to identify groups with similar CTC trajectory (tCTC) patterns during the course of treatment. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in groups based on baseline CTCs, combined CTC status at baseline to the end of cycle 1, and tCTC. Akaike information criterion was used to select the model that best predicted PFS and OS. RESULTS Latent mixture modeling revealed 4 distinct tCTC patterns: undetectable CTCs (56.9% ), low (23.7%), intermediate (14.5%), or high (4.9%). Patients with low, intermediate, and high tCTC patterns had statistically significant inferior PFS and OS compared with those with undetectable CTCs (P < .001). Akaike Information Criterion indicated that the tCTC model best predicted PFS and OS compared with baseline CTCs and combined CTC status at baseline to the end of cycle 1 models. Validation studies in an independent cohort of 1856 MBC patients confirmed these findings. Further validation using only a single pretreatment CTC measurement confirmed prognostic performance of the tCTC model. CONCLUSIONS We identified 4 novel prognostic groups in MBC based on similarities in tCTC patterns during chemotherapy. Prognostic groups included patients with very poor outcome (intermediate + high CTCs, 19.4%) who could benefit from more effective treatment. Our novel prognostic classification approach may be used for fine-tuning of CTC-based risk stratification strategies to guide future prospective clinical trials in MBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Terry Hyslop
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - William T Barry
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA, USA
- Rho Inc., Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Eric P Winer
- Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Clifford Hudis
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Lisa Anne Carey
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Jean-Yves Pierga
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Tanja Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Dimitrios Mavroudis
- Laboratory of Translational Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Greece
| | | | - Justin Stebbing
- Division of Cancer, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Paola Gazzaniga
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Rita Zamarchi
- Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - María Luisa Antelo
- Department of Hematology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Leticia De Mattos-Arruda
- Val d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Val d’Hebron University Hospital, and Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Carlos Caldas
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute and Department of Oncology Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Elisabetta Munzone
- Division of Medical Senology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Luc Dirix
- Translational Cancer Research Unit, GZA Hospitals Sint-Augustinus, Antwerp, Belgium
- University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Amy L Delson
- Breast Science Advocacy Group, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Misbah Qadir
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Cynthia Ma
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Janet H Scott
- Division of Hematology Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - John W Park
- Division of Hematology Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Hope S Rugo
- Division of Hematology Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Garrido-Castro AC, Spurr LF, Hughes ME, Li YY, Cherniack AD, Kumari P, Lloyd MR, Bychkovsky B, Barroso-Sousa R, Di Lascio S, Jain E, Files J, Mohammed-Abreu A, Krevalin M, MacKichan C, Barry WT, Guo H, Xia D, Cerami E, Rollins BJ, MacConaill LE, Lindeman NI, Krop IE, Johnson BE, Wagle N, Winer EP, Dillon DA, Lin NU. Genomic Characterization of de novo Metastatic Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 27:1105-1118. [PMID: 33293374 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-1720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Revised: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In contrast to recurrence after initial diagnosis of stage I-III breast cancer [recurrent metastatic breast cancer (rMBC)], de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) represents a unique setting to elucidate metastatic drivers in the absence of treatment selection. We present the genomic landscape of dnMBC and association with overall survival (OS). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Targeted DNA sequencing (OncoPanel) was prospectively performed on either primary or metastatic tumors from 926 patients (212 dnMBC and 714 rMBC). Single-nucleotide variants, copy-number variations, and tumor mutational burden (TMB) in treatment-naïve dnMBC primary tumors were compared with primary tumors in patients who ultimately developed rMBC, and correlated with OS across all dnMBC. RESULTS When comparing primary tumors by subtype, MYB amplification was enriched in triple-negative dnMBC versus rMBC (21.1% vs. 0%, P = 0.0005, q = 0.111). Mutations in KMTD2, SETD2, and PIK3CA were more prevalent, and TP53 and BRCA1 less prevalent, in primary HR+/HER2- tumors of dnMBC versus rMBC, though not significant after multiple comparison adjustment. Alterations associated with shorter OS in dnMBC included TP53 (wild-type: 79.7 months; altered: 44.2 months; P = 0.008, q = 0.107), MYC (79.7 vs. 23.3 months; P = 0.0003, q = 0.011), and cell-cycle (122.7 vs. 54.9 months; P = 0.034, q = 0.245) pathway genes. High TMB correlated with better OS in triple-negative dnMBC (P = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS Genomic differences between treatment-naïve dnMBC and primary tumors of patients who developed rMBC may provide insight into mechanisms underlying metastatic potential and differential therapeutic sensitivity in dnMBC. Alterations associated with poor OS in dnMBC highlight the need for novel approaches to overcome potential intrinsic resistance to current treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana C Garrido-Castro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. .,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Liam F Spurr
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Melissa E Hughes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Yvonne Y Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Andrew D Cherniack
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Priti Kumari
- Department of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Maxwell R Lloyd
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Brittany Bychkovsky
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Simona Di Lascio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Esha Jain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Janet Files
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Max Krevalin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Colin MacKichan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - William T Barry
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hao Guo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel Xia
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women' Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ethan Cerami
- Department of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Barrett J Rollins
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Laura E MacConaill
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women' Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Center for Cancer Genome Discovery, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Neal I Lindeman
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women' Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Center for Cancer Genome Discovery, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ian E Krop
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Bruce E Johnson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nikhil Wagle
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Eric P Winer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Deborah A Dillon
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women' Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Atisha-Fregoso Y, Malkiel S, Harris KM, Byron M, Ding L, Kanaparthi S, Barry WT, Gao W, Ryker K, Tosta P, Askanase AD, Boackle SA, Chatham WW, Kamen DL, Karp DR, Kirou KA, Sam Lim S, Marder B, McMahon M, Parikh SV, Pendergraft WF, Podoll AS, Saxena A, Wofsy D, Diamond B, Smilek DE, Aranow C, Dall'Era M. Phase II Randomized Trial of Rituximab Plus Cyclophosphamide Followed by Belimumab for the Treatment of Lupus Nephritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2020; 73:121-131. [PMID: 32755035 PMCID: PMC7839443 DOI: 10.1002/art.41466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Objective To assess the safety, mechanism of action, and preliminary efficacy of rituximab followed by belimumab in the treatment of refractory lupus nephritis (LN). Methods In a multicenter, randomized, open‐label clinical trial, 43 patients with recurrent or refractory LN were treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide (CYC), and glucocorticoids followed by weekly belimumab infusions until week 48 (RCB group), or treated with rituximab and CYC but no belimumab infusions (RC group). Patients were followed up until week 96. Percentages of total and autoreactive B cell subsets in the patients’ peripheral blood were analyzed by flow cytometry. Results Treatment with belimumab did not increase the incidence of adverse events in patients with refractory LN. At week 48, a complete or partial renal response occurred in 11 (52%) of 21 patients receiving belimumab, compared to 9 (41%) of 22 patients in the RC group who did not receive belimumab (P = 0.452). Lack of improvement in or worsening of LN was the major reason for treatment failure. B cell depletion occurred in both groups, but the percentage of B cells remained lower in those receiving belimumab (geometric mean number of B cells at week 60, 53 cells/μl in the RCB group versus 11 cells/μl in the RC group; P = 0.0012). Percentages of total and autoreactive transitional B cells increased from baseline to week 48 in both groups. However, percentages of total and autoreactive naive B cells decreased from baseline to week 48 in the belimumab group compared to the no belimumab RC group (P = 0.0349), a finding that is consistent with the observed impaired maturation of naive B cells and enhanced censoring of autoreactive B cells. Conclusion The addition of belimumab to a treatment regimen with rituximab and CYC was safe in patients with refractory LN. This regimen diminished maturation of transitional to naive B cells during B cell reconstitution, and enhanced the negative selection of autoreactive B cells. Clinical efficacy was not improved with rituximab and CYC in combination with belimumab when compared to a therapeutic strategy of B cell depletion alone in patients with LN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Susan Malkiel
- Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York
| | | | | | - Linna Ding
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | | | - Wendy Gao
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - Patti Tosta
- Immune Tolerance Network, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Samir V Parikh
- Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | | | | | | | | | - Betty Diamond
- Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York
| | | | - Cynthia Aranow
- Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cook EE, Rosenberg SM, Ruddy KJ, Barry WT, Greaney M, Ligibel J, Sprunck-Harrild K, Holmes MD, Tamimi RM, Emmons KM, Partridge AH. Prospective evaluation of the impact of stress, anxiety, and depression on household income among young women with early breast cancer from the Young and Strong trial. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:1514. [PMID: 33023562 PMCID: PMC7541223 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09562-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2019] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Young women with breast cancer tend to report lower quality of life and higher levels of stress than older women with breast cancer, and this may have implications for other psychosocial factors including finances. We sought to determine if stress, anxiety, and depression at diagnosis were associated with changes in household income over 12-months in young women with breast cancer in the United States. Methods This study was a prospective, longitudinal cohort study comprised of women enrolled in the Young and Strong trial. Of the 467 women aged 18–45 newly diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer enrolled in the Young and Strong trial from 2012 to 2013, 356 (76%) answered income questions. Change in household income from baseline to 12 months was assessed and women were categorized as having lost, gained, maintained the same household income <$100,000, or maintained household income ≥$100,000. Patient-reported stress, anxiety, and depression were assessed close to diagnosis at trial enrollment. Adjusted multinomial logistic regression models were used to compare women who lost, gained, or maintained household income ≥$100,000 to women who maintained the same household income <$100,000. Results Although most women maintained household income ≥$100,000 (37.1%) or the same household income <$100,000 (32.3%), 15.4% lost household income and 15.2% gained household income. Stress, anxiety, and depression were not associated with gaining or losing household income compared to women maintaining household incomes <$100,000. Women with household incomes <$50,000 had a higher risk of losing household income compared to women with household incomes ≥$50,000. Women who maintained household incomes ≥$100,000 were less likely to report financial or insurance problems. Among women who lost household income, 56% reported financial problems and 20% reported insurance problems at 12 months. Conclusions Baseline stress, anxiety, and depression were not associated with household income changes for young women with breast cancer. However, lower baseline household income was associated with losing household income. Some young survivors encounter financial and insurance problems in the first year after diagnosis, and further support for these women should be considered. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01647607; date registered: July 23, 2012.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin E Cook
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.,Current affiliation: Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shoshana M Rosenberg
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - William T Barry
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jennifer Ligibel
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kim Sprunck-Harrild
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | | | - Rulla M Tamimi
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Karen M Emmons
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. .,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sella T, Dowton AA, Meyer ME, Ruddy KJ, Yeh ED, Barry WT, Partridge AH. The utility of magnetic resonance imaging in early-stage breast cancer survivors-An institutional experience and literature review. Breast J 2020; 26:1673-1679. [PMID: 32754998 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Revised: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The role of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the screening of breast cancer survivors with remaining breast tissue is not well studied. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of screening breast MRI in a cohort of breast cancer survivors. A population of patients with history of stage I-IIIa breast cancer and ≥1 MRI a year or later from diagnosis between 2006-2008 were identified using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network data base from two large Boston-area cancer centers. Patient and disease characteristics were obtained from the data base, and medical records were reviewed to identify the index MRI (first eligible), indications, and two-year outcomes. Overall, 647 patients had breast MRI scans during the study period including 342 eligible patients whose index MRIs were done for breast screening purposes. 47/342 (13.7%) were abnormal, and 3.8% (13/342) underwent biopsy, resulting in the detection of 3 cases of locoregional recurrence or new primary breast cancer (0.9%, 95% CI = 0.2%-2.5%). Of 295 patients with a normal index screening MRI, 12 had a breast cancer recurrence diagnosed within 2 years (4.1% 95%CI = 2.1%-7.0%), and 5 of these recurrences were limited to MRI-screened breast tissue. No statistically significant difference in the rate of 2-year locoregional or distant recurrence was observed between patients with an abnormal screening MRI and those with a normal scan. Adjunct single breast MRI surveillance in a general population of breast cancer survivors one year after diagnosis detected few recurrences, and its effect on short-term outcomes was unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tal Sella
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Anne A Dowton
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Meghan E Meyer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kathryn J Ruddy
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Eren D Yeh
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - William T Barry
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lietz CE, Garbutt C, Barry WT, Deshpande V, Chen YL, Lozano-Calderon SA, Wang Y, Lawney B, Ebb D, Cote GM, Duan Z, Hornicek FJ, Choy E, Petur Nielsen G, Haibe-Kains B, Quackenbush J, Spentzos D. MicroRNA-mRNA networks define translatable molecular outcome phenotypes in osteosarcoma. Sci Rep 2020; 10:4409. [PMID: 32157112 PMCID: PMC7064533 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-61236-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
There is a lack of well validated prognostic biomarkers in osteosarcoma, a rare, recalcitrant disease for which treatment standards have not changed in over 20 years. We performed microRNA sequencing in 74 frozen osteosarcoma biopsy samples, constituting the largest single center translationally analyzed osteosarcoma cohort to date, and we separately analyzed a multi-omic dataset from a large NCI supported national cooperative group cohort. We validated the prognostic value of candidate microRNA signatures and contextualized them in relevant transcriptomic and epigenomic networks. Our results reveal the existence of molecularly defined phenotypes associated with outcome independent of clinicopathologic features. Through machine learning based integrative pharmacogenomic analysis, the microRNA biomarkers identify novel therapeutics for stratified application in osteosarcoma. The previously unrecognized osteosarcoma subtypes with distinct clinical courses and response to therapy could be translatable for discerning patients appropriate for more intensified, less intensified, or alternate therapeutic regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher E Lietz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Cassandra Garbutt
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Illumina, Inc., San Diego, United States
| | - William T Barry
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Vikram Deshpande
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Yen-Lin Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Santiago A Lozano-Calderon
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Yaoyu Wang
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, United States
| | - Brian Lawney
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, United States
| | - David Ebb
- Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Gregory M Cote
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Zhenfeng Duan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | | | - Edwin Choy
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - G Petur Nielsen
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Benjamin Haibe-Kains
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - John Quackenbush
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, United States
| | - Dimitrios Spentzos
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Myers AP, Konstantinopoulos PA, Barry WT, Luo W, Broaddus RR, Makker V, Drapkin R, Liu J, Doyle A, Horowitz NS, Meric-Bernstam F, Birrer M, Aghajanian C, Coleman RL, Mills GB, Cantley LC, Matulonis UA, Westin SN. Phase II, 2-stage, 2-arm, PIK3CA mutation stratified trial of MK-2206 in recurrent endometrial cancer. Int J Cancer 2019; 147:413-422. [PMID: 31714586 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2019] [Revised: 09/27/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Endometrial cancers have high rates of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway alterations. MK-2206 is an allosteric inhibitor of AKT, an effector kinase of PI3K signals. We hypothesized patients with tumors harboring PIK3CA mutations would be more likely to benefit from MK-2206 than those without PIK3CA mutation. A Phase II study was performed in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer; all histologies except carcinosarcoma were eligible. Up to two prior chemotherapy lines were permitted, excluding prior treatment with PI3K pathway inhibitors. The first 18 patients were treated with MK-2206 200 mg weekly. Due to unacceptable toxicity, dose was reduced to 135 mg. Co-primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival at 6 months (6moPFS). Thirty-seven patients were enrolled (one ineligible). By somatic PIK3CA mutation analysis, nine patients were mutant (MT) [one with partial response (PR)/6moPFS, two with 6moPFS]. Twenty-seven patients were wild-type (WT) (one PR and four 6moPFS). Most common toxicities were rash (44%), fatigue (41%), nausea (42%) and hyperglycemia (31%). Grade 3 and 4 toxicities occurred in 25 and 17% of patients, respectively. Exploratory analysis found serous histology had greater 6moPFS as compared to all other histologies (5/8 vs. 2/28, p = 0.003). PTEN expression was associated with median time to progression (p = 0.04). No other significant associations with PI3K pathway alterations were identified. There is limited single agent activity of MK-2206 in PIK3CA MT and PIK3CA WT endometrial cancer populations. Activity was detected in patients with serous histology and due to their poor outcomes warrants further study (NCT01307631).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea P Myers
