1
|
van der Vegt AH, Campbell V, Mitchell I, Malycha J, Simpson J, Flenady T, Flabouris A, Lane PJ, Mehta N, Kalke VR, Decoyna JA, Es’haghi N, Liu CH, Scott IA. Systematic review and longitudinal analysis of implementing Artificial Intelligence to predict clinical deterioration in adult hospitals: what is known and what remains uncertain. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2024; 31:509-524. [PMID: 37964688 PMCID: PMC10797271 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocad220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify factors influencing implementation of machine learning algorithms (MLAs) that predict clinical deterioration in hospitalized adult patients and relate these to a validated implementation framework. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review of studies of implemented or trialed real-time clinical deterioration prediction MLAs was undertaken, which identified: how MLA implementation was measured; impact of MLAs on clinical processes and patient outcomes; and barriers, enablers and uncertainties within the implementation process. Review findings were then mapped to the SALIENT end-to-end implementation framework to identify the implementation stages at which these factors applied. RESULTS Thirty-seven articles relating to 14 groups of MLAs were identified, each trialing or implementing a bespoke algorithm. One hundred and seven distinct implementation evaluation metrics were identified. Four groups reported decreased hospital mortality, 1 significantly. We identified 24 barriers, 40 enablers, and 14 uncertainties and mapped these to the 5 stages of the SALIENT implementation framework. DISCUSSION Algorithm performance across implementation stages decreased between in silico and trial stages. Silent plus pilot trial inclusion was associated with decreased mortality, as was the use of logistic regression algorithms that used less than 39 variables. Mitigation of alert fatigue via alert suppression and threshold configuration was commonly employed across groups. CONCLUSIONS : There is evidence that real-world implementation of clinical deterioration prediction MLAs may improve clinical outcomes. Various factors identified as influencing success or failure of implementation can be mapped to different stages of implementation, thereby providing useful and practical guidance for implementers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anton H van der Vegt
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia
| | - Victoria Campbell
- Intensive Care Unit, Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service, Birtynia, QLD 4575, Australia
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia
| | - Imogen Mitchell
- Office of Research and Education, Canberra Health Services, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
| | - James Malycha
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA 5011, Australia
| | - Joanna Simpson
- Eastern Health Intensive Care Services, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC 3128, Australia
| | - Tracy Flenady
- School of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4701, Australia
| | - Arthas Flabouris
- Intensive Care Department, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
| | - Paul J Lane
- Safety Quality & Innovation, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, QLD 4032, Australia
| | - Naitik Mehta
- Patient Safety and Quality, Clinical Excellence Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia
| | - Vikrant R Kalke
- Patient Safety and Quality, Clinical Excellence Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia
| | - Jovie A Decoyna
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia
| | - Nicholas Es’haghi
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia
| | - Chun-Huei Liu
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia
| | - Ian A Scott
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia
- Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kovoor JG, Bacchi S, Gupta AK, Stretton B, Nann SD, Aujayeb N, Lu A, Nathin K, Lam L, Jiang M, Lee S, To MS, Ovenden CD, Hewitt JN, Goh R, Gluck S, Reid JL, Khurana S, Dobbins C, Hewett PJ, Padbury RT, Malycha J, Trochsler MI, Hugh TJ, Maddern GJ. Surgery's Rosetta Stone: Natural language processing to predict discharge and readmission after general surgery. Surgery 2023; 174:1309-1314. [PMID: 37778968 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to examine the accuracy with which multiple natural language processing artificial intelligence models could predict discharge and readmissions after general surgery. METHODS Natural language processing models were derived and validated to predict discharge within the next 48 hours and 7 days and readmission within 30 days (based on daily ward round notes and discharge summaries, respectively) for general surgery inpatients at 2 South Australian hospitals. Natural language processing models included logistic regression, artificial neural networks, and Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers. RESULTS For discharge prediction analyses, 14,690 admissions were included. For readmission prediction analyses, 12,457 patients were included. For prediction of discharge within 48 hours, derivation and validation data set area under the receiver operator characteristic curves were, respectively: 0.86 and 0.86 for Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers, 0.82 and 0.81 for logistic regression, and 0.82 and 0.81 for artificial neural networks. For prediction of discharge within 7 days, derivation and validation data set area under the receiver operator characteristic curves were, respectively: 0.82 and 0.81 for Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers, 0.75 and 0.72 for logistic regression, and 0.68 and 0.67 for artificial neural networks. For readmission prediction within 30 days, derivation and validation data set area under the receiver operator characteristic curves were, respectively: 0.55 and 0.59 for Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers and 0.77 and 0.62 for logistic regression. CONCLUSION Modern natural language processing models, particularly Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers, can effectively and accurately identify general surgery patients who will be discharged in the next 48 hours. However, these approaches are less capable of identifying general surgery patients who will be discharged within the next 7 days or who will experience readmission within 30 days of discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua G Kovoor
