Update on Endoscopic Treatments for Obesity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Increased morbidity seen with rising obesity rates continues to place an unheralded burden on our health system. Lack of higher bariatric surgery utilization and limitations with lifestyle modification and pharmacotherapy highlights the need for additional therapies for obesity. Endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMT) are effective, safe treatments for obesity. Current FDA-approved EBMT are confined to gastric modalities while small bowel directed therapies are still considered investigational. This review highlights current modalities of EBMT.

RECENT FINDINGS

Many randomized controlled trials have been performed, including both open label and sham-controlled, which have demonstrated safety and efficacy of EBMT over lifestyle therapy alone. In addition, emerging evidence from clinical experience further supports EBMT for treatment of obesity. Current evidence supports the safety and efficacy of EBMT for obesity treatment in conjunction with lifestyle therapy. They can also be used concurrently with weight loss medications to increase total weight loss.

Gastric Aspiration Improves Postprandial Glucose Tolerance Without Causing a Compensatory Increase in Appetite and Food Intake

INTRODUCTION

AspireAssist® allows aspiration of ~30% of an ingested meal through a percutaneous gastrostomy tube, reducing caloric uptake. We evaluated the acute effects of gastric aspiration on postprandial glucose tolerance, responses of gluco-regulatory and appetite-regulating hormones, appetite sensations, and food intake.

METHODS

Seven AspireAssist®-treated individuals underwent two separate experimental days each involving a mixed meal test (MMT) with double-blinded aspiration and sham aspiration, respectively. Seven age and body mass index (BMI)-matched controls underwent one MMT. MMTs were followed by an ad libitum meal.

RESULTS

Postprandial glucose tolerance was improved during aspiration vs. sham visits (median [interquartile range] baseline-subtracted area under the curve (bsAUC) 170 [88.4;356] vs. 388 [239;456] mmol/L × min, p = 0.025). Reduced responses (bsAUCs) of C-peptide (113 [28.4;224] vs. 302 [215;433] nmol/L × min, p = 0.014), cholecystokinin (223 [59.4;402] vs. 467 [416;546] pmol/L × min, p = 0.005), glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (4.63 [1.49;9.04] vs. 15.4 [9.59;18.9] nmol/L × min, p = 0.025), and glucagon-like peptide 1 (532.8 [274.5;1,278] vs. 1,296 [746.2;1,618] pmol/L × min, p = 0.032) were observed during aspiration vs. sham visits. Responses of glucagon, gastrin, ghrelin and peptide YY, appetite sensations, and ad libitum food intake were unaffected by aspiration. Responses of plasma glucose, gut hormones, appetite sensations, and food intake were similar during sham and control visits.

CONCLUSION

Gastric aspiration improved postprandial glucose tolerance without causing compensatory increases in appetite or food intake, pointing to acute beneficial metabolic effects of aspiration therapy together with previously reported body weight-lowering effects.

Effect of Aspiration Therapy on Obesity-Related Comorbidities: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Aspiration therapy (AT) involves endoscopic placement of a gastrostomy tube with an external device that allows patients to drain 30% of ingested calories after meals. Its efficacy for inducing weight loss has been shown. This study aimed to assess the effect of AT on obesity-related comorbidities.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of studies that assessed AT outcomes was conducted through December 2018. Primary outcomes were changes in comorbidities at 1 year following AT. Secondary outcomes were the amount of weight loss at up to 4 years and pooled serious adverse events (SAEs).

RESULTS

Five studies with 590 patients were included. At 1 year, there were improvements in metabolic conditions: mean difference (MD) in systolic blood pressure: -7.8 (-10.7 - -4.9) mm Hg; MD in diastolic blood pressure: -5.1 (-7.0 - 3.2) mm Hg; MD in triglycerides: -15.8 (-24.0 - -7.6) mg/dL; MD in high-density lipoprotein: 3.6 (0.7-6.6) mg/dL; MD in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c): -1.3 (-1.8 - -0.8) %; MD in aspartate transaminase: -2.7 (-4.1 - -1.3) U/L; MD in alanine transaminase: -7.5 (-9.8 - -5.2) U/L. At 1 (n=218), 2 (n=125), 3 (n=46), and 4 (n=27) years, the patients experienced 17.8%, 18.3%, 19.1%, and 18.6% total weight loss (TWL), corresponding to 46.3%, 46.2%, 48.0%, and 48.7% excess weight loss (EWL) (p<0.0001 for all). Subgroup analysis of 2 randomized controlled trials (n=225) showed that AT patients lost more weight than did controls by 11.6 (6.5-16.7) %TWL and 25.6 (16.0-35.3) %EWL and experienced greater improvement in HbA1c and alanine transaminase by 1.3 (0.8-1.8) % and 9.0 (3.9-14.0) U/L. The pooled SAE rate was 4.1%.

CONCLUSION

Obesity-related comorbidities significantly improved at 1 year following AT. Additionally, a subgroup of patients who continued to use AT appeared to experience significant weight loss that persisted up to at least 4 years.

