Coronary Artery Vasospasm Requiring Cardiac Autotransplantation Yet Controlled With Tobacco

Coronary artery vasospasm is typically managed through avoidance of triggers and with symptomatic treatments with calcium channel blockers and long-acting nitrates. Here, we report a rare case of medically refractory coronary artery vasospasm associated with genetic predispositions that initially required cardiac autotransplantation followed paradoxically by nicotine for long-term symptomatic control. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.)

Vasopressin for persistent hypotension due to amlodipine and olmesartan overdose: A case report

Background

While there are consensus recommendations for managing calcium channel blocker (CCB) toxicity, reports on angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) toxicity and management are limited. Herein, we report a case of catecholamine-refractory hypotension due to CCB and ARB overdose.

Case presentation

A 54-year-old woman with underlying hypertension was brought to the emergency department after she attempted suicide by ingesting 345 mg of amlodipine, a CCB, and 340 mg of olmesartan, an ARB. She was hypotensive, which was considered vasodilatory because of high cardiac and low systemic vascular resistance indices. Hypotension persisted despite the administration of norepinephrine and epinephrine. Intravenous calcium gluconate, glucagon, and high-dose insulin euglycemia therapy, which were initiated because CCB toxicity was suspected, failed to raise her blood pressure. The presence of normal anion-gap metabolic acidosis and the fact that the patient remained hypotensive suggested that the hypotension might have been due to the effect of ARB. Vasopressin was finally administered, which improved her hemodynamic status. She was weaned off all vasopressors on day 3.

Discussion

There is no consensus recommendation for ARB toxicity. Since chronic use of ARBs at conventional doses can block the sympathetic nervous and renin–angiotensin systems, catecholamines may not effectively increase blood pressure in cases of hypotension due to ARB overdose, for which vasopressin could be indicated.

Conclusions

Vasopressin could be an option for treating hypotension secondary to ARB and CCB toxicity when catecholamines and treatment for CCB toxicity fail.

•

Chronic use of ARBs blocks the sympathetic nervous and renin–angiotensin systems.

•

There is no consensus recommendation for angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) toxicity.

•

Catecholamines may not effectively raise blood pressure in hypotension due to ARB toxicity.

•

Vasopressin could be an option for treating hypotension secondary to ARB toxicity.

Results of a prospective cardiovascular disease prevention program

The Cardiovascular Health Program (CHP) Registry is a 12-month, prospective study of therapeutic lifestyle change (TLC). Adult participants received comprehensive assessment of health behaviors and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. Personalized TLC action plans addressed modifiable health behaviors for diet, exercise, stress management, and sleep. Participants attended a half-day interactive workshop and met face-to-face with certified health coaches four times over 6 months. Monthly telephonic coaching for 6 more months completed the intervention. Measured outcomes included adherence to behavioral prescriptions, anthropometrics, CVD-relevant laboratory tests, and for a subset of participants, carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT). Of 965 participants, 648 (67%) completed the program and were included in the analysis. Participants were of mean age 55.4 ± 12.5 years, 57% women, and racially diverse. Adherence to prescribed TLC was substantial: dietary behaviors at goal rose from 53% to 86%, exercise 44% to 66%, perceived stress 65% to 79%, and sleep quality 28% to 49%. For participants with abnormal anthropometrics at baseline, there were improvements in body mass index in 63%, waist circumference (men 71%, women 74%), systolic BP 69%, and diastolic BP 71%. For participants with abnormal laboratory values at baseline, there were improvements in total cholesterol in 74%, LDL-cholesterol 65%, triglycerides 86%, fasting glucose 72%, and insulin resistance 71%. Improvements were not driven by prescribed medications. CIMT improved or showed no change in 70% of those measured, associated with significant improvements in sleep quality and longer total sleep time. Longer trials incorporating controls and major adverse CVD events are warranted.