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Weixiu Luo
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Russell R Broaddus
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Vicky Makker
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Ronny Drapkin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Joyce Liu
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Austin Doyle
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Neil S Horowitz
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Funda Meric-Bernstam
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michael Birrer
- Division of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Carol Aghajanian
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Robert L Coleman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Gordon B Mills
- Department of Systems Biology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Lewis C Cantley
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Ursula A Matulonis
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Shannon N Westin
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sharma MR, Mehrotra S, Gray E, Wu K, Barry WT, Hudis C, Winer EP, Lyss AP, Toppmeyer DL, Moreno-Aspitia A, Lad TE, Velasco M, Overmoyer B, Rugo HS, Ratain MJ, Gobburu JV. Personalized Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Based on a Patient Reported Outcome: CALGB 40502 (Alliance). J Clin Pharmacol 2019; 60:444-452. [PMID: 31802506 DOI: 10.1002/jcph.1559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2019] [Accepted: 10/29/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (henceforth, neuropathy) is often dose limiting and is generally managed by empirical dose modifications. We aimed to (1) identify an early time point that is predictive of future neuropathy using a patient-reported outcome and (2) propose a dose-adjustment algorithm based on simulated data to manage neuropathy. In previous work, a dose-neuropathy model was developed using dosing and patient-reported outcome data from Cancer and Leukemia Group B 40502 (Alliance), a randomized phase III trial of paclitaxel, nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel or ixabepilone as first-line chemotherapy for locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. In the current work, an early time point that is predictive of the future severity of neuropathy was identified based on predictive accuracy of the model. Using the early data and model parameters, simulations were conducted to propose a dose-adjustment algorithm for the prospective management of neuropathy in individual patients. The end of the first 3 cycles (12 weeks) was identified as the early time point based on a predictive accuracy of 75% for the neuropathy score after 6 cycles. For paclitaxel, nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel, and ixabepilone, simulations with the proposed dose-adjustment algorithm resulted in 61%, 48%, and 35% fewer patients, respectively, with neuropathy score ≥8 after 6 cycles compared to no dose adjustment. We conclude that early patient-reported outcome data on neuropathy can be used to guide dose adjustments in individual patients that reduce the severity of future neuropathy. Prospective validation of this approach should be undertaken in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shailly Mehrotra
- Center for Translational Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Kehua Wu
- The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - William T Barry
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Clifford Hudis
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Eric P Winer
- Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alan P Lyss
- Heartland Cancer Research NCORP, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | | | | | - Thomas E Lad
- John H. Stroger Jr Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mario Velasco
- Decatur Memorial Hospital/Cancer Care Specialists of Illinois/Heartland Cancer Research NCORP, Decatur, Illinois, USA
| | - Beth Overmoyer
- Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hope S Rugo
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Jogarao V Gobburu
- Center for Translational Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Song Y, Barry WT, Seah DS, Tung NM, Garber JE, Lin NU. Patterns of recurrence and metastasis in BRCA1/BRCA2-associated breast cancers. Cancer 2019; 126:271-280. [PMID: 31581314 PMCID: PMC7003745 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2018] [Revised: 06/27/2019] [Accepted: 07/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Background Breast cancer subtypes are associated with distinct metastatic patterns. Whether germline BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation status is independently associated with central nervous system (CNS) relapse, controlling for tumor subtype, is unknown. Methods Patients who were treated at Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute and diagnosed with a first locoregional recurrence (LRR) or metastasis between 1981 and 2014 were identified using 2 institutional registries: 1) patients treated for recurrent breast cancer and 2) patients who underwent BRCA testing. The frequencies of LRR, sites of metastasis, and breast cancer‐specific survival from LRR or metastasis were calculated, and the factors associated with CNS recurrence were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression models. Results The final study cohort included 30 BRCA1 mutation carriers, 32 BRCA2 mutation carriers, and 270 noncarriers. Most BRCA1 carriers (73%) had triple‐negative breast cancer; whereas most BRCA2 carriers (72%) had hormone receptor‐positive tumors. BRCA1 carriers frequently experienced lung and distant lymph node metastasis, whereas BRCA2 carriers and noncarriers most often experienced bone metastasis. Although CNS disease occurred frequently in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers (53% BRCA1, 50% BRCA2, 25% noncarriers; P < .001), only BRCA2 mutation (P = .006) was significantly associated with CNS metastasis in multivariable analysis controlling for tumor subtype. BRCA2 mutation (P = .01), triple‐negative subtype (P < .001), and the involvement of CNS (P < .001) and other non‐CNS distant sites (relative to locoregional recurrence or contralateral disease; P < .001) at presentation of recurrent breast cancer were associated with risk for mortality. Conclusions CNS involvement is frequent in women with germline BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations who have metastatic breast cancer. BRCA2 mutation carriers had a significantly higher frequency of CNS metastasis than noncarriers when controlling for breast cancer subtype. Germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 alterations are associated with a high frequency (≥50%) of brain metastases in patients with locoregionally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. In multivariable analysis, only BRCA2 mutation (P = .006) was significantly associated with central nervous system metastasis when controlling for breast cancer subtype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Song
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - William T Barry
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Davinia S Seah
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nadine M Tung
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Hematology Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Judy E Garber
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Leone JP, Duda DG, Hu J, Barry WT, Trippa L, Gerstner ER, Jain RK, Tan S, Lawler E, Winer EP, Lin NU, Tolaney SM. A phase II study of cabozantinib alone or in combination with trastuzumab in breast cancer patients with brain metastases. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 179:113-123. [PMID: 31541381 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05445-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2019] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze the efficacy and tolerability of cabozantinib-a small molecule inhibitor of MET and VEGFR2-alone or with trastuzumab in patients with breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM). METHODS This single-arm phase II study enrolled patients with new or progressive measurable BCBM into 3 cohorts: Cohort 1 (HER2-positive), Cohort 2 (hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative), and Cohort 3 (triple-negative). Patients received cabozantinib 60-mg daily on a 21-day cycle. Cohort 1 added trastuzumab every 3 weeks and had a primary objective of central nervous system (CNS) objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1. Secondary objectives for all cohorts were progression-free survival, overall survival, toxicity, and changes in vascular parameters and circulating biomarkers. Cohorts 2 and 3 also had CNS ORR as a secondary objective. RESULTS Thirty-six BCBM patients enrolled (cohort 1, n = 21; cohort 2, n = 7; cohort 3, n = 8), with a median age of 50. Patients had a median of 3 prior lines for metastatic disease (range 1-9). Treatments prior to enrollment included craniotomy (n = 4), whole brain radiation (n = 24) and stereotactic radiosurgery (n = 11). CNS ORR was 5% in cohort 1, 14% in cohort 2, and 0% in cohort 3. Most common grade 3/4 adverse events included elevations in lipase (11%), AST (8%), ALT (6%), hyponatremia (8%), and hypertension (6%). Cabozantinib increased plasma concentrations of CA-IX, soluble (s)MET, PlGF, sTIE-2, VEGF, and VEGF-D, and decreased sVEGFR2 and TNF-α and total tumor blood volume. CONCLUSIONS Cabozantinib had insufficient activity in heavily pretreated BCBM patients. Biomarker analysis showed that cabozantinib had antiangiogenic activity and increased tissue hypoxia. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrial.gov registration: NCT02260531.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Pablo Leone
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Dan G Duda
- Steele Laboratories for Tumor Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jiani Hu
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - William T Barry
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lorenzo Trippa
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Rakesh K Jain
- Steele Laboratories for Tumor Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sally Tan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Lawler
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Eric P Winer
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Sara M Tolaney
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mallory MA, Valero MG, Hu J, Barry WT, Losk K, Nimbkar S, Golshan M. Bilateral mastectomy operations and the role for the cosurgeon technique: A Nationwide analysis of surgical practice patterns. Breast J 2019; 26:220-226. [PMID: 31498509 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2019] [Revised: 06/13/2019] [Accepted: 06/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Traditionally, bilateral mastectomy (BM) operations are performed by a single surgeon but a two-attending co-surgeon technique (CST) has been described. A questionnaire was sent to members of the American Society of Breast Surgeons to assess national BM practices and analyze utilization and perceived benefits of the CST. Among surgeons responding, most continue to use the single-surgeon approach for BMs; however, 14.1% utilize the CST and up to 31% are interested in future CST use. Time savings, mentorship, cost savings, and opportunity to learn new techniques were identified as perceived CST advantages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Anne Mallory
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Monica G Valero
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jiani Hu
- Department of Biostatistics & Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - William T Barry
- Department of Biostatistics & Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Katya Losk
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Suniti Nimbkar
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mehra Golshan
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Barroso-Sousa R, Barry WT, Garrido-Castro AC, Hodi FS, Min L, Krop IE, Tolaney SM. Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction Following the Use of Different Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Regimens: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol 2019; 4:173-182. [PMID: 28973656 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 640] [Impact Index Per Article: 128.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Importance If not promptly recognized, endocrine dysfunction can be life threatening. The incidence and risk of developing such adverse events (AEs) following the use of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) regimens are unknown. Objective To compare the incidence and risk of endocrine AEs following treatment with US Food and Drug Administration-approved ICI regimens. Data Sources A PubMed search through July 18, 2016, using the following keywords was performed: "ipilimumab," "MDX-010," "nivolumab," "BMS-963558," "pembrolizumab," "MK-3475," "atezolizumab," "MPDL3280A," and "phase." Study Selection Thirty-eight randomized clinical trials evaluating the usage of these ICIs for treatment of advanced solid tumors were identified, resulting in a total of 7551 patients who were eligible for a meta-analysis. Regimens were categorized by class into monotherapy with a PD-1 (programmed cell death protein 1) inhibitor, a CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4) inhibitor, or a PD-L1 (programmed cell death 1 ligand 1) inhibitor, and combination therapy with PD-1 plus CTLA-4 inhibitors. Data Extraction and Synthesis The data were extracted by 1 primary reviewer (R.B.-S.) and then independently reviewed by 2 secondary reviewers (W.T.B. and A.C.G.-C.) following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Inferences on the incidence of AEs were made using log-odds random effects models. Main Outcomes and Measures Incidence of all-grade hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, hypophysitis, primary adrenal insufficiency, and insulin-deficient diabetes. Results Overall, 38 randomized clinical trials comprising 7551 patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The incidence of both hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism was highest in patients receiving combination therapy. Patients on the combination regimen were significantly more likely to experience hypothyroidism (odds ratio [OR], 3.81; 95% CI, 2.10-6.91, P < .001) and hyperthyroidism (OR, 4.27; 95% CI, 2.05-8.90; P = .001) than patients on ipilimumab. Compared with patients on ipilimumab, those on PD-1 inhibitors had a higher risk of developing hypothyroidism (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.17-3.05; P = .03). The risk of hyperthyroidism, but not hypothyroidism, was significantly greater with PD-1 than with PD-L1 inhibitors (OR, 5.36; 95% CI, 2.04-14.08; P = .002). While patients who received PD-1 inhibitors were significantly less likely to experience hypophysitis than those receiving ipilimumab (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.18-0.49; P < .001), those who received combination therapy were significantly more likely to develop it (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.39-3.60; P = .001). For primary adrenal insufficiency and insulin-deficient diabetes no statistical inferences were made due to the smaller number of events. Conclusions and Relevance Our study provides more precise data on the incidence of endocrine dysfunctions among patients receiving ICI regimens. Patients on combination therapy are at increased risk of thyroid dysfunction and hypophysitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - William T Barry
- Department of Biostatistics and Computation Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ana C Garrido-Castro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - F Stephen Hodi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Le Min
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Hypertension, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ian E Krop
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sara M Tolaney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mayer EL, DeMichele A, Rugo HS, Miller K, Waks AG, Come SE, Mulvey T, Jeselsohn R, Overmoyer B, Guo H, Barry WT, Huang Bartlett C, Koehler M, Winer EP, Burstein HJ. A phase II feasibility study of palbociclib in combination with adjuvant endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive invasive breast carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:1514-1520. [PMID: 31250880 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib prolongs progression-free survival in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer when combined with endocrine therapy. This phase II trial was designed to determine the feasibility of adjuvant palbociclib and endocrine therapy for early breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients with HR+/HER2- stage II-III breast cancer received 2 years of palbociclib at 125 mg daily, 3 weeks on/1 week off, with endocrine therapy. The primary end point was discontinuation from palbociclib due to toxicity, non-adherence, or events related to tolerability. A discontinuation rate of 48% or higher would indicate the treatment duration of 2 years was not feasible, and was evaluated under a binomial test using a one-sided α = 0.025. RESULTS Overall, 162 patients initiated palbociclib; over half had stage III disease (52%) and most received prior chemotherapy (80%). A total of 102 patients (63%) completed 2 years of palbociclib; 50 patients discontinued early for protocol-related reasons (31%, 95% CI 24% to 39%, P = 0.001), and 10 discontinued due to protocol-unrelated reasons. The cumulative incidence of protocol-related discontinuation was 21% (95% CI 14% to 27%) at 12 months from start of treatment. Rates of palbociclib-related toxicity were congruent with the metastatic experience, and there were no cases of febrile neutropenia. Ninety-one patients (56%) required at least one dose reduction. CONCLUSION Adjuvant palbociclib is feasible in early breast cancer, with a high proportion of patients able to complete 2 years of therapy. The safety profile in the adjuvant setting mirrors that observed in metastatic disease, with approximately half of the patients requiring dose-modification. As extended duration adjuvant palbociclib appears feasible and tolerable for most patients, randomized phase III trials are evaluating clinical benefit in this population. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV REGISTRATION NCT02040857.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E L Mayer
- Susan F. Smith Center for Women's Cancers, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston.
| | - A DeMichele
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia
| | - H S Rugo
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco
| | - K Miller
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis
| | - A G Waks
- Susan F. Smith Center for Women's Cancers, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - S E Come
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston
| | - T Mulvey
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston
| | - R Jeselsohn
- Susan F. Smith Center for Women's Cancers, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - B Overmoyer
- Susan F. Smith Center for Women's Cancers, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - H Guo
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - W T Barry
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | | | | | - E P Winer
- Susan F. Smith Center for Women's Cancers, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - H J Burstein
- Susan F. Smith Center for Women's Cancers, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Martín M, Loibl S, Hyslop T, De la Haba-Rodríguez J, Aktas B, Cirrincione CT, Mehta K, Barry WT, Morales S, Carey LA, Garcia-Saenz JA, Partridge A, Martinez-Jañez N, Hahn O, Winer E, Guerrero-Zotano A, Hudis C, Casas M, Rodriguez-Martin C, Furlanetto J, Carrasco E, Dickler MN. Evaluating the addition of bevacizumab to endocrine therapy as first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a pooled analysis from the LEA (GEICAM/2006-11_GBG51) and CALGB 40503 (Alliance) trials. Eur J Cancer 2019; 117:91-98. [PMID: 31276981 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2019] [Revised: 05/20/2019] [Accepted: 06/02/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomised trials comparing the efficacy of standard endocrine therapy (ET) versus experimental ET + bevacizumab (Bev) in 1st line hormone receptor-positive patients with metastatic breast cancer have thus far shown conflicting results. PATIENTS AND METHODS We pooled data from two similar phase III randomised trials of ET ± Bev (LEA and Cancer and Leukemia Group B 40503) to increase precision in estimating treatment effect. Primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end-points were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR) and safety. Exploratory analyses were performed within subgroups defined by patients with recurrent disease, de novo disease, prior endocrine sensitivity or resistance and reported grades III-IV hypertension and proteinuria. RESULTS The pooled sample consisted of 749 patients randomised to ET or ET + Bev. Median PFS was 14.3 months for ET versus 19 months for ET + Bev (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.91; p < 0.01). ORR and CBR with ET and ET + Bev were 40 versus 61% (p < 0.01) and 64 versus 77% (p < 0.01), respectively. There was no difference in OS (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.77-1.18; p = 0.68). PFS was superior for ET + Bev for endocrine-sensitive patients (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.53-0.89; p = 0.004). Grade III-IV hypertension (2.2 versus 20.1%), proteinuria (0 versus 9.3%), cardiovascular (0.5 versus 4.2%) and liver events (0 versus 2.9%) were significantly higher for ET + Bev (all p < 0.01). Hypertension and proteinuria were not predictors of efficacy (interaction test p = 0.33). CONCLUSION The addition of Bev to ET increased PFS overall and in endocrine-sensitive patients but not OS at the expense of significant additional toxicity. TRIALS REGISTRATION ClinicalTrial.Gov NCT00545077 and NCT00601900.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Martín
- Medical Oncology, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense Madrid, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Oncología, CIBERONC-ISCIII, GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Spain.
