1
|
Coleman-Cowger VH, Mark KS, Rosenberry ZR, Koszowski B, Terplan M. A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Phone-based Intervention for Smoking Cessation and Relapse Prevention in the Postpartum Period. J Addict Med 2019; 12:193-200. [PMID: 29351139 PMCID: PMC5970014 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000000385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To pilot-test a Phone-based Postpartum Continuing Care (PPCC) protocol developed from existing evidence-based approaches to address both postpartum smoking relapse among low-income women who quit smoking during pregnancy and postpartum smoking increase among those who had cut down. METHODS One hundred thirty low-income pregnant women who were current or recently quit tobacco smokers were recruited at their first prenatal appointment and randomized to either a Control (standard care) or Experimental (standard care + PPCC) group. An intent-to-treat analysis was conducted on biochemically verified data from 6 in-person interviews during pregnancy and postpartum. Feasibility with regard to recruitment, randomization, assessment, and implementation of PPCC were assessed, along with acceptability among the target population. RESULTS PPCC was found to be feasible and acceptable to some participants, but not all. There were no significant differences in tobacco products per day at 6 months postpartum between groups; however, effect sizes differed at 6 weeks compared with 6 months postpartum. Similarly, there were no significant differences between groups in cessation rate (24% in each group) and past 90-day tobacco use (59 vs 55 days, for Control and Experimental groups, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The PPCC intervention did not differentially reduce tobacco use postpartum compared with a controlled comparison group, though it was found to be acceptable among a subpopulation of low-income pregnant women and feasible with regard to recruitment, randomization, assessment procedures, and implementation. Further research is needed to identify an intervention that significantly improves smoking relapse rates postpartum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Katrina S. Mark
- University of Maryland Baltimore, 11 S Paca Street, Suite 40, Baltimore, MD 21201
| | - Zachary R. Rosenberry
- Battelle Public Health Center for Tobacco Research, 6115 Falls Road, Suite 200, Baltimore, MD 21209
| | - Bartosz Koszowski
- Battelle Public Health Center for Tobacco Research, 6115 Falls Road, Suite 200, Baltimore, MD 21209
| | - Mishka Terplan
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Box 980034 Richmond VA 23298
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schauer GL, Peters EN, Rosenberry ZR, Kim H. Trends in and Characteristics of Marijuana and Menthol Cigarette Use Among Current Cigarette Smokers, 2005-2014. Nicotine Tob Res 2019; 20:362-369. [PMID: 28064202 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntw394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2016] [Accepted: 12/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Given increasing co-marijuana and tobacco use in the United States, this study aimed to explore the overlap between menthol cigarette use (MCU) and marijuana. Methods Data came from past month US cigarette smokers 12 years and older responding to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health between 2005 and 2014 (N = 51 500). Prevalence, demographics and substance use characteristics from 2013 to 2014 were assessed across four groups, based on past month marijuana and tobacco use: cigarette smokers with marijuana and MCU, with marijuana but no MCU, with no marijuana but MCU, and with use of neither. Multivariable logistic regression explored the relationship between MCU, marijuana, and dependence. Linear and quadratic trends were assessed using logistic regression with orthogonal polynomials. Results Past month marijuana/MCU among cigarette smokers was 8.3% in 2013-2014. Overall, marijuana/MCU was significantly higher among blacks versus whites (20.8% vs. 5.8%, p < .0001), though among 12-25 year olds, prevalence was significantly higher among whites versus blacks (6.3% vs. 0.9% for 12-17-year-olds; 39.2% vs. 26.8% for 18-25-year-olds). Marijuana/MCU increased significantly between 2005 and 2014 overall, and among whites and blacks. No adjusted associations were found between marijuana, MCU and nicotine or marijuana dependence. Conclusions Past month marijuana/MCU among cigarette smokers is increasing in the United States, with specific racial and age-based disparities. Research about the implications of consuming both marijuana and menthol, and the potential overlap in consumption of flavors across the products is warranted