1
|
Duffin K, Neuhaus N, Andersen CY, Barraud-Lange V, Braye A, Eguizabal C, Feraille A, Ginsberg JP, Gook D, Goossens E, Jahnukainen K, Jayasinghe Y, Keros V, Kliesch S, Lane S, Mulder CL, Orwig KE, van Pelt AMM, Poirot C, Rimmer MP, Rives N, Sadri-Ardekani H, Safrai M, Schlatt S, Stukenborg JB, van de Wetering MD, Wyns C, Mitchell RT. A 20-year overview of fertility preservation in boys: new insights gained through a comprehensive international survey. Hum Reprod Open 2024; 2024:hoae010. [PMID: 38449521 PMCID: PMC10914450 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoae010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Twenty years after the inception of the first fertility preservation programme for pre-pubertal boys, what are the current international practices with regard to cryopreservation of immature testicular tissue? SUMMARY ANSWER Worldwide, testicular tissue has been cryopreserved from over 3000 boys under the age of 18 years for a variety of malignant and non-malignant indications; there is variability in practices related to eligibility, clinical assessment, storage, and funding. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY For male patients receiving gonadotoxic treatment prior to puberty, testicular tissue cryopreservation may provide a method of fertility preservation. While this technique remains experimental, an increasing number of centres worldwide are cryopreserving immature testicular tissue and are approaching clinical application of methods to use this stored tissue to restore fertility. As such, standards for quality assurance and clinical care in preserving immature testicular tissue should be established. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION A detailed survey was sent to 17 centres within the recently established ORCHID-NET consortium, which offer testicular tissue cryopreservation to patients under the age of 18 years. The study encompassed 60 questions and remained open from 1 July to 1 November 2022. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS Of the 17 invited centres, 16 completed the survey, with representation from Europe, Australia, and the USA. Collectively, these centres have cryopreserved testicular tissue from patients under the age of 18 years. Data are presented using descriptive analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Since the establishment of the first formal fertility preservation programme for pre-pubertal males in 2002, these 16 centres have cryopreserved tissue from 3118 patients under the age of 18 years, with both malignant (60.4%) and non-malignant (39.6%) diagnoses. All centres perform unilateral biopsies, while 6/16 sometimes perform bilateral biopsies. When cryopreserving tissue, 9/16 centres preserve fragments sized ≤5 mm3 with the remainder preserving fragments sized 6-20 mm3. Dimethylsulphoxide is commonly used as a cryoprotectant, with medium supplements varying across centres. There are variations in funding source, storage duration, and follow-up practice. Research, with consent, is conducted on stored tissue in 13/16 centres. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION While this is a multi-national study, it will not encompass every centre worldwide that is cryopreserving testicular tissue from males under 18 years of age. As such, it is likely that the actual number of patients is even higher than we report. Whilst the study is likely to reflect global practice overall, it will not provide a complete picture of practices in every centre. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Given the research advances, it is reasonable to suggest that cryopreserved immature testicular tissue will in the future be used clinically to restore fertility. The growing number of patients undergoing this procedure necessitates collaboration between centres to better harmonize clinical and research protocols evaluating tissue function and clinical outcomes in these patients. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS K.D. is supported by a CRUK grant (C157/A25193). R.T.M. is supported by an UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Future Leaders Fellowship (MR/S017151/1). The MRC Centre for Reproductive Health at the University of Edinburgh is supported by MRC (MR/N022556/1). C.L.M. is funded by Kika86 and ZonMW TAS 116003002. A.M.M.v.P. is supported by ZonMW TAS 116003002. E.G. was supported by the Research Program of the Research Foundation-Flanders (G.0109.18N), Kom op tegen Kanker, the Strategic Research Program (VUB_SRP89), and the Scientific Fund Willy Gepts. J.