1
|
Wang Y, Coyne KJ. Molecular Insights into the Synergistic Effects of Putrescine and Ammonium on Dinoflagellates. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:1306. [PMID: 38279308 PMCID: PMC10816187 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25021306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 01/13/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Ammonium and polyamines are essential nitrogen metabolites in all living organisms. Crosstalk between ammonium and polyamines through their metabolic pathways has been demonstrated in plants and animals, while no research has been directed to explore this relationship in algae or to investigate the underlying molecular mechanisms. Previous research demonstrated that high concentrations of ammonium and putrescine were among the active substances in bacteria-derived algicide targeting dinoflagellates, suggesting that the biochemical inter-connection and/or interaction of these nitrogen compounds play an essential role in controlling these ecologically important algal species. In this research, putrescine, ammonium, or a combination of putrescine and ammonium was added to cultures of three dinoflagellate species to explore their effects. The results demonstrated the dose-dependent and species-specific synergistic effects of putrescine and ammonium on these species. To further explore the molecular mechanisms behind the synergistic effects, transcriptome analysis was conducted on dinoflagellate Karlodinium veneficum treated with putrescine or ammonium vs. a combination of putrescine and ammonium. The results suggested that the synergistic effects of putrescine and ammonium disrupted polyamine homeostasis and reduced ammonium tolerance, which may have contributed to the cell death of K. veneficum. There was also transcriptomic evidence of damage to chloroplasts and impaired photosynthesis of K. veneficum. This research illustrates the molecular mechanisms underlying the synergistic effects of the major nitrogen metabolites, ammonium and putrescine, in dinoflagellates and provides direction for future studies on polyamine biology in algal species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kathryn J. Coyne
- College of Earth, Ocean, and Environment, University of Delaware, Lewes, DE 19958, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Farmer NA, Powell JR, Morris JA, Soldevilla MS, Wickliffe LC, Jossart JA, MacKay JK, Randall AL, Bath GE, Ruvelas P, Gray L, Lee J, Piniak W, Garrison L, Hardy R, Hart KM, Sasso C, Stokes L, Riley KL. Modeling protected species distributions and habitats to inform siting and management of pioneering ocean industries: A case study for Gulf of Mexico aquaculture. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0267333. [PMID: 36178939 PMCID: PMC9524655 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) provides a process that uses spatial data and models to evaluate environmental, social, economic, cultural, and management trade-offs when siting (i.e., strategically locating) ocean industries. Aquaculture is the fastest-growing food sector in the world. The United States (U.S.) has substantial opportunity for offshore aquaculture development given the size of its exclusive economic zone, habitat diversity, and variety of candidate species for cultivation. However, promising aquaculture areas overlap many protected species habitats. Aquaculture siting surveys, construction, operations, and decommissioning can alter protected species habitat and behavior. Additionally, aquaculture-associated vessel activity, underwater noise, and physical interactions between protected species and farms can increase the risk of injury and mortality. In 2020, the U.S. Gulf of Mexico was identified as one of the first regions to be evaluated for offshore aquaculture opportunities as directed by a Presidential Executive Order. We developed a transparent and repeatable method to identify aquaculture opportunity areas (AOAs) with the least conflict with protected species. First, we developed a generalized scoring approach for protected species that captures their vulnerability to adverse effects from anthropogenic activities using conservation status and demographic information. Next, we applied this approach to data layers for eight species listed under the Endangered Species Act, including five species of sea turtles, Rice’s whale, smalltooth sawfish, and giant manta ray. Next, we evaluated four methods for mathematically combining scores (i.e., Arithmetic mean, Geometric mean, Product, Lowest Scoring layer) to generate a combined protected species data layer. The Product approach provided the most logical ordering of, and the greatest contrast in, site suitability scores. Finally, we integrated the combined protected species data layer into a multi-criteria decision-making modeling framework for MSP. This process identified AOAs with reduced potential for protected species conflict. These modeling methods are transferable to other regions, to other sensitive or protected species, and for spatial planning for other ocean-uses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas A. Farmer
- NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Regional Office, St. Petersburg, Florida, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Jessica R. Powell
- NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Regional Office, St. Petersburg, Florida, United States of America
| | - James A. Morris
- NOAA/National Ocean Service, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, Beaufort, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Melissa S. Soldevilla
- NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Miami, Florida, United States of America
| | - Lisa C. Wickliffe
- CSS, Inc. under contract to the National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, National Ocean Service, NOAA, Beaufort, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Jonathan A. Jossart
- CSS, Inc. under contract to the National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, National Ocean Service, NOAA, Beaufort, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Jonathan K. MacKay
- CSS, Inc. under contract to the National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, National Ocean Service, NOAA, Beaufort, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Alyssa L. Randall
- CSS, Inc. under contract to the National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, National Ocean Service, NOAA, Beaufort, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Gretchen E. Bath