to better inform future preventive and treatment approaches. Implications This is the first study to assess the overlap between MCU and marijuana use among a nationally representative sample of US current smokers ages 12 and older. Findings from this study suggest that past month marijuana and menthol use among cigarette smokers is increasing in the United States, with specific racial/ethnic and age-based disparities. More research about the implications of consuming both marijuana and menthol, and the potential overlap in consumption of flavors in marijuana and tobacco products is warranted to better understand what preventive and treatment approaches may be needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian L Schauer
- Health Services Department, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Erica N Peters
- Battelle Public Health Center for Tobacco Research, Battelle Memorial Institute, Baltimore, MD and Seattle, WA.,Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.,Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Zachary R Rosenberry
- Battelle Public Health Center for Tobacco Research, Battelle Memorial Institute, Baltimore, MD and Seattle, WA
| | - Hyoshin Kim
- Battelle Public Health Center for Tobacco Research, Battelle Memorial Institute, Baltimore, MD and Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Herrmann ES, Jarvis BP, Sparks AC, Cohn AM, Koszowski B, Rosenberry ZR, Coleman-Cowger VH, Pickworth WB, Peters EN. Sweet flowers are slow, and weeds make haste: leveraging methodology from research on tobacco, alcohol, and opioid analgesics to make rapid and policy-relevant advances in cannabis science. Int Rev Psychiatry 2018; 30:238-250. [PMID: 30179535 PMCID: PMC6396691 DOI: 10.1080/09540261.2018.1465400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The legalization of medical and recreational cannabis use has occurred ahead of science. The current evidence base has poor utility for determining if cannabis products can meet the standards of safety, efficacy, and quality intrinsic to modern medicine, and for informing regulation of cannabis as a legal intoxicant. Individual jurisdictions that pass cannabis reforms may not have adequate resources to support the level of new scientific research needed to inform regulatory actions; this could make it difficult to keep a rapidly growing multi-billion-dollar cannabis industry in check. Further, the present lack of evidence-based regulatory oversight for cannabis parallels the climates that gave rise to the tobacco and prescription opioid epidemics, suggesting that continued omission may result in negative public health consequences. However, translating a methodological framework developed through research on these compounds may promote rapid advances in cannabis science germane to regulatory knowledge gaps. The present review highlights specific advancements in these areas, as well as in alcohol regulation, that are prime for informing policy-relevant cannabis science, and also offers some recommendations for evidence-based regulatory policy. Resulting progress may directly inform both regulation of cannabis in both medical and licit recreational drug frameworks, and new cannabis-related public health initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan S. Herrmann
- Individual and Population Health, Battelle, Baltimore, MD, USA,CONTACT: Evan S. Herrmann Individual and Population Health, Battelle, Baltimore, MD, 21209, USA[TQ1]
| | | | | | - Amy M. Cohn
- Individual and Population Health, Battelle, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Erica N. Peters
- Individual and Population Health, Battelle, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pickworth WB, Rosenberry ZR, Yi D, Pitts EN, Lord-Adem W, Koszowski B. Cigarillo and Little Cigar Mainstream Smoke Constituents from Replicated Human Smoking. Chem Res Toxicol 2018; 31:251-258. [PMID: 29582659 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.7b00312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Little cigar and cigarillo smoking is increasing in popularity in the U.S., but little is known about the topography and mainstream smoke (MSS) constituents of these types of cigar products. This report describes the quantity of selected MSS toxicants generated from puff-by-puff replication of human laboratory smoking. Participants were dual users of cigarettes and either little cigars ( n = 21) or cigarillos ( n = 23). In the laboratory smoking session, participants of the little cigar group smoked a filtered unflavored Winchester Little Cigar; those in the cigarillo group smoked an unfiltered, unflavored Black & Mild cigarillo. MSS components included both volatiles and semivolatile compounds. The MSS of five