-B.S. is supported by the Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation (TJ2020-0026). The work of NORDFERTIL is supported by the Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation (PR2019-0123; PR2022-0115), the Swedish Research Council (2018-03094; 2021-02107), and the Birgitta and Carl-Axel Rydbeck's Research Grant for Paediatric Research (2020-00348; 2021-00073; 2022-00317; 2023-00353). C.E is supported by the Health Department of the Basque Government (Grants 2019111068 and 2022111067) and Inocente Inocente Foundation (FII22/001). M.P.R. is funded by a Medical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health Grant No: MR/N022556/1. A.F. and N.R. received support from a French national research grant PHRC No. 2008/071/HP obtained by the French Institute of Cancer and the French Healthcare Organization. K.E.O. is funded by the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and the US National Institutes of Health HD100197. V.B-L is supported by the French National Institute of Cancer (Grant Seq21-026). Y.J. is supported by the Royal Children's Hospital Foundation and a Medical Research Future Fund MRFAR000308. E.G., N.N., S.S., C.L.M., A.M.M.v.P., C.E., R.T.M., K.D., M.P.R. are members of COST Action CA20119 (ANDRONET) supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). The Danish Child Cancer Foundation is also thanked for financial support (C.Y.A.). The authors declare no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen Duffin
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Nina Neuhaus
- Centre of Reproductive Medicine and Andrology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Claus Yding Andersen
- Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, University Hospital of Copenhagen & Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Virginie Barraud-Lange
- Department of Reproductive Biology CECOS, AP-HP Centre—University of Paris Cité, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France
- AYA Unit, Fertility Preservation Consultation, Haematology Department, AP-HP Nord, University of Paris Cité, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Aude Braye
- Department of Genetics, Reproduction and Development (GRAD), Biology of the Testis (BITE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Cristina Eguizabal
- Cell Therapy, Stem Cells and Tissues Group, Basque Center for Blood Transfusion and Human Tissues, Bizkaia, Spain
- Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Aurélie Feraille
- NorDIC, Team “Adrenal and Gonadal Pathophysiology”, Biology of Reproduction-CECOS Laboratory, Rouen University Hospital, Université de Rouen Normandie, Rouen, France
| | - Jill P Ginsberg
- Division of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Debra Gook
- Reproductive Services/Melbourne IVF, The Royal Women’s Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women’s Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Ellen Goossens
- Department of Genetics, Reproduction and Development (GRAD), Biology of the Testis (BITE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kirsi Jahnukainen
- Childhood Cancer Research Unit, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, NORDFERTIL Research Lab Stockholm, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
- Division of Haematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, New Children’s Hospital, Pediatric Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Yasmin Jayasinghe
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women’s Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Oncofertility Program, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Victoria Keros
- Division of Gynecology and Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Division of Urology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology—CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sabine Kliesch
- Centre of Reproductive Medicine and Andrology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Sheila Lane
- Department of Paediatric Oncology and Haematology, Children’s Hospital Oxford, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Callista L Mulder
- Reproductive Biology Laboratory, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kyle E Orwig
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ans M M van Pelt
- Reproductive Biology Laboratory, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Catherine Poirot
- Fertility Preservation Consultation, Haematology Department, AYA Unit, Saint Louis Hospital, AP-HP Médecine Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- Department of Reproductive Biology, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Michael P Rimmer
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Institute of Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Nathalie Rives
- NorDIC, Team “Adrenal and Gonadal Pathophysiology”, Biology of Reproduction-CECOS Laboratory, Rouen University Hospital, Université de Rouen Normandie, Rouen, France
| | - Hooman Sadri-Ardekani
- Department of Urology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
- Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Myriam Safrai
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center (Tel Hashomer), Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Stefan Schlatt
- Centre of Reproductive Medicine and Andrology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Jan-Bernd Stukenborg
- Childhood Cancer Research Unit, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, NORDFERTIL Research Lab Stockholm, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| | | | - Christine Wyns
- Department of Gynecology and Andrology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Rod T Mitchell