| | - S Loibl
- GBG (German Breast Group), Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - T Hyslop
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - J De la Haba-Rodríguez
- Oncology Department and Research Unit, Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba, Hospital Reina Sofía, Universidad de Córdoba Spain. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Oncología, CIBERONC-ISCIII, GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Spain
| | - B Aktas
- University Women's Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - C T Cirrincione
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - K Mehta
- GBG (German Breast Group), Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - W T Barry
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care, Boston, MA, USA
| | - S Morales
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova de Lérida, GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Spain
| | - L A Carey
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - J A Garcia-Saenz
- Medical Oncology, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clinico San Carlos (IdISSC) Madrid, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Oncología, CIBERONC-ISCIII, GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Spain
| | - A Partridge
- Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA, USA
| | - N Martinez-Jañez
- Medical Oncology. Universitary Hospital Ramon y Cajal. GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group; Madrid, Spain
| | - O Hahn
- Alliance Protocol Operations Office, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - E Winer
- Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA, USA
| | - A Guerrero-Zotano
- Medical Oncology. Valencian Institute of Oncology. GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Valencia, Spain
| | - C Hudis
- American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Alexandria, VA, USA
| | - M Casas
- GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - J Furlanetto
- GBG (German Breast Group), Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - E Carrasco
- GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Laws A, Hughes ME, Hu J, Barry WT, Dominici L, Nakhlis F, Barbie T, Duggan M, Weiss A, Rhei E, Carter K, Nimbkar S, Schnitt SJ, King TA. Impact of Residual Nodal Disease Burden on Technical Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Node-Positive (cN1) Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:3846-3855. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07515-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
23
|
Partridge AH, Ruddy KJ, Barry WT, Greaney ML, Ligibel JA, Sprunck-Harrild KM, Rosenberg SM, Baker EL, Hoverman JR, Emmons KM. A randomized study to improve care for young women with breast cancer at community and academic medical oncology practices in the United States: The Young and Strong study. Cancer 2019; 125:1799-1806. [PMID: 30707756 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Revised: 11/19/2018] [Accepted: 12/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The authors conducted a cluster randomized study to determine the effect of an exportable educational intervention for young women with breast cancer (YWI) on improving care. METHODS Sites were randomized 1:1 to the YWI or a contact time control physical activity intervention (PAI) stratified by academic or community site. Up to 15 women aged ≤45 years with newly diagnosed breast cancer were enrolled at each of 14 academic sites and 10 were enrolled at each of 40 community sites. The primary endpoint, attention to fertility, was ascertained by medical record review. Statistical inferences concerning the effect of the intervention used general estimating equations for clustered data. RESULTS A total of 467 patients across 54 sites were enrolled between July 2012 and December 2013. The median age of the patients at the time of diagnosis was 40 years (range, 22-45 years). Attention to fertility by 3 months was observed in 55% of patients in the YWI and 58% of patients in the PAI (P = .88). Rates were found to be strongly correlated with age (P < .0001), and were highest in patients aged <30 years. Attention to genetics was similar (80% in the YWI and 81% in the PAI), whereas attention to emotional health was higher in patients in the YWI (87% vs 76%; estimated odds ratio, 2.63 [95% confidence interval, 1.20-5.76; P = .016]). Patients rated both interventions as valuable in providing education (64% in the YWI and 63% in the PAI). CONCLUSIONS The current study failed to demonstrate differences in attention to fertility with an intervention to improve care for women with breast cancer, although attention to fertility was found to be higher than expected in both groups and emotional health was improved in the YWI group. Greater attention to young women with breast cancer in general may promote more comprehensive care for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann H Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - William T Barry
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mary L Greaney
- Department of Kinesiology, University of Rhode Island at Kingston, Kingston, Rhode Island
| | - Jennifer A Ligibel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Shoshana M Rosenberg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Emily L Baker
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Karen M Emmons
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Waks AG, Stover DG, Guerriero JL, Dillon D, Barry WT, Gjini E, Hartl C, Lo W, Savoie J, Brock J, Wesolowski R, Li Z, Damicis A, Philips AV, Wu Y, Yang F, Sullivan A, Danaher P, Brauer HA, Osmani W, Lipschitz M, Hoadley KA, Goldberg M, Perou CM, Rodig S, Winer EP, Krop IE, Mittendorf EA, Tolaney SM. The Immune Microenvironment in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Before and After Preoperative Chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 25:4644-4655. [PMID: 31061067 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-0173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2019] [Revised: 04/05/2019] [Accepted: 05/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer is associated with low levels of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL) and PD-L1, and demonstrates poor responses to checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Evaluating the effect of standard chemotherapy on the immune microenvironment may suggest new opportunities for immunotherapy-based approaches to treating HR+/HER2- breast tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN HR+/HER2- breast tumors were analyzed before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. sTIL were assessed histologically; CD8+ cells, CD68+ cells, and PD-L1 staining were assessed immunohistochemically; whole transcriptome sequencing and panel RNA expression analysis (NanoString) were performed. RESULTS Ninety-six patients were analyzed from two cohorts (n = 55, Dana-Farber cohort; n = 41, MD Anderson cohort). sTIL, CD8, and PD-L1 on tumor cells were higher in tumors with basal PAM50 intrinsic subtype. Higher levels of tissue-based lymphocyte (sTIL, CD8, PD-L1) and macrophage (CD68) markers, as well as gene expression markers of lymphocyte or macrophage phenotypes (NanoString or CIBERSORT), correlated with favorable response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, but not with improved distant metastasis-free survival in these cohorts or a large gene expression dataset (N = 302). In paired pre-/postchemotherapy samples, sTIL and CD8+ cells were significantly decreased after treatment, whereas expression analyses (NanoString) demonstrated significant increase of multiple myeloid signatures. Single gene expression implicated increased expression of immunosuppressive (M2-like) macrophage-specific genes after chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS The immune microenvironment of HR+/HER2- tumors differs according to tumor biology. This cohort of paired pre-/postchemotherapy samples suggests a critical role for immunosuppressive macrophage expansion in residual disease. The role of macrophages in chemoresistance should be explored, and further evaluation of macrophage-targeting therapy is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrienne G Waks
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel G Stover
- Division of Medical Oncology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Jennifer L Guerriero
- Breast Tumor Immunology Laboratory, Susan F. Smith Center for Women's Cancers, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Deborah Dillon
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - William T Barry
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Evisa Gjini
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Christina Hartl
- Breast Tumor Immunology Laboratory, Susan F. Smith Center for Women's Cancers, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Wesley Lo
- Department of Cancer Immunology and Virology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer Savoie
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jane Brock
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robert Wesolowski
- Division of Medical Oncology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Zaibo Li
- Department of Pathology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Adrienne Damicis
- Department of Biostatistics, Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Anne V Philips
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yun Wu
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Fei Yang
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | | | - Wafa Osmani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mikel Lipschitz
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Katherine A Hoadley
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Michael Goldberg
- Department of Cancer Immunology and Virology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Charles M Perou
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Scott Rodig
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Eric P Winer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ian E Krop
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elizabeth A Mittendorf
- Breast Tumor Immunology Laboratory, Susan F. Smith Center for Women's Cancers, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sara M Tolaney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bellon JR, Guo H, Barry WT, Dang CT, Yardley DA, Moy B, Marcom PK, Albain KS, Rugo HS, Ellis M, Wolff AC, Carey LA, Overmoyer BA, Partridge AH, Hudis CA, Krop I, Burstein HJ, Winer EP, Tolaney SM. Local-regional recurrence in women with small node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer: results from a prospective multi-institutional study (the APT trial). Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 176:303-310. [PMID: 31004299 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05238-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2019] [Accepted: 04/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Women with HER2-positive breast cancer treated prior to effective anti-HER2 therapy have higher rates of local-regional recurrence (LRR) than those with HER2-negative disease. Effective systemic therapy, however, has been shown to decrease LRR. This study examines LRR in women with HER2-positive breast cancer treated on a single-arm prospective multicenter trial of adjuvant trastuzumab (H) and paclitaxel (T). METHODS Patients with HER2-positive tumors ≤ 3.0 cm with negative axillary nodes or micrometastatic disease were eligible. Systemic therapy included weekly T and H for 12 weeks followed by continuation of H to complete 1 year. Radiation therapy (RT) was required following breast-conserving surgery (BCS), but dose and fields were not specified. Disease-free survival (DFS) and LRR-free survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Of the 410 patients enrolled from September 2007 to September 2010, 406 initiated protocol therapy and formed the basis of this analysis. A total of 272 (67%) had hormone receptor-positive tumors. Of 162 patients undergoing mastectomy, local therapy records were unavailable for two. None of the 160 for whom records were available received RT. Among 244 BCS patients, detailed RT records were available for 217 (89%). With a median follow-up of 6.5 years, 7-year DFS was 93.3% (95% CI 90.4-96.2), and LRR-free survival was 98.6% (95% CI 97.4-99.8). CONCLUSION LRR in this select group of early-stage patients with HER2-positive disease receiving effective anti-HER2 therapy is extremely low. If confirmed in additional studies, future investigational efforts should focus on de-escalating local therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer R Bellon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Hao Guo
- Department of Statistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - William T Barry
- Department of Statistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Chau T Dang
- Breast Cancer Medicine Service, Solid Tumor Division, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Denise A Yardley
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sarah Cannon Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Beverly Moy
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - P Kelly Marcom
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kathy S Albain
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL, USA
| | - Hope S Rugo
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Matthew Ellis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Baylor Clinic-Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Antonio C Wolff
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lisa A Carey
- Department of Medical Oncology, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Beth A Overmoyer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Clifford A Hudis
- Breast Cancer Medicine Service, Solid Tumor Division, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.,American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA, USA
| | - Ian Krop
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Harold J Burstein
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eric P Winer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sara M Tolaney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Tolaney SM, Guo H, Pernas S, Barry WT, Dillon DA, Ritterhouse L, Schneider BP, Shen F, Fuhrman K, Baltay M, Dang CT, Yardley DA, Moy B, Marcom PK, Albain KS, Rugo HS, Ellis MJ, Shapira I, Wolff AC, Carey LA, Overmoyer B, Partridge AH, Hudis CA, Krop IE, Burstein HJ, Winer EP. Seven-Year Follow-Up Analysis of Adjuvant Paclitaxel and Trastuzumab Trial for Node-Negative, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:1868-1875. [PMID: 30939096 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.00066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 177] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The Adjuvant Paclitaxel and Trastuzumab trial was designed to address treatment of patients with small human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. The primary analysis of the Adjuvant Paclitaxel and Trastuzumab trial demonstrated a 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) of 98.7%. In this planned secondary analysis, we report longer-term outcomes and exploratory results to characterize the biology of small HER2-positive tumors and genetic factors that may predispose to paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy (TIPN). PATIENTS AND METHODS In this phase II study, patients with HER2-positive breast cancer with tumors 3 cm or smaller and negative nodes received paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) with trastuzumab for 12 weeks, followed by trastuzumab for 9 months. The primary end point was DFS. Recurrence-free interval (RFI), breast cancer-specific survival, and overall survival (OS) were also analyzed. In an exploratory analysis, intrinsic subtyping by PAM50 (Prosigna) and calculation of the risk of recurrence score were performed on the nCounter analysis system on archival tissue. Genotyping was performed to investigate TIPN. RESULTS A total of 410 patients were enrolled from October 2007 to September 2010. After a median follow-up of 6.5 years, there were 23 DFS events. The 7-year DFS was 93% (95% CI, 90.4 to 96.2) with four (1.0%) distant recurrences, 7-year OS was 95% (95% CI, 92.4 to 97.7), and 7-year RFI was 97.5% (95% CI, 95.9 to 99.1). PAM50 analyses (n = 278) showed that most tumors were HER2-enriched (66%), followed by luminal B (14%), luminal A (13%), and basal-like (8%). Genotyping (n = 230) identified one single-nucleotide polymorphism, rs3012437, associated with an increased risk of TIPN in patients with grade 2 or greater TIPN (10.4%). CONCLUSION With longer follow-up, adjuvant paclitaxel and trastuzumab is associated with excellent long-term outcomes. Distribution of PAM50 intrinsic subtypes in small HER2-positive tumors is similar to that previously reported for larger tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hao Guo
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Sonia Pernas
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.,2Institut Català d'Oncologia-H.U.Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Lauren Ritterhouse
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.,4University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Fei Shen
- 5Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | | | - Chau T Dang
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.,Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | - Kathy S Albain
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL
| | - Hope S Rugo
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Mathew J Ellis
- Baylor Clinic Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Houston, TX
| | - Iuliana Shapira
- Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, New Hyde Park, NY.,SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY
| | | | | | | | | | - Clifford A Hudis
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.,Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY.,American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | - Ian E Krop
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Barroso-Sousa R, Barry WT, Guo H, Dillon D, Tan YB, Fuhrman K, Osmani W, Getz A, Baltay M, Dang C, Yardley D, Moy B, Marcom PK, Mittendorf EA, Krop IE, Winer EP, Tolaney SM. The immune profile of small HER2-positive breast cancers: a secondary analysis from the APT trial. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:575-581. [PMID: 30753274 PMCID: PMC8033534 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous data suggest that the immune microenvironment plays a critical role in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive breast cancer; however, there is little known about the immune profiles of small HER2-positive tumors. In this study, we aimed to characterize the immune microenvironment of small HER2-positive breast cancers included in the Adjuvant paclitaxel and trastuzumab for node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer (APT) trial and to correlate the immune markers with pathological and molecular tumor characteristics. PATIENTS AND METHODS The APT trial was a multicenter, single-arm, phase II study of paclitaxel and trastuzumab in patients with node-negative HER2-positive breast cancer. The study included 406 patients with HER2-positive, node-negative breast cancer, measuring up to 3 cm. Exploratory analysis of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (by immunohistochemistry), and immune gene signatures using data generated by nCounter PanCancer Pathways Panel (NanoString Technologies, Seattle, WA), and their association with pathological and molecular characteristics was carried out. RESULTS Of the 406 patients, 328 (81%) had at least one immune assay carried out: 284 cases were evaluated for TIL, 266 for PD-L1, and 213 for immune gene signatures. High TIL (≥60%) were seen with greater frequency in hormone-receptor (HR) negative, histological grades 2 and 3, as well in HER2-enriched and basal-like tumors. Lower stromal PD-L1 (≤1%) expression was seen with greater frequency in HR-positive, histological grade 1, and in luminal tumors. Both TIL and stromal PD-L1 were positively correlated with 10 immune cell signatures, including Th1 and B cell signatures. Luminal B tumors were negatively correlated with those signatures. Significant correlation was seen among these immune markers; however, the magnitude of correlation did not indicate a monotonic relationship between them. CONCLUSION Immune profiles of small HER2-positive breast cancers differ according to HR status, histological grade, and molecular subtype. Further work is needed to explore the implication of these findings on disease outcome. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00542451.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - W T Barry
- Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - H Guo
- Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - D Dillon
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston
| | - Y B Tan
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston
| | | | | | - A Getz
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston
| | - M Baltay
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston
| | - C Dang
- Breast Cancer Medicine Service, Department of Medicine, Solid Tumor Division, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York
| | | | - B Moy
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - P K Marcom
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham
| | - E A Mittendorf
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Liu JF, Barry WT, Birrer M, Lee JM, Buckanovich RJ, Fleming GF, Rimel BJ, Buss MK, Nattam SR, Hurteau J, Luo W, Curtis J, Whalen C, Kohn EC, Ivy SP, Matulonis UA. Overall survival and updated progression-free survival outcomes in a randomized phase II study of combination cediranib and olaparib versus olaparib in relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:551-557. [PMID: 30753272 PMCID: PMC6503628 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Olaparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor and cediranib is an oral anti-angiogenic. In the primary analysis of this phase II study, combination cediranib/olaparib improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with olaparib alone in relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. This updated analysis was conducted to characterize overall survival (OS) and update PFS outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS Ninety patients were enrolled to this randomized, open-label, phase II study between October 2011 and June 2013 across nine United States-based academic centers. Data cut-off was 21 December 2016, with a median follow-up of 46 months. Participants had relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer of high-grade serous or endometrioid histology or had a deleterious germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCAm). Participants were randomized to receive olaparib capsules 400 mg twice daily or cediranib 30 mg daily and olaparib capsules 200 mg twice daily until disease progression. RESULTS In this updated analysis, median PFS remained significantly longer with cediranib/olaparib compared with olaparib alone (16.5 versus 8.2 months, hazard ratio 0.50; P = 0.007). Subset analyses within stratum defined by BRCA status demonstrated statistically significant improvement in PFS (23.7 versus 5.7 months, P = 0.002) and OS (37.8 versus 23.0 months, P = 0.047) in gBRCA wild-type/unknown patients, although OS was not statistically different in the overall study population (44.2 versus 33.3 months, hazard ratio 0.64; P = 0.11). PFS and OS appeared similar between the two arms in gBRCAm patients. The most common CTCAE grade 3/4 adverse events with cediranib/olaparib remained fatigue, diarrhea, and hypertension. CONCLUSIONS Combination cediranib/olaparib significantly extends PFS compared with olaparib alone in relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Subset analyses suggest this margin of benefit is driven by PFS prolongation in patients without gBRCAm. OS was also significantly increased by the cediranib/olaparib combination in this subset of patients. Additional studies of this combination are ongoing and should incorporate analyses based upon BRCA status. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT0111648.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J F Liu
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology.