representative U.S. domestic cigarettes was generated using smoking topography profiles of the participants smoking their own brand of cigarettes. Machine smoking accurately replicated individual puff profiles as indicated by a high correlation between lab and machine smoked: time to smoke, number of puffs, and total puff volume. There was wide variability in smoking patterns across subjects of both little cigars and cigarillos. For example, total puff volume ranged from 84 to 732 mL after the little cigar and from 270 to 2089 mL after the cigarillo. Qualitatively, cigar smoke from little cigars and cigarillos were similar and resembles cigarette smoke. All analytes (VOC and SVOCs) were greater in cigarillo smoke compared to that of little cigars and cigarettes. However, when the toxicants were adjusted for grams of tobacco burned, little cigar smoke contained more nicotine, tobacco-specific nitrosamines, acetonitrile, and acrylonitrile compared with cigarillo smoke. When the constituents were adjusted for nicotine content, cigarillo MSS contained more of all toxicants compared with little cigar. Cigarillos and little cigars, like cigarettes, deliver nicotine and other toxicants known to be harmful to health; their regulation by the FDA is appropriate for their public health risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wallace B Pickworth
- Battelle Memorial Institute, Public Health Center for Tobacco Research, 6115 Falls Road Suite 200 , Baltimore , Maryland 21209 , United States
| | - Zachary R Rosenberry
- Battelle Memorial Institute, Public Health Center for Tobacco Research, 6115 Falls Road Suite 200 , Baltimore , Maryland 21209 , United States
| | - Daniel Yi
- University of Maryland School of Pharmacy , 20 North Pine Street , Baltimore , Maryland 21201 , United States
| | - Emily N Pitts
- Notre Dame of Maryland University School of Pharmacy , 4701 North Charles Street , Baltimore , Maryland 21210 , United States
| | - Wilhelmina Lord-Adem
- University of Maryland School of Pharmacy , 20 North Pine Street , Baltimore , Maryland 21201 , United States
| | - Bartosz Koszowski
- Battelle Memorial Institute, Public Health Center for Tobacco Research, 6115 Falls Road Suite 200 , Baltimore , Maryland 21209 , United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rosenberry ZR, Pickworth WB, Koszowski B. Large Cigars: Smoking Topography and Toxicant Exposure. Nicotine Tob Res 2018; 20:183-191. [PMID: 27798089 PMCID: PMC5896453 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntw289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2016] [Accepted: 10/19/2016] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Background Cigar smoking in the United States continues despite decreases in cigarette smoking and increased tobacco control efforts. We compared large cigar and cigarette smoking for use patterns, smoking topography, and toxicant exposure. Methods Dual users (n = 17, 94% men, 77% African American) smoked ad libitum either their usual cigarette brand or a study large cigar (Phillies Blunt) in two laboratory sessions. Plasma nicotine and exhaled carbon monoxide were collected before and after smoking. Smoking topography measures of puff volume, puff duration, puff velocity, and interpuff interval were also collected. Results Both cigarettes and large cigars significantly increased plasma nicotine and carbon monoxide and significantly decreased the urge to smoke. Cigarettes delivered more nicotine per gram of tobacco smoked and per 1000 mL of puff volume. Number of puffs, time to smoke, puff volume, and puff velocity were significantly larger and interpuff interval was significantly shorter in large cigar smoking. The temporal pattern of puffing more intensely at the beginning of smoking was similar for both large cigars and cigarettes. Conclusions People who regularly use both large cigars and cigarettes adapt their smoking pattern such that they are exposed to similar levels of nicotine from each product. The immediate increase in plasma nicotine and carbon monoxide suggest significant inhalation of large cigar smoke. These data call to question the assumption that cigar smoking is less toxic than cigarette smoking. By smoking large cigars, dual users expose themselves to toxic components that have been linked with the addiction risk, morbidity, and mortality of cigarette smoking. Implications This study found that dual users of large cigars and cigarettes inhale significant quantities of carbon monoxide, nicotine, and presumably other components of mainstream smoke. Large cigar smoke exposure may lead to or sustain nicotine addiction as wells as subject large cigar consumers to similar risks associated with cigarette smoking such as lung cancer and cardiovascular disease.