- Department of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. https://twitter.com/josh.kovoor
| | - Stephen Bacchi
- Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Aashray K Gupta
- Department of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Brandon Stretton
- Department of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Silas D Nann
- Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Nidhi Aujayeb
- Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Amy Lu
- Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Kayla Nathin
- Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Lydia Lam
- Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Melinda Jiang
- Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Shane Lee
- Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Minh-Son To
- Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Christopher D Ovenden
- Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Joseph N Hewitt
- Department of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Rudy Goh
- Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Samuel Gluck
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jessica L Reid
- Department of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Sanjeev Khurana
- Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Christopher Dobbins
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Peter J Hewett
- Department of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Robert T Padbury
- Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - James Malycha
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Markus I Trochsler
- Department of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Thomas J Hugh
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Guy J Maddern
- Department of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wiseman TJ, Tan S, Stretton B, Kovoor J, Gupta A, Fabian J, Chan WO, Malycha J, Gluck S, Gilbert T, Zannettino AC, Bacchi S. Double or nothing: Costs of duplicate haematinic ordering in medical inpatients. Transfus Med 2023; 33:423-425. [PMID: 37385797 DOI: 10.1111/tme.12984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sheryn Tan
- School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Brandon Stretton
- School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Joshua Kovoor
- School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Aashray Gupta
- School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jack Fabian
- General Medicine, Ophthalmology, Neurology, Critical Care, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Weng Onn Chan
- School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- General Medicine, Ophthalmology, Neurology, Critical Care, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - James Malycha
- School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- General Medicine, Ophthalmology, Neurology, Critical Care, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Samuel Gluck
- School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Medical Education, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Elizabeth Vale, South Australia, Australia
| | - Toby Gilbert
- School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Andrew C Zannettino
- School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Stephen Bacchi
- School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia
- College of Medicine, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kovoor JG, Bacchi S, Gupta AK, Stretton B, Malycha J, Reddi BA, Liew D, O'Callaghan PG, Beltrame JF, Zannettino AC, Jones KL, Horowitz M, Dobbins C, Hewett PJ, Trochsler MI, Maddern GJ. The Adelaide Score: An artificial intelligence measure of readiness for discharge after general surgery. ANZ J Surg 2023; 93:2119-2124. [PMID: 37264548 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Revised: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to examine the performance of machine learning algorithms for the prediction of discharge within 12 and 24 h to produce a measure of readiness for discharge after general surgery. METHODS Consecutive general surgery patients at two tertiary hospitals, over a 2-year period, were included. Observation and laboratory parameter data were stratified into training, testing and validation datasets. Random forest, XGBoost and logistic regression models were evaluated. Each ward round note time was taken as a different event. Primary outcome was classification accuracy of the algorithmic model able to predict discharge within the next 12 h on the validation data set. RESULTS 42 572 ward round note timings were included from 8826 general surgery patients. Discharge occurred within 12 h for 8800 times (20.7%), and within 24 h for 9885 (23.2%). For predicting discharge within 12 h, model classification accuracies for derivation and validation data sets were: 0.84 and 0.85 random forest, 0.84 and 0.83 XGBoost, 0.80 and 0.81 logistic regression. For predicting discharge within 24 h, model classification accuracies for derivation and validation data sets were: 0.83 and 0.84 random forest, 0.82 and 0.81 XGBoost, 0.78 and 0.79 logistic regression. Algorithms generated a continuous number between 0 and 1 (or 0 and 100), representing readiness for discharge after general surgery. CONCLUSIONS A derived artificial intelligence measure (the Adelaide Score) successfully predicts discharge within the next 12 and 24 h in general surgery patients. This may be useful for both treating teams and allied health staff within surgical systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua G Kovoor
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Stephen Bacchi
- Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Aashray K Gupta
- Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Brandon Stretton
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - James Malycha
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Benjamin A Reddi
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Danny Liew
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Patrick G O'Callaghan
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - John F Beltrame
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | | | - Karen L Jones
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Michael Horowitz
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Christopher Dobbins
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Peter J Hewett
