1
|
Pastore MA, Classen AT, D'Amato AW, English ME, Rand K, Foster JR, Adair EC. Frequent and strong cold-air pooling drives temperate forest composition. Ecol Evol 2024; 14:e11126. [PMID: 38571787 PMCID: PMC10985370 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.11126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Cold-air pooling is an important topoclimatic process that creates temperature inversions with the coldest air at the lowest elevations. Incomplete understanding of sub-canopy spatiotemporal cold-air pooling dynamics and associated ecological impacts hinders predictions and conservation actions related to climate change and cold-dependent species and functions. To determine if and how cold-air pooling influences forest composition, we characterized the frequency, strength, and temporal dynamics of cold-air pooling in the sub-canopy at local to regional scales in New England, USA. We established a network of 48 plots along elevational transects and continuously measured sub-canopy air temperatures for 6-10 months (depending on site). We then estimated overstory and understory community temperature preferences by surveying tree composition in each plot and combining these data with known species temperature preferences. We found that cold-air pooling was frequent (19-43% seasonal occurrences) and that sites with the most frequent inversions displayed inverted forest composition patterns across slopes with more cold-adapted species, namely conifers, at low instead of high elevations. We also observed both local and regional variability in cold-air pooling dynamics, revealing that while cold-air pooling is common, it is also spatially complex. Our study, which uniquely focused on broad spatial and temporal scales, has revealed some rarely reported cold-air pooling dynamics. For instance, we discovered frequent and strong temperature inversions that occurred across seasons and in some locations were most frequent during the daytime, likely affecting forest composition. Together, our results show that cold-air pooling is a fundamental ecological process that requires integration into modeling efforts predicting future forest vegetation patterns under climate change, as well as greater consideration for conservation strategies identifying potential climate refugia for cold-adapted species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa A. Pastore
- Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural ResourcesUniversity of VermontBurlingtonVermontUSA
- Gund Institute for Environment, University of VermontBurlingtonVermontUSA
- USDA Forest Service, Northern Research StationSt. PaulMinnesotaUSA
| | - Aimée T. Classen
- Gund Institute for Environment, University of VermontBurlingtonVermontUSA
- Ecology and Evolutionary Biology DepartmentUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
- University of Michigan Biological StationPellstonMichiganUSA
| | - Anthony W. D'Amato
- Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural ResourcesUniversity of VermontBurlingtonVermontUSA
| | - Marie E. English
- Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural ResourcesUniversity of VermontBurlingtonVermontUSA
| | - Karin Rand
- Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural ResourcesUniversity of VermontBurlingtonVermontUSA
- Ecology and Evolutionary Biology DepartmentUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Jane R. Foster
- Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural ResourcesUniversity of VermontBurlingtonVermontUSA
- USDA Forest Service, Southern Research StationKnoxvilleTennesseeUSA
| | - E. Carol Adair
- Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural ResourcesUniversity of VermontBurlingtonVermontUSA
- Gund Institute for Environment, University of VermontBurlingtonVermontUSA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ashbrook S, Hapeman P. American marten occupancy and activity patterns at the southern extent of their range in the eastern United States. Ecol Evol 2024; 14:e10904. [PMID: 38322003 PMCID: PMC10844684 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
The relatively recent rediscovery of an American marten (Martes americana) population that was reintroduced over 30 years ago in southern Vermont provides an opportunity to investigate the relative importance of other mesocarnivores, and forest stand (e.g., DBH, downed logs, vertical structure) and habitat variables to their presence on the Green Mountain National Forest. Marten are state-listed as an endangered species in Vermont and occur there at the southern extent of their range in the eastern United States. We collected detection data from camera surveys in 5 km2 units between 2019 and 2021 (December-April; n = 40 units, 238 cameras). We examined activity patterns and applied an occupancy modeling framework to the detection data to assess the relative importance of covariates at unit and camera levels and assess interactions of marten with other mesocarnivores. We did not find any unit-level occupancy models with significant covariates that were better supported than the base model in the single-season unit-level analysis. Distance to the nearest release site was the covariate most supported for detectability at both spatial scales, and marten occupancy at the camera level was positively influenced by the amount of canopy cover. Two species interaction models did not indicate any positive or negative association beyond random with other mesocarnivores and activity patterns among mesocarnivores had substantial overlap. Marten recovery since the time of the reintroduction appears slow, and even 30 years later, the marten distribution is limited and suggests that dispersal is restricted at some level. We recommend a further investigation of the possible impact of other mesocarnivores to juvenile survival or other vital demographic rate (e.g., recruitment) in marten that were not explicitly measured in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Ashbrook
- Department of BiologyCentral Connecticut State UniversityNew BritainConnecticutUSA
| | - Paul Hapeman