- CSS, Inc. under contract to the National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, National Ocean Service, NOAA, Beaufort, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Penny Ruvelas
- NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, West Coast Regional Office, Long Beach, California, United States of America
| | - Laura Gray
- NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, Office of Protected Resources, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Jennifer Lee
- NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Regional Office, St. Petersburg, Florida, United States of America
| | - Wendy Piniak
- NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, Office of Protected Resources, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Lance Garrison
- NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Miami, Florida, United States of America
| | - Robert Hardy
- NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Miami, Florida, United States of America
| | - Kristen M. Hart
- U.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, Davie, Florida, United States of America
| | - Chris Sasso
- NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Miami, Florida, United States of America
| | - Lesley Stokes
- NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Miami, Florida, United States of America
| | - Kenneth L. Riley
- NOAA/National Ocean Service, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, Beaufort, North Carolina, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hardison DR, Holland WC, McCall JR, Bourdelais AJ, Baden DG, Darius HT, Chinain M, Tester PA, Shea D, Flores Quintana HA, Morris JA, Litaker RW. Fluorescent Receptor Binding Assay for Detecting Ciguatoxins in Fish. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0153348. [PMID: 27073998 PMCID: PMC4830512 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2016] [Accepted: 03/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Ciguatera fish poisoning is an illness suffered by > 50,000 people yearly after consumption of fish containing ciguatoxins (CTXs). One of the current methodologies to detect ciguatoxins in fish is a radiolabeled receptor binding assay (RBA(R)). However, the license requirements and regulations pertaining to radioisotope utilization can limit the applicability of the RBA(R) in certain labs. A fluorescence based receptor binding assay (RBA(F)) was developed to provide an alternative method of screening fish samples for CTXs in facilities not certified to use radioisotopes. The new assay is based on competition binding between CTXs and fluorescently labeled brevetoxin-2 (BODIPY®- PbTx-2) for voltage-gated sodium channel receptors at site 5 instead of a radiolabeled brevetoxin. Responses were linear in fish tissues spiked from 0.1 to 1.0 ppb with Pacific ciguatoxin-3C (P-CTX-3C) with a detection limit of 0.075 ppb. Carribean ciguatoxins were confirmed in Caribbean fish by LC-MS/MS analysis of the regional biomarker (C-CTX-1). Fish (N = 61) of six different species were screened using the RBA(F). Results for corresponding samples analyzed using the neuroblastoma cell-based assay (CBA-N2a) correlated well (R2 = 0.71) with those of the RBA(F), given the low levels of CTX present in positive fish. Data analyses also showed the resulting toxicity levels of P-CTX-3C equivalents determined by CBA-N2a were consistently lower than the RBA(F) affinities expressed as % binding equivalents, indicating that a given amount of toxin bound to the site 5 receptors translates into corresponding lower cytotoxicity. Consequently, the RBA(F), which takes approximately two hours to perform, provides a generous estimate relative to the widely used CBA-N2a which requires 2.5 days to complete. Other RBA(F) advantages include the long-term (> 5 years) stability of the BODIPY®- PbTx-2 and having similar results as the commonly used RBA(R). The RBA(F) is cost-effective, allows high sample throughput, and is well-suited for routine CTX monitoring programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D. Ransom Hardison
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Center for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research, Beaufort, North Carolina, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - William C. Holland
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Center for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research, Beaufort, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Jennifer R. McCall
- University of North Carolina at Wilmington, MARBIONC at CREST Research Park, Wilmington, North Carolina, United States of America
- SeaTox Research Inc, UNCW CREST Research Park, Wilmington, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Andrea J. Bourdelais
- University of North Carolina at Wilmington, MARBIONC at CREST Research Park, Wilmington, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Daniel G. Baden
- University of North Carolina at Wilmington, MARBIONC at CREST Research Park, Wilmington, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - H. Taiana Darius
- Institut Louis Malardé (ILM)–UMR 241 EIO, Laboratory of Toxic-Microalgae, Papeete, Tahiti, French Polynesia
| | - Mireille Chinain
- Institut Louis Malardé (ILM)–UMR 241 EIO, Laboratory of Toxic-Microalgae, Papeete, Tahiti, French Polynesia
| | - Patricia A. Tester
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Center for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research, Beaufort, North Carolina, United States of America
- JHT, Inc., Orlando, Florida, United States of America
| | - Damian Shea
- North Carolina State University, Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology Laboratory, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Harold A. Flores Quintana
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Division of Seafood Science and Technology, Gulf Coast Seafood Laboratory, Dauphin Island, Alabama, United States of America
| | - James A. Morris
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Center for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research, Beaufort, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - R. Wayne Litaker
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Center for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research, Beaufort, North Carolina, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|