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Markus I Trochsler
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Guy J Maddern
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dishnica N, Vuong A, Xiong L, Tan S, Kovoor J, Gupta A, Stretton B, Goh R, Harroud A, Schultz D, Malycha J, Bacchi S. Single count breath test for the evaluation of respiratory function in Myasthenia Gravis: A systematic review. J Clin Neurosci 2023; 112:58-63. [PMID: 37094510 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2023.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Revised: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Myasthenia gravis (MG) can have a variety of respiratory presentations, ranging from mild symptoms through to respiratory failure. The evaluation of respiratory function in MG can be limited by accessibility to testing facilities, availability of medical equipment, and facial weakness. The single count breath test (SCBT) may be a useful adjunct in the evaluation of respiratory function in MG. METHOD A systematic review of the databases PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was conducted from inception to October 2022 in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and was registered on PROSPERO. RESULTS There were 6 studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The described method of evaluating SCBT involves inhaling deeply, then counting at two counts per second, in English or Spanish, sitting upright, with normal vocal register, until another breath needs to be taken. The identified studies support that the SCBT has a moderate correlation with forced vital capacity. These results also support that SCBT can assist the identification of MG exacerbation, including via assessment over the telephone. The included studies support a threshold count of ≥ 25 as consistent with normal respiratory muscle function. Although further analysis is needed, the included studies describe the SCBT as a quick bedside tool that is inexpensive and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS The results of this review support the clinical utility of the SCBT in assessing respiratory function in MG and describe the most current and effective methods of administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noel Dishnica
- Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia.
| | - Alysha Vuong
- Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia
| | - Lucy Xiong
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
| | - Sheryn Tan
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
| | - Joshua Kovoor
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA 5011, Australia
| | - Aashray Gupta
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, QLD 4215, Australia
| | - Brandon Stretton
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA 5011, Australia
| | - Rudy Goh
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; Lyell McEwin Hospital, Elizabeth Vale, SA 5112, Australia
| | - Adil Harroud
- McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0G4, Canada
| | - David Schultz
- Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia
| | - James Malycha
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA 5011, Australia
| | - Stephen Bacchi
- Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Malycha J, Andersen C, Redfern OC, Peake S, Subbe C, Dykes L, Phillips A, Ludbrook G, Young D, Watkinson PJ, Flabouris A, Jones D. Protocol describing a systematic review and mixed methods consensus process to define the deteriorated ward patient. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e057614. [PMID: 36123094 PMCID: PMC9486195 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Most patients admitted to hospital recover with treatments that can be administered on the general ward. A small but important group deteriorate however and require augmented organ support in areas with increased nursing to patient ratios. In observational studies evaluating this cohort, proxy outcomes such as unplanned intensive care unit admission, cardiac arrest and death are used. These outcome measures introduce subjectivity and variability, which in turn hinders the development and accuracy of the increasing numbers of electronic medical record (EMR) linked digital tools designed to predict clinical deterioration. Here, we describe a protocol for developing a new outcome measure using mixed methods to address these limitations. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will undertake firstly, a systematic literature review to identify existing generic, syndrome-specific and organ-specific definitions for clinically deteriorated, hospitalised adult patients. Secondly, an international modified Delphi study to generate a short list of candidate definitions. Thirdly, a nominal group technique (NGT) (using a trained facilitator) will take a diverse group of stakeholders through a structured process to generate a consensus definition. The NGT process will be informed by the data generated from the first two stages. The definition(s) for the deteriorated ward patient will be readily extractable from the EMR. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study has ethics approval (reference 16399) from the Central Adelaide Local Health Network Human Research Ethics Committee. Results generated from this study will be disseminated through publication and presentation at national and international scientific meetings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Malycha
- Intensive Care Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, South Australia, Australia
- Department of Acute Care Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Kadoorie Centre for Critical Care Research and Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
- Intensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Chris Andersen
- Critical Care Program, The George Institute for Global Health, Newtown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Oliver C Redfern
- Kadoorie Centre for Critical Care Research and Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Sandra Peake
- Intensive Care Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, South Australia, Australia
- Department of Acute Care Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Christian Subbe
- School of Medical Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK
| | - Lukah Dykes
- Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Adam Phillips
- University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Guy Ludbrook
