Fold-back mechanism originating inv-dup-del rearrangements in chromosomes 13 and 15

Intrachromosomal rearrangements involve a single chromosome and can be formed by several proposed mechanisms. We reported two patients with intrachromosomal duplications and deletions, whose rearrangements and breakpoints were characterized through karyotyping, chromosomal microarray, fluorescence in situ hybridization, whole-genome sequencing, and Sanger sequencing. Inverted duplications associated with terminal deletions, known as inv-dup-del rearrangements, were found in 13q and 15q in these patients. The presence of microhomology at the junction points led to the proposal of the Fold-back mechanism for their formation. The use of different high-resolution techniques allowed for a better characterization of the rearrangements, with Sanger sequencing of the junction points being essential to infer the mechanisms of formation as it revealed microhomologies that were missed by the previous techniques. A karyotype-phenotype correlation was also performed for the characterized rearrangements.

Terminal 18q deletions are stabilized by neotelomeres

BACKGROUND

All human chromosomes are capped by tandem repeat (TTAGGG)n sequences that protect them against end-to-end fusion and are essential to chromosomal replication and integrity. Therefore, after a chromosomal breakage, the deleted chromosomes must be stabilized by retaining the telomere or acquiring a new cap, by telomere healing or telomere capture. There are few reports with molecular approaches on the mechanisms involved in stabilization of 18q terminal deletions.

RESULTS

In this study we analyzed nine patients with 18q terminal deletion identified by G-banding and genomic array. FISH using PNA probe revealed telomeric signals in all deleted chromosomes tested. We fine-mapped breakpoints with customized arrays and sequenced six terminal deletion junctions. In all six deleted chromosomes sequenced, telomeric sequences were found directly attached to the breakpoints. Little or no microhomology was found at the breakpoints and none of the breaks sequenced were located in low copy repeat (LCR) regions, though repetitive elements were found around the breakpoints in five patients. One patient presented a more complex rearrangement with two deleted segments and an addition of 17 base pairs (bp).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that all six deleted chromosomes sequenced were probably stabilized by the healing mechanism leading to a neotelomere formation.