| | - W T Barry
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - M Birrer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - J-M Lee
- Women's Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda
| | - R J Buckanovich
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh
| | - G F Fleming
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago
| | - B J Rimel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles
| | - M K Buss
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Beth-Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston
| | - S R Nattam
- Department of Oncology, Fort Wayne Medical Oncology and Hematology, Fort Wayne
| | - J Hurteau
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston Hospital, Evanston
| | - W Luo
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - J Curtis
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology
| | - C Whalen
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology
| | - E C Kohn
- Women's Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda; Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - S P Ivy
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - U A Matulonis
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Konstantinopoulos PA, Barry WT, Birrer M, Westin SN, Cadoo KA, Shapiro GI, Mayer EL, O'Cearbhaill RE, Coleman RL, Kochupurakkal B, Whalen C, Curtis J, Farooq S, Luo W, Eismann J, Buss MK, Aghajanian C, Mills GB, Palakurthi S, Kirschmeier P, Liu J, Cantley LC, Kaufmann SH, Swisher EM, D'Andrea AD, Winer E, Wulf GM, Matulonis UA. Olaparib and α-specific PI3K inhibitor alpelisib for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: a dose-escalation and dose-expansion phase 1b trial. Lancet Oncol 2019; 20:570-580. [PMID: 30880072 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30905-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 158] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2018] [Revised: 11/25/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Based on preclinical work, we found that combination of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors with drugs that inhibit the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway (such as PI3K inhibitors) might sensitise HRR-proficient epithelial ovarian cancers to PARP inhibitors. We aimed to assess the safety and identify the recommended phase 2 dose of the PARP inhibitor olaparib in combination with the PI3K inhibitor alpelisib in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and in patients with breast cancer. METHODS In this multicentre, open-label, phase 1b trial following a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design, we recruited patients aged 18 years or older with the following key eligibility criteria: confirmed diagnosis of either recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer of high-grade serous histology; confirmed diagnosis of either recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer of any histology with known germline BRCA mutations; confirmed diagnosis of recurrent breast cancer of triple-negative histology; or confirmed diagnosis of recurrent breast cancer of any histology with known germline BRCA mutations. Additional patients with epithelial ovarian cancer were enrolled in a dose-expansion cohort. Four dose levels were planned: the starting dose level of alpelisib 250 mg once a day plus olaparib 100 mg twice a day (dose level 0); alpelisib 250 mg once a day plus olaparib 200 mg twice a day (dose level 1); alpelisib 300 mg once a day plus olaparib 200 mg twice a day (dose level 2); and alpelisib 200 mg once a day plus olaparib 200 mg twice a day (dose level 3). Both drugs were administered orally, in tablet formulation. The primary objective was to identify the maximum tolerated dose and the recommended phase 2 dose of the combination of alpelisib and olaparib for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and patients with breast cancer. Analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of the study drugs. The trial is active, but closed to enrolment; follow-up for patients who completed treatment is ongoing. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01623349. FINDINGS Between Oct 3, 2014, and Dec 21, 2016, we enrolled 34 patients (28 in the dose-escalation cohort and six in the dose-expansion cohort); two in the dose-escalation cohort were ineligible at the day of scheduled study initiation. Maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase 2 dose were identified as alpelisib 200 mg once a day plus olaparib 200 mg twice a day (dose level 3). Considering all dose levels, the most common treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events were hyperglycaemia (five [16%] of 32 patients), nausea (three [9%]), and increased alanine aminotransferase concentrations (three [9%]). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Dose-limiting toxic effects included hyperglycaemia and fever with decreased neutrophil count. Of the 28 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, ten (36%) achieved a partial response and 14 (50%) had stable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. INTERPRETATION Combining alpelisib and olaparib is feasible with no unexpected toxic effects. The observed activity provides preliminary clinical evidence of synergism between olaparib and alpelisib, particularly in epithelial ovarian cancer, and warrants further investigation. FUNDING Ovarian Cancer Dream Team (Stand Up To Cancer, Ovarian Cancer Research Alliance, National Ovarian Cancer Coalition), Breast Cancer Research Foundation, Novartis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Michael Birrer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Karen A Cadoo
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Roisin E O'Cearbhaill
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Weixiu Luo
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Julia Eismann
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mary K Buss
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Carol Aghajanian
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Joyce Liu
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Eric Winer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Metzger-Filho O, Ferreira AR, Jeselsohn R, Barry WT, Dillon DA, Brock JE, Vaz-Luis I, Hughes ME, Winer EP, Lin NU. Mixed Invasive Ductal and Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast: Prognosis and the Importance of Histologic Grade. Oncologist 2018; 24:e441-e449. [PMID: 30518616 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2018] [Accepted: 08/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The diagnosis of mixed invasive ductal and lobular carcinoma (IDC-L) in clinical practice is often associated with uncertainty related to its prognosis and response to systemic therapies. With the increasing recognition of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) as a distinct disease subtype, questions surrounding IDC-L become even more relevant. In this study, we took advantage of a detailed clinical database to compare IDC-L and ILC regarding clinicopathologic and treatment characteristics, prognostic power of histologic grade, and survival outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, we identified 811 patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer with IDC-L or ILC. Descriptive statistics were performed to compare baseline clinicopathologic characteristics and treatments. Survival rates were subsequently analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS Patients with ILC had more commonly multifocal disease, low to intermediate histologic grade, and HER2-negative disease. Histologic grade was prognostic for patients with IDC-L but had no significant discriminatory power in patients with ILC. Among postmenopausal women, those with IDC-L had significantly better outcomes when compared with those with ILC: disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.95). Finally, postmenopausal women treated with an aromatase inhibitor had more favorable DFS and OS than those treated with tamoxifen only (OS adjusted HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.29-0.87), which was similar for both histologic types (p = .212). CONCLUSION IDC-L tumors have a better prognosis than ILC tumors, particularly among postmenopausal women. Histologic grade is an important prognostic factor in IDC-L but not in ILC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE This study compared mixed invasive ductal and lobular carcinoma (IDC-L) with invasive lobular carcinomas (ILCs) to assess the overall prognosis, the prognostic role of histologic grade, and response to systemic therapy. It was found that patients with IDC-L tumors have a better prognosis than ILC, particularly among postmenopausal women, which may impact follow-up strategies. Moreover, although histologic grade failed to stratify the risk of ILC, it showed an important prognostic power in IDC-L, thus highlighting its clinical utility to guide treatment decisions of IDC-L. Finally, the disease-free survival advantage of adjuvant aromatase inhibitors over tamoxifen in ILC was consistent in IDC-L.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Otto Metzger-Filho
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Arlindo R Ferreira
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Hospital de Santa Maria and Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Rinath Jeselsohn
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - William T Barry
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Deborah A Dillon
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jane E Brock
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ines Vaz-Luis
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Melissa E Hughes
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Eric P Winer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Barroso-Sousa R, Barry WT, Tolaney SM. Database Selection and Heterogeneity—More Details, More Credibility—Reply. JAMA Oncol 2018; 4:1295-1296. [DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.1231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - William T. Barry
- Department of Biostatistics and Computation Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sara M. Tolaney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kuang Y, Siddiqui B, Hu J, Pun M, Cornwell M, Buchwalter G, Hughes ME, Wagle N, Kirschmeier P, Jänne PA, Paweletz CP, Lin NU, Krop IE, Barry WT, Winer EP, Brown M, Jeselsohn R. Unraveling the clinicopathological features driving the emergence of ESR1 mutations in metastatic breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 2018; 4:22. [PMID: 30083595 PMCID: PMC6072793 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-018-0075-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2018] [Revised: 07/10/2018] [Accepted: 07/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
ESR1 mutations were recently found to be an important mechanism of endocrine resistance in ER-positive (ER + ) metastatic breast cancer. To determine the clinicopathological features driving the emergence of the ESR1 mutations we studied plasma cfDNA and detailed clinical data collected from patients with metastatic breast cancer. Droplet Digital PCR was performed for the detection of the most common ESR1 mutations and PIK3CA mutations. Among the patients with ER + /HER2- disease, ESR1 mutations were detected in 30% of the patients. There were no associations between the pathological features of the primary disease or time to distant recurrence and the emergence of ESR1 mutations in metastatic disease. The prevalence of the ESR1 mutations was significantly associated with prior treatment with an aromatase inhibitor in the adjuvant or metastatic setting. The prevalence of the ESR1 mutations was also positively associated with prior fulvestrant treatment. Conversely, the prevalence of ESR1 mutations was lower after treatment with a CDK4/6 inhibitor. There were no significant associations between specific systemic treatments and the prevalence of PIK3CA mutations. These results support the evolution of the ESR1 mutations under the selective pressure of treatment with aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant and metastatic settings and have important implications in the optimization of adjuvant and metastatic treatment in ER + breast cancer. Treatment with aromatase inhibitors, a class of drugs that suppress the synthesis of estrogen, can drive the evolution of mutations in the estrogen receptor gene ESR1, leading to tumor resistance against hormone therapies. To better understand the emergence of ESR1 mutations, Rinath Jeselsohn from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
in Boston, Massachusetts, USA, and coworkers tested tumor DNA contained within blood samples from 155 women with metastatic breast cancer. They found ESR1 mutations rarely in women with any molecular subtype of cancer other than estrogen receptor-positive disease. Nothing about the primary tumor predicted who would develop ESR1 mutations; however, treatment with an aromatase inhibitor was associated with mutations arising. The findings highlight the need to develop therapeutic regimens that reduce the selective pressure for ESR1 mutations and/or target these mutations directly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanan Kuang
- 1Belfer Center for Applied Cancer Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215 USA.,2Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber-Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215 USA
| | - Bilal Siddiqui
- 3Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215 USA
| | - Jiani Hu
- 4Department of Biostatistics & Comp Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215 USA
| | - Matthew Pun
- 2Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber-Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215 USA.,5Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana Farber-Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215 USA
| | - MacIntosh Cornwell
- 2Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber-Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215 USA.,5Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana Farber-Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215 USA
| | - Gilles Buchwalter
- 2Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber-Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215 USA.,5Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana Farber-Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215 USA
| | - Melissa E Hughes
- 6Breast Oncology Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215 USA
| | - Nikhil Wagle
- 2Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber-Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215 USA.,6Breast Oncology Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215 USA
| | - Paul Kirschmeier
- 1Belfer Center for Applied Cancer Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215 USA.,2Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber-Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215 USA
| | - Pasi A Jänne
- 1Belfer Center for Applied Cancer Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215 USA.,2Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber-Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215 USA.,7Lowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215 USA
| | - Cloud P Paweletz
- 1Belfer Center for Applied Cancer Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215 USA.,2Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber-Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215 USA
| | - Nancy U Lin
- 2Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber-Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215 USA.,6Breast Oncology Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215 USA
| | - Ian E Krop
- 2Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber-Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215 USA.,6Breast Oncology Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215 USA
| | - William T Barry
- 4Department of Biostatistics & Comp Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215 USA
| | - Eric P Winer
- 2Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber-Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215 USA.,6Breast Oncology Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215 USA
| | - Myles Brown
- 2Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber-Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215 USA.,5Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana Farber-Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215 USA.,6Breast Oncology Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215 USA
| | - Rinath Jeselsohn
- 2Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber-Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215 USA.,5Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana Farber-Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215 USA.,6Breast Oncology Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215 USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Waks AG, Stover DG, Barry WT, Dillon DA, Gjini E, Rodig SJ, Brock JE, Baltay M, Savoie J, Winer EP, Krop IE, Tolaney SM. Abstract 4564: The immune microenvironment in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and treatment outcome following preoperative chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-4564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancers (BC) have fewer tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and lower response rates to immune checkpoint inhibitors in early phase studies than other breast cancer subtypes. Immune biomarkers that accurately reflect the immune microenvironment have important clinical implications in HR+ BC patients. Prior evidence suggests that macrophage-related immune pathways may be relevant to the pathophysiology of HR+ BC.
Methods: Patients identified from a prospective trial of preoperative bevacizumab (preop bev) followed by bev with adriamycin/cyclophosphamide/paclitaxel dose-dense chemotherapy (chemo). Tumor samples were collected at diagnosis and surgery (pre-tx and post-tx). TILs and immunohistochemical staining for PD-L1, CD8, and CD68 were scored. Whole transcriptome sequencing (RNAseq) and Nanostring PanCancer Immune Profiling Panel were performed. Pathologic response at surgery was assessed by Miller-Payne (MP) and residual cancer burden (RCB) scores. An immune score was calculated for each pre-tx specimen by integrating 10 published immune signatures. Immune cell subsets were inferred from bulk transcriptional data using CIBERSORT.
Results: 55 patients had at least 1 evaluable specimen and were included for analysis. 18% of pre-tx tumors had ‘high' (≥10%) TILs and ‘high' TILs were associated with significantly higher immune signature score (p=0.004). Immune score correlated highly with proportion of CIBERSORT anti-tumor M1 macrophage and CD8 T-cell signatures (r>0.65 and p<0.001) and was significantly associated with RCB. Higher pre-tx TILs, tPD-L1, sPD-L1, CD8, and CD68 were associated with favorable RCB significantly associated with more favorable RCB after adjustment for tumor size and grade. Pathologic complete response occurred in 4 pts; all 4 had high pre-tx TILs, pre-tx tPD-L1, or both. Among patients with residual disease, there were significantly fewer TILs and CD8 cells after chemotherapy (Wilcoxon signed rank p=0.037 and p=0.002, respectively), however tPD-L1 and CD68 were not significantly different. Nanostring analyses demonstrated that chemokines and complement pathway components were among most significantly enriched post-tx relative to pre-tx.
Conclusions: Most HR+/HER2- breast tumors demonstrate low levels of anti-tumor immune activity; however, those with higher levels have a more favorable response to chemo plus bev. Assessment of immune activity based on RNA signatures is consistent with histology and immune-related protein expression. T-cell- and checkpoint-related biomarkers tend to decrease following preoperative chemo plus bev in HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Following treatment with chemotherapy/bevacizumab, we observe increased expression of chemokines and complement pathway genes.