- Department of Acute Care Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Duncan Young
- Kadoorie Centre for Critical Care Research and Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Peter J Watkinson
- Kadoorie Centre for Critical Care Research and Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Arthas Flabouris
- Department of Acute Care Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Intensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Daryl Jones
- Intensive Care Unit Austin Hospital, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To provide an overview of the systems being used to identify and predict clinical deterioration in hospitalised patients, with focus on the current and future role of artificial intelligence (AI). RECENT FINDINGS There are five leading AI driven systems in this field: the Advanced Alert Monitor (AAM), the electronic Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage (eCART) score, Hospital wide Alert Via Electronic Noticeboard, the Mayo Clinic Early Warning Score, and the Rothman Index (RI). Each uses Electronic Patient Record (EPR) data and machine learning to predict adverse events. Less mature but relevant evolutions are occurring in the fields of Natural Language Processing, Time and Motion Studies, AI Sepsis and COVID-19 algorithms. SUMMARY Research-based AI-driven systems to predict clinical deterioration are increasingly being developed, but few are being implemented into clinical workflows. Escobar et al. (AAM) provide the current gold standard for robust model development and implementation methodology. Multiple technologies show promise, however, the pathway to meaningfully affect patient outcomes remains challenging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Malycha
- Discipline of Acute Care Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide
- The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Woodville South
| | - Stephen Bacchi
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Oliver Redfern
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Malycha J, Redfern O, Pimentel M, Ludbrook G, Young D, Watkinson P. Evaluation of a digital system to predict unplanned admissions to the intensive care unit: A mixed-methods approach. Resusc Plus 2022; 9:100193. [PMID: 35005662 PMCID: PMC8715371 DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We have developed the Hospital Alerting Via Electronic Noticeboard (HAVEN) which aims to identify hospitalised patients most at risk of reversible deterioration. HAVEN combines patients’ vital-sign measurements with laboratory results, demographics and comorbidities using a machine learnt algorithm. Objectives The aim of this study was to identify variables or concepts that could improve HAVEN predictive performance. Methods This was an embedded, mixed methods study. Eligible patients with the five highest HAVEN scores in the hospital (i.e., ‘HAVEN Top 5′) had their medical identification details recorded. We conducted a structured medical note review on these patients 48 hours post their identifiers being recorded. Methods of constant comparison were used during data collection and to analyse patient data. Results The 129 patients not admitted to ICU then underwent constant comparison review, which produced three main groups. Group 1 were patients referred to specialist services (n = 37). Group 2 responded to ward-based treatment, (n = 38). Group 3 were frail and had documented treatment limitations (n = 47). Conclusions Digital-only validation methods code the cohort not admitted to ICU as ‘falsely positive’ in sensitivity analyses however this approach limits the evaluation of model performance. Our study suggested that coding for patients referred to other specialist teams, those with treatment limitations in place, along with those who are deteriorating but then respond to ward-based therapies, would give a more accurate measure of the value of the scores, especially in relation to cost-effectiveness of resource utilisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Malycha
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Discipline of Acute Care Medicine, University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Intensive Care Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Corresponding author at: Discipline of Acute Care Medicine, University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Department of Intensive Care Medicine 28 Woodville Road, Woodville South, South Australia, 5011, Australia. Tel.: (+61) 0 419 004 939.
| | - Oliver Redfern
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Marco Pimentel
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Guy Ludbrook
- Discipline of Acute Care Medicine, University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Duncan Young
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Peter Watkinson
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wronikowska MW, Malycha J, Morgan LJ, Westgate V, Petrinic T, Young JD, Watkinson PJ. Systematic review of applied usability metrics within usability evaluation methods for hospital electronic healthcare record systems: Metrics and Evaluation Methods for eHealth Systems. J Eval Clin Pract 2021; 27:1403-1416. [PMID: 33982356 PMCID: PMC9438452 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Electronic healthcare records have become central to patient care. Evaluation of new systems include a variety of usability evaluation methods or usability metrics (often referred to interchangeably as usability components or usability attributes). This study reviews the breadth of usability evaluation methods, metrics, and associated measurement techniques that have been reported to assess systems designed for hospital staff to assess inpatient clinical condition. METHODS Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology, we searched Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Open Grey from 1986 to 2019. For included studies, we recorded usability evaluation methods or usability metrics as appropriate, and any measurement techniques applied to illustrate these. We classified and described all usability evaluation methods, usability metrics, and measurement techniques. Study quality was evaluated using a modified Downs and Black checklist. RESULTS The search identified 1336 studies. After abstract screening, 130 full texts were reviewed. In the 51 included studies 11 distinct usability evaluation methods were identified. Within these usability evaluation methods, seven usability metrics were reported. The most common metrics were ISO9241-11 and Nielsen's components. An additional "usefulness" metric was reported in almost 40% of included studies. We identified 70 measurement techniques used to evaluate systems. Overall study quality was reflected in a mean modified Downs and Black checklist score of 6.8/10 (range 1-9) 33% studies classified as "high-quality" (scoring eight or higher), 51% studies "moderate-quality" (scoring 6-7), and the remaining 16% (scoring below five) were "low-quality." CONCLUSION There is little consistency within the field of electronic health record systems evaluation. This review highlights the variability within usability methods, metrics, and reporting. Standardized processes may improve evaluation and comparison electronic health record systems and improve their development and implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - James Malycha
