Comparison of bivalent and monovalent SARS-CoV-2 variant vaccines: the phase 2 randomized open-label COVAIL trial

Vaccine protection against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection wanes over time, requiring updated boosters. In a phase 2, open-label, randomized clinical trial with sequentially enrolled stages at 22 US sites, we assessed safety and immunogenicity of a second boost with monovalent or bivalent variant vaccines from mRNA and protein-based platforms targeting wild-type, Beta, Delta and Omicron BA.1 spike antigens. The primary outcome was pseudovirus neutralization titers at 50% inhibitory dilution (ID50 titers) with 95% confidence intervals against different SARS-CoV-2 strains. The secondary outcome assessed safety by solicited local and systemic adverse events (AEs), unsolicited AEs, serious AEs and AEs of special interest. Boosting with prototype/wild-type vaccines produced numerically lower ID50 titers than any variant-containing vaccine against all variants. Conversely, boosting with a variant vaccine excluding prototype was not associated with decreased neutralization against D614G. Omicron BA.1 or Beta monovalent vaccines were nearly equivalent to Omicron BA.1 + prototype or Beta + prototype bivalent vaccines for neutralization of Beta, Omicron BA.1 and Omicron BA.4/5, although they were lower for contemporaneous Omicron subvariants. Safety was similar across arms and stages and comparable to previous reports. Our study shows that updated vaccines targeting Beta or Omicron BA.1 provide broadly crossprotective neutralizing antibody responses against diverse SARS-CoV-2 variants without sacrificing immunity to the ancestral strain. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT05289037 .

Bivalent and Monovalent SARS-CoV-2 Variant Vaccine Boosters Improve coverage of the known Antigenic Landscape: Results of the COVID-19 Variant Immunologic Landscape (COVAIL) Trial

Vaccine protection against COVID-19 wanes over time and has been impacted by the emergence of new variants with increasing escape of neutralization. The COVID-19 Variant Immunologic Landscape (COVAIL) randomized clinical trial (clinicaltrials.gov NCT05289037) compares the breadth, magnitude and durability of antibody responses induced by a second COVID-19 vaccine boost with mRNA (Moderna mRNA-1273 and Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2), or adjuvanted recombinant protein (Sanofi CoV2 preS DTM-AS03) monovalent or bivalent vaccine candidates targeting ancestral and variant SARS-CoV-2 spike antigens (Beta, Delta and Omicron BA.1). We found that boosting with a variant strain is not associated with loss in neutralization against the ancestral strain. However, while variant vaccines compared to the prototype/wildtype vaccines demonstrated higher neutralizing activity against Omicron BA.1 and BA.4/5 subvariants for up to 3 months after vaccination, neutralizing activity was lower for more recent Omicron subvariants. Our study, incorporating both antigenic distances and serologic landscapes, can provide a framework for objectively guiding decisions for future vaccine updates.

SARS-CoV-2 Variant Vaccine Boosters Trial: Preliminary Analyses

Background

Protection from SARS-CoV-2 vaccines wanes over time and is compounded by emerging variants including Omicron subvariants. This study evaluated safety and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 variant vaccines.

Methods

This phase 2 open-label, randomized trial enrolled healthy adults previously vaccinated with a SARS-CoV-2 primary series and a single boost. Eligible participants were randomized to one of six Moderna COVID19 mRNA vaccine arms (50µg dose): Prototype (mRNA-1273), Omicron BA.1+Beta (1 or 2 doses), Omicron BA.1+Delta, Omicron BA.1 monovalent, and Omicron BA.1+Prototype. Neutralization antibody titers (ID 50 ) were assessed for D614G, Delta, Beta and Omicron BA.1 variants and Omicron BA.2.12.1 and BA.4/BA.5 subvariants 15 days after vaccination.