Collapse
|
6
|
Peters EN, Rosenberry ZR, Schauer GL, O'Grady KE, Johnson PS. Marijuana and tobacco cigarettes: Estimating their behavioral economic relationship using purchasing tasks. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2017; 25:208-215. [PMID: 28437124 DOI: 10.1037/pha0000122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Although marijuana and tobacco are commonly coused, the nature of their relationship has not been fully elucidated. Behavioral economics has characterized the relationship between concurrently available commodities but has not been applied to marijuana and tobacco couse. U.S. adults ≥18 years who coused marijuana and tobacco cigarettes were recruited via Mechanical Turk, a crowdsourcing service by Amazon. Participants (N = 82) completed online purchasing tasks assessing hypothetical marijuana or tobacco cigarette puff consumption across a range of per-puff prices; 2 single-commodity tasks assessed these when only 1 commodity was available, and 2 cross-commodity tasks assessed these in the presence of a concurrently available fixed-price commodity. Purchasing tasks generated measures of demand elasticity, that is, sensitivity of consumption to prices. In single-commodity tasks, consumption of tobacco cigarette puffs (elasticity of demand: α = 0.0075; 95% confidence interval [0.0066, 0.0085], R² = 0.72) and of marijuana puffs (α = .0044; 95% confidence interval [0.0038, 0.0049], R² = 0.71) declined significantly with increases in price per puff. In cross-commodity tasks when both tobacco cigarette puffs and marijuana puffs were available, demand for 1 commodity was independent of price increases in the other commodity (ps > .05). Results revealed that, in this small sample, marijuana and tobacco cigarettes did not substitute for each other and did not complement each other; instead, they were independent of each other. These preliminary results can inform future studies assessing the economic relationship between tobacco and marijuana in the quickly changing policy climate in the United States. (PsycINFO Database Record
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gillian L Schauer
- Department of Health Services, University of Washington School of Public Health
| | - Kevin E O'Grady
- Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schauer GL, Rosenberry ZR, Peters EN. Marijuana and tobacco co-administration in blunts, spliffs, and mulled cigarettes: A systematic literature review. Addict Behav 2017; 64:200-211. [PMID: 27654966 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2016] [Revised: 09/02/2016] [Accepted: 09/06/2016] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Blunts and spliffs/mulled cigarettes combine marijuana and tobacco for co-administration (use at the same time, in the same product). Co-administration of marijuana and tobacco presents significant potential for nicotine exposure, and may lead to exclusive tobacco use patterns, nicotine addiction, and compounded health effects. No review articles have summarized the number and nature of studies published on these co-administered products. METHODS Keywords "(blunt* OR spliff OR mull* OR joint) AND (tobacco OR smok* OR cigarette) AND (cannabis OR marijuana OR hashish)" were searched in the published literature. A total of 220 articles were considered for inclusion, 49 were reviewed by two independent qualitative coders, and 45 were included in this review. RESULTS Of the 45 articles, most (n=27) of studies were observational or descriptive; ten were qualitative, five employed causal designs, and three were mixed methods. A majority of the studies assessed blunts; only 11 studies assessed spliffs/mulled cigarettes. Many studies focused on sub-populations of youth, males, and African Americans. Use of co-administered marijuana and tobacco products was associated with several indicators of problematic use patterns, including perceptions of less risk, dependence on nicotine and marijuana, and greater subjective effects related to marijuana. CONCLUSIONS Literature on marijuana and tobacco co-administration comes largely from qualitative and observational/descriptive studies. In addition to continued surveillance, experimental research that directly assesses the smoking patterns of co-administered marijuana and tobacco products as compared with to those of marijuana and tobacco only products is needed to determine the potential long-term health consequences of using blunts, spliffs, or other co-administered products.