- Critical Care Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical NeurosciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
- Department of Acute Care MedicineUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
| | - Lauren J. Morgan
- Nuffield Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of Oxford, John Radcliffe HospitalOxfordUK
| | - Verity Westgate
- Critical Care Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical NeurosciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Tatjana Petrinic
- Bodleian Health Care LibrariesJohn Radcliffe Hospital, University of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - J Duncan Young
- Critical Care Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical NeurosciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Peter J. Watkinson
- Critical Care Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical NeurosciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pimentel MAF, Redfern OC, Malycha J, Meredith P, Prytherch D, Briggs J, Young JD, Clifton DA, Tarassenko L, Watkinson PJ. Detecting Deteriorating Patients in the Hospital: Development and Validation of a Novel Scoring System. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2021; 204:44-52. [PMID: 33525997 PMCID: PMC8437126 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202007-2700oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Rationale: Late recognition of patient deterioration in hospital is associated with worse outcomes, including higher mortality. Despite the widespread introduction of early warning score (EWS) systems and electronic health records, deterioration still goes unrecognized. Objectives: To develop and externally validate a Hospital- wide Alerting via Electronic Noticeboard (HAVEN) system to identify hospitalized patients at risk of reversible deterioration. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients 16 years of age or above admitted to four UK hospitals. The primary outcome was cardiac arrest or unplanned admission to the ICU. We used patient data (vital signs, laboratory tests, comorbidities, and frailty) from one hospital to train a machine-learning model (gradient boosting trees). We internally and externally validated the model and compared its performance with existing scoring systems (including the National EWS, laboratory-based acute physiology score, and electronic cardiac arrest risk triage score). Measurements and Main Results: We developed the HAVEN model using 230,415 patient admissions to a single hospital. We validated HAVEN on 266,295 admissions to four hospitals. HAVEN showed substantially higher discrimination (c-statistic, 0.901 [95% confidence interval, 0.898-0.903]) for the primary outcome within 24 hours of each measurement than other published scoring systems (which range from 0.700 [0.696-0.704] to 0.863 [0.860-0.865]). With a precision of 10%, HAVEN was able to identify 42% of cardiac arrests or unplanned ICU admissions with a lead time of up to 48 hours in advance, compared with 22% by the next best system. Conclusions: The HAVEN machine-learning algorithm for early identification of in-hospital deterioration significantly outperforms other published scores such as the National EWS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Oliver C. Redfern
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - James Malycha
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Meredith
- Research and Innovation Department, Portsmouth Hospitals University National Health Service Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
| | - David Prytherch
- Centre for Healthcare Modelling and Informatics, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom; and
| | - Jim Briggs
- Centre for Healthcare Modelling and Informatics, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom; and
| | - J. Duncan Young
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - David A. Clifton
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, and
| | - Lionel Tarassenko
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, and
| | - Peter J. Watkinson
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Kadoorie Centre for Critical Care Research and Education, Oxford University Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Subbe CP, Bannard-Smith J, Bunch J, Champunot R, DeVita MA, Durham L, Edelson DP, Gonzalez I, Hancock C, Haniffa R, Hartin J, Haskell H, Hogan H, Jones DA, Kalkman CJ, Lighthall GK, Malycha J, Ni MZ, Phillips AV, Rubulotta F, So RK, Welch J. Corrigendum to "Quality metrics for the evaluation of Rapid Response Systems: Proceedings from the third international consensus conference on Rapid Response Systems" [Resuscitation 141 (2019) 1-12]. Resuscitation 2019; 145:93-94. [PMID: 31743828 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Lesley Durham
- North of England Critical Care Network (NoECCN), North Tyneside General Hospital, North Shields, UK
| | - Dana P Edelson
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Isabel Gonzalez
- North of England Critical Care Network (NoECCN), North Tyneside General Hospital, North Shields, UK
| | | | - Rashan Haniffa
- Network for Improving Critical Care Systems and Training, UK
| | - Jillian Hartin
- Patient Emergency Response and Resuscitation Team, UCLH, London, UK
| | - Helen Haskell
- Founder and President of the US Patient Group Mothers Against Medical Error; WHO Patient Safety Champion
| | - Helen Hogan
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Daryl A Jones
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Geoffrey K Lighthall