Do Endoscopic Bariatric Procedures Improve Postprocedural Quality of Life and Mental Health?Obes Surg. 2020;30:4091-4100. [PMID: 32761319 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-020-04860-2]

Quality of life and mental health are important outcomes of bariatric therapy. This review aimed to determine endoscopic bariatric procedures' impact on postprocedural quality of life and mental health. Four electronic databases were systematically searched. Studies with adults > 18 years who underwent an endoscopic bariatric procedure and reported pre- and postprocedural quality of life and/or mental health using a validated tool were included. Meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan and study quality was assessed. Twenty studies evaluating five different endoscopic procedures were included (N = 876 total sample size). Intragastric balloon placement was associated with a large improvement in postprocedural quality of life and mental health. Endoscopic bariatric therapies may improve short-term quality of life and mental health alongside weight loss and comorbidity improvement.

Metabolic Endoscopy: Development and Perspectives

BACKGROUND

Obesity and its metabolic sequelae are among the most serious challenges faced by health systems today and they are expected to pose a serious threat in the future as well. Therapy ranges from lifestyle modification to drug treatment to surgery. Metabolic endoscopy (ME) might close the gap between invasive "metabolic" surgery and conservative, less effective treatment. In recent years, several endoscopic approaches have emerged, promising a safe and effective approach to cope with obesity. Data on metabolic endpoints is scarce. This article will therefore highlight procedures with data on type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as the most prominent component of the metabolic syndrome.

SUMMARY

Most procedures showed beneficial effects in terms of weight reduction. For gastric procedures, there were no systematic studies primarily addressing parameters of glucose metabolism or diabetes outcomes. Metabolic benefit, if there is any, is most likely a by-product of weight loss. By contrast, duodenal-jejunal bypass sleeve (DJBS) is conceptually an antidiabetic procedure. Although adverse events are frequent, recent data points to a positive benefit-risk ratio. Key Messages: ME has the potential to constitute a growing field in the treatment of obesity and associated T2DM. While data published on glycaemic parameters in restrictive approaches is not sufficient, there is strong evidence that malabsorptive DJBS has an antidiabetic "plus" effect. Further studies are necessary to define the role of ME within a lifelong concept of treating obesity and T2DM.

Aspiration Therapy

Aspiration therapy is a novel, endoscopic bariatric therapy that allows patients to remove a portion of an ingested meal through a modified percutaneous gastrostomy tube, called an A-Tube. Weight loss results from both fewer calories consumed, and from modifications in lifestyle and mealtime behaviors that patients make as a result of having the device installed. The first commercially available device for aspiration therapy, the AspireAssist (Aspire Bariatrics, King of Prussia, PA), was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2016 for weight loss for greater than 6 months duration in patients with a body mass index of 35-55. Multiple studies have demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of aspiration therapy, with low rates of adverse events related to the procedure, including no reported deaths, as well as no evidence of eating disorders developed during therapy. This chapter will describe our experience with aspiration therapy. We will describe how we select appropriate candidates for aspiration therapy, how we perform the procedure including a summary of the equipment used, and how we mitigate and manage complications of the procedure. This article will highlight the effectiveness of aspiration therapy as a novel and safe approach for weight loss in patients in obesity.

Aspiration therapy for the treatment of obesity: 4-year results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The AspireAssist is the first Food and Drug Administration-approved endoluminal device indicated for treatment of class II and III obesity.

OBJECTIVES

We earlier reported 1-year results of the PATHWAY study. Here, we report 4-year outcomes.

SETTING

United States-based, 10-center, randomized controlled trial involving 171 participants with the treatment arm receiving Aspiration Therapy (AT) plus Lifestyle Therapy and the control arm receiving Lifestyle Therapy (2:1 randomization).

METHODS

AT participants were permitted to continue in the study for an additional year up to a maximum of 5 years providing they maintained at least 10% total weight loss (TWL) from baseline at each year end. For AT participants who continued the study, 5 medical monitoring visits were provided at weeks 60, 68, 76, 90, and 104 and thereafter once every 13 weeks up to week 260. Exclusion criteria were a history of eating disorder or evidence of eating disorder on a validated questionnaire. Follow-up weight, quality of life, and co-morbidities were compared with the baseline levels. In addition, rates of serious adverse event, persistent fistula, withdrawal, and A-tube replacement were reported. All analyses were performed using a per-protocol analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 82 AT participants who completed 1 year, 58 continued to this phase of the trial. Mean baseline body mass index of these 58 patients was 41.6 ± 4.5 kg/m². At the end of first year (at the beginning of the follow-up study), these 58 patients had a body mass index of 34.1 ± 5.4 kg/m² and had achieved an 18.3 ± 8.0% TWL. On a per protocol basis, patients experienced 14.2%, 15.3%, 16.6%, and 18.7% TWL at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively (P < .01 for all). Forty of 58 patients (69%) achieved at least 10% TWL at 4 years or at time of study withdrawal. Improvements in quality of life scores and select cardiometabolic parameters were also maintained through 4 years. There were 2 serious adverse events reported in the second through fourth years, both of which resolved with removal or replacement of the A tube. Two persistent fistulas required surgical repair, representing approximately 2% of all tube removals. There were no clinically significant metabolic or electrolytes disorders observed, nor any evidence for development of any eating disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this midterm study have shown that AT is a safe, effective, and durable weight loss alternative for people with class II and III obesity and who are willing to commit to using the therapy and adhere to adjustments in eating behavior.