- Department of BiologyCentral Connecticut State UniversityNew BritainConnecticutUSA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Deckel SC, DeLuca WV, Gerson AR, King DI. Factors affecting the nesting success of Swainson's Thrush ( Catharus ustulatus) along an elevational gradient. Ecol Evol 2024; 14:e10738. [PMID: 38235410 PMCID: PMC10792399 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Montane birds experience a range of challenges that may limit their breeding success, including nest predation and severe climactic conditions. The continuing effects of climate change are causing shifts in biotic and abiotic factors that may compound these threats to montane bird species. In northeastern montane forests, many bird species are shifting downslope, potentially as the result of increased precipitation and temperature at higher elevations. Although lower elevations might be more favorable in terms of climactic conditions, nest predation is higher at lower elevations. Thus, montane birds might be faced with the opposing pressures of adverse climactic conditions at higher elevations and increased predation at lower elevations. We monitored nests of Swainson's Thrush (Catharus ustulatus) along an elevation gradient in the White Mountain National Forest in New Hampshire in 2016, 2018, 2019, and 2021 to examine the effect of biotic and abiotic factors on daily nest survival rate (DSR). Linear time explained the most variation of DSR in AICc model comparison, indicating that DSR decreases across the breeding season. Rain intensity (mm/h) had a weak negative effect on DSR, indicating that heavier rain per hour decreases Swainson's Thrush DSR. Moreover, we found some support for a negative interaction effect of elevation in conjunction with minimum daily temperature: DSR of Swainson's Thrush nests at low elevations (281 m) increased with increasing minimum daily temperatures and decreased at high elevations with increasing minimum daily temperatures. Our results suggest nesting survival of montane breeding birds may be at risk as heavier precipitation events become more frequent and intense due to the changing climate and raises the possibility that other passerine species could be at risk in this system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah C. Deckel
- Department of Environmental ConservationUniversity of MassachusettsAmherstMassachusettsUSA
| | - William V. DeLuca
- Department of Environmental ConservationUniversity of MassachusettsAmherstMassachusettsUSA
- Science DivisionNational Audubon SocietyNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | | | - David I. King
- Department of Environmental ConservationUniversity of MassachusettsAmherstMassachusettsUSA
- Northern Research StationUSDA Forest ServiceAmherstMassachusettsUSA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dechaine AC, Pfeiffer DG, Kuhar TP, Salom SM, Leskey TC, McIntyre KC, Walsh B, Speer JH. Dendrochronology reveals different effects among host tree species from feeding by Lycorma delicatula (White). Front Insect Sci 2023; 3:1137082. [PMID: 38469497 PMCID: PMC10926496 DOI: 10.3389/finsc.2023.1137082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
The spotted lanternfly, Lycorma delicatula (White) (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae), was first detected in the United States in Berks County, Pennsylvania, in 2014. Native to China, this phloem-feeding planthopper threatens agricultural, ornamental, nursery, and timber industries in its invaded range through quarantine restrictions on shipments, as well as impacts on plants themselves. The long-term impacts of L. delicatula feeding on tree species have not been well studied in North America. Using standard dendrochronological methods on cores taken from trees with differing levels of L. delicatula infestation and systemic insecticidal control, we quantified the impact of L. delicatula feeding on the annual growth of four tree species in Pennsylvania: Ailanthus altissima, Juglans nigra, Liriodendron tulipifera, and Acer rubrum. The results suggest that L. delicatula feeding is associated with the diminished growth of A. altissima, but no change was observed in any other tree species tested. The results also suggest that systemic insecticides mitigate the impact of L. delicatula feeding on A. altissima growth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew C. Dechaine
- Department of Entomology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, United States
| | - Douglas G. Pfeiffer
- Department of Entomology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, United States
| | - Thomas P. Kuhar
- Department of Entomology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, United States
| | - Scott M. Salom
- Department of Entomology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, United States
| | - Tracy C. Leskey
- Appalachian Fruit Research Station, United States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service (USDA—ARS), Kearneysville, WV, United States
| | - Kelly C. McIntyre
- Department of Entomology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, United States
| | - Brian Walsh
- Pennsylvania State University Extension, Leesport, PA, United States
| | - James H. Speer
- Geography and Geology Department of Earth and Environmental Systems, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rutledge CE, Clark RE. Temporal and spatial dynamics of the emerald ash borer invasion in Connecticut as shown by the native digging wasp Cerceris fumipennis (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae). Front Insect Sci 2023; 3:1179368. [PMID: 38469528 PMCID: PMC10926490 DOI: 10.3389/finsc.2023.1179368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
Detecting and monitoring populations of the invasive emerald ash borer (EAB) is crucial to successful management of the pest and evaluation of its ecological impacts. However, the beetle's cryptic habit makes accurate monitoring costly and time-consuming. Biosurveillance takes advantage of the foraging effort of a predatory wasp Cerceris fumipennis (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae). This native, solitary, ground-nesting hunting wasp hunts adult buprestid beetles to provision its brood cells. By intercepting the hunting wasps, we can learn which species of buprestids are in the surrounding forest. The resulting data provides information on the presence and relative abundance of invasive buprestids like EAB which can supplement other monitoring efforts. In this paper we share results of ten years of biosurveillance surveys of the EAB in Connecticut. Among 112 sites, we observed EAB populations; from first detection, through the population peak and then through to the population crash, matching patterns observed in other regions of the United States. We also observed the spread of the EAB relative abundance as it moved through the state following an invasion front starting in New Haven, Co. The average time from first detection to population crash was nine years. On average, populations peaked three years after first detection, and remained at peak levels for three to four years. Population decline was gradual and took another three to four years. Notably, no evidence of a second introduction to Connecticut was seen with proportional abundance increasing over time after expanding outward from the introduction point. These results corroborate other traditional monitoring efforts in the eastern U.S. and provide independent validation of predicted population dynamics in ash stands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire E. Rutledge
- Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Robert E. Clark
- EcoData Technology, Plantsville, CT, United States
- Department of Entomology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dobbs JT, Kim MS, Reynolds GJ, Wilhelmi N, Dumroese RK, Klopfenstein NB, Fraedrich SW, Cram MM, Bronson J, Stewart JE. Fusarioid community diversity associated with conifer seedlings in forest nurseries across the contiguous USA. Front Plant Sci 2023; 14:1104675. [PMID: 36818886 PMCID: PMC9930990 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1104675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fusarioid fungi that cause damping-off and root diseases can result in significant losses to conifer crops produced in forest nurseries across the USA. These nurseries are vital to reforestation and forest restoration efforts. Understanding the diversity of Fusarioid fungi associated with damping-off and root diseases of conifer seedlings can provide an approach for targeted management techniques to limit seedling losses and pathogen spread to novel landscapes. METHODS This study identifies 26 Fusarium spp. (F. acuminatum, F. annulatum, F. avenaceum, F. brachygibbosum, F. clavus, F. commune, F. cugenangense, F. diversisporum, F. elaeagni, F. elaeidis, F. flocciferum, F. fredkrugeri, F. fujikuroi, F. grosmichelii, F. ipomoeae, F. lactis, F. languescens, F. luffae, F. odoratissimum, F. oxysporum, F. queenslandicum, F. redolens, F. torulosum, F. triseptatum, F. vanleeuwenii, & F. verticillioides), 15 potential species within Fusarium and Neocosmospora species complexes (two from F. fujikuroi species complex, nine from F. oxysporum species complex, three from F. tricinctum species complex, and one from Neocosmospora species complex), and four Neocosmospora spp. (N. falciforme, N. metavorans, N. pisi, & N. solani) and associated host information collected from conifer-producing nurseries across the contiguous USA. RESULTS Phylogenetic analyses identified Fusarioid fungi haplotypes that were associated with 1) host specificity, 2) localization to geographic regions, or 3) generalists found on multiple hosts across diverse geographic regions. DISCUSSION The haplotypes and novel species identified on conifer seedlings should be considered for further analysis to determine pathogenicity, pathogen spread, and assess management practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. T. Dobbs
- Colorado State University, Department of Agricultural Biology, Fort Collins, CO, United States
| | - M.-S. Kim
- USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Corvallis, OR, United States
| | - G. J. Reynolds
- USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Protection – Region 3, Albuquerque, NM, United States
| | - N. Wilhelmi
- USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Protection – Region 3, Flagstaff, AZ, United States
| | - R. K. Dumroese
- USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Moscow, ID, United States
| | - N. B. Klopfenstein
- USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Moscow, ID, United States
| | - S. W. Fraedrich
- USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Athens, GA, United States
| | - M. M. Cram
- USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Protection – Region 8, Athens, GA, United States
| | - J. Bronson
- USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Protection – Region 6, Medford, OR, United States
| | - J. E. Stewart
- Colorado State University, Department of Agricultural Biology, Fort Collins, CO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rockweit JT, Jenkins JM, Hines JE, Nichols JD, Dugger KM, Franklin AB, Carlson PC, Kendall WL, Lesmeister DB, McCafferty C, Ackers SH, Andrews LS, Bailey LL, Burgher J, Burnham KP, Chestnut T, Conner MM, Davis RJ, Dilione KE, Forsman ED, Glenn EM, Gremel SA, Hamm KA, Herter DR, Higley JM, Horn RB, Lamphear DW, McDonald TL, Reid JA, Schwarz CJ, Simon DC, Sovern SG, Swingle JK, Wiens JD, Wise H, Yackulic CB. Range-wide sources of variation in reproductive rates of northern spotted owls. Ecol Appl 2023; 33:e2726. [PMID: 36053865 PMCID: PMC10078374 DOI: 10.1002/eap.2726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
We conducted a range-wide investigation of the dynamics of site-level reproductive rate of northern spotted owls using survey data from 11 study areas across the subspecies geographic range collected during 1993-2018. Our analytical approach accounted for imperfect detection of owl pairs and misclassification of successful reproduction (i.e., at least one young fledged) and contributed further insights into northern spotted owl population ecology and dynamics. Both nondetection and state misclassification were important, especially because factors affecting these sources of error also affected focal ecological parameters. Annual probabilities of site occupancy were greatest at sites with successful reproduction in the previous year and lowest for sites not occupied by a pair in the previous year. Site-specific occupancy transition probabilities declined over time and were negatively affected by barred owl presence. Overall, the site-specific probability of successful reproduction showed substantial year-to-year fluctuations and was similar for occupied sites that did or did not experience successful reproduction the previous year. Site-specific probabilities for successful reproduction were very small for sites that were unoccupied the previous year. Barred owl presence negatively affected the probability of successful reproduction by northern spotted owls in Washington and California, as predicted, but the effect in Oregon was mixed. The proportions of sites occupied by northern spotted owl pairs showed steep, near-monotonic declines over the study period, with all study areas showing the lowest observed levels of occupancy to date. If trends continue it is likely that northern spotted owls will become extirpated throughout large portions of their range in the coming decades.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy T. Rockweit
- Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation SciencesOregon State UniversityCorvallisOregonUSA
- Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation BiologyColorado State UniversityFort CollinsColoradoUSA
| | - Julianna M. Jenkins
- US Department of Agriculture, Forest ServicePacific Northwest Research StationCorvallisOregonUSA
| | - James E. Hines
- US Geological Survey, Eastern Ecological Science CenterLaurelMarylandUSA
| | - James D. Nichols
- Department of Wildlife Ecology and ConservationUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleFloridaUSA
| | - Katie M. Dugger
- US Geological Survey, Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation SciencesOregon State UniversityCorvallisOregonUSA
| | - Alan B. Franklin
- US Department of Agriculture, Wildlife ServicesNational Wildlife Research CenterFort CollinsColoradoUSA
| | - Peter C. Carlson
- Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation BiologyColorado State UniversityFort CollinsColoradoUSA
| | - William L. Kendall
- US Geological Survey, Colorado Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research UnitColorado State UniversityFort CollinsColoradoUSA
| | - Damon B. Lesmeister
- US Department of Agriculture, Forest ServicePacific Northwest Research StationCorvallisOregonUSA
| | - Christopher McCafferty
- US Department of Agriculture, Forest ServicePacific Northwest Research StationCorvallisOregonUSA
| | - Steven H. Ackers
- Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation SciencesOregon State UniversityCorvallisOregonUSA
| | - L. Steven Andrews
- Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation SciencesOregon State UniversityCorvallisOregonUSA
| | - Larissa L. Bailey
- Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation BiologyColorado State UniversityFort CollinsColoradoUSA
| | - Jesse Burgher
- US Department of Agriculture, Forest ServicePacific Northwest Research StationCorvallisOregonUSA
| | - Kenneth P. Burnham
- Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation BiologyColorado State UniversityFort CollinsColoradoUSA
| | - Tara Chestnut
- National Park Service, Mount Rainier National ParkAshfordWashingtonUSA
| | - Mary M. Conner
- Department of Wildland ResourcesUtah State UniversityLoganUtahUSA
| | - Raymond J. Davis
- US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest RegionCorvallisOregonUSA
| | - Krista E. Dilione
- US Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science CenterCorvallisOregonUSA
| | - Eric D. Forsman
- US Department of Agriculture, Forest ServicePacific Northwest Research StationCorvallisOregonUSA
| | - Elizabeth M. Glenn
- US Geological Survey, Northwest Climate Adaptation Science CenterCorvallisOregonUSA
| | - Scott A. Gremel
- National Park Service, Olympic National ParkPort AngelesWashingtonUSA
| | - Keith A. Hamm
- Green Diamond Resource Company, California Timberlands DivisionKorbelCaliforniaUSA
| | | | - J. Mark Higley
- Hoopa Tribal Council, Forestry DivisionHoopaCaliforniaUSA
| | - Rob B. Horn
- US Bureau of Land ManagementRoseburgOregonUSA
| | - David W. Lamphear
- Green Diamond Resource Company, California Timberlands DivisionKorbelCaliforniaUSA
| | | | - Janice A. Reid
- US Department of Agriculture, Forest ServicePacific Northwest Research StationCorvallisOregonUSA
| | - Carl J. Schwarz
- Department of Mathematics and StatisticsSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - David C. Simon
- US Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science CenterCorvallisOregonUSA
| | - Stan G. Sovern
- Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation SciencesOregon State UniversityCorvallisOregonUSA
- US Department of Agriculture, Forest ServicePacific Northwest Research StationCorvallisOregonUSA
| | - James K. Swingle
- US Department of Agriculture, Forest ServicePacific Northwest Research StationCorvallisOregonUSA
| | - J. David Wiens
- US Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science CenterCorvallisOregonUSA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Davis TS, Meddens AJH, Stevens‐Rumann CS, Jansen VS, Sibold JS, Battaglia MA. Monitoring resistance and resilience using carbon trajectories: Analysis of forest management-disturbance interactions. Ecol Appl 2022; 32:e2704. [PMID: 35801514 PMCID: PMC10077906 DOI: 10.1002/eap.2704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Revised: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
A changing climate is altering ecosystem carbon dynamics with consequences for natural systems and human economies, but there are few tools available for land managers to meaningfully incorporate carbon trajectories into planning efforts. To address uncertainties wrought by rapidly changing conditions, many practitioners adopt resistance and resilience as ecosystem management goals, but these concepts have proven difficult to monitor across landscapes. Here, we address the growing need to understand and plan for ecosystem carbon with concepts of resistance and resilience. Using time series of carbon fixation (n = 103), we evaluate forest management treatments and their relative impacts on resistance and resilience in the context of an expansive and severe natural disturbance. Using subalpine spruce-fir forest with a known management history as a study system, we match metrics of ecosystem productivity (net primary production, g C m-2 year-1 ) with site-level forest structural measurements to evaluate (1) whether past management efforts impacted forest resistance and resilience during a spruce beetle (Dendroctonus rufipennis) outbreak, and (2) how forest structure and physiography contribute to anomalies in carbon trajectories. Our analyses have several important implications. First, we show that the framework we applied was robust for detecting forest treatment impacts on carbon trajectories, closely tracked changes in site-level biomass, and was supported by multiple evaluation methods converging on similar management effects on resistance and resilience. Second, we found that stand species composition, site productivity, and elevation predicted resistance, but resilience was only related to elevation and aspect. Our analyses demonstrate application of a practical approach for comparing forest treatments and isolating specific site and physiographic factors associated with resistance and resilience to biotic disturbance in a forest system, which can be used by managers to monitor and plan for both outcomes. More broadly, the approach we take here can be applied to many scenarios, which can facilitate integrated management and monitoring efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas S. Davis
- Forest & Rangeland StewardshipWarner College of Natural Resources, Colorado State UniversityFort CollinsColoradoUSA
