1
|
van der Vegt AH, Campbell V, Mitchell I, Malycha J, Simpson J, Flenady T, Flabouris A, Lane PJ, Mehta N, Kalke VR, Decoyna JA, Es’haghi N, Liu CH, Scott IA. Systematic review and longitudinal analysis of implementing Artificial Intelligence to predict clinical deterioration in adult hospitals: what is known and what remains uncertain. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2024; 31:509-524. [PMID: 37964688 PMCID: PMC10797271 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocad220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify factors influencing implementation of machine learning algorithms (MLAs) that predict clinical deterioration in hospitalized adult patients and relate these to a validated implementation framework. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review of studies of implemented or trialed real-time clinical deterioration prediction MLAs was undertaken, which identified: how MLA implementation was measured; impact of MLAs on clinical processes and patient outcomes; and barriers, enablers and uncertainties within the implementation process. Review findings were then mapped to the SALIENT end-to-end implementation framework to identify the implementation stages at which these factors applied. RESULTS Thirty-seven articles relating to 14 groups of MLAs were identified, each trialing or implementing a bespoke algorithm. One hundred and seven distinct implementation evaluation metrics were identified. Four groups reported decreased hospital mortality, 1 significantly. We identified 24 barriers, 40 enablers, and 14 uncertainties and mapped these to the 5 stages of the SALIENT implementation framework. DISCUSSION Algorithm performance across implementation stages decreased between in silico and trial stages. Silent plus pilot trial inclusion was associated with decreased mortality, as was the use of logistic regression algorithms that used less than 39 variables. Mitigation of alert fatigue via alert suppression and threshold configuration was commonly employed across groups. CONCLUSIONS : There is evidence that real-world implementation of clinical deterioration prediction MLAs may improve clinical outcomes. Various factors identified as influencing success or failure of implementation can be mapped to different stages of implementation, thereby providing useful and practical guidance for implementers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anton H van der Vegt
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia
| | - Victoria Campbell
- Intensive Care Unit, Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service, Birtynia, QLD 4575, Australia
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia
| | - Imogen Mitchell
- Office of Research and Education, Canberra Health Services, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
| | - James Malycha
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA 5011, Australia
| | - Joanna Simpson
- Eastern Health Intensive Care Services, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC 3128, Australia
| | - Tracy Flenady
- School of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4701, Australia
| | - Arthas Flabouris
- Intensive Care Department, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
| | - Paul J Lane
- Safety Quality & Innovation, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, QLD 4032, Australia
| | - Naitik Mehta
- Patient Safety and Quality, Clinical Excellence Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia
| | - Vikrant R Kalke
- Patient Safety and Quality, Clinical Excellence Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia
| | - Jovie A Decoyna
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia
| | - Nicholas Es’haghi
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia
| | - Chun-Huei Liu
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia
| | - Ian A Scott
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia
- Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van der Vegt AH, Scott IA, Dermawan K, Schnetler RJ, Kalke VR, Lane PJ. Implementation frameworks for end-to-end clinical AI: derivation of the SALIENT framework. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2023; 30:1503-1515. [PMID: 37208863 PMCID: PMC10436156 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocad088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To derive a comprehensive implementation framework for clinical AI models within hospitals informed by existing AI frameworks and integrated with reporting standards for clinical AI research. MATERIALS AND METHODS (1) Derive a provisional implementation framework based on the taxonomy of Stead et al and integrated with current reporting standards for AI research: TRIPOD, DECIDE-AI, CONSORT-AI. (2) Undertake a scoping review of published clinical AI implementation frameworks and identify key themes and stages. (3) Perform a gap analysis and refine the framework by incorporating missing items. RESULTS The provisional AI implementation framework, called SALIENT, was mapped to 5 stages common to both the taxonomy and the reporting standards. A scoping review retrieved 20 studies and 247 themes, stages, and subelements were identified. A gap analysis identified 5 new cross-stage themes and 16 new tasks. The final framework comprised 5 stages, 7 elements, and 4 components, including the AI system, data pipeline, human-computer interface, and clinical workflow. DISCUSSION This pragmatic framework resolves gaps in existing stage- and theme-based clinical AI implementation guidance by comprehensively addressing the what (components), when (stages), and how (tasks) of AI implementation, as well as the who (organization) and why (policy domains). By integrating research reporting standards into SALIENT, the framework is grounded in rigorous evaluation methodologies. The framework requires validation as being applicable to real-world studies of deployed AI models. CONCLUSIONS A novel end-to-end framework has been developed for implementing AI within hospital clinical practice that builds on previous AI implementation frameworks and research reporting standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anton H van der Vegt
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Ian A Scott
- Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Krishna Dermawan
- Centre for Information Resilience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
| | - Rudolf J Schnetler
- School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
| | - Vikrant R Kalke
- Patient Safety and Quality, Clinical Excellence Queensland, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Paul J Lane
- Safety Quality & Innovation, The Prince Charles Hospital, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|