Endoscopic Bariatric Therapies: Intragastric Balloons, Tissue Apposition, and Aspiration Therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Endoscopic bariatric therapies (EBTs) have been identified as a group of procedures that can bridge the treatment gap between bariatric surgical procedures and non-procedural treatments such as pharmacotherapy and lifestyle therapy. We will review the recent progress that has been made in this important area in the past several years.

RECENT FINDINGS

Traditional intragastric balloons (IGB) that are both placed and removed endoscopically have been the fixture of IGB therapy. They have been shown to be safe and effective, when kept in place for 6 months. Newer IGBs, both currently FDA approved and those in clinical trials, have unique features. The Obalon gastric balloon system is gas filled and does not require endoscopy for placement. The Elipse balloon system that is in clinical trials neither requires endoscopy for placement nor removal. The Spatz3 balloon is in clinical trials and can be adjusted endoscopically by adding or subtracting volume to titrate balloon volume to symptoms and weight loss. In addition to IGBs, several other promising therapies have continued to evolve. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is a promising gastric restriction technique that has efficacy and durability. POSE is a gastric plication technique that is available in Europe and in clinical trials in the USA. Aspiration therapy is a novel approach to weight loss that requires patient compliance but can be very effective and used long term. EBTs are an evolving effective and safe approach for patients who do not qualify for or do not want bariatric surgery. There are multiple EBTs currently FDA approved as well as prospective endoscopic therapies in clinical trials that appear promising.

Devices and Endoscopic Bariatric Therapies for Obesity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we describe the FDA-approved and investigational devices and endoscopic bariatric therapies for the treatment of obesity. We focus on literature published in the past few years and present mechanisms of action as well as efficacy and safety data.

RECENT FINDINGS

Devices and endoscopic procedures are emerging options to fill the significant treatment gap in the management of obesity. Not only are these devices and procedures minimally invasive and reversible, but they are potentially more effective than antiobesity medications, often safer for poor surgical candidates and possibly less expensive than bariatric surgery. As many patients require a variety of management strategies (medications, devices, procedures, and/or surgery) in addition to lifestyle modifications to achieve clinically significant weight loss, the future of obesity treatment involves a multidisciplinary approach. Combinations of advanced treatment strategies can lead to additive or synergistic weight loss. This is an area that requires further investigation.

Aspiration Therapy for Obesity

Aspiration therapy is a weight loss therapy in the United States for patients with a body mass index between 35 kg/m² and 55 kg/m². Aspiration therapy allows patients to remove up to one-third of calories consumed at a meal and causes patients to eat fewer calories than prior to starting treatment. Studies demonstrate 14.2% to 21.5% total body weight loss in participants who complete 1 year of treatment and maintenance of weight loss in patients treated for 2 years. Aspiration therapy is a safe and effective new treatment of obesity.

Aspiration therapy for obesity; a safe and effective treatment

Background

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the novel AspireAssist® Aspiration Therapy System for treatment of obesity, and its effect on patient’s quality of life.

Methods

A prospective observational study with 25 obese subjects, mean age 48 years (range 33–65), was performed. A custom gastrostomy tube (A-tube, Aspire Bariatrics) was percutaneously inserted during a gastroscopy performed under conscious sedation. Drainage and irrigation of the stomach were performed 3 times daily, 20 min after each meal, for 1–2 years. Efficient aspiration required thorough chewing of ingested food. Treatment included a cognitive behavioral weight loss program.

Results

Mean body mass index (BMI) at inclusion was 39.8 kg/m² (range 35–49). After 1 year mean (SD) BMI was 32.1 kg/m² (5.4), p < 0.01, and excess weight loss was 54.4% (28.8), p < 0.01. Quality of life, as measured with EQ-5D, improved from 0.73 (0.27) to 0.88 (0.13), p < 0.01. After 2 years BMI was 31.0 kg/m² (5.1), p < 0.01, and excess weight loss was 61.5% (28.5), p < 0.01. There were no serious adverse events or electrolyte disorders. Compliance was 80% after 1 year and 60% after 2 years.

Conclusions

Aspiration therapy is an efficient and safe treatment for obesity, and weight reduction improves quality of life. Excess weight was approximately halved in a year, with weight stability if treatment was continued.

Trial registration

Trial Register ISRCTN 49958132. Retrospectively registered 28/02/2014.

Endoscopic Management

Endoscopic bariatric therapy consists of devices or procedures for primary weight loss or weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass that are placed or done endoscopically. In most cases, they result in less weight loss, but fewer complications than bariatric surgery; and more weight loss than lifestyle therapy or weight loss medications. These therapies are important advances to treat patients with obesity. This article focuses on therapies or devices with US Food and Drug Administration approval or those with current or planned US pivotal trials.