- Graduate Degree Program in EcologyColorado State UniversityFort CollinsColoradoUSA
| | - Arjan J. H. Meddens
- School of the EnvironmentCollege of Agricultural, Human, and Natural Resource Sciences, Washington State UniversityPullmanWashingtonUSA
| | - Camille S. Stevens‐Rumann
- Forest & Rangeland StewardshipWarner College of Natural Resources, Colorado State UniversityFort CollinsColoradoUSA
- Colorado Forest Restoration Institute, Colorado State UniversityFort CollinsColoradoUSA
| | - Vincent S. Jansen
- Forest, Rangeland, and Fire Sciences, College of Natural Resources, University of IdahoMoscowIdahoUSA
| | - Jason S. Sibold
- Graduate Degree Program in EcologyColorado State UniversityFort CollinsColoradoUSA
- Anthropology and GeographyCollege of Liberal Arts, Colorado State UniversityFort CollinsColoradoUSA
| | - Mike A. Battaglia
- USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research StationFort CollinsColoradoUSA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rastetter EB, Kwiatkowski BL, Kicklighter DW, Barker Plotkin A, Genet H, Nippert JB, O'Keefe K, Perakis SS, Porder S, Roley SS, Ruess RW, Thompson JR, Wieder WR, Wilcox K, Yanai RD. N and P constrain C in ecosystems under climate change: Role of nutrient redistribution, accumulation, and stoichiometry. Ecol Appl 2022; 32:e2684. [PMID: 35633204 PMCID: PMC10078338 DOI: 10.1002/eap.2684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
We use the Multiple Element Limitation (MEL) model to examine responses of 12 ecosystems to elevated carbon dioxide (CO2 ), warming, and 20% decreases or increases in precipitation. Ecosystems respond synergistically to elevated CO2 , warming, and decreased precipitation combined because higher water-use efficiency with elevated CO2 and higher fertility with warming compensate for responses to drought. Response to elevated CO2 , warming, and increased precipitation combined is additive. We analyze changes in ecosystem carbon (C) based on four nitrogen (N) and four phosphorus (P) attribution factors: (1) changes in total ecosystem N and P, (2) changes in N and P distribution between vegetation and soil, (3) changes in vegetation C:N and C:P ratios, and (4) changes in soil C:N and C:P ratios. In the combined CO2 and climate change simulations, all ecosystems gain C. The contributions of these four attribution factors to changes in ecosystem C storage varies among ecosystems because of differences in the initial distributions of N and P between vegetation and soil and the openness of the ecosystem N and P cycles. The net transfer of N and P from soil to vegetation dominates the C response of forests. For tundra and grasslands, the C gain is also associated with increased soil C:N and C:P. In ecosystems with symbiotic N fixation, C gains resulted from N accumulation. Because of differences in N versus P cycle openness and the distribution of organic matter between vegetation and soil, changes in the N and P attribution factors do not always parallel one another. Differences among ecosystems in C-nutrient interactions and the amount of woody biomass interact to shape ecosystem C sequestration under simulated global change. We suggest that future studies quantify the openness of the N and P cycles and changes in the distribution of C, N, and P among ecosystem components, which currently limit understanding of nutrient effects on C sequestration and responses to elevated CO2 and climate change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Helene Genet
- Institute of Arctic BiologyUniversity of Alaska FairbanksFairbanksAlaskaUSA
| | | | - Kimberly O'Keefe
- Department of Biological SciencesSaint Edward's UniversityAustinTexasUSA
| | - Steven S. Perakis
- U.S. Geological SurveyForest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science CenterCorvallisOregonUSA
| | - Stephen Porder
- Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyInstitute for Environment and Society, Brown UniversityProvidenceRhode IslandUSA
| | - Sarah S. Roley
- School of the EnvironmentWashington State UniversityRichlandWashingtonUSA
- W.K. Kellogg Biological StationMichigan State UniversityHickory CornersMichiganUSA
| | - Roger W. Ruess
- Department of Biology and WildlifeInstitute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska FairbanksFairbanksAlaskaUSA
| | | | - William R. Wieder
- Climate and Global Dynamics LaboratoryNational Center for Atmospheric ResearchBoulderColoradoUSA
- Institute of Arctic and Alpine ResearchUniversity of Colorado BoulderBoulderColoradoUSA
| | - Kevin Wilcox
- Department of Ecosystem Science and ManagementUniversity of WyomingLaramieWyomingUSA
| | - Ruth D. Yanai
- Department of Sustainable Resources ManagementSUNY College of Environmental Science and ForestrySyracuseNew YorkUSA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hacket‐Pain A, Foest JJ, Pearse IS, LaMontagne JM, Koenig WD, Vacchiano G, Bogdziewicz M, Caignard T, Celebias P, van Dormolen J, Fernández‐Martínez M, Moris JV, Palaghianu C, Pesendorfer M, Satake A, Schermer E, Tanentzap AJ, Thomas PA, Vecchio D, Wion AP, Wohlgemuth T, Xue T, Abernethy K, Aravena Acuña M, Daniel Barrera M, Barton JH, Boutin S, Bush ER, Donoso Calderón S, Carevic FS, de Castilho CV, Manuel Cellini J, Chapman CA, Chapman H, Chianucci F, da Costa P, Croisé L, Cutini A, Dantzer B, Justin DeRose R, Dikangadissi J, Dimoto E, da Fonseca FL, Gallo L, Gratzer G, Greene DF, Hadad MA, Herrera AH, Jeffery KJ, Johnstone JF, Kalbitzer U, Kantorowicz W, Klimas CA, Lageard JGA, Lane J, Lapin K, Ledwoń M, Leeper AC, Vanessa Lencinas M, Lira‐Guedes AC, Lordon MC, Marchelli P, Marino S, Schmidt Van Marle H, McAdam AG, Momont LRW, Nicolas M, de Oliveira Wadt LH, Panahi P, Martínez Pastur G, Patterson T, Luis Peri P, Piechnik Ł, Pourhashemi M, Espinoza Quezada C, Roig FA, Peña Rojas K, Micaela Rosas Y, Schueler S, Seget B, Soler R, Steele MA, Toro‐Manríquez M, Tutin CEG, Ukizintambara T, White L, Yadok B, Willis JL, Zolles A, Żywiec M, Ascoli D. MASTREE+: Time-series of plant reproductive effort from six continents. Glob Chang Biol 2022; 28:3066-3082. [PMID: 35170154 PMCID: PMC9314730 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Significant gaps remain in understanding the response of plant reproduction to environmental change. This is partly because measuring reproduction in long-lived plants requires direct observation over many years and such datasets have rarely been made publicly available. Here we introduce MASTREE+, a data set that collates reproductive time-series data from across the globe and makes these data freely available to the