Citation Format: Adrienne G. Waks, Daniel G. Stover, William T. Barry, Deborah A. Dillon, Evisa Gjini, Scott J. Rodig, Jane E. Brock, Michele Baltay, Jennifer Savoie, Eric P. Winer, Ian E. Krop, Sara M. Tolaney. The immune microenvironment in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and treatment outcome following preoperative chemotherapy plus bevacizumab [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4564.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniel G. Stover
- 2Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Moossdorff M, Nakhlis F, Hu J, Barry WT, Losk K, Haskett C, Smidt ML, King TA. The Potential Impact of AMAROS on the Management of the Axilla in Patients with Clinical T1-2N0 Breast Cancer Undergoing Primary Total Mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:2612-2619. [PMID: 29855827 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6519-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent trials have demonstrated that axillary observation or axillary radiation therapy (AxRT) is equivalent to axillary node dissection (ALND) for patients with one or two positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). These strategies have been widely adopted for patients having breast conservation. This report demonstrates the potential impact of the AMAROS trial on axillary therapy in a retrospective cohort of mastectomy patients. METHODS Patients undergoing primary mastectomy for cT1-2N0 breast cancer who had one or two positive SLNs were identified from institutional databases (2005-2015). Locoregional management strategies were evaluated, and variables predictive of the use of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) were identified. RESULTS Among 2594 mastectomies, 193 (7%) met the AMAROS eligibility criteria. The median patient age was 50 years (range 22-83 years). Locoregional treatment consisted of ALND + PMRT for 102 patients (53%), ALND alone for 66 patients (34%), PMRT alone for 11 patients (6%), and observation for 14 patients (7%). Overall, 59 ALND patients (35%) had additional positive nodes. In the multivariate analysis, age younger than 50 years (odds ratio [OR] 3.55; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.57-8.45), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (OR 5.78; 95% CI 2.53-4.78), macrometastases (OR 3.99; 95% CI 1.54-10.97), and extracapsular extension (OR 11.66; 95% CI 2.55-88.34) were associated with receipt of PMRT. CONCLUSION In this cohort of AMAROS-eligible patients, 168 (87%) underwent ALND, 102 (61%) of whom also received PMRT, suggesting that AxRT could have been used instead of ALND for a significant number of patients. Preoperative factors associated with the receipt of PMRT, such as young age and LVI, may be useful for defining a multidisciplinary decision-making framework for axillary management in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martine Moossdorff
- Department of Surgery, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Faina Nakhlis
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jiani Hu
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - William T Barry
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Katya Losk
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Courtney Haskett
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marjolein L Smidt
- Department of Surgery, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Tari A King
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. .,Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Criscitiello C, Golshan M, Barry WT, Viale G, Wong S, Santangelo M, Curigliano G. Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and pathological complete response on eligibility for breast-conserving surgery in patients with early breast cancer: A meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer 2018; 97:1-6. [PMID: 29734046 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.03.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2018] [Accepted: 03/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We conducted a meta-analysis of randomised trials evaluating pathological complete response (pCR) and surgical outcomes after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) in patients with early breast cancer (EBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS The primary outcome was breast-conserving surgery (BCT) rate. Secondary outcomes were pCR rate and association to BCT. Meta-analyses were performed using random effects models that use inverse-variance weighting for each treatment arm based on evaluable patients. Point estimates are reported with 95% confidence interval (CI), and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS Thirty-six studies were identified (N = 12,311 patients). We selected for the analysis 16 of 36 studies reporting both pCR and BCT for at least one treatment arm. Arms per study ranged from one to six; 42 independent units were available to evaluate the association between pCR and BCT. BCT rate ranged 5-76% across arms with an average BCT of 57% (95% CI 52-62%). Significant heterogeneity was observed among the trials (Cochrane Q = 787, p < 0.001, I2 = 97%). In the meta-regression model, BCT rates were not significantly associated with year of first patient-in (p = 0.89), grade (p = 0.93) and hormone-receptor status (p = 0.39). Clinical N-stage (p = 0.01) and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) status (p = 0.03) were significantly associated with BCT. pCR rate ranged 3-60% across studies. The average pCR across all study arms was 24% (95% CI 19-29%). No association was observed between pCR rate in a study arm and the resulting BCT rate in a univariate model (p = 0.34) nor after adjusting for HER2 and clinical nodal status (p = 0.82). In the subset of 14 multi-arm studies, no significant association was seen between the differences in pCR and BCT between treatment arms (p = 0.27). CONCLUSIONS pCR does not increase BCT in patients receiving NST for EBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Criscitiello
- Division of New Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Mehra Golshan
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; General Surgery, Department of Advanced Biomedical Science, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - William T Barry
- General Surgery, Department of Advanced Biomedical Science, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Giulia Viale
- Division of New Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Stephanie Wong
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michele Santangelo
- General Surgery, Department of Advanced Biomedical Science, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of New Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Magbanua MJM, Rugo HS, Wolf DM, Hauranieh L, Roy R, Pendyala P, Sosa EV, Scott JH, Lee JS, Pitcher B, Hyslop T, Barry WT, Isakoff SJ, Dickler M, Van't Veer L, Park JW. Expanded Genomic Profiling of Circulating Tumor Cells in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients to Assess Biomarker Status and Biology Over Time (CALGB 40502 and CALGB 40503, Alliance). Clin Cancer Res 2018; 24:1486-1499. [PMID: 29311117 PMCID: PMC5856614 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-2312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2017] [Revised: 10/18/2017] [Accepted: 01/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: We profiled circulating tumor cells (CTCs) to study the biology of blood-borne metastasis and to monitor biomarker status in metastatic breast cancer (MBC).Methods: CTCs were isolated from 105 patients with MBC using EPCAM-based immunomagnetic enrichment and fluorescence-activated cells sorting (IE/FACS), 28 of whom had serial CTC analysis (74 samples, 2-5 time points). CTCs were subjected to microfluidic-based multiplex QPCR array of 64 cancer-related genes (n = 151) and genome-wide copy-number analysis by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH; n = 49).Results: Combined transcriptional and genomic profiling showed that CTCs were 26% ESR1-ERBB2-, 48% ESR1+ERBB2-, and 27% ERBB2+ Serial testing showed that ERBB2 status was more stable over time compared with ESR1 and proliferation (MKI67) status. While cell-to-cell heterogeneity was observed at the single-cell level, with increasingly stable expression in larger pools, patient-specific CTC expression "fingerprints" were also observed. CTC copy-number profiles clustered into three groups based on the extent of genomic aberrations and the presence of large chromosomal imbalances. Comparative analysis showed discordance in ESR1/ER (27%) and ERBB2/HER2 (23%) status between CTCs and matched primary tumors. CTCs in 65% of the patients were considered to have low proliferation potential. Patients who harbored CTCs with high proliferation (MKI67) status had significantly reduced progression-free survival (P = 0.0011) and overall survival (P = 0.0095) compared with patients with low proliferative CTCs.Conclusions: We demonstrate an approach for complete isolation of EPCAM-positive CTCs and downstream comprehensive transcriptional/genomic characterization to examine the biology and assess breast cancer biomarkers in these cells over time. Clin Cancer Res; 24(6); 1486-99. ©2018 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Jesus M Magbanua
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
| | - Hope S Rugo
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Denise M Wolf
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Louai Hauranieh
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Ritu Roy
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center and Computational Biology and Informatics, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Praveen Pendyala
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Eduardo V Sosa
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Janet H Scott
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Jin Sun Lee
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Brandelyn Pitcher
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Terry Hyslop
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - William T Barry
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Steven J Isakoff
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Maura Dickler
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Laura Van't Veer
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - John W Park
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Stover DG, Parsons HA, Ha G, Freeman SS, Barry WT, Guo H, Choudhury AD, Gydush G, Reed SC, Rhoades J, Rotem D, Hughes ME, Dillon DA, Partridge AH, Wagle N, Krop IE, Getz G, Golub TR, Love JC, Winer EP, Tolaney SM, Lin NU, Adalsteinsson VA. Association of Cell-Free DNA Tumor Fraction and Somatic Copy Number Alterations With Survival in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:543-553. [PMID: 29298117 PMCID: PMC5815405 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.76.0033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 143] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) offers the potential for minimally invasive genome-wide profiling of tumor alterations without tumor biopsy and may be associated with patient prognosis. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by few mutations but extensive somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs), yet little is known regarding SCNAs in metastatic TNBC. We sought to evaluate SCNAs in metastatic TNBC exclusively via cfDNA and determine if cfDNA tumor fraction is associated with overall survival in metastatic TNBC. Patients and Methods In this retrospective cohort study, we identified 164 patients with biopsy-proven metastatic TNBC at a single tertiary care institution who received prior chemotherapy in the (neo)adjuvant or metastatic setting. We performed low-coverage genome-wide sequencing of cfDNA from plasma. Results Without prior knowledge of tumor mutations, we determined tumor fraction of cfDNA for 96.3% of patients and SCNAs for 63.9% of patients. Copy number profiles and percent genome altered were remarkably similar between metastatic and primary TNBCs. Certain SCNAs were more frequent in metastatic TNBCs relative to paired primary tumors and primary TNBCs in publicly available data sets The Cancer Genome Atlas and METABRIC, including chromosomal gains in drivers NOTCH2, AKT2, and AKT3. Prespecified cfDNA tumor fraction threshold of ≥ 10% was associated with significantly worse metastatic survival (median, 6.4 v 15.9 months) and remained significant independent of clinicopathologic factors (hazard ratio, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.4 to 3.8; P < .001). Conclusion We present the largest genomic characterization of metastatic TNBC to our knowledge, exclusively from cfDNA. Evaluation of cfDNA tumor fraction was feasible for nearly all patients, and tumor fraction ≥ 10% is associated with significantly worse survival in this large metastatic TNBC cohort. Specific SCNAs are enriched and prognostic in metastatic TNBC, with implications for metastasis, resistance, and novel therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel G. Stover
- Daniel G. Stover, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Parsons, Gavin Ha, William T. Barry, Hao Guo, Atish D. Choudhury, Melissa E. Hughes, Deborah A. Dillon, Ann H. Partridge, Nikhil Wagle, Ian E. Krop, Todd R. Golub, Eric P. Winer, Sara M. Tolaney, and Nancy U. Lin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Gad Getz, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Gavin Ha, Samuel S. Freeman, Atish D. Choudhury, Gregory Gydush, Sarah C. Reed, Justin Rhoades, Denisse Rotem, Nikhil Wagle, Gad Getz, Todd R. Golub, and Viktor A. Adalsteinsson, Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and J. Christopher Love, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | - Heather A. Parsons
- Daniel G. Stover, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Parsons, Gavin Ha, William T. Barry, Hao Guo, Atish D. Choudhury, Melissa E. Hughes, Deborah A. Dillon, Ann H. Partridge, Nikhil Wagle, Ian E. Krop, Todd R. Golub, Eric P. Winer, Sara M. Tolaney, and Nancy U. Lin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Gad Getz, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Gavin Ha, Samuel S. Freeman, Atish D. Choudhury, Gregory Gydush, Sarah C. Reed, Justin Rhoades, Denisse Rotem, Nikhil Wagle, Gad Getz, Todd R. Golub, and Viktor A. Adalsteinsson, Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and J. Christopher Love, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | - Gavin Ha
- Daniel G. Stover, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Parsons, Gavin Ha, William T. Barry, Hao Guo, Atish D. Choudhury, Melissa E. Hughes, Deborah A. Dillon, Ann H. Partridge, Nikhil Wagle, Ian E. Krop, Todd R. Golub, Eric P. Winer, Sara M. Tolaney, and Nancy U. Lin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Gad Getz, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Gavin Ha, Samuel S. Freeman, Atish D. Choudhury, Gregory Gydush, Sarah C. Reed, Justin Rhoades, Denisse Rotem, Nikhil Wagle, Gad Getz, Todd R. Golub, and Viktor A. Adalsteinsson, Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and J. Christopher Love, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | - Samuel S. Freeman
- Daniel G. Stover, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Parsons, Gavin Ha, William T. Barry, Hao Guo, Atish D. Choudhury, Melissa E. Hughes, Deborah A. Dillon, Ann H. Partridge, Nikhil Wagle, Ian E. Krop, Todd R. Golub, Eric P. Winer, Sara M. Tolaney, and Nancy U. Lin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Gad Getz, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Gavin Ha, Samuel S. Freeman, Atish D. Choudhury, Gregory Gydush, Sarah C. Reed, Justin Rhoades, Denisse Rotem, Nikhil Wagle, Gad Getz, Todd R. Golub, and Viktor A. Adalsteinsson, Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and J. Christopher Love, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | - William T. Barry
- Daniel G. Stover, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Parsons, Gavin Ha, William T. Barry, Hao Guo, Atish D. Choudhury, Melissa E. Hughes, Deborah A. Dillon, Ann H. Partridge, Nikhil Wagle, Ian E. Krop, Todd R. Golub, Eric P. Winer, Sara M. Tolaney, and Nancy U. Lin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Gad Getz, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Gavin Ha, Samuel S. Freeman, Atish D. Choudhury, Gregory Gydush, Sarah C. Reed, Justin Rhoades, Denisse Rotem, Nikhil Wagle, Gad Getz, Todd R. Golub, and Viktor A. Adalsteinsson, Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and J. Christopher Love, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | - Hao Guo
- Daniel G. Stover, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Parsons, Gavin Ha, William T. Barry, Hao Guo, Atish D. Choudhury, Melissa E. Hughes, Deborah A. Dillon, Ann H. Partridge, Nikhil Wagle, Ian E. Krop, Todd R. Golub, Eric P. Winer, Sara M. Tolaney, and Nancy U. Lin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Gad Getz, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Gavin Ha, Samuel S. Freeman, Atish D. Choudhury, Gregory Gydush, Sarah C. Reed, Justin Rhoades, Denisse Rotem, Nikhil Wagle, Gad Getz, Todd R. Golub, and Viktor A. Adalsteinsson, Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and J. Christopher Love, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | - Atish D. Choudhury
- Daniel G. Stover, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Parsons, Gavin Ha, William T. Barry, Hao Guo, Atish D. Choudhury, Melissa E. Hughes, Deborah A. Dillon, Ann H. Partridge, Nikhil Wagle, Ian E. Krop, Todd R. Golub, Eric P. Winer, Sara M. Tolaney, and Nancy U. Lin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Gad Getz, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Gavin Ha, Samuel S. Freeman, Atish D. Choudhury, Gregory Gydush, Sarah C. Reed, Justin Rhoades, Denisse Rotem, Nikhil Wagle, Gad Getz, Todd R. Golub, and Viktor A. Adalsteinsson, Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and J. Christopher Love, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | - Gregory Gydush
- Daniel G. Stover, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Parsons, Gavin Ha, William T. Barry, Hao Guo, Atish D. Choudhury, Melissa E. Hughes, Deborah A. Dillon, Ann H. Partridge, Nikhil Wagle, Ian E. Krop, Todd R. Golub, Eric P. Winer, Sara M. Tolaney, and Nancy U. Lin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Gad Getz, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Gavin Ha, Samuel S. Freeman, Atish D. Choudhury, Gregory Gydush, Sarah C. Reed, Justin Rhoades, Denisse Rotem, Nikhil Wagle, Gad Getz, Todd R. Golub, and Viktor A. Adalsteinsson, Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and J. Christopher Love, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | - Sarah C. Reed
- Daniel G. Stover, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Parsons, Gavin Ha, William T. Barry, Hao Guo, Atish D. Choudhury, Melissa E. Hughes, Deborah A. Dillon, Ann H. Partridge, Nikhil Wagle, Ian E. Krop, Todd R. Golub, Eric P. Winer, Sara M. Tolaney, and Nancy U. Lin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Gad Getz, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Gavin Ha, Samuel S. Freeman, Atish D. Choudhury, Gregory Gydush, Sarah C. Reed, Justin Rhoades, Denisse Rotem, Nikhil Wagle, Gad Getz, Todd R. Golub, and Viktor A. Adalsteinsson, Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and J. Christopher Love, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | - Justin Rhoades
- Daniel G. Stover, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Parsons, Gavin Ha, William T. Barry, Hao Guo, Atish D. Choudhury, Melissa E. Hughes, Deborah A. Dillon, Ann H. Partridge, Nikhil Wagle, Ian E. Krop, Todd R. Golub, Eric P. Winer, Sara M. Tolaney, and Nancy U. Lin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Gad Getz, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Gavin Ha, Samuel S. Freeman, Atish D. Choudhury, Gregory Gydush, Sarah C. Reed, Justin Rhoades, Denisse Rotem, Nikhil Wagle, Gad Getz, Todd R. Golub, and Viktor A. Adalsteinsson, Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and J. Christopher Love, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | - Denisse Rotem
- Daniel G. Stover, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Parsons, Gavin Ha, William T. Barry, Hao Guo, Atish D. Choudhury, Melissa E. Hughes, Deborah A. Dillon, Ann H. Partridge, Nikhil Wagle, Ian E. Krop, Todd R. Golub, Eric P. Winer, Sara M. Tolaney, and Nancy U. Lin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Gad Getz, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Gavin Ha, Samuel S. Freeman, Atish D. Choudhury, Gregory Gydush, Sarah C. Reed, Justin Rhoades, Denisse Rotem, Nikhil Wagle, Gad Getz, Todd R. Golub, and Viktor A. Adalsteinsson, Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and J. Christopher Love, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | - Melissa E. Hughes