- Department of Anesthesia, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr. H3580, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - James Malycha
- Kadoorie Centre for Critical Care Research and Education, John Radcliffe Hospital, Level 3, Headley Way, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - Francesca Rubulotta
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Centre for Peri-operative Medicine and Critical Care Charing Cross Hospital Intensive Care Unit, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Ralph K So
- Department of Intensive Care, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Albert Schweitzerplaats 25, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - John Welch
- Consultant Nurse in Critical Care, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Malycha J, Redfern OC, Ludbrook G, Young D, Watkinson PJ. Testing a digital system that ranks the risk of unplanned intensive care unit admission in all ward patients: protocol for a prospective observational cohort study. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e032429. [PMID: 31511294 PMCID: PMC6747664 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Traditional early warning scores (EWSs) use vital sign derangements to detect clinical deterioration in patients treated on hospital wards. Combining vital signs with demographics and laboratory results improves EWS performance. We have developed the Hospital Alerting Via Electronic Noticeboard (HAVEN) system. HAVEN uses vital signs, as well as demographic, comorbidity and laboratory data from the electronic patient record, to quantify and rank the risk of unplanned admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) within 24 hours for all ward patients. The primary aim of this study is to find additional variables, potentially missed during development, which may improve HAVEN performance. These variables will be sought in the medical record of patients misclassified by the HAVEN risk score during testing. METHODS This will be a prospective, observational, cohort study conducted at the John Radcliffe Hospital, part of the Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust in the UK. Each day during the study periods, we will document all highly ranked patients (ie, those with the highest risk for unplanned ICU admission) identified by the HAVEN system. After 48 hours, we will review the progress of the identified patients. Patients who were subsequently admitted to the ICU will be removed from the study (as they will have been correctly classified by HAVEN). Highly ranked patients not admitted to ICU will undergo a structured medical notes review. Additionally, at the end of the study periods, all patients who had an unplanned ICU admission but whom HAVEN failed to rank highly will have a structured medical notes review. The review will identify candidate variables, likely associated with unplanned ICU admission, not included in the HAVEN risk score. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Approval has been granted for gathering the data used in this study from the South Central Oxford C Research Ethics Committee (16/SC/0264, 13 June 2016) and the Confidentiality Advisory Group (16/CAG/0066). DISCUSSION Our study will use a clinical expert conducting a structured medical notes review to identify variables, associated with unplanned ICU admission, not included in the development of the HAVEN risk score. These variables will then be added to the risk score and evaluated for potential performance gain. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study of this type. We anticipate that documenting the HAVEN development methods will assist other research groups developing similar technology. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN12518261.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Malycha
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Kadoorie Centre for Critical Care Research and Education, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Oliver C Redfern
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Kadoorie Centre for Critical Care Research and Education, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Guy Ludbrook
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Duncan Young
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Kadoorie Centre for Critical Care Research and Education, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Peter J Watkinson
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Kadoorie Centre for Critical Care Research and Education, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Malycha J, Farajidavar N, Pimentel MAF, Redfern O, Clifton DA, Tarassenko L, Meredith P, Prytherch D, Ludbrook G, Young JD, Watkinson PJ. The effect of fractional inspired oxygen concentration on early warning score performance: A database analysis. Resuscitation 2019; 139:192-199. [PMID: 31005587 PMCID: PMC6547016 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2019] [Revised: 03/05/2019] [Accepted: 04/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To calculate fractional inspired oxygen concentration (FiO2) thresholds in ward patients and add these to the National Early Warning Score (NEWS). To evaluate the performance of NEWS-FiO2 against NEWS when predicting in-hospital death and unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission. METHODS A multi-centre, retrospective, observational cohort study was carried out in five hospitals from two UK NHS Trusts. Adult admissions with at least one complete set of vital sign observations recorded electronically were eligible. The primary outcome measure was an 'adverse event' which comprised either in-hospital death or unplanned ICU admission. Discrimination was assessed using the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC). RESULTS A cohort of 83,304 patients from a total of 271,363 adult admissions were prescribed oxygen. In this cohort, NEWS-FiO2 (AUROC 0.823, 95% CI 0.819-0.824) outperformed NEWS (AUORC 0.811, 95% CI 0.809-0.814) when predicting in-hospital death or unplanned ICU admission within 24 h of a complete set of vital sign observations. CONCLUSIONS NEWS-FiO2 generates a performance gain over NEWS when studied in ward patients requiring oxygen. This warrants further study, particularly in patients with respiratory disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Malycha
- Kadoorie Centre for Critical Care Research and Education, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Level 3, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom.