community. MASTREE+ includes 73,828 georeferenced observations of annual reproduction (e.g. seed and fruit counts) in perennial plant populations worldwide. These observations consist of 5971 population-level time-series from 974 species in 66 countries. The mean and median time-series length is 12.4 and 10 years respectively, and the data set includes 1122 series that extend over at least two decades (≥20 years of observations). For a subset of well-studied species, MASTREE+ includes extensive replication of time-series across geographical and climatic gradients. Here we describe the open-access data set, available as a.csv file, and we introduce an associated web-based app for data exploration. MASTREE+ will provide the basis for improved understanding of the response of long-lived plant reproduction to environmental change. Additionally, MASTREE+ will enable investigation of the ecology and evolution of reproductive strategies in perennial plants, and the role of plant reproduction as a driver of ecosystem dynamics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Hacket‐Pain
- Department of Geography and PlanningSchool of Environmental SciencesUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
| | - Jessie J. Foest
- Department of Geography and PlanningSchool of Environmental SciencesUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
| | - Ian S. Pearse
- U.S. Geological SurveyFort Collins Science CenterFort CollinsColoradoUSA
| | | | - Walter D. Koenig
- Hastings ReservationUniversity of California BerkeleyCarmel ValleyCaliforniaUSA
| | - Giorgio Vacchiano
- Department of Agricultural and Environmental SciencesUniversity of MilanMilanItaly
| | - Michał Bogdziewicz
- Faculty of BiologyInstitute of Environmental BiologyAdam Mickiewicz UniversityPoznańPoland
- INRAELESSEMUniversity Grenoble AlpesGrenobleFrance
| | | | - Paulina Celebias
- Faculty of BiologyInstitute of Environmental BiologyAdam Mickiewicz UniversityPoznańPoland
| | | | | | - Jose V. Moris
- Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (DISAFA)University of TorinoTorinoItaly
| | | | - Mario Pesendorfer
- Department of Forest and Soil SciencesInstitute of Forest EcologyUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences ViennaViennaAustria
| | | | - Eliane Schermer
- Aix Marseille UnivAvignon UniversitéCNRSIRDIMBEMarseilleFrance
| | - Andrew J. Tanentzap
- Ecosystems and Global Change GroupDepartment of Plant SciencesUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | | | - Davide Vecchio
- Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (DISAFA)University of TorinoTorinoItaly
| | - Andreas P. Wion
- Graduate Degree Program in Ecology and The Department of Forest and Rangeland StewardshipColorado State UniversityFort CollinsColoradoUSA
| | - Thomas Wohlgemuth
- Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSLBirmensdorfSwitzerland
| | - Tingting Xue
- College of Civil and Architecture and EngineeringChuzhou UniversityChina
| | - Katharine Abernethy
- Faculty of Natural SciencesUniversity of StirlingStirlingUK
- Institut de Recherche en Ecologie TropicaleCENARESTLibrevilleGabon
| | - Marie‐Claire Aravena Acuña
- Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y de la Conservación de la Naturaleza (FCFCN)Universidad de ChileSantiagoChile
| | | | - Jessica H. Barton
- Department of Biological SciencesDePaul UniversityChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Stan Boutin
- Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonABCanada
| | | | - Sergio Donoso Calderón
- Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y de la Conservación de la Naturaleza (FCFCN)Universidad de ChileSantiagoChile
| | - Felipe S. Carevic
- Facultad de Recursos Naturales RenovablesUniversidad Arturo PratIquiqueChile
| | | | - Juan Manuel Cellini
- Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y de la Conservación de la Naturaleza (FCFCN)Universidad de ChileSantiagoChile
| | - Colin A. Chapman
- Wilson CenterWashingtonDistrict of ColumbiaUSA
- Department of AnthropologyGeorge Washington UniversityWashingtonDistrict of ColumbiaUSA
- School of Life SciencesUniversity of KwaZulu‐NatalPietermaritzburgSouth Africa
- Shaanxi Key Laboratory for Animal ConservationNorthwest UniversityXi'anChina
| | - Hazel Chapman
- School of Biological SciencesUniversity of CanterburyCanterburyNew Zealand
- Nigerian Montane Forest Project (NMFP)Yelway VillageNigeria
| | | | - Patricia da Costa
- Brazilian Agricultural Research CorporationEmbrapa Meio AmbienteJaguariúnaBrazil
| | - Luc Croisé
- Département Recherche‐Développement‐InnovationOffice National des ForêtsFontainebleauFrance
| | - Andrea Cutini
- CREA—Research Centre for Forestry and WoodArezzoItaly
| | - Ben Dantzer
- Department of PsychologyDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - R. Justin DeRose
- Department of Wildland Resources and Ecology CenterUtah State UniversityLoganUtahUSA
| | | | - Edmond Dimoto
- Agence Nationale des Parcs Nationaux (ANPN)LibrevilleGabon
| | | | - Leonardo Gallo
- Instituto de Investigaciones Forestales y Agropecuarias Bariloche (IFAB) (INTA—CONICETInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria—Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasBarilocheArgentina
| | - Georg Gratzer
- Department of Forest and Soil SciencesInstitute of Forest EcologyUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences ViennaViennaAustria
| | - David F. Greene
- Department of Forestry and Wildland ResourcesHumboldt State UniversityArcataCaliforniaUSA
| | - Martín A. Hadad
- Laboratorio de Dendrocronología de Zonas ÁridasCIGEOBIO (CONICET‐UNSJ)RivadaviaArgentina
| | - Alejandro Huertas Herrera
- Centro de Investigación en Ecosistemas de la Patagonia (CIEP)CoyhaiqueChile
- Ulterarius Consultores Ambientales y Científicos LtdaPunta ArenasChile
| | | | - Jill F. Johnstone
- Institute of Arctic BiologyUniversity of Alaska FairbanksFairbanksAlaskaUSA
| | - Urs Kalbitzer
- Department for the Ecology of Animal SocietiesMax Planck Institute of Animal BehaviorRadolfzellGermany
- Department of BiologyUniversity of KonstanzKonstanzGermany
| | - Władysław Kantorowicz
- Department of Silviculture and Genetics of Forest TreesForest Research InstituteRaszynPoland
| | - Christie A. Klimas
- Environmental Science and Studies DepartmentDePaul UniversityChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | | | - Jeffrey Lane
- Department of BiologyUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatoonSaskatchewanCanada
| | | | - Mateusz Ledwoń
- Institute of Systematics and Evolution of AnimalsPolish Academy of SciencesKrakówPoland
| | - Abigail C. Leeper