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Institute of Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Royal Hospital for Children and Young People, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rosario R, Stewart HL, Spears N, Telfer EE, Anderson RA. Anti-Mullerian hormone attenuates both cyclophosphamide-induced damage and PI3K signalling activation, while rapamycin attenuates only PI3K signalling activation, in human ovarian cortex in vitro. Hum Reprod 2024; 39:382-392. [PMID: 38070496 PMCID: PMC10833070 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dead255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What are the effects of cyclophosphamide exposure on the human ovary and can anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) and rapamycin protect against these? SUMMARY ANSWER Exposure to cyclophosphamide compromises the health of primordial and transitional follicles in the human ovarian cortex and upregulates PI3K signalling, indicating both direct damage and increased follicular activation; AMH attenuates both of these chemotherapy-induced effects, while rapamycin attenuates only PI3K signalling upregulation. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Studies primarily in rodents demonstrate that cyclophosphamide causes direct damage to primordial follicles or that the primordial follicle pool is depleted primarily through excessive initiation of follicle growth. This increased follicular activation is mediated via upregulated PI3K signalling and/or reduced local levels of AMH production due to lost growing follicles. Furthermore, while rodent data show promise regarding the potential benefits of inhibitors/protectants alongside chemotherapy treatment to preserve female fertility, there is no information about the potential for this in humans. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Fresh ovarian cortical biopsies were obtained from 17 healthy women aged 21-41 years (mean ± SD: 31.8 ± 4.9 years) at elective caesarean section. Biopsies were cut into small fragments and cultured for 24 h with either vehicle alone (DMSO), the active cyclophosphamide metabolite 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide (4-HC) alone, 4-HC + rapamycin or 4-HC+AMH. Two doses of 4-HC were investigated, 0.2 and 2 μM in separate experiments, using biopsies from seven women (aged 27-41) and six women (aged 21-34), respectively. Biopsies from four women (aged 28-38) were used to investigate the effect of rapamycin or AMH only. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Histological analysis of ovarian tissue was undertaken for follicle staging and health assessment. Western blotting and immunostaining were used to assess activation of PI3K signalling by measuring phosphorylation of AKT and phosphorylated FOXO3A staining intensity, respectively. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Exposure to either dose of 4-HC caused an increase in the proportion of unhealthy primordial (P < 0.0001, both doses) and transitional follicles (P < 0.01 for low dose and P < 0.01 for high dose) compared to vehicle. AMH significantly reduced follicle damage by approximately half in both of the investigated doses of 4-HC (P < 0.0001), while rapamycin had no protective effect on the health of the follicles. Culture with AMH or rapamycin alone had no effect on follicle health. Activation of PI3K signalling following 4-HC exposure was demonstrated by both Western blotting data showing that 4-HC increased in AKT phosphorylation and immunostaining showing increased phosphorylated FOXO3A staining of non-growing oocytes. Treatment with rapamycin reduced the activation of PI3K signalling in experiments with low doses of 4-HC while culture with AMH reduced PI3K activation (both AKT phosphorylation and phosphorylated FOXO3A staining intensity) across both doses investigated. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION These in vitro studies may not replicate in vivo exposures. Furthermore, longer experiment durations are needed to determine whether the effects observed translate into irreparable deficits of ovarian follicles. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS These data provide a solid foundation on which to explore the efficacy of AMH in protecting non-growing ovarian follicles from gonadotoxic chemotherapies. Future work will require consideration of the sustained effects of chemotherapy treatment and potential protectants to ensure these agents do not impair the developmental competence of oocytes or lead to the survival of oocytes with accumulated DNA damage, which could have adverse consequences for potential offspring. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This work was supported by grants from TENOVUS Scotland, the Academy of Medical Sciences (to R.R.), the Medical Research Council (G1100357 to R.A.A., MR/N022556/1 to the MRC Centre for Reproductive Health), and Merck Serono UK (to R.A.A.). R.R., H.L.S., N.S., and E.E.T. declare no conflicts of interest. R.A.A. reports grants and personal fees from Roche Diagnostics and Ferring Pharmaceuticals, and personal fees from IBSA and Merck outside the submitted work. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roseanne Rosario
- Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Centre for Reproductive Health, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Hazel L Stewart
- Centre for Reproductive Health, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Norah Spears
- Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Evelyn E Telfer
- Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Institute of Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Richard A Anderson
- Centre for Reproductive Health, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Henderson I, Black N, Khattak H, Gupta JK, Rimmer MP. Diagnosis and management of endometrial hyperplasia: A UK national audit of adherence to national guidance 2012-2020. PLoS Med 2024; 21:e1004346. [PMID: 38421942 PMCID: PMC10903889 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endometrial hyperplasia (EH) is a precusor lesion for endometrial cancer (EC), the commonest gynaecological malignancy in high-income countries. EH is a proliferation of glandular tissue, classified as either non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia (NEH) or, if the cytological features are abnormal, atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH). The clinical significance of AEH is that patients face both a high risk of having occult EC and a high risk of progression to EC if untreated. Recommendations on the care of women with EH were introduced by United Kingdom-wide guidance (Green-top Guide No. 67, 2016). National adherence to guidance is unknown. We aimed to describe the care of patients with EH; to compare the patterns of care for those with EH with national guidance to identify opportunities for quality improvement; and to compare patterns of care prior to and following the introduction of national guidance to understand its impact. METHODS AND FINDINGS In this UK-wide patient-level clinical audit, we included 3,307 women who received a new histological diagnosis of EH through a gynaecology service between 1 January 2012 and 30 June 2020. We described first-line management, management at 2 years, and surgical characteristics prior to and following national guidance for EH using proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and compared process measures between time periods using multilevel Poisson regression. Of the 3,307 patients, 1,570 had NEH and 1,511 had AEH between 2012 and 2019. An additional 85 patients had NEH and 141 had AEH during 2020. Prior to national guidance, 9% (95% CI [6%, 15%]) received no initial treatment for NEH compared with 3% (95% CI [1%, 5%]) post-guidance; 31% (95% CI [26%, 36%]) and 48% (95% CI [43% 53%]) received an intrauterine progestogen, respectively, in the same periods. The predominant management of women with AEH did not differ, with 68% (95% CI [61%, 74%]) and 67% (95 CI [63%, 71%]) receiving first-line hysterectomy, respectively. By 2 years, follow-up to histological regression without hysterectomy increased from 38% (95% CI [33%, 43%]) to 52% (95% CI [47%, 58%]) for those with NEH (rate ratio (RR) 1.38, 95% CI [1.18, 1.63] p < 0.001). We observed an increase in the use of total laparoscopic hysterectomy among those with AEH (RR 1.26, 95% CI [1.04, 1.52]). In the later period, 37% (95% CI [29%, 44%]) of women initially diagnosed with AEH who underwent a first-line hysterectomy, received an upgraded diagnosis of EC. Study limitations included retrospective data collection from routine clinical documentation and the inability to comprehensively understand the shared decision-making process where care differed from guidance. CONCLUSIONS The care of patients with EH has changed in accordance with national guidance. More women received first-line medical management of NEH and were followed up to histological regression. The follow-up of those with AEH who do not undergo hysterectomy must be improved, given their very high risk of coexistent cancer and high risk of developing cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Henderson
- The United Kingdom Audit and Research Collaborative in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, London, United Kingdom
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Naomi Black
- The United Kingdom Audit and Research Collaborative in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, London, United Kingdom
- Division of Biomedical Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Hajra Khattak
- The United Kingdom Audit and Research Collaborative in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, London, United Kingdom
- Elizabeth Garret Anderson Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Janesh K. Gupta
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Birmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Hospital Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Michael P. Rimmer
- The United Kingdom Audit and Research Collaborative in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, London, United Kingdom