| | - Nazli Farajidavar
- James Black Centre, King's College London, London SE5 9NU, United Kingdom.
| | - Marco A F Pimentel
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7DQ, United Kingdom.
| | - Oliver Redfern
- Kadoorie Centre for Critical Care Research and Education, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Level 3, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom.
| | - David A Clifton
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7DQ, United Kingdom.
| | - Lionel Tarassenko
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7DQ, United Kingdom.
| | - Paul Meredith
- Research and Innovation Department, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, United Kingdom.
| | - David Prytherch
- Centre for Healthcare Modelling & Informatics, School of Computing, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 2UP, United Kingdom.
| | - Guy Ludbrook
- University of Adelaide, Faculty of Health and Medical Science, North Terrace, AHMS Floor 8, 5000, Australia.
| | - J Duncan Young
- Kadoorie Centre for Critical Care Research and Education, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Level 3, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom.
| | - Peter J Watkinson
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Oxford, Kadoorie Centre for Critical Care Research and Education, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Level 3, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Malycha J, Bonnici T, Clifton DA, Ludbrook G, Young JD, Watkinson PJ. Patient centred variables with univariate associations with unplanned ICU admission: a systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2019; 19:98. [PMID: 31092256 PMCID: PMC6521409 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-019-0820-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2018] [Accepted: 05/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Multiple predictive scores using Electronic Patient Record data have been developed for hospitalised patients at risk of clinical deterioration. Methods used to select patient centred variables for inclusion in these scores varies. We performed a systematic review to describe univariate associations with unplanned Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission with the aim of assisting model development for future scores that predict clinical deterioration. Methods Data sources were MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Included studies were published since 2000 describing an association between patient centred variables and unplanned ICU admission determined using univariate analysis. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts against inclusion and exclusion criteria. DistillerSR (Evidence Partners, Canada, Ottawa, Ontario) software was used to manage the data and identify duplicate search results. All screening and data extraction forms were implemented within DistillerSR. Study quality was assessed using an adapted version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Variables were analysed for strength of association with unplanned ICU admission. Results The database search yielded 1520 unique studies; 1462 were removed after title and abstract review; 57 underwent full text screening; 16 studies were included. One hundred and eighty nine variables with an evaluated univariate association with unplanned ICU admission were described. Discussion Being male, increasing age, a history of congestive cardiac failure or diabetes, a diagnosis of hepatic disease or having abnormal vital signs were all strongly associated with ICU admission. Conclusion These findings will assist variable selection during the development of future models predicting unplanned ICU admission. Trial registration This study is a component of a larger body of work registered in the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN12518261). Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12911-019-0820-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Malycha
- Kadoorie Centre for Critical Care Research and Education, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Level 3, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
| | - Timothy Bonnici
- Department of Critical Care, University College London Hospitals Foundation Trust, Maple Link Bridge, University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK
| | - David A Clifton
- Department of Engineering Science, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7DC, UK
| | - Guy Ludbrook
- Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, AHMS Floor 8, Adelaide, 5000, Australia
| | - J Duncan Young
- Kadoorie Centre for Critical Care Research and Education, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Level 3, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Peter J Watkinson
- Kadoorie Centre for Critical Care Research and Education, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Level 3, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Affiliation(s)
- Gary B Smith
- Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK
| | - Oliver C Redfern
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Marco Af Pimentel
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Stephen Gerry
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Gary S Collins
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - James Malycha
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - David Prytherch
- Centre for Healthcare Modelling and Informatics, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Paul E Schmidt
- Department of Medicine, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Peter J Watkinson
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pimentel MAF, Smith GB, Redfern OC, Gerry S, Collins GS, Malycha J, Prytherch D, Schmidt PE, Watkinson PJ. Reply to: NEWS2 needs to be tested in prospective trials involving patients with confirmed hypercapnia. Resuscitation 2019; 139:371-372. [PMID: 31005584 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.03.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Accepted: 03/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marco A F Pimentel
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Gary B Smith
- Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK
| | - Oliver C Redfern
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Stephen Gerry
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Gary S Collins