- Department of Biological SciencesDePaul UniversityChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Maria Vanessa Lencinas
- Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC)Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)UshuaiaArgentina
| | | | - Michael C. Lordon
- Department of Biological SciencesDePaul UniversityChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Paula Marchelli
- Instituto de Investigaciones Forestales y Agropecuarias Bariloche (IFAB) (INTA—CONICETInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria—Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasBarilocheArgentina
| | - Shealyn Marino
- Department of Biology and Institute of the EnvironmentWilkes UniversityWilkes‐BarrePennsylvaniaUSA
| | | | - Andrew G. McAdam
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of ColoradoBoulderColoradoUSA
| | | | - Manuel Nicolas
- Département Recherche‐Développement‐InnovationOffice National des ForêtsFontainebleauFrance
| | | | - Parisa Panahi
- Botany Research DivisionResearch Institute of Forests and RangelandsAgricultural Research, Education and Extension OrganizationTehranIran
| | - Guillermo Martínez Pastur
- Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC)Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)UshuaiaArgentina
| | - Thomas Patterson
- School of Biological, Environmental, and Earth SciencesThe University of Southern MississippiHattiesburgMississippiUSA
| | - Pablo Luis Peri
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA)Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral (UNPA)Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)Río GallegosArgentina
| | - Łukasz Piechnik
- W. Szafer Institute of BotanyPolish Academy of SciencesKrakówPoland
| | - Mehdi Pourhashemi
- Forest Research DivisionResearch Institute of Forests and RangelandsAgricultural Research, Education and Extension OrganizationTehranIran
| | | | - Fidel A. Roig
- Laboratorio de Dendrocronología e Historia AmbientalIANIGLA—CONICET‐Universidad Nacional de CuyoMendozaArgentina
- Facultad de CienciasHémera Centro de Observación de la TierraEscuela de Ingeniería ForestalUniversidad MayorSantiagoChile
| | | | - Yamina Micaela Rosas
- Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC)Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)UshuaiaArgentina
| | | | - Barbara Seget
- W. Szafer Institute of BotanyPolish Academy of SciencesKrakówPoland
| | - Rosina Soler
- Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC)Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)UshuaiaArgentina
| | - Michael A. Steele
- Department of Biology and Institute of the EnvironmentWilkes UniversityWilkes‐BarrePennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Mónica Toro‐Manríquez
- Centro de Investigación en Ecosistemas de la Patagonia (CIEP)CoyhaiqueChile
- Ulterarius Consultores Ambientales y Científicos LtdaPunta ArenasChile
| | | | | | - Lee White
- Faculty of Natural SciencesUniversity of StirlingStirlingUK
- Institut de Recherche en Ecologie TropicaleCENARESTLibrevilleGabon
- Ministère des Eaux, des Forêts, de la Mer, de l'Environnement chargé du Plan Climat, des Objectifs de Development Durable et du Plan d'Affectation des TerresBoulevard TriomphaleLibrevilleGabon
| | - Biplang Yadok
- Nigerian Montane Forest Project (NMFP)Yelway VillageNigeria
- Biosecurity NZMinistry for Primary IndustriesWellingtonNew Zealand
| | | | - Anita Zolles
- Austrian Research Centre for Forests BFWViennaAustria
| | - Magdalena Żywiec
- W. Szafer Institute of BotanyPolish Academy of SciencesKrakówPoland
| | - Davide Ascoli
- Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (DISAFA)University of TorinoTorinoItaly
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Aycrigg JL, Mccarley TR, Belote RT, Martinuzzi S. Wilderness areas in a changing landscape: changes in land use, land cover, and climate. Ecol Appl 2022; 32:e02471. [PMID: 34626517 PMCID: PMC9285566 DOI: 10.1002/eap.2471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Wilderness areas are not immune to changes in land use, land cover, and/or climate. Future changes will intensify the balancing act of maintaining ecological conditions and untrammeled character within wilderness areas. We assessed the quantitative and spatial changes in land use, land cover, and climate predicted to occur in and around wilderness areas by (1) quantifying projected changes in land use and land cover around wilderness areas; (2) evaluating if public lands surrounding wilderness areas can buffer future land-use change; (3) quantifying future climate conditions in and around wilderness areas; and (4) identifying wilderness areas expected to experience the most change in land use, land cover, and climate. We used projections of land use (four variables), land cover (five variables), and climate (nine variables) to assess changes for 707 wilderness areas in the contiguous United States by mid-21st century under two scenarios (medium-low and high). We ranked all wilderness areas relative to each other by summing and ranking decile values for each land use, land cover, and climate variable and calculating a multivariate metric of future change. All wilderness areas were projected to experience some level of change by mid-century. The greatest land-use changes were associated with increases in agriculture, clear cutting, and developed land, while the greatest land cover changes were observed for grassland, forest, and shrubland. In 51.6% and 73.8% of wilderness areas, core area of natural vegetation surrounding wilderness was projected to decrease for the medium-low and high scenarios, respectfully. Presence of public land did not mitigate the influence of land-use change around wilderness areas. Geographically, projected changes occurred throughout the contiguous U.S., with areas in the northeast and upper Midwest projected to have the greatest land-use and climate change and the southwestern U.S. projected to undergo the greatest land cover and climate change. Our results provide insights into potential future threats to wilderness areas and the challenges associated with wilderness stewardship and climate adaptation. Despite the high degree of protection and remoteness of wilderness areas, effective management and preservation of these lands must consider future changes in land use, land cover, and climate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jocelyn L. Aycrigg
- Department of Fish and Wildlife SciencesCollege of Natural ResourcesUniversity of IdahoMoscowIdaho83844USA
| | - T. Ryan Mccarley
- Department of Fish and Wildlife SciencesCollege of Natural ResourcesUniversity of IdahoMoscowIdaho83844USA