Collapse
|
8
|
Peters EN, Schauer GL, Rosenberry ZR, Pickworth WB. Does marijuana "blunt" smoking contribute to nicotine exposure?: Preliminary product testing of nicotine content in wrappers of cigars commonly used for blunt smoking. Drug Alcohol Depend 2016; 168:119-122. [PMID: 27639129 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2016] [Revised: 09/06/2016] [Accepted: 09/06/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION An increasingly popular method of consuming marijuana is through the smoking of "blunts," cigar products in which some or all of the tobacco filler is removed and repacked with marijuana. Even if all tobacco filler is removed from the cigar product in the process of making blunts, nicotine may be present in the wrapper of the cigar product. This preliminary analysis quantified the nicotine content in wrappers of cigar products commonly used for blunt smoking. METHODS Five cigar products (3 large cigars, 2 cigarillos) were tested, yielding physical characteristics of cigar length, diameter, weight, and wrapper weight. Nicotine concentration in the wrapper of each cigar product was analyzed via gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Total nicotine content in the wrapper of each cigar product was computed as the product of cigar wrapper weight and nicotine concentration in wrapper. RESULTS Depending on the product, the cigar wrapper contributed between 8 and 18% of the weight of the entire cigar article. Total nicotine content in the cigar wrapper ranged from 1.2 to 6.0mg per cigar. DISCUSSION All 5 tested cigar products had wrappers that contain quantifiable levels of nicotine, indicating that users of blunts may expose themselves to some degree of nicotine, the addictive component of tobacco. Future experimental studies that examine the efficiency of nicotine delivery from typical blunt smoking, as well as surveillance studies that quantify the number of blunts smoked by an individual per day, are needed to evaluate the contribution of blunt smoking to nicotine dependence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica N Peters
- Battelle Public Health Center for Tobacco Research, Battelle Memorial Institute, 6115 Falls Road, Suite 200, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Gillian L Schauer
- Battelle Public Health Center for Tobacco Research, Battelle Memorial Institute, 1100 Dexter Avenue North, Suite 400, Seattle, WA 98109-3598, USA; Health Services Department, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Zachary R Rosenberry
- Battelle Public Health Center for Tobacco Research, Battelle Memorial Institute, 6115 Falls Road, Suite 200, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Wallace B Pickworth
- Battelle Public Health Center for Tobacco Research, Battelle Memorial Institute, 6115 Falls Road, Suite 200, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare pregnant women who are current smokers at their first prenatal visit with those who recently quit smoking in the 90 days prior to their first prenatal visit (i.e., spontaneous quitters) to identify differences between them and factors that predict their intake smoking status. METHODS One hundred and thirty participants were enrolled in this cross-sectional research study. The sample was drawn from a population of pregnant women attending their first prenatal visit at a low-income obstetrics clinic in Baltimore, Maryland; the large majority of which have characteristics that previous research has identified as putting them at high-risk of continued smoking during pregnancy. Participants were recruited through referrals from clinical staff. Intake data collection occurred between March and December, 2013. RESULTS Of the 130 pregnant women enrolled in the study, 126 had complete intake data. The sample included 86 current smokers and 40 recent quitters. The large majority of participants were African American with an average age of 26. Current smokers were significantly more likely than recent quitters to have: more depression symptoms; self-perceived stress; internalizing and externalizing disorder symptoms; substance use disorders; and tobacco dependence. The most significant predictors of smoking status at first prenatal visit were depressive symptoms, readiness to quit, and number of children. CONCLUSIONS for Practice Differences were identified at intake among this sample of pregnant women already considered to be at high-risk for continued smoking throughout their pregnancy. This study identified relevant factors associated with whether or not a woman had recently quit smoking in early pregnancy or was continuing to smoke at her first prenatal visit. Knowledge of these factors may benefit physicians in understanding and promoting smoking cessation throughout the perinatal period and specifically intervening to decrease depressive symptoms and increasing readiness to quit may improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria H Coleman-Cowger
- The Battelle Public Health Center for Tobacco Research, Battelle Memorial Institute, 6115 Falls Road, Suite 200, Baltimore, MD, 21209, USA.
