Genomic Profiling of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma Shows Frequent Coexisting BAP1 or SF3B1 and GNAQ/GNA11 Mutations and Correlation With Prognosis

OBJECTIVES

To identify therapeutic targets and correlate with clinical outcomes from mutation profiling of metastatic uveal melanoma (UM) using next-generation sequencing (NGS).

METHODS

Melanoma cases that were tested using DNA-based NGS panels of 25 and/or 214 genes were evaluated retrospectively (263 cases) and identified 27 UM cases. BAP1 expression was examined by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Mutations in GNA11 (14) and GNAQ (12) were found in 96% (n = 27) of cases of UM, and most had coexisting BAP1 (17) or SF3B1 (4) mutations. Coexisting GNAQ/11-SF3B1 mutations correlated with a longer average time to first metastasis compared with GNAQ/11-BAP1 mutations (99.7 vs 38.5 months, P = .047). Three patients with BAP1 mutations received trametinib; two are still alive (15 months; 23 months), and one died (32 months). In non-UMs, only 4.2% (n = 236) had BAP1 and 3.8% had SF3B1 mutations; none had coexisting GNAQ/11 mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

Coexisting BAP1/SF3B1 and GNAQ/11 mutations were unique to UM. SF3B1 mutations were reported to be UM-specific in melanoma and associated with rare/no metastasis. The finding of mutated SF3B1 in 14.8% (n = 27) of UMs suggests its role should be further evaluated. The correlation of BAP1/SF3B1 mutation with survival also warrants investigation.

Pathologic Spectrum and Molecular Landscape of Myeloid Disorders Harboring SF3B1 Mutations

Objectives

SF3B1 mutations are the most common mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). The International Working Group for the Prognosis of MDS (IWG-PM) recently proposed SF3B1-mutant MDS (SF3B1^-mut-MDS) as a distinct disease subtype. We evaluated the spectrum and molecular landscape of SF3B1-mutated myeloid disorders and assessed the prognostication in MDS harboring SF3B1 mutations (MDS-SF3B1).

Methods

Cases were selected by retrospective review. Clinical course and laboratory and clinical findings were collected by chart review. SF3B1^-mut-MDS was classified following IWG-PM criteria.

Results

SF3B1 mutations were identified in 75 of 955 patients, encompassing a full spectrum of myeloid disorders. In MDS-SF3B1, Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) score greater than 3 and transcription factor (TF) comutations were adverse prognostic markers by both univariate and multivariate analyses. We confirmed the favorable outcome of IWG-PM-defined SF3B1^-mut-MDS. Interestingly, it did not show sharp prognostic differentiation within MDS-SF3B1.

Conclusions

SF3B1 mutations occur in the full spectrum of myeloid disorders. We independently validated the favorable prognostication of IWG-PM-defined SF3B1^-mut-MDS. However it may not provide sharp prognostication within MDS-SF3B1 where IPSS-R and TF comutations were prognostic-informative. Larger cohort studies are warranted to verify these findings and refine MDS-SF3B1 prognostication.

Comparison of SF3B1/DNMT3A Comutations With DNMT3A or SF3B1 Mutation Alone in Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Clonal Cytopenia of Undetermined Significance

OBJECTIVES

To compare the clinical significance of SF3B1/DNMT3A Comutations with SF3B1 or DNMT3A mutation alone in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS).

METHODS

We identified and compared 31 patients with only DNMT3A mutation, 48 patients with only SF3B1 mutation, and 16 patients with only SF3B1/DNMT3A comutations.

RESULTS

SF3B1/DNMT3A comutations were found to be more common in MDS, whereas DNMT3A mutation alone was more common in CCUS. The patients with SF3B1/DNMT3A comutations were less likely to have poor cytogenetics than patients with DNMT3A mutation alone. Patients with SF3B1/DNMT3A comutations showed significantly longer median survival time and better overall survival than patients with DNMT3A mutation alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with SF3B1/DNMT3A comutations appear to have better clinical outcomes than patients with isolated DNMT3A mutation. These findings suggest that the favorable prognosis of SF3B1 mutation in is not abrogated by the concurrent presence of a DNMT3A mutation.