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - James Malycha
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - David Prytherch
- Centre for Healthcare Modelling and Informatics, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Paul E Schmidt
- Department of Medicine, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Peter J Watkinson
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Pimentel MAF, Redfern OC, Gerry S, Collins GS, Malycha J, Prytherch D, Schmidt PE, Smith GB, Watkinson PJ. A comparison of the ability of the National Early Warning Score and the National Early Warning Score 2 to identify patients at risk of in-hospital mortality: A multi-centre database study. Resuscitation 2018; 134:147-156. [PMID: 30287355 PMCID: PMC6995996 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.09.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2018] [Revised: 09/26/2018] [Accepted: 09/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Aims To compare the ability of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) to identify patients at risk of in-hospital mortality and other adverse outcomes. Methods We undertook a multi-centre retrospective observational study at five acute hospitals from two UK NHS Trusts. Data were obtained from completed adult admissions who were not fit enough to be discharged alive on the day of admission. Diagnostic coding and oxygen prescriptions were used to identify patients with type II respiratory failure (T2RF). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality within 24 h of a vital signs observation. Secondary outcomes included unanticipated intensive care unit admission or cardiac arrest within 24 h of a vital signs observation. Discrimination was assessed using the c-statistic. Results Among 251,266 adult admissions, 48,898 were identified to be at risk of T2RF by diagnostic coding. In this group, NEWS2 showed statistically significant lower discrimination (c-statistic, 95% CI) for identifying in-hospital mortality within 24 h (0.860, 0.857–0.864) than NEWS (0.881, 0.878-0.884). For 1394 admissions with documented T2RF, discrimination was similar for both systems: NEWS2 (0.841, 0.827-0.855), NEWS (0.862, 0.848–0.875). For all secondary endpoints, NEWS2 showed no improvements in discrimination. Conclusions NEWS2 modifications to NEWS do not improve discrimination of adverse outcomes in patients with documented T2RF and decrease discrimination in patients at risk of T2RF. Further evaluation of the relationship between SpO2 values, oxygen therapy and risk should be investigated further before wide-scale adoption of NEWS2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco A F Pimentel
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Oliver C Redfern
- Centre for Healthcare Modelling and Informatics, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Stephen Gerry
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Gary S Collins
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - James Malycha
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - David Prytherch
- Centre for Healthcare Modelling and Informatics, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Paul E Schmidt
- Department of Medicine, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Gary B Smith
- Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK
| | - Peter J Watkinson
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Malycha J, Bonnici T, Sebekova K, Petrinic T, Young D, Watkinson P. Variables associated with unplanned general adult ICU admission in hospitalised patients: protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev 2017; 6:67. [PMID: 28351424 PMCID: PMC5370455 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-017-0456-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2016] [Accepted: 03/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Failure to promptly identify deterioration in hospitalised patients is associated with delayed admission to intensive care units (ICUs) and poor outcomes. Existing vital sign-based Early Warning Score (EWS) algorithms do not have a sufficiently high positive predictive value to be used for automated activation of an ICU outreach team. Incorporating additional patient data might improve the predictive power of EWS algorithms; however, it is currently not known which patient data (or variables) are most predictive of ICU admission. We describe the protocol for a systematic review of variables associated with ICU admission. METHODS/DESIGN MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library, including Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) will be searched for studies that assess the association of routinely recorded variables associated with subsequent unplanned ICU admission. Only studies involving adult patients admitted to general ICUs will be included. We will extract data relating to the statistical association between ICU admission and predictor variables, the quality of the studies and the generalisability of the findings. DISCUSSION The results of this review will aid the development of future models which predict the risk of unplanned ICU admission. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO: CRD42015029617.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Malycha
- Kadoorie Centre for Critical Care Research and Education, John Radcliffe Hospital, Level 3, Headley Way, Oxford, OX3 9DU UK
| | - Tim Bonnici
- Kadoorie Centre for Critical Care Research and Education, John Radcliffe Hospital, Level 3, Headley Way, Oxford, OX3 9DU UK
| | - Katarina Sebekova
- Kadoorie Centre for Critical Care Research and Education, John Radcliffe Hospital, Level 3, Headley Way, Oxford, OX3 9DU UK
| | - Tatjana Petrinic
- University of Oxford, Bodleian Health Care Libraries, Academic Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Level 3, Headley Way, Oxford, OX3 9DU UK
| | - Duncan Young
- Kadoorie Centre for Critical Care Research and Education, John Radcliffe Hospital, Level 3, Headley Way, Oxford, OX3 9DU UK
| | - Peter Watkinson
- Kadoorie Centre for Critical Care Research and Education, John Radcliffe Hospital, Level 3, Headley Way, Oxford, OX3 9DU UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Malycha J, Colebourn C. Repatriated patient with leptospirosis and severe iron deficiency. J Intensive Care Soc 2015; 16:359. [DOI: 10.1177/1751143715589328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|