- Daniel G. Stover, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Parsons, Gavin Ha, William T. Barry, Hao Guo, Atish D. Choudhury, Melissa E. Hughes, Deborah A. Dillon, Ann H. Partridge, Nikhil Wagle, Ian E. Krop, Todd R. Golub, Eric P. Winer, Sara M. Tolaney, and Nancy U. Lin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Gad Getz, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Gavin Ha, Samuel S. Freeman, Atish D. Choudhury, Gregory Gydush, Sarah C. Reed, Justin Rhoades, Denisse Rotem, Nikhil Wagle, Gad Getz, Todd R. Golub, and Viktor A. Adalsteinsson, Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and J. Christopher Love, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | - Deborah A. Dillon
- Daniel G. Stover, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Parsons, Gavin Ha, William T. Barry, Hao Guo, Atish D. Choudhury, Melissa E. Hughes, Deborah A. Dillon, Ann H. Partridge, Nikhil Wagle, Ian E. Krop, Todd R. Golub, Eric P. Winer, Sara M. Tolaney, and Nancy U. Lin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Gad Getz, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Gavin Ha, Samuel S. Freeman, Atish D. Choudhury, Gregory Gydush, Sarah C. Reed, Justin Rhoades, Denisse Rotem, Nikhil Wagle, Gad Getz, Todd R. Golub, and Viktor A. Adalsteinsson, Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and J. Christopher Love, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | - Ann H. Partridge
- Daniel G. Stover, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Parsons, Gavin Ha, William T. Barry, Hao Guo, Atish D. Choudhury, Melissa E. Hughes, Deborah A. Dillon, Ann H. Partridge, Nikhil Wagle, Ian E. Krop, Todd R. Golub, Eric P. Winer, Sara M. Tolaney, and Nancy U. Lin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Gad Getz, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Gavin Ha, Samuel S. Freeman, Atish D. Choudhury, Gregory Gydush, Sarah C. Reed, Justin Rhoades, Denisse Rotem, Nikhil Wagle, Gad Getz, Todd R. Golub, and Viktor A. Adalsteinsson, Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and J. Christopher Love, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | - Nikhil Wagle
- Daniel G. Stover, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Parsons, Gavin Ha, William T. Barry, Hao Guo, Atish D. Choudhury, Melissa E. Hughes, Deborah A. Dillon, Ann H. Partridge, Nikhil Wagle, Ian E. Krop, Todd R. Golub, Eric P. Winer, Sara M. Tolaney, and Nancy U. Lin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Gad Getz, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Gavin Ha, Samuel S. Freeman, Atish D. Choudhury, Gregory Gydush, Sarah C. Reed, Justin Rhoades, Denisse Rotem, Nikhil Wagle, Gad Getz, Todd R. Golub, and Viktor A. Adalsteinsson, Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and J. Christopher Love, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | - Ian E. Krop
- Daniel G. Stover, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Parsons, Gavin Ha, William T. Barry, Hao Guo, Atish D. Choudhury, Melissa E. Hughes, Deborah A. Dillon, Ann H. Partridge, Nikhil Wagle, Ian E. Krop, Todd R. Golub, Eric P. Winer, Sara M. Tolaney, and Nancy U. Lin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Gad Getz, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Gavin Ha, Samuel S. Freeman, Atish D. Choudhury, Gregory Gydush, Sarah C. Reed, Justin Rhoades, Denisse Rotem, Nikhil Wagle, Gad Getz, Todd R. Golub, and Viktor A. Adalsteinsson, Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and J. Christopher Love, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | - Gad Getz
- Daniel G. Stover, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Parsons, Gavin Ha, William T. Barry, Hao Guo, Atish D. Choudhury, Melissa E. Hughes, Deborah A. Dillon, Ann H. Partridge, Nikhil Wagle, Ian E. Krop, Todd R. Golub, Eric P. Winer, Sara M. Tolaney, and Nancy U. Lin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Gad Getz, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Gavin Ha, Samuel S. Freeman, Atish D. Choudhury, Gregory Gydush, Sarah C. Reed, Justin Rhoades, Denisse Rotem, Nikhil Wagle, Gad Getz, Todd R. Golub, and Viktor A. Adalsteinsson, Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and J. Christopher Love, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | - Todd R. Golub
- Daniel G. Stover, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Parsons, Gavin Ha, William T. Barry, Hao Guo, Atish D. Choudhury, Melissa E. Hughes, Deborah A. Dillon, Ann H. Partridge, Nikhil Wagle, Ian E. Krop, Todd R. Golub, Eric P. Winer, Sara M. Tolaney, and Nancy U. Lin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Gad Getz, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Gavin Ha, Samuel S. Freeman, Atish D. Choudhury, Gregory Gydush, Sarah C. Reed, Justin Rhoades, Denisse Rotem, Nikhil Wagle, Gad Getz, Todd R. Golub, and Viktor A. Adalsteinsson, Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and J. Christopher Love, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | - J. Christopher Love
- Daniel G. Stover, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Parsons, Gavin Ha, William T. Barry, Hao Guo, Atish D. Choudhury, Melissa E. Hughes, Deborah A. Dillon, Ann H. Partridge, Nikhil Wagle, Ian E. Krop, Todd R. Golub, Eric P. Winer, Sara M. Tolaney, and Nancy U. Lin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Gad Getz, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Gavin Ha, Samuel S. Freeman, Atish D. Choudhury, Gregory Gydush, Sarah C. Reed, Justin Rhoades, Denisse Rotem, Nikhil Wagle, Gad Getz, Todd R. Golub, and Viktor A. Adalsteinsson, Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and J. Christopher Love, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | - Eric P. Winer
- Daniel G. Stover, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Parsons, Gavin Ha, William T. Barry, Hao Guo, Atish D. Choudhury, Melissa E. Hughes, Deborah A. Dillon, Ann H. Partridge, Nikhil Wagle, Ian E. Krop, Todd R. Golub, Eric P. Winer, Sara M. Tolaney, and Nancy U. Lin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Gad Getz, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Gavin Ha, Samuel S. Freeman, Atish D. Choudhury, Gregory Gydush, Sarah C. Reed, Justin Rhoades, Denisse Rotem, Nikhil Wagle, Gad Getz, Todd R. Golub, and Viktor A. Adalsteinsson, Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and J. Christopher Love, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | - Sara M. Tolaney
- Daniel G. Stover, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Parsons, Gavin Ha, William T. Barry, Hao Guo, Atish D. Choudhury, Melissa E. Hughes, Deborah A. Dillon, Ann H. Partridge, Nikhil Wagle, Ian E. Krop, Todd R. Golub, Eric P. Winer, Sara M. Tolaney, and Nancy U. Lin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Gad Getz, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Gavin Ha, Samuel S. Freeman, Atish D. Choudhury, Gregory Gydush, Sarah C. Reed, Justin Rhoades, Denisse Rotem, Nikhil Wagle, Gad Getz, Todd R. Golub, and Viktor A. Adalsteinsson, Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and J. Christopher Love, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | - Nancy U. Lin
- Daniel G. Stover, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Parsons, Gavin Ha, William T. Barry, Hao Guo, Atish D. Choudhury, Melissa E. Hughes, Deborah A. Dillon, Ann H. Partridge, Nikhil Wagle, Ian E. Krop, Todd R. Golub, Eric P. Winer, Sara M. Tolaney, and Nancy U. Lin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Gad Getz, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Gavin Ha, Samuel S. Freeman, Atish D. Choudhury, Gregory Gydush, Sarah C. Reed, Justin Rhoades, Denisse Rotem, Nikhil Wagle, Gad Getz, Todd R. Golub, and Viktor A. Adalsteinsson, Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and J. Christopher Love, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | - Viktor A. Adalsteinsson
- Daniel G. Stover, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Heather A. Parsons, Gavin Ha, William T. Barry, Hao Guo, Atish D. Choudhury, Melissa E. Hughes, Deborah A. Dillon, Ann H. Partridge, Nikhil Wagle, Ian E. Krop, Todd R. Golub, Eric P. Winer, Sara M. Tolaney, and Nancy U. Lin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Gad Getz, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Gavin Ha, Samuel S. Freeman, Atish D. Choudhury, Gregory Gydush, Sarah C. Reed, Justin Rhoades, Denisse Rotem, Nikhil Wagle, Gad Getz, Todd R. Golub, and Viktor A. Adalsteinsson, Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and J. Christopher Love, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Barroso-Sousa R, Gao H, Barry WT, Krop IE, Schoenfeld JD, Tolaney SM. Abstract OT1-02-02: A phase II study of pembrolizumab in combination with palliative radiotherapy for metastatic hormone receptor positive breast cancer. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-ot1-02-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite recent advances in the treatment of patients with metastatic hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2- breast cancer (BC), it remains an incurable disease. The activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) as monotherapy in patients with metastatic HR+/HER2- BC has been limited. Therefore, the addition of other strategies that elicit an immunogenic tumor microenvironment may be needed. We hypothesize that radiation therapy (RT) will potentiate the efficacy of the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic HR+/HER2- BC. METHODS: Trial Design: This is a phase II single arm study assessing objective response rate (ORR) according to RECIST 1.1 in patients with metastatic HR+/HER2- BC who will receive pembrolizumab in combination with palliative RT. Pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously will be administered 2-7 days before day 1 of RT, and will be given every 21 days until disease progression. Biopsies will be performed in the same lesion at baseline (mandatory if tumor tissue is accessible outside the field of RT) and during cycle 2 within 7-14 days before the day 1 of cycle 3 of pembrolizumab. Key Eligibility Criteria: Patients with metastatic HR+/HER2- BC, with measurable disease outside the field of radiation, for whom palliative RT to at least one bone, lymph node, or soft tissue lesion is indicated. Radiation of visceral lesions (such as lung or hepatic lesions) is not permitted. Although prior RT is allowed, patients must be at least 3 months free from RT; Re-irradiation of the same field is not allowed. There is no limit to the number of previous treatments, and systemic treatment naive patients for metastatic disease are also eligible. Specific Aims: The primary aim is to evaluate the efficacy of the combination, as defined by objective response rate (ORR) outside the field of RT according to RECIST 1.1. Secondary objectives include to determine the ORR according to immune-related criteria, the progression-free survival, the abscopal response rate, the clinical benefit rate, the safety and the tolerability of the combination. In addition, correlative studies will be performed to explore the correlation of immunosuppressive and/or immune-stimulating immune marker profiles at baseline and after cycle 2 to disease response to therapy. Statistical Methods: Using the Simons “optimal” method, in the first stage, 8 patients will be enrolled. If there is at least 1 response, accrual will continue to the second stage where up to 19 additional patients will be enrolled. If at least 3 of these 27 patients have an objective response (≥10%), the regimen will be considered worthy of further study. With this design, the probability of stopping the trial early is 78% if the true response rate is 3%. If the true response rate is 20% the chance that the regimen is declared worthy of further study is 80%. Patient accrual and target accrual: The trial opened in April/2017, and so far, has accrued 2 patients with a target accrual of 27 patients. Accrual should be complete in 14-25 months. Clinical trial information: NCT03051672.
Citation Format: Barroso-Sousa R, Gao H, Barry WT, Krop IE, Schoenfeld JD, Tolaney SM. A phase II study of pembrolizumab in combination with palliative radiotherapy for metastatic hormone receptor positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-02-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - H Gao
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - WT Barry
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - IE Krop
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | - SM Tolaney
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ligibel JA, Huebner LJ, Rugo HS, Burstein H, Toppmeyer DL, Anders CK, Ma C, Hudis CA, Winer EP, Barry WT. Abstract P1-07-04: Physical activity, weight and outcomes in patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: Results from CALGB 40502 (Alliance). Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p1-07-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Obesity and inactivity are associated with an increased risk of cancer-related and overall mortality in women with early-stage breast cancer, but there are few data in advanced breast cancer.
Methods: C40502 was a Phase III trial of first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Participants were randomized to weekly paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel or ixabepilone. Height and weight at the time of study enrollment were abstracted from medical records. After study activation, the protocol was amended to collect physical activity (PA) data. Participants completed the Nurses' Health Study Exercise Questionnaire, indicating the frequency, type and duration of recreational PA in which they engaged at study enrollment. Metabolic equivalent (MET)-hours of weekly PA (MET-hrs/wk) were calculated using the Ainsworth Compendium. PA was dichotomized to 0-9 or 9+ MET-hrs/wk based on data in early stage breast cancer suggesting that women who engaged in > 9 MET-hrs of PA/wk had lower cancer-specific mortality. Association with clinical endpoints was evaluated using multivariate Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for treatment assignment, age, tumor hormone-receptor status, prior taxane use, disease-free interval and visceral metastases.
Results: 799 patients enrolled in C40502 between 2008 and 2011. Baseline body mass index (BMI) was available for 792 patients and PA data for 500 participants. Median follow up was 60 months. Median age was 56.7 years; 72% of patients had hormone receptor (HR)-positive cancers. Median BMI was 28.6 kg/m2 (IQR: 24.7-33.1 kg/m2). Patients engaged in a median of 3.3 MET-hrs/wk of PA (about 1 hour of moderate-intensity PA/wk) (IQR: 0.7-12.7 MET-hrs/wk). Neither BMI nor PA was significantly associated with progression-free (PFS) or overall survival (OS).
BMI and OutcomesBMI (kg/m2)N (%)PFS (months)Adj HRP valueOS (months)Adj HRP value18.5-24.9209 (26.4)10.0 (9.1-11.2)ref0.4826.1 (23.3-33.2)ref0.5425-29.9248 (31.3)9.0 (7.6-10.3)1.00 (0.83-1.22) 22.0 (20.0-25.4)1.05 (0.85-1.30) ≥30335 (42.3)8.7 (7.7-9.7)0.97 (0.81-1.17) 25.5 (23.1-29.5)0.95 (0.78-1.16)
PA and OutcomesPA (MET-hrs/wk)N (%)PFS (months)Adj HRP valueOS (months)Adj HRP value0-9344 (68.8)7.9 (7.4-9.2)ref0.1323.6 (20.1-26.8)ref0.21>9156 (31.2)9.8 (8.9-12.0)0.86 (0.71-1.05) 27.4 (22.3-35.6)0.87 (0.70-1.08)
There was a trend toward longer PFS and OS in patients who reported PA > 9 MET-hrs/wk vs 0-9 MET-hrs/wk, especially in individuals with HR+ cancers (median PFS 11.7 vs 9.2 months [adj HR = 0.84 (0.66-1.05)] and OS 34.0 vs 26.5 months [adj HR = 0.83 (0.66-1.05)] with PA >9 vs 0- 9 MET-hrs/wk).
Conclusions: In some of the first data looking at the relationship between lifestyle factors and outcomes in MBC, there was no relationship between BMI and PFS or OS in patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for advanced disease. A trend toward improved PFS and OS was seen in multivariate analysis in patients who reported higher levels of PA, but results were not statistically significant and could have been influenced by other patient factors. More information is needed regarding the relationship between PA and cancer outcomes, especially in patients with HR+ cancers.
Citation Format: Ligibel JA, Huebner LJ, Rugo HS, Burstein H, Toppmeyer DL, Anders CK, Ma C, Hudis CA, Winer EP, Barry WT. Physical activity, weight and outcomes in patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: Results from CALGB 40502 (Alliance) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-07-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- JA Ligibel
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Alliance Statistics and Data Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington University School of Medicine; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - LJ Huebner
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Alliance Statistics and Data Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington University School of Medicine; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - HS Rugo
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Alliance Statistics and Data Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington University School of Medicine; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - H Burstein
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Alliance Statistics and Data Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington University School of Medicine; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - DL Toppmeyer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Alliance Statistics and Data Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington University School of Medicine; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - CK Anders
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Alliance Statistics and Data Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington University School of Medicine; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - C Ma
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Alliance Statistics and Data Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington University School of Medicine; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - CA Hudis
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Alliance Statistics and Data Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington University School of Medicine; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - EP Winer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Alliance Statistics and Data Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington University School of Medicine; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - WT Barry
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Alliance Statistics and Data Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington University School of Medicine; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Magbanua MJ, Hendrix L, Hyslop T, Barry WT, Winer EP, Hudis C, Toppmeyer D, Burnstein H, Qadir M, Ma C, Scott JH, Park JW, Rugo HS. Abstract P2-01-01: Trajectory patterns of circulating tumor cells (CTC) in chemotherapy-treated metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients predict poor clinical outcomes: CALGB 40502 (Alliance)/NCCTG N063H study. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p2-01-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Little is known about the dynamics of CTCs during treatment and its clinical significance. We examined the predictive utility of serial CTC analysis in ER+HER2- MBC patients (pts) treated with chemotherapy in the CALGB 40502/NCCTG N063H study, a randomized phase III trial of weekly paclitaxel compared to weekly nanoparticle albumin bound nab-paclitaxel or ixabepilone +/- bevacizumab as first-line therapy (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00785291, Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882).
Methods: Of the 783 pts treated, 469 had ≥3 serial blood samples (including baseline) successfully analyzed for CTCs by CellSearch® and were included in this analysis (n=2,202). Samples with ≥5 CTCs per 7.5 mLs of blood were considered CTC+. The prognostic and predictive performance of baseline CTCs (bCTC) and CTC status from baseline to cycle 2 (b2CTC) were compared to a novel latent mixture model classification based on trajectory of CTCs (tCTC). Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) was used to select the model (bCTC vs b2CTC vs tCTC) that best predicts overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and time-to-treatment failure (TTF).