Results

From March 30 to May 6, 2022, 597 participants were randomized and vaccinated. Median age was 53 years, and 20% had a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. All vaccines were safe and well-tolerated. Day 15 geometric mean titers (GMT) against D614G were similar across arms and ages, and higher with prior infection. For uninfected participants, Day 15 Omicron BA.1 GMTs were similar across Omicron-containing vaccine arms (3724-4561) and higher than Prototype (1,997 [95%CI:1,482-2,692]). The Omicron BA.1 monovalent and Omicron BA.1+Prototype vaccines induced a geometric mean ratio (GMR) to Prototype for Omicron BA.1 of 2.03 (97.5%CI:1.37-3.00) and 1.56 (97.5%CI:1.06-2.31), respectively. A subset of samples from uninfected participants in four arms were also tested in a different laboratory at Day 15 for neutralizing antibody titers to D614G and Omicron subvariants BA.1, BA.2.12.2 and BA.4/BA.5. Omicron BA.4/BA.5 GMTs were approximately one third BA.1 GMTs (Prototype 517 [95%CI:324-826] vs. 1503 [95%CI:949-2381]; Omicron BA.1+Beta 628 [95%CI:367-1,074] vs. 2125 [95%CI:1139-3965]; Omicron BA.1+Delta 765 [95%CI:443-1,322] vs. 2242 [95%CI:1218-4128] and Omicron BA.1+Prototype 635 [95%CI:447-903] vs. 1972 [95%CI:1337-2907).

Conclusions

Higher Omicron BA.1 titers were observed with Omicron-containing vaccines compared to Prototype vaccine and titers against Omicron BA.4/BA.5 were lower than against BA.1 for all candidate vaccines.

Clinicaltrialsgov

NCT05289037.

Chronic Granulomatous Disease: an Updated Experience, with Emphasis on Newly Recognized Features

Purpose

Chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) is an uncommon, inborn error of immunity. We updated our large, single-center US experience with CGD and describe some newly recognized features.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 26 patients seen from November 2013 to December 2019. Serious infections required intravenous antibiotics or hospitalization.

Results

There were 21 males and 5 females. The most frequent infectious agents at presentation were aspergillus (4), serratia (4), burkholderia (2), Staphylococcus aureus (2), and klebsiella (2). The most common serious infections at presentation were pneumonia (6), lymphadenitis (6), and skin abscess (3). Our serious infection rate was 0.2 per patient-year from December 2013 through November 2019, down from 0.62 per patient-year from the previous study period (March 1985–November 2013). In the last 6 years, four patients were evaluated for human stem cell transplantation, two were successfully transplanted, and we had no deaths. Several patients had unusual infections or autoimmune manifestations of disease, such as pneumocystis pneumonia, basidiomycete/phellinus fungal pneumonia, and retinitis pigmentosa. We included one carrier female with unfavorable Lyonization in our cohort.

Conclusion

We update of a large US single-center experience with CGD and describe some recently identified features of the illness.

Opportunities for Antimicrobial Stewardship Among Pediatric Patients Prescribed Combination Antifungal Therapy

OBJECTIVE

Combination antifungal therapy (CAF) may be prescribed to treat invasive fungal infections (IFIs). Data on the incidence of CAF among the pediatric population are limited. Antimicrobial stewardship for CAF includes therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and monitoring for adverse events. Primary outcome was to determine the incidence of CAF prescribed for documented proven, probable, and possible IFI. Secondary outcomes were to determine initial dose of antifungal therapy, determine incidence of adverse events, and evaluate our practice of TDM.

METHODS

Medical charts of patients who received CAF for proven, probable, or possible IFI within 6 years were reviewed. Patients age ≤18 years, prescribed CAF (defined as a second antifungal therapy started ≤72 hours of initial antifungal therapy) for at least 72 hours, and with normal liver function test results were included.

RESULTS

57 patients received CAF for 72 separate episodes: 35 episodes were proven IFI, 11 were probable IFI, and 26 were possible IFI. Initial dose of antifungal therapy varied, and 29.1% received a loading dose. A total of 10 patients experienced 14 adverse events that were related to antifungal therapy. In 63.8% of CAF episodes, TDM was conducted. Target antifungal concentrations were documented for 10 CAF episodes. Reason for discontinued of CAF was documented for 35 episodes. Of these episodes, 74% were discontinued after therapeutic antifungal concentrations were achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

There are opportunities for antimicrobial stewardship interventions in the method of TDM and monitoring for adverse events that could aid in management of CAF.

1127. Utilization of Combination Anti-fungal Therapy in Hospitalized Children and Adverse Events

Background

Combination antifungal therapy (CAF) is often prescribed to treat invasive fungal infections, despite equivocal data showing benefit. We evaluated number of CAF for treatment of proven, probable and possible invasive fungal infection (IFI) in hospitalized children, associated adverse effects (AE), and use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM).

