Redox homeostasis in human renal cells that had been treated with amphotericin B in combination with selected 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives

BACKGROUND

The use of amphotericin B (AmB) in the therapy of systemic mycosis is associated with strong side effects, including nephrotoxicity, and hepatotoxicity. Therefore, agents that can reduce the toxic effects of AmB while acting synergistically as antifungal agents are currently being sought. 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives are promising compounds that have an antifungal activity and act synergically with AmB. Such combinations might allow the dose of AmB, which is essential for preventing patients from having serious side effects, to be decreased. This might result from the antioxidant properties of 1,3,4-thiadiazoles. Thus, the aim of the study was to investigate redox homeostasis in human renal proximal tubule epithelial cells (RPTEC) after they had been treated with AmB in combination with 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives.

METHODS

Cellular redox homeostasis was assessed by investigating the total antioxidant capacity (TAC) of cells, the malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration, and the activity of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), and catalase (CAT). TAC was measured using an ABTS method. The MDA concentration, and the activity of SOD, GPX, and CAT were determined spectrophotometrically using commercially available assays. Additionally, the antioxidant defense system-related gene expression profile was determined using oligonucleotide microarrays (HG-U133A 2.0). Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was used to confirm the microarray results.

RESULTS

Amphotericin B and selected 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives had a significant effect on the total antioxidant capacity of the RPTEC cells, and the activity of the antioxidant enzymes. We also revealed that the effect of thiadiazoles on the SOD and CAT activities is dependent on the treatment of RPTEC cells with AmB. At the transcriptional level, the expression of several genes was affected by the studied compounds and their combinations.

CONCLUSIONS

The results confirmed that thiadiazoles can stimulate the RPTEC cells to defend against the oxidative stress that is generated by AmB. In addition, together with the previously demonstrated synergistic antifungal activity, and low nephrotoxicity, these compounds have the potential to be used in new therapeutic strategies in the treatment of fungal infections.

Synergistic Antifungal Interactions between Antibiotic Amphotericin B and Selected 1,3,4-thiadiazole Derivatives, Determined by Microbiological, Cytochemical, and Molecular Spectroscopic Studies

In recent years, drug-resistant and multidrug-resistant fungal strains have been more frequently isolated in clinical practice. This phenomenon is responsible for difficulties in the treatment of infections. Therefore, the development of new antifungal drugs is an extremely important challenge. Combinations of selected 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives with amphotericin B showing strong synergic antifungal interactions are promising candidates for such formulas. In the study, microbiological, cytochemical, and molecular spectroscopy methods were used to investigate the antifungal synergy mechanisms associated with the aforementioned combinations. The present results indicate that two derivatives, i.e., C1 and NTBD, demonstrate strong synergistic interactions with AmB against some Candida species. The ATR-FTIR analysis showed that yeasts treated with the C1 + AmB and NTBD + AmB compositions, compared with those treated with single compounds, exhibited more pronounced abnormalities in the biomolecular content, suggesting that the main mechanism of the synergistic antifungal activity of the compounds is related to a disturbance in cell wall integrity. The analysis of the electron absorption and fluorescence spectra revealed that the biophysical mechanism underlying the observed synergy is associated with disaggregation of AmB molecules induced by the 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives. Such observations suggest the possibility of the successful application of thiadiazole derivatives combined with AmB in the therapy of fungal infections.

Effect of Antibiotic Amphotericin B Combinations with Selected 1,3,4-Thiadiazole Derivatives on RPTECs in an In Vitro Model

4-(5-methyl-1,3,4-thiadiazole-2-yl) benzene-1,3-diol (C1) and 4-[5-(naphthalen-1-ylmethyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl] benzene1,3-diol (NTBD) are representative derivatives of the thiadiazole group, with a high antimycotic potential and minimal toxicity against normal human fibroblast cells. The present study has proved its ability to synergize with the antifungal activity of AmB. The aim of this work was to evaluate the cytotoxic effects of C1 or NTBD, alone or in combination with AmB, on human renal proximal tubule epithelial cells (RPTECs) in vitro. Cell viability was assessed with the MTT assay. Flow cytometry and spectrofluorimetric techniques were used to assess the type of cell death and production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), respectively. The ELISA assay was performed to measure the caspase-2, -3, and -9 activity. ATR-FTIR spectroscopy was used to evaluate biomolecular changes in RPTECs induced by the tested formulas. The combinations of C1/NTBD and AmB did not exert a strong inhibitory effect on the viability/growth of kidney cells, as evidenced by the negligible changes in the apoptotic/necrotic rate and caspase activity, compared to the control cells. Both NTBD and C1 displayed stronger anti-oxidant activity when combined with AmB. The relatively low nephrotoxicity of the thiadiazole derivative combinations and the protective activity against AmB-induced oxidative stress may indicate their potential use in the therapy of fungal infections.

Design, Synthesis, Antibacterial Activity, and Mechanisms of Novel 1,3,4-Thiadiazole Derivatives Containing an Amide Moiety

To discover novel antibacterial agents, a series of novel 1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives containing an amide moiety were designed and synthesized, and their antibacterial activities were tested. Compound 30 was designed and synthesized according to the CoMFA model. Compound 30 exhibited higher antibacterial activities against Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola and Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae, with EC₅₀ values of 2.1 and 1.8 mg/L, respectively, which were superior to those of thiodiazole copper (99.6 and 92.5 mg/L). The protective and curative activities of compound 30 against rice bacterial leaf blight were 51.3 and 46.1%, respectively, which were better than those of thiodiazole copper (37.8 and 38.5%). The protective and curative activities of compound 30 against rice bacterial leaf streak were 45.9 and 40.5%, respectively, which were better than those of thiodiazole copper (36.2 and 31.1%). In addition, the protective activity of compound 30 against rice bacterial leaf streak was related to increased activities of related defense enzymes and upregulated the differentially expressed proteins of the glycolysis/gluconeogenesis pathway.