Results: 53% of the pts were CTC+ at baseline. b2CTC status changed in 36% of the pts, most of whom were CTC+CTC- (35%), and very few CTC-CTC+ (1%); the rest of the pts did not experience a change in b2CTC status (46% CTC-CTC- and 19% CTC+CTC+). Mixture model analysis revealed 4 groups of pts that show distinct tCTC patterns over the course of treatment: consitently very low/undectectable CTCs (tCTCneg, 56%), low (tCTClo, 24%), intermediate (tCTCmid, 15%), or high (tCTChi, 5%). bCTC, b2CTC, and tCTC were significantly correlated with tumor subtype (all p <0.0022) and presence of bone metastasis (all p <0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that pts who were CTC+ at baseline, and those whose b2CTC status remained positive (CTC+CTC+) had significantly reduced OS, PFS and TTF.
OSPFSTTFModelsHR (95% CI)p-valueHR (95% CI)p-valueHR (95% CI)p-valuebCTC (vs CTC-) → CTC+2.5(1.8-3.3)<0.00011.6(1.3-2.0)<0.00011.3(1.1-1.6)0.0046b2CTC (vs CTC+CTC-) → CTC-CTC+1.6(0.5-5.4)0.41491.6(0.6-4.5)0.39051.6(0.6-4.3)0.3961→ CTC+CTC+2.7(1.9-3.8)<0.00011.8(1.4-2.5)<0.00011.8(1.3-2.4)<0.0001→ CTC-CTC-0.5(0.4-0.8)0.00020.8(0.6-0.9)0.01600.9(0.7-1.1)0.2771tCTC (vs tCTCneg) → tCTClo2.6(1.9-3.7)<0.00011.9(1.4-2.4)<0.00010.9(0.7-1.1)0.0033→ tCTCmid5.3(3.6-8.0)<0.00012.5(1.8-3.4)<0.00011.8(1.4-2.5)0.0001→ tCTChi10.8(6.1-19)<0.00013.0(1.8-5.0)<0.00012.3(1.4-3.7)0.0009CTC- (<5 CTCs per 7.5 mLs); CTC+ (≥5 CTCs per 7.5 mLs)
Pts with tCTClo, tCTCmid and tCTChi had significantly shorter OS, PFS and TTF compared to those with tCTCneg. After adjustment for potential confounders, AIC analysis revealed that the tCTC model best predicts OS and PFS, while b2CTC best predicts TTF.
AIC Score*ModelsOSPFSTTFbCTC243240514199b2CTC240540384186tCTC237940264188*The lowest AIC score indicates the best model.
Conclusions: Analysis of CTC trajectory patterns identified pts with poor outcome who could potentially benefit from more effective treatment. Validation in independent cohorts is warranted to confirm the findings in this study.
Citation Format: Magbanua MJ, Hendrix L, Hyslop T, Barry WT, Winer EP, Hudis C, Toppmeyer D, Burnstein H, Qadir M, Ma C, Scott JH, Park JW, Rugo HS. Trajectory patterns of circulating tumor cells (CTC) in chemotherapy-treated metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients predict poor clinical outcomes: CALGB 40502 (Alliance)/NCCTG N063H study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-01-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- MJ Magbanua
- University of California San Francisco; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University School of Medicine; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare; Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington University School of Medicine
| | - L Hendrix
- University of California San Francisco; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University School of Medicine; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare; Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington University School of Medicine
| | - T Hyslop
- University of California San Francisco; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University School of Medicine; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare; Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington University School of Medicine
| | - WT Barry
- University of California San Francisco; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University School of Medicine; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare; Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington University School of Medicine
| | - EP Winer
- University of California San Francisco; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University School of Medicine; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare; Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington University School of Medicine
| | - C Hudis
- University of California San Francisco; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University School of Medicine; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare; Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington University School of Medicine
| | - D Toppmeyer
- University of California San Francisco; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University School of Medicine; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare; Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington University School of Medicine
| | - H Burnstein
- University of California San Francisco; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University School of Medicine; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare; Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington University School of Medicine
| | - M Qadir
- University of California San Francisco; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University School of Medicine; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare; Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington University School of Medicine
| | - C Ma
- University of California San Francisco; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University School of Medicine; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare; Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington University School of Medicine
| | - JH Scott
- University of California San Francisco; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University School of Medicine; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare; Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington University School of Medicine
| | - JW Park
- University of California San Francisco; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University School of Medicine; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare; Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington University School of Medicine
| | - HS Rugo
- University of California San Francisco; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University School of Medicine; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare; Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington University School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Mehrotra S, Sharma MR, Gray E, Wu K, Barry WT, Hudis C, Winer EP, Lyss AP, Toppmeyer DL, Moreno-Aspitia A, Lad TE, Valasco M, Overmoyer B, Rugo H, Ratain MJ, Gobburu JV. Kinetic-Pharmacodynamic Model of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated with Paclitaxel, Nab-Paclitaxel, or Ixabepilone: CALGB 40502 (Alliance). AAPS J 2017; 19:1411-1423. [PMID: 28620884 PMCID: PMC5711539 DOI: 10.1208/s12248-017-0101-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2017] [Accepted: 05/11/2017] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a dose-limiting toxicity caused by several chemotherapeutic agents. Currently, CIPN is managed by empirical dose modifications at the discretion of the treating physician. The goal of this research is to quantitate the dose-CIPN relationship to inform the optimal strategies for dose modification. Data were obtained from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 40502 trial, a randomized phase III trial of paclitaxel vs. nab-paclitaxel vs. ixabepilone as first-line chemotherapy for locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. CIPN was measured using a subset of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Gynecologic Oncology Group Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) scale. A kinetic-pharmacodynamic (K-PD) model was utilized to quantitate the dose-CIPN relationship simultaneously for the three drugs. Indirect response models with linear and Smax drug effects were evaluated. The model was evaluated by comparing the predicted proportion of patients with CIPN (score ≥8 or score ≥12) to the observed proportion. An indirect response model with linear drug effect was able to describe the longitudinal CIPN data reasonably well. The proportion of patients that were falsely predicted to have CIPN or were falsely predicted not to have CIPN was 20% or less at any cycle. The model will be utilized to identify an early time point that can predict CIPN at later time points. This strategy will be utilized to inform dose adjustments to prospectively manage CIPN. Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT00785291.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shailly Mehrotra
- Center for Translational Medicine, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Elizabeth Gray
- NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Kehua Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs (Peking University), Beijing, China
| | - William T Barry
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Clifford Hudis
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Eric P Winer
- Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare/ Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alan P Lyss
- Heartland Cancer Research NCORP, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | | | | | - Thomas E Lad
- John H. Stroger Jr Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mario Valasco
- Decatur Memorial Hospital/Cancer Care Specialists of Illinois/ Heartland Cancer Research NCORP, Decatur, Illinois, USA
| | - Beth Overmoyer
- Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare/ Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hope Rugo
- University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Jogarao V Gobburu
- Center for Translational Medicine, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
- Center for Translational Medicine, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, 20 N Pine Street, Room 513, Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kuang Y, Siddiqui B, Hu J, Barry WT, Lin NU, Wagle N, Kirschmeier P, Jänne PA, Paweletz C, Krop I, Winer EP, Brown M, Jeselsohn R. Abstract 4950: The emergence of ESR1 mutations is associated with aromatase inhibitor and fulvestrant therapy. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-4950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: In recent studies, constitutively active recurrent ESR1 ligand binding mutations (LBD) were found in about 20% of metastatic (met) HR+ breast cancers ( BRCAs) and rarely in primary HR+ cancers. In our previous work, we analyzed clinical tissue samples and detected an association between the number of prior endocrine treatments and the prevalence of these mutations, suggesting the emergence of the ESR1 mutations under the selective pressure of endocrine treatment. More recently, the LBD ESR1 mutations were successfully detected in plasma cell free (cf)DNA in patients with met HR+ disease. The presence of mutant ESR1 cfDNA was found to be prognostic. Here we sought to study the association between endocrine treatments in the adjuvant (adj) and met settings and the prevalence of cfDNA ESR1 and PIK3CA mutations in patients with met HR+ BRCA.
Methods: Plasma samples and detailed clinical data were collected from patients with met BRCA through the Collection of Specimens and Clinical Data program of the Breast Oncology Center at the Dana Farber Cancer Institute. Droplet Digital PCR was used for the detection of the most common ESR1 LBD mutations (E380Q, Y537C, Y537N, Y537S and D538G) and the 3 most common PIK3CA mutations (E542K, E545K and H1047R) in cfDNA. Fisher’s Exact Test was used for statistical analysis.
Results: Plasma samples were collected from 155 patients with met BRCA. ESR1 mutations were found in 30.1% of the patients with HR+/HER2- negative disease (34/113). PIK3CA mutations were detected in 31.8% of patients with HR+/HER2- disease. The majority of the patients had either newly diagnosed met disease or progressive met disease at the time of the blood draw. 14 patients had stable met disease and among these patients, only 1 of these patients was found to have an ESR1 mutation and no PIK3CA mutations were detected. The majority of patients with ESR1 mutations (88%) and PIK3CA mutations (75%) had progressive disease. Patients that received an aromatase inhibitor (AI) either in the adj or met setting had a higher prevalence of ESR1 mutations compared to patients that had no AI treatment, regardless of whether or not they received tamoxifen (TAM) (prevalence was 32% for adj AI only, 40.4% AI in met only, No AI and no TAM 7.1% and TAM but no AI 6.7%). In addition fulvestrant treatment in the met setting was significantly associated with ESR1 mutations (odds ratio 3.38, p-value<0.01). Conversely, we did not detect any significant associations between endocrine treatments in the adj or met settings and PIK3CA mutations.
Conclusions: Analysis of cfDNA can successfully detect ESR1 and PIK3CA mutations in newly diagnosed or progressive met BRCA patients and the emergence of the ESR1 mutations is associated with AI and fulvestrant treatment. These results support the serial monitoring of ESR1 mutations in cfDNA in met disease and highlight the need to study new agents to target these mutations.
Citation Format: Yanan Kuang, Bilal Siddiqui, Jiani Hu, William T. Barry, Nancy U. Lin, Nikhil Wagle, Paul Kirschmeier, Pasi A. Jänne, Cloud Paweletz, Ian Krop, Eric P. Winer, Myles Brown, Rinath Jeselsohn. The emergence of ESR1 mutations is associated with aromatase inhibitor and fulvestrant therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4950. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-4950
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jiani Hu
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ian Krop
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Konstantinopoulos PA, Barry WT, Birrer M, Westin SN, Farooq S, Cadoo K, Whalen C, Luo W, Liu H, Aghajanian C, Solit DB, Mills GB, Taylor BS, Won H, Berger MF, Palakurthi S, Liu JF, Cantley L, Kaufmann SH, Swisher EM, D'Andrea AD, Winer E, Wulf GM, Matulonis UA. Abstract CT008: Phase I study of the alpha specific PI3-Kinase inhibitor BYL719 and the poly (ADP-Ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib in recurrent ovarian and breast cancer: Analysis of the dose escalation and ovarian cancer expansion cohort. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-ct008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: In vivo synergy with concurrent PI3-Kinase inhibition and PARP inhibition has been observed in BRCA-deficient and BRCA-proficient preclinical models of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and ovarian cancer (OC). A phase I trial of the oral pan-class I PI3-Kinase inhibitor BKM120 and the PARP inhibitor olaparib demonstrated anti-cancer activity in TNBC and OC, both in patients with and without germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA) mutations. However, CNS toxicity (depression) and liver function test abnormalities limited dose escalation of BKM120 prompting evaluation of the alpha specific PI3-Kinase inhibitor BYL719 (which has no CNS toxicity) in combination with olaparib.
Methods: Olaparib was administered twice daily (tablet formulation) and BYL719 daily on a 28-day cycle, both orally. A 3 + 3 dose-escalation design was employed with primary objectives of defining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose of the combination of BYL719 and olaparib, and secondary objectives of defining toxicity, activity, and pharmacokinetic profiles of both agents. Eligibility included recurrent TNBC or high grade serous (HGS) OC, or any histology OC or breast cancer (BC) with presence of a known germline BRCA mutation, performance status of 0-1 and measurable/evaluable cancer. Patients with platinum sensitive or resistant or refractory OC were eligible and prior PARP inhibitor use was allowed. Dose-expansion cohorts at the MTD were enrolled for both BC and OC.
Results: 46 patients (16 BC and 30 OC) have been enrolled in the study; 28 patients participated in the dose escalation portion of the study (4 BC and 24 OC). Two patients with OC did not receive study drugs because of ineligibility. MTD was defined as BYL719 200mg once daily and olaparib 200mg twice daily. Dose limiting toxicities included hyperglycemia, rash and fever with decreased neutrophil count. Four patients (3 OC and 1 BC) discontinued protocol therapy because of toxicity (2 for hyperglycemia, 1 for nausea and 1 for allergic reaction). Most common toxicities included nausea, hyperglycemia, fatigue, diarrhea and vomiting. At the MTD, 6 patients with OC and 12 patients with BC were enrolled into a dose expansion cohort. The OC expansion cohort has completed enrollment, while the BC cohort is still enrolling. Among patients with OC who received study drugs (28 patients, 26 (93%) with platinum resistant disease), objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1 was 36% (10/28 patients, all partial responses (PRs)). Median duration of response was 167 days (range 16-398 days); 5 of 10 patients with PR remain on treatment. ORR was 33% for patients with germline BRCA mutations and 31% for patients without germline BRCA mutations. Among patients without germline BRCA mutations with platinum resistant OC, ORR was 29%.
Conclusions: Combined BYL719 and olaparib is feasible, and similar clinical benefit was observed in patients with and without germline BRCA mutations. The activity of this combination in OC patients without germline BRCA mutations and with platinum resistant disease was higher than expected from olaparib monotherapy and warrants further investigation. This work was funded in part by the Stand Up To Cancer Ovarian Dream Team. Clinical trial: NCT01623349.
Citation Format: Panagiotis A. Konstantinopoulos, William T. Barry, Michael Birrer, Shannon N. Westin, Sarah Farooq, Karen Cadoo, Christin Whalen, Weixiu Luo, Hui Liu, Carol Aghajanian, David B. Solit, Gordon B. Mills, Barry S. Taylor, Helen Won, Michael F. Berger, Sangeetha Palakurthi, Joyce F. Liu, Lew Cantley, Scott H. Kaufmann, Elizabeth M. Swisher, Alan D. D'Andrea, Eric Winer, Gerburg M. Wulf, Ursula A. Matulonis. Phase I study of the alpha specific PI3-Kinase inhibitor BYL719 and the poly (ADP-Ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib in recurrent ovarian and breast cancer: Analysis of the dose escalation and ovarian cancer expansion cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT008. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-CT008
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Karen Cadoo
- 4Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Weixiu Luo
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Hui Liu
- 5Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | - Helen Won
- 4Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | - Lew Cantley
- 6Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | - Eric Winer
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Wang ZC, Birkbak NJ, Barry WT, Roberts TM, Winer EP, Iglehart JD, Matulonis UA, Ivy SP, Liu JF. Abstract NTOC-112: GENOMIC SCARS AND CLINICAL RESPONSE TO COMBINATION THERAPY OF PARP AND ANGIOGENESIS INHIBITORS IN OVARIAN CANCER. Clin Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.ovcasymp16-ntoc-112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genomic instability, frequently resulting in chromosomal allelic deletion with allelic imbalance (AI)/loss of heterozygosity (LOH), is characteristic of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). Frequent allelic deletion is thought to arise from deficiency in DNA repair by homologous recombination (HR) resulting in the so called “genomic scars” of HR deficiency. Quantification of AI/LOH events in the tumor genome has previously been shown to predict response to therapy using platinum compounds. Recently, PARP inhibitors have proved useful in treating a sub-set of patients with HGSOC, particularly tumors harboring BRCA1/2 mutations. Combination with an angiogenesis inhibitor significantly improved the outcome. This study explores the potential of using AI/LOH scores to predict clinical response of HGSOC to PARP inhibition alone or in combination with an angiogenesis inhibitor.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Molecular inversion probe array data were generated using tumors from a sub-set of patients (n=37) enrolled in a clinical trial comparing the PARP inhibitor Olaparib to the combination of Olaparib with the anti-angiogenic agent Cediranib (NCT01116648). AI/LOH regions were identified using an ASCAT based algorithm. Markers of genomic instability associated with DNA repair deficiency were scored. These quantify AI regions (NAI), telomeric AI (NtAI), large scale transition (LST), fraction of LOH (FLOH), and HRD-LOH. dChip was used for copy number analysis. The best overall response to therapy was determined using the RECIST 1.1 criteria for complete and partial response (CR, n = 3 and PR, n = 18), and stable disease without objective response (SD, n = 16).
