Inclusive and intersectoral: community health improvement planning opportunities to advance the social determinants of health and health equity

BACKGROUND

Community health improvement plans (CHIPs) are strategic planning tools that help local communities identify and address their public health needs. Many local health departments have developed a CHIP, yet there is a lack of research on the extent to which these plans address root causes of health disparities such as the social determinants of health. This study aims to inventory the social determinants of health included in 13 CHIPs and examine facilitators and challenges faced by local health departments and partners when trying to include the social determinants of health.

METHODS

We conducted a comparative plan evaluation by scoring 13 CHIPs on their inclusion of equity orientation, inclusive planning processes, and five social determinants of health: health care access and quality, the neighborhood and built environment, economic stability, social and community context, and education access and quality. To supplement the plan evaluation, we conducted 32 in-depth interviews with CHIP leaders and stakeholders to understand the factors contributing to the inclusion and exclusion of the social determinants of health in the planning process.

RESULTS

CHIPs received an average score of 49/100 for the inclusion of the social determinants of health. Most plans addressed health care access and quality and the neighborhood and built environment, but they often did not address economic stability, the social and community context, and education access and quality. Regarding their overall equity orientation, CHIPs received an average score of 35/100, reflecting a relative lack of attention to equity and inclusive planning processes in the plans. Interviews revealed that challenges engaging partners, making clear connections between CHIPs and social determinants, and a lack of capacity or public and partner support often led to the exclusion of the social determinants of health. Recommendations to improve planning processes include improving data infrastructure, providing resources for dedicated planning staff and community engagement incentives, and centering equity throughout the planning process.

CONCLUSIONS

Although local health departments can leverage CHIPs to improve population health and address health disparities, they face a range of challenges to including the social determinants of health in CHIPs. Additional resourcing and improved data are needed to facilitate broader inclusion of these determinants, and more work is needed to elevate equity throughout these planning processes.

Using an Integrated Conceptual Framework to Clarify Health Problems and Assess A Community Health Planning Process: A Mid-Western USA Case Study

Within a case study design, this paper clarifies community problems, and assesses a Community Health Improvement Plan development process using a framework of explanatory models and change theories that links the macro social model, the materialistic model, social cognitive theory, theory of fundamental causes, and community organizing theory. Properties of demographic and health status artifacts are consistent with the core constructs in both the macro social and the materialistic models. The constructs in social cognitive theory and the theory of fundamental causes seem to influence program strategies even as socio-economic factors were only minimally addressed. At the organizing level, the Plan excelled in locality development and social planning but was short on social action. The findings suggest a need for social action as a model of practice in solving persistent social and health problems, and for research that investigates if social action practice can predict success in resolving these problems.