- Medical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health, Institute of Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Clark I, Brougham MFH, Spears N, Mitchell RT. The impact of vincristine on testicular development and function in childhood cancer. Hum Reprod Update 2023; 29:233-245. [PMID: 36495566 PMCID: PMC9976970 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmac039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing childhood cancer survival rates in recent decades have led to an increased focus on fertility as a long-term complication of cancer treatment. Male childhood cancer survivors often face compromised testicular function as a late effect of chemotherapy exposure, with no well-established options to prevent such damage and subsequent infertility. Despite vincristine being considered to be associated with low-gonadotoxic potential, in prepubertal rodents, it was recently shown to result in morphological alterations of the testis and in severely impaired fertility. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effects of vincristine-containing regimens on human prepubertal testis with reference to testicular function and fertility in adulthood. SEARCH METHODS The systematic search of the literature was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, and the study was registered with PROSPERO. PubMed and Scopus were searched for articles published in English between 01 January 1900 and 05 March 2021, with the search including 'chemotherapy', 'vincristine', 'prepubertal', 'testis', 'spermatogenesis' and related terms. Abstracts and full-text articles were screened and selected for, providing they met the inclusion criteria (≤12 years at treatment, exposure to vincristine-containing regimens and long-term fertility outcomes). Additional studies were identified via bibliography screening. Bias evaluation across included studies was conducted using the ROBINS-I tool, subdivided into assessment for confounding, participant selection, intervention classification, missing data, outcome measurements and selection of reported results. OUTCOMES Our initial search identified 288 articles of which 24 (8%; n = 7134 males) met all inclusion criteria. Control groups were included for 9/24 (38%) studies and 4/24 (17%) studies provided sub-analysis of the relative gonadotoxicity of vincristine-based agents. Primary outcome measures were: fertility and parenthood; semen analysis (World Health Organization criteria); and hormonal function and testicular volume. For the studies that performed vincristine sub-analysis, none reported negative associations with vincristine for the potential of siring a pregnancy, including the largest (n = 6224; hazard ratio = 0.56) controlled study. For semen analysis, no significant difference versus healthy controls was illustrated for mitotic inhibitors (including vincristine) following sub-analysis in one study (n = 143). For hormone analysis, a single study did not find significant impacts on spermatogenesis attributed to vincristine based on levels of FSH and semen analysis, which meant that its administration was unlikely to be responsible for the diminished testicular reserve; however, most of the studies were based on low numbers of patients receiving vincristine-containing chemotherapy. Analysis of bias demonstrated that studies which included vincristine exposure sub-analysis had a lower risk of bias when compared with cohorts which did not. WIDER IMPLICATIONS In contrast to recent findings in rodent studies, the limited number of clinical studies do not indicate gonadotoxic effects of vincristine following prepubertal exposure. However, given the relative lack of data from studies with vincristine sub-analysis, experimental studies involving vincristine exposure using human testicular tissues are warranted. Results from such studies could better inform paediatric cancer patients about their future fertility and eligibility for fertility preservation before initiation of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioanna Clark
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, The Queen’s Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Mark F H Brougham
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Royal Hospital for Children and Young People, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Norah Spears
- Edinburgh Medical School: Biomedical Sciences, Hugh Robson Building, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Rod T Mitchell
- Correspondence address. MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, The Queen’s Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK. Tel: +44-131-242-6470; Fax: +44-131-242-6197; E-mail: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4650-3765
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Reynolds-Wright JJ, Johnstone A, McCabe K, Evans E, Cameron S. Adherence to treatment and prevalence of side effects when medical abortion is delivered via telemedicine: a prospective observational cohort study during COVID-19. BMJ Sex Reprod Health 2022; 48:185-192. [PMID: 34711647 PMCID: PMC8593268 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2021-201263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/09/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Scottish government introduced legislation during the COVID-19 outbreak to permit medical abortion at home with telemedicine. All women received an initial telephone consultation. For those choosing medical abortion, we provided self-administered medications to eligible women with pregnancies under 12 weeks' gestation. AIMS To assess adherence to the recommended abortion drug regimen, with particular focus on the number of misoprostol doses used and the interval between mifepristone and misoprostol