Methods

Medical charts of patients ≤ 18 years old that received CAF for ≥72 hours with normal liver function test between 1/1/13 through December 31/18 were reviewed. Patients could be included for multiple episodes of CAF. Data included primary site of IFI, host risk factors, demonstration of fungal elements in tissue/sterile sites, clinical and mycological criteria for IFI (defined by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group), CAF regimen, incidence of TDM, and AE.

Results

Overall, 73 episodes of IFI were reviewed [unique patients (n) =60]. The median age was 10 years. Majority (61.6%) of patients were diagnosed with a hematological malignancy (n = 20 acute lymphoblastic leukemia, n = 12 acute myeloid leukemia, n = 5 aplastic anemia). A number of proven, possible, probable IFI were 36, 27 and 20, respectively (Table 1). Most frequent organism isolated in proven IFI was Aspergillus fumigatus (episodes=5, n = 4). Most common primary site of IFI was pulmonary (episodes=32, n = 27). Median days of CAF was 6.8 (range: 3–170). Sixty-six episodes included treatment with a triazole-containing regimen (90%). TDM was conducted in 51 (77%) episodes of triazole-containing regimens. AE were reported in 14 episodes (n = 10) (infusion-related reactions and nephrotoxicity reported in 4 episodes each, electrolyte abnormalities and skin reaction reported in 2 episodes each, and liver dysfunction and hypersensitivity reported in 1 episode each).

Conclusion

Patients diagnosed with proven or probable IFI received a longer duration of CAF in comparison to possible IFI. Voriconazole was frequently prescribed in combination with either micafungin or liposomal amphotericin B for IFI. Antifungal stewardship opportunities exist to improve TDM and reduce the incidence of AE when prescribing CAF.

Disclosures

All authors: No reported disclosures

265. Clinical Epidemiology of Invasive Fungal Infection with Aspergillus and Mucor Species in a Tertiary Children’s Hospital

Background

Patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and patients with hematologic malignancies are at increased risk for acquiring invasive fungal infection (IFI) due to immune system impairment from chemotherapy. Affected patients require prolonged antifungal therapy with the risk of associated toxicity and extended hospitalization due to delay of accurate diagnosis. There is a lack of effective serologic biomarkers and hesitancy to proceed with tissue diagnosis due to thrombocytopenia or other associated risks. Mortality in oncology patients with invasive mycoses is high, with pediatric mortality rates of 30–40% at 12 weeks following diagnosis.

Methods

All patients that were admitted to Lurie Children’s Hospital between January 2014 and December 2018 and received voriconazole, ambisome, posaconazole and isavuconazole were identified. The following data were retrospectively collected: CT chest and sinus, (1,3)-β-d-Glucan and Aspergillus galactomannan, ANC and ALC at diagnosis, blood next-generation sequencing, tissue 18s rRNA, fungal culture, duration of neutropenia and lymphopenia, site of infection, time between underlying diagnosis and development of IFI, surgical intervention and associated mortality.

Results

A total of 94 unique patients that received voriconazole were identified. There were 8 proven cases of invasive Aspergillus infection the past 5 years, 50% male, mean age 14 years. Only 25% of patients had positive serum Aspergillus galactomannan and 37.5% had positive β-d-Glucan. Seven cases were due to Aspergillus fumigatus and one case was due to Aspergillus flavus. There were 9 patients with mucormycosis and all but one were culture positive. Three patients with Mucor had mold identification in blood next-generation sequencing prior to surgery. Mucor associated mortality was 22.2%.

Conclusion

The majority of pediatric patients with invasive aspergillosis did not have characteristic chest CT imaging findings and serum Aspergillus galactomannan was usually negative.The was no associated mortality in invasive Aspergillus cases, whereas the mortality rate of invasive mucormycosis was 22.2%. Although we have a small sample size, this is significantly lower compared with published literature.

Disclosures

All authors: No reported disclosures.

