The progestin-only pills drospirenone 4 mg and desogestrel 0.075 mg as an option for the management of dysmenorrhea and mastodynia

INTRODUCTION

Dysmenorrhea and mastodynia are the most common gynecologic pain causes in women of all ages and races during their reproductive life. The following study aimed to show the influence of two POP´s in the development of dysmenorrhea and mastodynia after nine months of use.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 858 women with 6691 drospirenone (DRSP) cycles and 332 women with 2487 desogestrel (DSG) cycles were analyzed. Women included in this study were all child-bearing potentials, at risk of pregnancy, agreeing to use only the study medication for contraception for the duration of the study medication treatment, aged 18 to 45.

RESULTS

At screening, 168 (19.6%) of the 858 patients using DRSP and 64 (19,3%) of the DSG patients reported that they had suffered from dysmenorrhea within six cycles prior to the first visit before starting with the medication. 20,2% of the DRSP and 10,9% of the DSG group had a sever dysmenorrhea. After 9 cycles this was reduced to 0,6% and 3,1% respectively. In total, 96 women (11.2%) in the DRSP and 49 (14,8%) experienced mastodynia within six cycles before the screening. Of these 91.6% in the DRSP group and 91,8% in the DSG group had no or mild mastodynoa at follow-up.

DISCUSSION

The progestins 4 mg and desogestrel 0,075 mg showed a marked effect in the non-contraceptive aspects of dysmenorrhea and mastodynia so that new possibilities are opened for these two benign gynecological diseases. Future studies must reaffirm these first data.

Long-term treatment of dienogest with symptomatic adenomyosis: retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety in clinical practice

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dienogest (DNG) in women with symptomatic adenomyosis.Methods: Women with symptomatic adenomyosis were included in this retrospective observation study. Group 1 (maximum uterine dimension ≥ 100.0 mm) began DNG after 4 months of GnRH-a administration, Group 2 (maximum uterine dimension < 100.0 mm) received DNG with no prior GnRH-a treatment. All women were assessed for their pain symptoms, uterine size, adverse effects and laboratory hematology at baseline and every 6 months during the treatment.Results: 123 women were enrolled in this study, in Group 1 (71 women) with severe uterine enlargement, the median VAS score was 80 mm prior to GnRH-a administration and 10, 10, 10, 20, and 20 mm, respectively, after 0, 6,12,18, and 24 months of DNG treatment. The mean uterine volume decreased from 262.9 ml to 104.7 ml after GnRH-a therapy, and slowly increased from 104.7 ml to 139.5 ml after 24 month-treatment of DNG. Another 52 women with mild uterine enlargement received DNG without prior GnRH-a administration, median VAS score was 70 mm at baseline and decreased to 20, 20, 10, and 10 mm at 6,12,18, and 24 months. The mean uterine volume slightly decreased from 157.9 ml to 153.3 ml after 24 months of DNG treatment (p > 0.05). All laboratory parameters were in the normal range.Conclusions: DNG is effective and well tolerated as a long-term treatment for symptomatic adenomyosis, and it can be used as maintenance therapy after discontinuation of GnRH-a administration.

Numerical rating scale for dysmenorrhea-related pain: a clinimetric study

Objective: To evaluate the numerical rating scale (NRS) measurement properties in women with dysmenorrhea. Methods: This was an online clinimetric study. Brazilian women aged over 18 years old with internet access to respond to online instruments were included in the study. We evaluated criterion validity (comparing women with and without dysmenorrhea), construct validity between the NRS and the bodily pain domain of the SF-36, test-retest reliability, and measurement errors (in women with dysmenorrhea). Results: Two hundred thirty-eight women with and 192 without dysmenorrhea participated in the study. For criterion validity, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.902 (95%CI, 0.873-0.931), and a cutoff point of 3 was considered to have the best sensitivity (83%) and specificity (86%). For construct validity, the NRS showed a moderate negative correlation with the SF-36 bodily pain domain (r=-0.46; p < 0.001). For test-retest reliability and measurement errors, 105 women whose symptoms did not change between 7 and 10 days of retest, with intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.90, standard error of measurement = 0.97, and smallest detectable change = 2.76 points. Conclusions: The NRS can be considered a valid and reliable patient-reported outcome measure for assessing dysmenorrhea-related pain intensity.