administration and the induction-expulsion interval. Additionally, to evaluate use of analgesia, antiemetics and antibiotics, and the side effects, pain and bleeding profile of medical abortion at home. METHODS We conducted a prospective cohort study of 663 women choosing medical abortion at home via telemedicine at an NHS abortion service in Edinburgh, Scotland between 1 April and 9 July 2020. Interviewer-administered questionnaires were completed at telephone follow-up 4 and 14 days following treatment. Outcome measures were self-reported and included use of mifepristone and misoprostol, induction-expulsion interval (time from misoprostol administration until expulsion of pregnancy), antiemetics, antibiotics, analgesia use, pain scores, rates of side effects, bleeding and preparedness for treatment. RESULTS Among the respondents, 652/663 women (98%) answered at least one questionnaire, and 594/663 (89.6%) used both abortion medications as directed (24-72 hours between medications). The mean (SD) induction-expulsion interval was 4.3 (4.3) hours. Antiemetics were used by 611/663 (92%), 383/599 (64%) completed the course of prophylactic antibiotics, and 616/663 (93%) used analgesia, with mean (SD) worst-pain scores of 6.7 (2.2) out of 10. Regarding side effects, 510/663 (77%) experienced either nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea or headache, 101/663 (15%) experienced headache and 510/663 (77%) experienced bleeding that was heavier than a period; 554/663, (84%) felt prepared for their treatment by teleconsultation. CONCLUSION Patients are able to correctly self-administer abortion medications following a telemedicine consultation. Further research is required to optimise pain management and gastrointestinal side effects during medical abortion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Joseph Reynolds-Wright
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Chalmers Centre, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Anne Johnstone
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Chalmers Centre, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Karen McCabe
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Chalmers Centre, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Emily Evans
- Edinburgh Clinical Research Facility, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Sharon Cameron
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Chalmers Centre, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Reynolds-Wright JJ, Boydell N, Cameron S, Harden J. A qualitative study of abortion care providers' perspectives on telemedicine medical abortion provision in the context of COVID-19. BMJ Sex Reprod Health 2022; 48:199-204. [PMID: 34848554 PMCID: PMC8635885 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2021-201309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 11/14/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Telemedicine for medical abortion care was rapidly introduced in Great Britain in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. A growing body of literature demonstrates that telemedicine abortion care is safe, effective and highly acceptable to patients. Less is known about the perspectives of abortion care providers (ACPs). METHODS Qualitative research within the telemedicine abortion service in Lothian (Edinburgh and surrounding region), UK. We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews with ACPs between May and July 2020 (doctors, n=6; nurses, n=10) and analysed the data thematically. RESULTS We present three themes from our qualitative analysis: (1) Selective use of ultrasound - the move away from routine ultrasound for determination of gestational age was generally viewed positively. Initial anxiety about non-detection of ectopic pregnancy and later gestations was expressed by some ACPs, but concerns were addressed through clinical practice and support structures within the clinic. (2) Identifying safeguarding issues - in the absence of visual cues some ACPs reported concerns about their ability to identify safeguarding issues, specifically domestic violence. Conversely it was acknowledged that teleconsultations may improve detection of this in some situations. (3) Provision of information during the consultation - telephone consultations were considered more focused than in-person consultations and formed only part of the overall 'package' of information provided to patients, supplemented by online and written information. CONCLUSIONS ACPs providing telemedicine abortion care value this option for patients and believe it should remain beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. Safeguarding patients and the selective use of ultrasound can be initially challenging; however, with experience, staff confidence improves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Joseph Reynolds-Wright
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Chalmers Centre, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Nicola Boydell
- Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Sharon Cameron
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Chalmers Centre, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jeni Harden
- Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|