Mixed viral infections of the respiratory tract; an epidemiological study during consecutive winter seasons

The current study aimed to describe the molecular epidemiology of mixed respiratory viral infections during consecutive winter seasons in a tertiary care hospital. Patients with symptoms of respiratory tract infection were evaluated during the 2009‐2011 and 2013‐15 winter seasons. A clinical microarray technique was used for viral detection. Clinical and epidemiological data were correlated with mixed viral detection and the need for hospitalization. In 332 out of 604 (54.4%) evaluated patients (17.6% children) a respiratory virus was identified. Mixed viral infections were diagnosed in 68/332 (20.5%) patients with virus detection (66.2% mixed Influenza‐RSV infections). Mixed viral infections were more commonly detected in children (OR 3.7; 95%CI 1.9‐5.6, P < 0.01) and patients with comorbidities. In logistic regression analyses, mixed viral infections were associated with younger age (mean age 30.4 years vs. 41.8 years, P ≤ 0.001) and increased rates of fever (OR: 2.7; 95%CI 1.04‐7.2, P < 0.05) but no adverse outcomes or increased rates of hospitalization. High rates of mixed viral infections were noted during all winter seasons (especially Influenza and RSV) and were more common in younger patients. The clinical significance of mixed respiratory viral infection needs further elucidation.

A Case of Adenovirus Viremia in a Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipient With Neutropenia and Lymphopenia: Who and When Should We Treat?

Human adenovirus (HAdV) is one of the most feared infections among immunocompromised patients. In particular, in liver transplant patients, HAdV has been implicated in acute liver failure with resultant mortality. The development of current molecular techniques and surveillance testing protocols have provided tools for early detection of HAdV infection, prior to or at the early onset of HAdV disease. Although reduction in immune suppression is the mainstay of therapy, many researchers have also advocated for early administration of antiviral therapy. In multiple reports, cidofovir treatment has been associated with declines in HAdV viral loads or clinical improvement in solid organ and bone marrow transplant recipients. However, there have also been case reports that raise questions about the effectiveness of antiviral therapy in controlling systemic HAdV disease. We report a case of a 26-month-old male recipient of a liver transplantation for hepatoblastoma who developed adenoviremia with an associated hepatitis and gastroenteritis. He recovered with reduced immune suppression but without antiviral therapy, thus avoiding potential toxicities associated with cidofovir therapy. This case a contrast to previous reports, and it highlights the ambiguity regarding which patients should receive HAdV-specific antiviral therapy. Additional knowledge regarding specific pediatric host factors and HAdV factors that predict poor outcomes are needed. Such information would allow clinicians to better stratify patients by risk at the time of adenoviremia detection so that low-risk patients are not unnecessarily exposed to medications with potential toxicities.

Identification of a novel intertypic recombinant species D human adenovirus in a pediatric stem cell transplant recipient

BACKGROUND

Human adenoviruses (HAdV) are known opportunistic pathogens in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (SCT) recipients. The detection of HAdV infection in children after SCT has been implicated as a determinant of poor outcome but specific associations between HAdV species or individual HAdV types and disease are poorly understood.

OBJECTIVES

Characterization of a HAdV-D strain isolated from multiple clinical specimens of an 11-year-old female recipient of a matched unrelated donor peripheral SCT for T-cell lymphoma and case report.

STUDY DESIGN

Archived HAdV PCR-positive plasma, urine, and stool specimens were processed for virus isolation and detailed molecular typing. Complete genomic sequencing was carried out on 2 isolates.

RESULTS

The patient tested positive for HAdV DNA by real-time PCR of a stool specimen at 44 days after initiation of a SCT conditioning regimen. In the subsequent 3 months, HAdV was detected in plasma, urine and stool specimens in association with symptoms of gastroenteritis and hemorrhagic cystitis. A novel HAdV-D with a HAdV20-like hexon gene was isolated from both urine and stool specimens. All isolates yielded identical restriction profiles with endonucleases BamHI, BglII, BstEII, HindIII, PstI and SmaI. Analysis of 2 complete genomic sequences further identified the virus as a novel intertypic recombinant HAdV-D (P20/H20/F42) closely related to HAdV42.

CONCLUSIONS

This case highlights the identification of a previously unknown HAdV-D from an immunocompromised host. In this patient, the course of adenovirus infection is compatible with reactivation of a latent virus or a primary opportunistic infection. Adenoviremia in this patient resolved without definitive adenovirus-directed antiviral therapy.