RESULTS: A high tumor NAI-score was positively correlated with the degree of clinical response to therapy (either olaparib alone or in combination with cediranib) (Chi-square test for trend, p = 0.036). This association remains statistically significant in the subgroup carrying BRCA mutations (n = 22, Chi-square test for trend, p = 0.0488). In this limited sample, the objective response rate of high NAI tumors to the combination therapy was high (7 out of 8), especially in patient carrying wild-type BRCA1/2 genes (2 out of 2, p = 0.045). The results suggest NAI may be a potential genomic marker for response to the therapy combining PARP and angiogenesis inhibitors. However, no significant association was observed between the degree of objective response and scores of other genomic measurements NtAI, LST, or HRD-LOH.
SUMMARY: High NAI-score was associated with objective response to olaparib, alone or in combination with cediranib, supporting NAI as a candidate of genomic marker for predicting response to PARP inhibitor-based therapy in HGSOC. A larger cohort would be required to further evaluate predictive value of NAI for response to the combinational therapy.
Citation Format: Zhigang C. Wang, Nicolai Juul Birkbak, William T. Barry, Thomas M. Roberts, Eric P. Winer, J Dirk Iglehart, Ursula A. Matulonis, S. Percy Ivy, and Joyce F. Liu. GENOMIC SCARS AND CLINICAL RESPONSE TO COMBINATION THERAPY OF PARP AND ANGIOGENESIS INHIBITORS IN OVARIAN CANCER [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Ovarian Cancer Research Symposium; Sep 12-13, 2016; Seattle, WA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2017;23(11 Suppl):Abstract nr NTOC-112.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - S. Percy Ivy
- 4Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Wong SM, King T, Boileau JF, Barry WT, Golshan M. Population-Based Analysis of Breast Cancer Incidence and Survival Outcomes in Women Diagnosed with Lobular Carcinoma In Situ. Ann Surg Oncol 2017; 24:2509-2517. [PMID: 28455673 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-5867-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE A diagnosis of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is associated with an increased risk of developing breast cancer, although little data exist on long-term patient outcomes, including those who develop subsequent breast malignancies. METHODS The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify women with a histological diagnosis of LCIS between 1983 and 2014. The incidence and clinicopathologic features of subsequent malignancies were then examined, and the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox PH regression used to obtain breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) estimates and associated hazard ratios. RESULTS Overall, 19,462 women swith a mean age at LCIS diagnosis of 53.7 years, and a 10- and 20-year cumulative incidence of subsequent breast malignancy of 11.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.7-11.9%] and 19.8% (95% CI 18.8-20.9) met the eligibility criteria. At a median follow-up of 8.1 years (range 0-30.9) a total of 1837 primary breast cancers were diagnosed, of which 55.2% were diagnosed in the ipsilateral breast. Most breast cancers were of low/intermediate grade, hormone receptor-positive, and diagnosed in early stages. Of subsequent malignancies, invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) distributed equally across both breasts, whereas invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) was more likely to present in the ipsilateral breast (69.0% ILC vs. 49.2% IDC; p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, type of surgical treatment for LCIS had no affect on long-term survival (p = 0.44). The 10- and 20-year BCSS for women with LCIS was 98.9 and 96.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION Women with LCIS who are diagnosed with a subsequent primary breast cancer are often diagnosed in early stages and have excellent BCSS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tari King
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jean-Francois Boileau
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Surgery, Jewish General Segal Cancer Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - William T Barry
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mehra Golshan
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Masko EM, Alfaqih MA, Solomon KR, Barry WT, Newgard CB, Muehlbauer MJ, Valilis NA, Phillips TE, Poulton SH, Freedland AR, Sun S, Dambal SK, Sanders SE, Macias E, Freeman MR, Dewhirst MW, Pizzo SV, Freedland SJ. Evidence for Feedback Regulation Following Cholesterol Lowering Therapy in a Prostate Cancer Xenograft Model. Prostate 2017; 77:446-457. [PMID: 27900797 PMCID: PMC5822711 DOI: 10.1002/pros.23282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2016] [Accepted: 11/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Epidemiologic data suggest cholesterol-lowering drugs may prevent the progression of prostate cancer, but not the incidence of the disease. However, the association of combination therapy in cholesterol reduction on prostate or any cancer is unclear. In this study, we compared the effects of the cholesterol lowering drugs simvastatin and ezetimibe alone or in combination on the growth of LAPC-4 prostate cancer in vivo xenografts. METHODS Proliferation assays were conducted by MTS solution and assessed by Student's t-test. 90 male nude mice were placed on a high-cholesterol Western-diet for 7 days then injected subcutaneously with 1 × 105 LAPC-4 cells. Two weeks post-injection, mice were randomized to control, 11 mg/kg/day simvastatin, 30 mg/kg ezetimibe, or the combination and sacrificed 42 days post-randomization. We used a generalized linear model with the predictor variables of treatment, time, and treatment by time (i.e., interaction term) with tumor volume as the outcome variable. Total serum and tumor cholesterol were measured. Tumoral RNA was extracted and cDNA synthesized from 1 ug of total RNA for quantitative real-time PCR. RESULTS Simvastatin directly reduced in vitro prostate cell proliferation in a dose-dependent, cell line-specific manner, but ezetimibe had no effect. In vivo, low continuous dosing of ezetimibe, delivered by food, or simvastatin, delivered via an osmotic pump had no effect on tumor growth compared to control mice. In contrast, dual treatment of simvastatin and ezetimibe accelerated tumor growth. Ezetimibe significantly lowered serum cholesterol by 15%, while simvastatin had no effect. Ezetimibe treatment resulted in higher tumor cholesterol. A sixfold induction of low density lipoprotein receptor mRNA was observed in ezetimibe and the combination with simvastatin versus control tumors. CONCLUSIONS Systemic cholesterol lowering by ezetimibe did not slow tumor growth, nor did the cholesterol independent effects of simvastatin and the combined treatment increased tumor growth. Despite lower serum cholesterol, tumors from ezetimibe treated mice had higher levels of cholesterol. This study suggests that induction of low density lipoprotein receptor is a possible mechanism of resistance that prostate tumors use to counteract the therapeutic effects of lowering serum cholesterol. Prostate 77:446-457, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth M. Masko
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Mahmoud A. Alfaqih
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Keith R. Solomon
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - William T. Barry
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Christopher B. Newgard
- Sarah W. Stedman Nutrition and Metabolism Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Michael J. Muehlbauer
- Sarah W. Stedman Nutrition and Metabolism Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Nikolaos A. Valilis
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Tameika E. Phillips
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Susan H. Poulton
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Alexis R. Freedland
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Stephanie Sun
- Department of Surgery, Durham Veterans Administration Hospital, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Shweta K. Dambal
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Sergio E. Sanders
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Everardo Macias
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Michael R. Freeman
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Mark W. Dewhirst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Salvatore V. Pizzo
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Stephen J. Freedland
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
- Department of Surgery, Durham Veterans Administration Hospital, Durham, North Carolina
- Correspondence to: Dr. Stephen Freedland, Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, 8635 West 3rd Street Suite 1070W, Los Angeles, CA 90048.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Di Meglio A, Lin NU, Freedman RA, Barry WT, Winer EP, Vaz-Luis I. Patterns of Utilization of Imaging Studies and Serum Tumor Markers Among Patients With De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2017; 15:316-324. [PMID: 28275032 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2016] [Accepted: 10/31/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background: When monitoring patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC), the optimal strategies for imaging and utilization of tumor markers (TM) are uncertain. Patients and Methods: We used a retrospective cohort of 302 patients with de novo mBC treated from 2000 to 2012 at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute to describe the type and timing of imaging and TM testing during the first line of treatment (baseline, first, and subsequent testing). Results: At baseline, all patients had staging scans, with increasing use of PET/PET-CT (17.5% from 2000-2002; 40.3% from 2009-2012). PET/PET-CT was used by itself in only 12.5% of cases. Overall, 30.1% of patients, of whom 80.2% had no neurologic symptoms, underwent central nervous system (CNS) screening; 78.2% of patients had baseline TM testing. Over the course of treatment, 23.5% of patients had TM retested once a month or more. Time-to-first reimaging varied by disease site (hazard ratios for shorter time-to-first reimaging [95% CI] vs bone: brain, 4.27 [1.46-12.50]; liver, 2.19 [1.39-3.46]; lung, 2.75 [1.66-4.57]), but was not associated with tumor subtype or baseline TM testing, regardless of test results. First reimaging was prompted by an elevation in TM in only 1.4% of cases. There was weak correlation between frequency of imaging and TM tests (r=0.33; R2 =0.11; P<.001). Discussion: Over time, we found an increased utilization of more sophisticated imaging staging techniques, such as PET/PET-CT scan, which was mostly requested in addition to other radiographic studies. CNS evaluations were frequently performed to screen asymptomatic patients. TM testing was often ordered, both at baseline and after treatment initiation. However, patterns of imaging utilization, although appropriately influenced by clinicopathologic factors such as disease site, did not appear to be impacted by TM testing. Conclusions: Studies focused on optimizing disease monitoring, including better integration of TM testing with imaging, are encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Di Meglio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts,Academic Unit of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Martino University Hospital – IST National Cancer Research Institute, Genoa, Italy
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rachel A Freedman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - William T Barry
- Department of Biostatistics & Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Eric P Winer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ines Vaz-Luis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts,Department of Medical Oncology and Unit INSERM 981, Institut Gustave Roussy, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Vaz-Luis I, Lin NU, Keating NL, Barry WT, Winer EP, Freedman RA. Factors Associated with Early Mortality Among Patients with De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study. Oncologist 2017; 22:386-393. [PMID: 28242790 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2016] [Accepted: 10/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although improvements in survival have been achieved for patients with metastatic breast cancer, some patients experience early death after diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data, we identified 26,538 patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer diagnosed between January 1, 2000 and June 30, 2011. We evaluated time trends for deaths at 1 and 6 months after diagnosis. We then restricted the cohort to patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2011 (n = 3,317), when human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 was routinely collected, and examined factors associated with early death. RESULTS In 2000, 15.9% of patients died within 1 month of diagnosis and 33.2% within 6 months. In 2011, the proportion of women dying within 1 month decreased to 13.4% and 26.3% within 6 months (p < .001). Older age and uninsured status were associated with early death (at both time points, age ≥70 [versus age <40] had >8.5 higher odds of dying, and uninsured [versus insured] patients had >2.5 higher odds of death). In addition, in some subgroups (e.g., no insurance and triple negative disease), more than half of patients died within 6 months. Region was also associated with early death. CONCLUSION Although we observed improvements in the proportion of patients experiencing early death, one quarter of patients with de novo metastatic disease diagnosed in 2011 died within 6 months of diagnosis. In addition to tumor factors and older age, geography and uninsured status were associated with early death. Our findings highlight the need for focused interventions for metastatic patients at highest risk for poor outcomes. The Oncologist 2017;22:386-393 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: With nearly one quarter of patients in our dataset diagnosed in 2011 dying within 6 months of diagnosis, our findings highlight the persistent and critical need of further characterization and identification of patients who are risk for poor outcomes in order to optimize care, impact change, and improve outcomes for all women with metastatic breast cancer. Our data also emphasize the need for interventions among those at highest risk for early death. These interventions would likely promote immediate referral for clinical trial participation, early palliative care referrals, and additional supportive services, optimizing equitable patient access to cancer treatment and care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ines Vaz-Luis
- Departments of Medical Oncology
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Nancy L Keating
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - William T Barry
- Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ventz S, Barry WT, Parmigiani G, Trippa L. Bayesian response-adaptive designs for basket trials. Biometrics 2017; 73:905-915. [PMID: 28211944 DOI: 10.1111/biom.12668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2016] [Revised: 11/01/2016] [Accepted: 01/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
We develop a general class of response-adaptive Bayesian designs using hierarchical models, and provide open source software to implement them. Our work is motivated by recent master protocols in oncology, where several treatments are investigated simultaneously in one or multiple disease types, and treatment efficacy is expected to vary across biomarker-defined subpopulations. Adaptive trials such as I-SPY-2 (Barker et al., 2009) and BATTLE (Zhou et al., 2008) are special cases within our framework. We discuss the application of our adaptive scheme to two distinct research goals. The first is to identify a biomarker subpopulation for which a therapy shows evidence of treatment efficacy, and to exclude other subpopulations for which such evidence does not exist. This leads to a subpopulation-finding design. The second is to identify, within biomarker-defined subpopulations, a set of cancer types for which an experimental therapy is superior to the standard-of-care. This goal leads to a subpopulation-stratified design. Using simulations constructed to faithfully represent ongoing cancer sequencing projects, we quantify the potential gains of our proposed designs relative to conventional non-adaptive designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steffen Ventz
- University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - William T Barry
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Giovanni Parmigiani
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lorenzo Trippa
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Stover DG, Selfors LM, Winer EP, Partridge AH, Barry WT. Abstract P1-07-05: Integrated transcriptional analysis of the triple negative 'proliferation paradox': High proliferation, chemosensitivity, and poor prognosis. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p1-07-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: In triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC), high proliferation is associated with greater chemosensitivity but, paradoxically, also associated with poor prognosis. We hypothesized that this subset of TNBC has distinct transcriptional features that contribute to poor prognosis.
Approach: To evaluate transcriptional signatures associated with this 'proliferation paradox,' we identified 17 study cohorts of TNBC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) that reported receptor status, pathologic response, and had expression data from biopsies obtained prior to NAC (n=446). In 6 studies, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) data was available for 235 patients with a median follow-up of 31.2 months. We calculated scores for 135 published gene expression signatures for each tumor and evaluated the association with response to chemotherapy and DMFS.
Results: Using recursive partitioning to develop a model of response using a training set (n=340), six of the 135 expression signatures stratify primary tumors into four groups based on signatures of proliferation, BRCA1 mutation, immune, luminal, Ras, and PI3K phenotypes (Table 1.). Response to NAC ranged from 11% to 61% pCR/RCB-I and results were highly concordant when applied to a validation set (n = 106, p = 0.006). The group that was highly proliferative but chemoresistant ('resistant' group) had a distinct transcriptional profile, including lower 'BRCA-ness' and DNA damage expression signatures with higher Ras and stem cell signatures. The 'resistant' group had the poorest DMFS (HR 2.48 [1.52-4.06]; log-rank p=0.002) and this poor survival was validated among chemotherapy-treated TNBCs in a separate dataset, METABRIC. Analyses of only patients with residual disease after NAC demonstrated that the 'resistant' group remained poorest prognosis, with median DMFS of only 31 months from diagnosis.
Conclusions: Using a novel approach to categorize primary TNBC tumors based on six signatures, we can effectively distinguish subgroups with higher versus lower pCR rates. One specific group demonstrated high proliferation but low response to chemotherapy and particularly poor survival. This group demonstrates expression signatures implicating DNA damage repair, stemness, and Ras pathway activity as potential mediators of the phenotype. We identify specific molecular characteristics for investigation in patients within a poor prognosis subgroup of TNBC.
Table 1. Proportion Pathologic Complete Response or RCB-I and Survival Low ProlifHigh Prolif / ResistantHigh Prolif / SensitiveHigh ImmuneSignature StratificationLow GGI + High LuminalHigh GGI + Low BRCA1mut or High RasHigh GGI + High PI3K or Low RasHigh TNBC ImmunepCR/RCB-I rate: Training Set11/105 (10.5%)26/127 (20.5%)42/81 (51.9%)16/27 (59.3%)pCR/RCB-I rate: Validation Set3/23 (13.0%)11/45 (24.4%)13/29 (44.8%)6/9 (66.7%)pCR/RCB-I rate: TOTAL14/128 (10.9%)37/172 (21.5%)55/110 (50.0%)22/36 (61.1%)Overall Survival (n=235)Hazard Ratio (95% CI)1.62 (0.99-2.64)2.48 (1.52-4.06)(ref.)0.47 (0.29-0.77)Signatures GGI (Sotiriou, JNCI 2006); Luminal (Lim, Nat Med 2009); BRCA1 mutation (van't Veer, Nature 2002); Ras (Pratilas, PNAS 2009); PI3K (Gatza, PNAS 2010), TNBC Immune (Lehmann, JCI 2011)
Citation Format: Stover DG, Selfors LM, Winer EP, Partridge AH, Barry WT. Integrated transcriptional analysis of the triple negative 'proliferation paradox': High proliferation, chemosensitivity, and poor prognosis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-07-05.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- DG Stover
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - LM Selfors
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - EP Winer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - AH Partridge
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - WT Barry
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|