Twelve-Year Survival in a Patient With Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension on Nifedipine Monotherapy

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a progressive vascular disease with a high mortality rate without proper therapy. Identification of the appropriate treatment for each patient is critical in regard to adverse effects, health care costs, ease of treatment, and the potential for prognostication. Treatment strategies typically begin with acute vasoreactivity testing, which is performed during a right heart catherization. If positive, a calcium channel blocker may work; however, another pulmonary arterial hypertension-specific medication is necessary when testing is negative. Acute vasoreactivity testing is currently recommended to be performed only in certain subgroups of pulmonary arterial hypertension, but not when related to connective tissue disease. In this report, we describe a patient who had systemic sclerosis-related pulmonary arterial hypertension with a positive acute vasoreactivity test result. The patient was placed on calcium channel blocker monotherapy that has been well tolerated for 12 years, resulting in improved symptoms and exercise capacity. The long-term response to calcium channel blocker therapy in systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension has not been previously described. In addition, pulmonary artery pressures have been well controlled. The absence of genetic smooth muscle variants prevalent in vasoresponsive idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension is also unique.

Medical expulsive therapy for ureteric stones: Analysing the evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analysis of powered double-blinded randomised controlled trials

Objective

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the efficacy and safety of medical expulsive therapy (MET) in low risk of bias (RoB) randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods

A Cochrane style systematic review was conducted on published literature from 1990 to 2016, to include low RoB and a power calculation. A pooled meta-analysis was conducted.

Results

The MET group included 1387 vs 1381 patients in the control group. The analysis reveals α-blockers increased stone expulsion rates (78% vs 74%) (P < 0.001), whilst calcium channel blockers (CCBs) had no effect compared to controls (79% vs 75%) (P = 0.38). In the subgroup analysis, α-blockers had a shorter time to stone expulsion vs the control group (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in expulsion rates between the treatment groups and control group for stones <5 mm in size (P = 0.48), proximal or mid-ureteric stones (P = 0.63 and P = 0.22, respectively). However, α-blockers increased stone expulsion in stones >5 mm (P = 0.02), as well as distal ureteric stones (P < 0.001). The α-blocker group developed more side-effects (6.6% of patients; P < 0.001). The numbers needed to treat for α-blockers was one in 14, for stones >5 mm one in eight, and for distal stones one in 10.

Conclusion

The primary findings show a small overall benefit for α-blockers as MET for ureteric stones but no benefit with CCBs. α-blockers show a greater benefit for large (>5 mm) ureteric stones and those located in the distal ureter, but no benefit for smaller or more proximal stones. α-blockers are associated with a greater risk of side-effects compared to placebo or CCBs.

Self-reported physician practices in pulmonary arterial hypertension: Diagnosis, assessment, and referral

Background

Numerous clinical trials have contributed to rapid advancements in the diagnosis and management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), yet patients often do not undergo right heart catheterization (RHC) with vasoreactivity testing and may receive a delayed or incorrect diagnosis. Efforts to improve standards of care include the designation of Pulmonary Hypertension Association (PHA)-Accredited PH Care Centers (PHCCs). This study evaluated current practices in the diagnosis and assessment of PAH.

Methods

A survey of 167 physicians who had ≥1 claim for PAH in the past 3 months was conducted.

Results

Of 167 respondents, 15% were affiliated with a PHCC, 40% had referred ≥1 patient with diagnosed PAH, and 79% had ≥1 patient referred to them by another physician who they then newly diagnosed with PAH. More than half (52%) reported having ≥1 patient who was previously misdiagnosed with PAH referred to them by another physician. RHC and vasoreactivity testing, respectively, were performed in 43% and 33% of patients with PAH who respondents referred to another physician, 86% and 67% of patients newly diagnosed by respondents, and 84% and 57% of patients who respondents considered accurately diagnosed prior to being referred to them. Respondents affiliated with a PHCC were more likely to try to refer to another physician affiliated with a PHCC, and to perform RHC and vasoreactivity testing.

Conclusions

Self-reported clinical practices often deviated from established guidelines. Future research should focus on both clinical efficacy and ways to encourage clinicians to bring their practices in line with well-supported, evidence-based recommendations.