| | - Bartosz Koszowski
- The Battelle Public Health Center for Tobacco Research, Battelle Memorial Institute, 6115 Falls Road, Suite 200, Baltimore, MD, 21209, USA
| | - Zachary R Rosenberry
- The Battelle Public Health Center for Tobacco Research, Battelle Memorial Institute, 6115 Falls Road, Suite 200, Baltimore, MD, 21209, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pickworth WB, Rosenberry ZR, Koszowski B. Toxicant exposure from smoking a little cigar: further support for product regulation. Tob Control 2016; 26:269-276. [DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2015] [Accepted: 03/31/2016] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|
11
|
Koszowski B, Rosenberry ZR, Kanu A, Viray LC, Potts JL, Pickworth WB. Nicotine and carbon monoxide exposure from inhalation of cigarillo smoke. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2015; 139:7-14. [PMID: 26459155 DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2015.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2015] [Revised: 09/24/2015] [Accepted: 10/08/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been an increase in the use of cigarillos in the US. People who smoke cigarillos typically also regularly smoke cigarettes (dual users). METHODS We compared puffing topography, biomarkers of acute exposure [exhaled carbon monoxide (COex) and plasma nicotine] and physiologic effects from usual brand cigarette and Black & Mild cigarillo smoking in dual users (N=23) in two laboratory sessions. RESULTS Participants (21 men) smoked an average of 17.5cigarettes/day. Cigarillo consumption varied widely from as few as 1/week to daily. Participants were highly nicotine dependent (average FTND score: 6.3). There were statistically significant differences in smoking behavior between cigarette and cigarillo smoking in time to smoke, number of puffs, and total puff volume (all P<0.001). Average puff duration, interpuff interval average puff volume, and puff velocity did not differ between cigarettes and cigarillos. Nicotine boost was similar after both cigarettes and cigarillos. COex boost was significantly greater after cigarillo smoking compared to cigarette smoking (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The smoking pattern and exposure profile indicate that dual users inhale cigarillo smoke just as they inhale cigarette smoke thereby exposing themselves to considerable amounts of nicotine and other components of tobacco smoke. COex exposure results imply that cigarillo smoking may be associated with higher exposure to smoke-delivered volatile components of mainstream cigarillo smoke including carcinogens when compared to cigarettes. IMPACT The findings that cigarillos and cigarettes are smoked similarly in dual users are relevant to health and regulatory considerations on cigar products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bartosz Koszowski
- Battelle Memorial Institute, Battelle Public Health Center for Tobacco Research, Baltimore, MD, United States.
