1
|
Prince M, McKinnon AC, Leemon D, Sawbridge T, Cunningham JP. Metarhizium spp. isolates effective against Queensland fruit fly juvenile life stages in soil. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0297341. [PMID: 38236905 PMCID: PMC10796031 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Queensland fruit fly, Bactrocera tryoni, Froggatt (Diptera: Tephritidae) is Australia's primary fruit fly pest species. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) has been adopted to sustainably manage this polyphagous species with a reduced reliance on chemical pesticides. At present, control measures are aimed at the adult stages of the fly, with no IPM tools available to target larvae once they exit the fruit and pupate in the soil. The use of entomopathogenic fungi may provide a biologically-based control method for these soil-dwelling life stages. The effectiveness of fungal isolates of Metarhizium and Beauveria species were screened under laboratory conditions against Queensland fruit fly. In bioassays, 16 isolates were screened for pathogenicity following exposure of third-instar larvae to inoculum-treated vermiculite used as a pupation substrate. The best performing Metarhizium sp. isolate achieved an average percentage mortality of 93%, whereas the best performing Beauveria isolate was less efficient, with an average mortality of 36%. Susceptibility to infection during different development stages was investigated using selected fungal isolates, with the aim of assessing all soil-dwelling life stages from third-instar larvae to final pupal stages and emerging adults. Overall, the third larval instar was the most susceptible stage, with average mortalities between 51-98% depending on the isolate tested. Moreover, adult mortality was significantly higher when exposed to inoculum during pupal eclosion, with mortalities between 56-76% observed within the first nine days post-emergence. The effect of temperature and inoculum concentration on insect mortality were assessed independently with candidate isolates to determine the optimum temperature range for fungal biological control activity and the rate required for application in field conditions. Metarhizium spp. are highly efficacious at killing Queensland fruit fly and have potential for use as biopesticides to target soil-dwelling and other life stages of B. tryoni.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madita Prince
- Agriculture Victoria, Tatura SmartFarm, Tatura, VIC, Australia
| | - Aimee C. McKinnon
- Agriculture Victoria, Agribio Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Tim Sawbridge
- Agriculture Victoria, Agribio Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
- School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - John Paul Cunningham
- Agriculture Victoria, Agribio Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
- School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zia SF, Berkowitz O, Bedon F, Whelan J, Franks AE, Plummer KM. Direct comparison of Arabidopsis gene expression reveals different responses to melatonin versus auxin. BMC Plant Biol 2019; 19:567. [PMID: 31856719 PMCID: PMC6921455 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-019-2158-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Melatonin (N-acetyl-5-methoxytryptamine) in plants, regulates shoot and root growth and alleviates environmental stresses. Melatonin and the phyto-hormone auxin are tryptophan-derived compounds. However, it largely remains controversial as to whether melatonin and auxin act through similar or overlapping signalling and regulatory pathways. RESULTS Here, we have used a promoter-activation study to demonstrate that, unlike auxin (1-naphthalene acetic acid, NAA), melatonin neither induces Direct repeat 5 DR5 expression in Arabidopsis thaliana roots under normal growth conditions nor suppresses the induction of Alternative oxidase 1a AOX1a in leaves upon Antimycin A treatment, both of which are the hallmarks of auxin action. Additionally, comparative global transcriptome analysis conducted on Arabidopsis treated with melatonin or NAA revealed differences in the number and types of differentially expressed genes. Auxin (4.5 μM) altered the expression of a diverse and large number of genes whereas melatonin at 5 μM had no significant effect but melatonin at 100 μM had a modest effect on transcriptome compared to solvent-treated control. Interestingly, the prominent category of genes differentially expressed upon exposure to melatonin trended towards biotic stress defence pathways while downregulation of key genes related to photosynthesis was observed. CONCLUSION Together these findings indicate that though they are both indolic compounds, melatonin and auxin act through different pathways to alter gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Furthermore, it appears that effects of melatonin enable Arabidopsis thaliana to prioritize biotic stress defence signalling rather than growth. These findings clear the current confusion in the literature regarding the relationship of melatonin and auxin and also have greater implications of utilizing melatonin for improved plant protection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sajal F Zia
- Department of Animal, Plant and Soil Sciences, AgriBio, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia
| | - Oliver Berkowitz
- Department of Animal, Plant and Soil Sciences, AgriBio, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia
- ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia
| | - Frank Bedon
- Department of Animal, Plant and Soil Sciences, AgriBio, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia.
| | - James Whelan
- Department of Animal, Plant and Soil Sciences, AgriBio, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia
- ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia
| | - Ashley E Franks
- Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Microbiology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia
- Centre for Future Landscapes, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia
| | - Kim M Plummer
- Department of Animal, Plant and Soil Sciences, AgriBio, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|