Comparison between volunteer- and expert-led versions of a community-based weight-loss intervention

•

We compared the effects of volunteer- and expert-led weight-loss intervention.

•

Participants were instructed to maintain a well-balanced, low-energy diet.

•

The completion proportions was significantly higher in the expert-led group.

•

The degree of body weight change was similar for both groups.

•

Such programs could be an alternative strategy for low-cost obesity management.

This study compared the effect of volunteer- and expert-led versions of a community-based weight-loss intervention in a non-randomized comparative trial conducted in Ibaraki, Japan from 2016 to 2017. Participants were 145 Japanese adults with overweightness or obesity, aged 20–69 years, with 77 in a volunteer-led group and 68 in an expert-led group. Both groups received the same program content and intervention period. Community volunteers were trained in four or five 3-hour training sessions while experts were highly trained and experienced professionals in the fields of exercise and nutrition prescription. Participants were also instructed to maintain a well-balanced, low-energy diet. The primary outcome measure was body weight change. In the volunteer- and expert-led groups, 58 of 77 (75%) and 61 of 68 (95%) participants completed the 12-week intervention, respectively. The mean (95% confidence interval, CI) weight loss of the volunteer-led group was 6.4 (95% CI: 5.6–7.2) kg, corresponding to 8.9% of initial body weight, while that of the expert-led group was 6.3 (95% CI: 5.5–7.1) kg, corresponding to 8.2% of the initial body weight. The proportion of participants who completed the course was significantly higher in the expert-led group (P < 0.05); however, the degree of the body weight change was similar for both groups. With improvement in the completion proportion of the volunteer-led weight-loss interventions, such programs could be an alternative strategy for the wide-scale dissemination of low-cost obesity management.

Web-based intervention to promote weight-loss maintenance using an activity monitor: A randomized controlled trial

The present study examined whether a web-based intervention could promote weight-loss maintenance, after weight loss. The study was a two-phase, 27-month, randomized controlled trial conducted in Ibaraki, Japan, from 2014 to 2017; 133 participants were recruited through local newspaper advertisements. The eligibility criteria were as follows: age of 40–64 years, body mass index of 25–40 kg/m², and having at least one metabolic syndrome component. In phase 1, a 3-month, group-based weight-loss program was provided to all eligible participants (n = 119). We then randomly assigned (1:1) participants who had lost 5% or more of their weight during phase 1 (n = 95) to either the self-help (mean 3-month weight loss 7.30 kg) or the web-support group (7.00 kg). Participants in the web-support group regularly reported their body weight and physical activity through a web-based system. They received monthly personalized feedback from a study staff for 24 months. The primary outcome, 27-month body-weight change (mean ± standard deviation), in the self-help and web-support groups were − 5.3 ± 5.0 kg and −4.5 ± 4.9 kg, respectively. There was no significant difference. An exploratory secondary analysis demonstrated that those with greater 27-month increases in their step count, assessed with an accelerometer, lost more weight with no difference in changes in energy intake. The mean 27-month body-weight change in the 4th quartile of changes in step count was −7.78 kg. Although web-based intervention using an activity monitor failed to promote weight-loss maintenance, increased physical activity was associated with successful weight-loss maintenance.

•

Web-based intervention using an activity monitor delivered no benefit on weight.

•

Participants with larger increases in step count lost more weight.

•

Increased physical activity was associated with successful weight loss maintenance.