| | - Zachary R Rosenberry
- Battelle Memorial Institute, Battelle Public Health Center for Tobacco Research, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Alieu Kanu
- Battelle Memorial Institute, Battelle Public Health Center for Tobacco Research, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Lauren C Viray
- Battelle Memorial Institute, Battelle Public Health Center for Tobacco Research, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Jennifer L Potts
- Battelle Memorial Institute, Battelle Public Health Center for Tobacco Research, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Wallace B Pickworth
- Battelle Memorial Institute, Battelle Public Health Center for Tobacco Research, Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Koszowski B, Rosenberry ZR, Strasser AA, Pickworth WB. Experimentally Switching from Factory Made to Self-Made Cigarettes: A Preliminary Study of Perceptions, Toxicant Exposure and Smoking Behavior. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2014; 5:179. [PMID: 25419477 DOI: 10.4172/2155-6105.1000179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is currently the potential for a great deal of transition and product switching among cigarette smokers. Studies on the transition when cigarette smokers switch from one type of nicotine delivery product to another are needed to understand subsequent toxicant exposure. METHODS A preliminary study was performed to determine the feasibility of experimentally replicating the transition from factory made (FM) to personal machine made (PMM) cigarette smoking. The adaptability and perceptions of the consumer and the consequent exposure to cigarette-delivered toxins were assessed. Six adults (4 men) were recruited for four laboratory visits (V1-V4) on study days 1, 5, 10 and 15, respectively. All of the participants agreed to switch from exclusive FM smoking to exclusive PMM cigarette smoking for the duration of the study. RESULTS Compliance was very high among these participants. Participants progressively accepted the PMM cigarettes and became efficient producers of PMMs as evidenced in the reduced time to make 5 PMMs in the laboratory. Participants reported a preference for FM at visit 2 (V2), but had stated no preference by the fourth visit. Compared to the FMs, the PMMs at V3 (p<0.05) and V4 (p<0.10) had lower CO boost (7.3 vs. 4.1 ppm; p<0.05). Over all conditions, nicotine plasma levels averaged 18.0±2.4 ng/ml before smoking (for both FM and PMM) and 34.0±5.3 ng/mL after smoking; there were no significant differences in the plasma nicotine boost (average 17.7 and 15.4ng/ml after FM and PMM smoking, respectively). Although there were differences between individual subjects' filter butt levels of deposited solanesol the within-subject levels were remarkably similar. Puff topography measures did not vary across visits or cigarette type. CONCLUSIONS Although interpretation of study results must be conservative because of the small sample size, this study demonstrates that experimentally-induced transition from FM to PMM smoking is feasible for laboratory study and the subsequent toxicant exposure is comparable for FM and PMM cigarettes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bartosz Koszowski
- Battelle Memorial Institute Human Exposure Assessment Laboratory (HEAL) Baltimore, MD
| | - Zachary R Rosenberry
- Battelle Memorial Institute Human Exposure Assessment Laboratory (HEAL) Baltimore, MD
| | - Andrew A Strasser
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Nicotine Addiction Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA
| | - Wallace B Pickworth
- Battelle Memorial Institute Human Exposure Assessment Laboratory (HEAL) Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Koszowski B, Rosenberry ZR, Viray LC, Potts JL, Pickworth WB. Make your own cigarettes: toxicant exposure, smoking topography, and subjective effects. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2014; 23:1793-803. [PMID: 24925675 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-14-0280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite considerable use of make your own (MYO) cigarettes worldwide and increasing use in the United States, relatively little is known about how these cigarettes are smoked and the resultant toxicant exposure. METHODS In a laboratory study, we compared two types of MYO cigarettes-roll your own (RYO) and personal machine made (PMM)-with factory-made (FM) cigarettes in three groups of smokers who exclusively used RYO (n = 34), PMM (n = 23), or FM (n = 20). Within each group, cigarettes were smoked in three conditions: (i) after confirmed overnight tobacco abstinence; (ii) in an intense smoking paradigm; and (iii) without restrictions. All cigarettes were smoked ad lib through a smoking topography unit. RESULTS Plasma nicotine significantly increased after cigarettes in all conditions except PMM in the intense smoking paradigm. Puff volume, puff duration, total puff volume, and puff velocity did not differ between cigarette types but the puffs per cigarette and time to smoke were significantly smaller for RYO compared with PMM and FM. Regardless of the cigarette, participants consumed the first three puffs more vigorously than the last three puffs. CONCLUSIONS Despite the belief of many of their consumers, smoking MYO cigarettes is not a safe alternative to FM cigarettes. Like FM, MYO cigarettes expose their users to harmful constituents of tobacco smoke. Despite differences in size and design their puffing profiles are remarkably similar. IMPACT These data are relevant to health and regulatory considerations on the MYO cigarettes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bartosz Koszowski
- Battelle Memorial Institute, Human Exposure Assessment Laboratory (HEAL), Baltimore, Maryland.