| | | | - Sebastian Martinuzzi
- SILVIS LaboratoryDepartment of Forest and Wildlife EcologyUniversity of WisconsinMadisonWisconsin53706USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Leaf AT, Fienen MN, Reeves HW. SFRmaker and Linesink-Maker: Rapid Construction of Streamflow Routing Networks from Hydrography Data. Ground Water 2021; 59:761-771. [PMID: 33745128 PMCID: PMC8518817 DOI: 10.1111/gwat.13095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2020] [Revised: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Groundwater models have evolved to encompass more aspects of the water cycle, but the incorporation of realistic boundary conditions representing surface water remains time-consuming and error-prone. We present two Python packages that robustly automate this process using readily available hydrography data as the primary input. SFRmaker creates input for the MODFLOW SFR package, while Linesink-maker creates linesink string input for the GFLOW analytic element program. These programs can reduce weeks or even months of manual effort to a few minutes of execution time, and carry the added advantages of reduced potential for error, improved reproducibility and facilitation of step-wise modeling through reduced dependency on a particular conceptual model or discretization. Two real-world examples at the county to multi-state scales are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew T. Leaf
- U.S. Geological Survey Upper Midwest Water Science Center8505 Research Way, MiddletonWI53562USA
| | - Michael N. Fienen
- U.S. Geological Survey Upper Midwest Water Science Center8505 Research Way, MiddletonWI53562USA
| | - Howard W. Reeves
- U.S. Geological Survey Upper Midwest Water Science Center, Michigan5840 Enterprise Drive, LansingMI48911USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Akresh ME, King DI, Marra PP. Hatching date influences winter habitat occupancy: Examining seasonal interactions across the full annual cycle in a migratory songbird. Ecol Evol 2021; 11:9241-9253. [PMID: 34306620 PMCID: PMC8293775 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2020] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Birds experience a sequence of critical events during their life cycle, and past events can subsequently determine future performance via carry-over effects. Events during the non-breeding season may influence breeding season phenology or productivity. Less is understood about how events during the breeding season affect individuals subsequently in their life cycle. Using stable carbon isotopes, we examined carry-over effects throughout the annual cycle of prairie warblers (Setophaga discolor), a declining Nearctic-Neotropical migratory passerine bird. In drier winters, juvenile males that hatched earlier at our study site in Massachusetts, USA, occupied wetter, better-quality winter habitat in the Caribbean, as indicated by depleted carbon isotope signatures. For juveniles that were sampled again as adults, repeatability in isotope signatures indicated similar winter habitat occupancy across years. Thus, hatching date of juvenile males appears to influence lifetime winter habitat occupancy. For adult males, reproductive success did not carry over to influence winter habitat occupancy. We did not find temporally consecutive "domino" effects across the annual cycle (breeding to wintering to breeding) or interseasonal, intergenerational effects. Our finding that a male's hatching date can have a lasting effect on winter habitat occupancy represents an important contribution to our understanding of seasonal interactions in migratory birds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael E. Akresh
- Department of Environmental StudiesAntioch University New EnglandKeeneNHUSA
- Department of Environmental ConservationUniversity of Massachusetts AmherstAmherstMAUSA
| | - David I. King
- U.S. Forest Service Northern Research StationUniversity of Massachusetts AmherstAmherstMAUSA
| | - Peter P. Marra
- Department of Biology and McCourt School of Public PolicyGeorgetown UniversityWashingtonDCUSA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Janousek WM, Hahn BA, Dreitz VJ. Disentangling monitoring programs: design, analysis, and application considerations. Ecol Appl 2019; 29:e01922. [PMID: 31066957 PMCID: PMC9286664 DOI: 10.1002/eap.1922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2018] [Revised: 04/15/2019] [Accepted: 04/25/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Monitoring programs are an essential tool for assessing and informing conservation efforts but the methods used to gather monitoring data directly influence results. This presents a challenge to conservation professionals when deciding on existing data to inform a given question. We illustrate the challenges of using monitoring data by comparing population trends from two large-scale avian monitoring programs in the western United States: the Breeding Bird Survey and Integrated Monitoring in Bird Conservation Regions programs. We used publicly available data to compare trend trajectory between 2008 and 2015 for 148 species across Colorado, Montana, and Wyoming. Trends were inconsistent for 62% of the comparisons, with species having opposite trends in 21 cases. The inconsistencies found within our species comparisons reflect the inherent differences between program sampling design and analytical approach. Periodically revisiting how and why we monitor natural resources is necessary to advance conservation and management as the lessons learned from long-standing programs guide the development of more recent efforts. Our results emphasize that prior to management actions and policy decisions, managers must be aware of both the sampling design and appropriate ecological inference of any monitoring program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William M. Janousek
- Avian Science Center and Wildlife Biology ProgramDepartment of Ecosystem and Conservation SciencesW.A. Franke College of Forestry and ConservationUniversity of Montana32 Campus DriveMissoulaMontana59812USA
| | - Beth A. Hahn
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern RegionMissoulaMontana59804USA
- Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research InstituteRocky Mountain Research StationU.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest ServiceMissoulaMontana59801USA
| | - Victoria J. Dreitz
- Avian Science Center and Wildlife Biology ProgramDepartment of Ecosystem and Conservation SciencesW.A. Franke College of Forestry and ConservationUniversity of Montana32 Campus DriveMissoulaMontana59812USA
| |
Collapse
|