Smartphone-based gait assessment for multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Multiple Sclerosis causes gait alteration, even in the early stages of the disease. Traditional methods to quantify gait impairment, such as performance-based measures, lab-based motion analyses, and self-report, have limited ecological relevance. The Mon4t® app is a digital tool that uses sensors embedded in standard smartphones to measure various gait parameters.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the use of Mon4t® technology in monitoring MS patients.

METHODS

100 MS patients and age-matched healthy controls were evaluated using both a human rater and the Mon4t Clinic™ app. Three motor tasks were performed: 3m Timed up and go test (TUG), 10m TUG, and tandem walk. The digital markers were used to compare MS vs. HC, MS with EDSS=0 vs. HC, and MS with EDSS=0 vs. MS with EDSS>0. Within the MS EDSS>0 group, correlations between digital gait markers and the EDSS score were calculated.

RESULTS

Significant differences were found between MS patients and HC in multiple gait parameters. When comparing MS patients with minimal disability (EDSS=0) and HC: On the 3m TUG task, MS patients took longer to complete the task (mean difference 0.167seconds, p =0.034), took more steps (mean difference 1.32 steps, p =0.003), and had a weaker ML step-to-step correlation (mean difference 0.1, p = 0.001). The combination of features from the three motor tasks allowed distinguishing a nondisabled MS patient from a HC with high confidence (AUC of 85.65 on the ROC). When comparing MS patients with minimal disability (EDSS=0) to those with higher disability (EDSS>0): On the tandem walk task, patients with EDSS>0 took significantly longer to complete 10 steps than those with EDSS=0 (mean difference 4.63 seconds, p < 0.001), showed greater ML sway (mean difference 0.2, p < 0.001), and had larger angular velocity in the SI axis on average (mean difference 2.31 degrees/sec, p = 0.01). A classification model achieved 81.79 ROC AUC. In the subgroup of patients with EDSS>0, gait features significantly correlated with EDSS score in all three tasks.

CONCLUSION

The findings demonstrate the potential of digital gait assessment to augment traditional disease monitoring and support clinical decision making. The Mon4t® app provides a convenient and ecologically relevant tool for monitoring MS patients and detecting early changes in gait impairment.

Deep brain stimulation and digital monitoring for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: A case series

AIM

The use of deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been recently extended for treating resistant psychiatric disorders, but the experience in patients with schizophrenia-related disorders and bipolar disorder (BD) is scarce.

METHOD

We conducted an observational, one-year longitudinal study to evaluate the effects of DBS in four treatment-resistant patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective, and BD, included in a pilot, last-resource protocol. Patients were digitally monitored for objective assessment of behavioral changes.

RESULTS

After one year of its initiation, DBS of the nucleus accumbens (in subjects N2, N3, and N4) and subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (in N1) produced a significant clinical improvement, associated with decreases in the Clinical Global Impression (from 5.25±0.5 to 3.5±1, p=0.035) and in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HADRS scores, from 14.5±6.56 to 1.5±1.29, p=0.020). We observed a notable, durable therapeutic response in two patients from this cohort (N1 and N3), a clinically relevant relief in a third (N2), and a lack of a significant response in the last one (N4). Maintenance electroconvulsive therapy sessions could be discontinued in the three patients that responded to DBS (N1-3). There were no side effects or relevant changes in cognitive functioning. There were relevant differences between physical activity and sleep time among the four participants.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest initial evidence that DBS may be an effective and safe alternative for treating complex and resistant forms of schizophrenia-related disorders and BD. Digital monitoring may help to capture objective measures of behavioral changes after the intervention.

Feasibility, usability and clinical value of intensive longitudinal diary assessments in older persons with cognitive impairment and depressive symptoms

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the feasibility, usability and clinical value of daily diary assessments combined with actigraphy in older persons with cognitive impairment.

METHODS

For 63 days, patients ≥60 years with cognitive impairments filled out a daily diary (including standardized questionnaires and cognitive test battery), and wore an actiwatch (sleep). After the study, participants and clinicians received personal feedback about patterns and daily triggers of depressive symptoms, sleep and cognitive performance. We assessed feasibility (participation rate, compliance and subjective burden), usability (variability and floor- or ceiling effects) and clinical value for patients and their clinicians (questionnaires).

RESULTS

Of 96 eligible patients, 13 agreed to participate (13.5%). One patient dropped out after 2 days, another after 37 days, and another did not complete the cognitive test battery. Compliance rate was high (6.7-10% missing values). Subjective burden was relatively low. Time-series data showed sufficient variability and no floor- or ceiling effects, except for one relevant ceiling effect on the One Back task. The personal feedback report was considered insightful by 4 out of 11 participants and 5 out of 7 clinicians.

CONCLUSION

Daily assessments are suitable for a minority of cognitively impaired older persons, but is helpful to increase insight into their symptoms.