| | - Zachary R Rosenberry
- Battelle Memorial Institute, Human Exposure Assessment Laboratory (HEAL), Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lauren C Viray
- Battelle Memorial Institute, Human Exposure Assessment Laboratory (HEAL), Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jennifer L Potts
- Battelle Memorial Institute, Human Exposure Assessment Laboratory (HEAL), Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Wallace B Pickworth
- Battelle Memorial Institute, Human Exposure Assessment Laboratory (HEAL), Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Nicotine delivery from smokeless tobacco (ST) products leads to addiction and the use of ST causes pathology that is associated with increased initiation of cigarette smoking. The rapid delivery of nicotine from ST seems to be associated with the pH of the aqueous suspension of the products - high pH is associated with high nicotine absorption. However, early studies compared nicotine absorption from different commercial products that not only differed in pH but in flavoring, nicotine content, and in format-pouches and loose tobacco. METHODS The present study compared nicotine absorption from a single unflavored referent ST product (pH 7.7) that was flavored with a low level of wintergreen (2 mg/g) and the pH was amended to either high (8.3) or low (5.4) pH with sodium carbonate or citric acid, respectively. RESULTS In a within-subject clinical study, the higher pH products delivered more nicotine. No significant differences were seen between perceived product strengths and product experience in all conditions. Heart rate increased by 4 to 6 beats per minute after the high pH flavored and the un-amended product but did not change after the low pH flavored product. CONCLUSIONS These results indicate that pH is a primary determinant of buccal nicotine absorption. The role of flavoring and other components of ST products in nicotine absorption remain to be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wallace B Pickworth
- Battelle Memorial Institute, Human Exposure Assessment Laboratory (HEAL), Baltimore, MD
| | - Zachary R Rosenberry
- Battelle Memorial Institute, Human Exposure Assessment Laboratory (HEAL), Baltimore, MD
| | - Wyatt Gold
- Notre Dame of Maryland University, School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD
| | - Bartosz Koszowski
- Battelle Memorial Institute, Human Exposure Assessment Laboratory (HEAL), Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rosenberry ZR, Strasser AA, Canlas LL, Potts JL, Pickworth WB. Make your own cigarettes: characteristics of the product and the consumer. Nicotine Tob Res 2013; 15:1453-7. [PMID: 23296210 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/nts271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite a worldwide increase in the use of Make Your Own (MYO) cigarettes, there is little research characterizing MYO smokers in the United States and the cigarettes they make. METHODS In a single laboratory visit, exclusive MYO smokers brought 5 MYO cigarettes they prepared at home, completed demographic and smoking history questionnaires, and prepared 25 cigarettes using their own tobacco and materials. RESULTS Participants were mostly male (86.7%), average age of 41.3 years, and smoked an average of 19.5 (SD = 7.9) MYO cigarettes per day. They produced two types of cigarettes-by rolling tobacco in a paper leaf (Roll Your Own [RYO, n = 56]) and by injecting tobacco into a tube (Personal Machine Made [PMM, n = 42]). The PMM cigarettes were significantly larger than RYO cigarettes (p < .001). Home- (0.97 g) and laboratory-produced (0.95 g) PMM cigarettes did not differ by weight; however, the RYO cigarettes made at home (0.45 g) were slightly, but significantly, larger than those produced in the laboratory [0.43 g (p < .05)]. There was significant internal consistency in the weight of RYO and PMM cigarettes (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.82, 0.84, respectively). Time to produce RYO cigarettes (53 s/cigarette) was significantly longer than that of PMM cigarettes (42 s/cigarette) (p < .01). CONCLUSIONS By using commercially available tobacco, tubes, and paper, experienced MYO smokers can quickly and consistently prepare cigarettes that may be useful in laboratory smoking topography and exposure experiments. Increasing the regulation of Factory Made (FM) cigarettes may lead to increased use of MYO cigarettes with unknown toxicant exposure and health risks to their consumers.
Collapse
|