Editor's Choice - Radiation Dose Reduction During Contralateral Limb Cannulation Using Fiber Optic RealShape Technology in Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

OBJECTIVE

The increasing number of endovascular procedures has resulted in an increasing radiation burden, particularly for the treatment team. Fiber Optic RealShape (FORS) technology uses laser light instead of fluoroscopy to visualise the endovascular guidewire and catheters. These devices can be used during the navigational part of procedures, such as cannulation of the contralateral limb (CL) in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The aim of this study was to describe the effect of using FORS on radiation dose during CL cannulation in standard EVAR.

METHODS

This was a non-randomised, retrospective comparison study of prospectively collected, single centre data from FORS guided EVAR compared with a conventional fluoroscopy only guided EVAR cohort. A total of 27 FORS guided cases were matched 1:1 based on sex, age, and body mass index (BMI) with 27 regular (fluoroscopy only) EVARs. This study primarily focused on (1) technical success of FORS and (2) navigation time and radiation dose (cumulative air kerma [CAK], air kerma area product [KAP], and fluoroscopy time [FT]) during cannulation of the CL. In addition, overall procedure time and radiation dose of the complete EVAR procedure were studied.

RESULTS

In 22 (81%) of the 27 FORS guided cases the CL was successfully cannulated using FORS. All radiation dose parameters were significantly lower in the FORS group (CAK, p < .001; KAP, p = .009; and FT, p < .001) for an equal navigation time (p = .95). No significant differences were found when comparing outcomes of the complete procedure.

CONCLUSION

Use of FORS technology significantly reduces radiation doses during cannulation of the CL in standard EVAR.

3D Visualisation of Navigation Catheters for Endovascular Procedures Using a 3D Hub and Fiber Optic RealShape Technology: Phantom Study Results

Objective

Fiber Optic RealShape (FORS) is a new technology that visualises the full three dimensional (3D) shape of guidewires using an optical fibre embedded in the device. Co-registering FORS guidewires with anatomical images, such as a digital subtraction angiography (DSA), provides anatomical context for navigating these devices during endovascular procedures. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility and usability of visualising compatible conventional navigation catheters, together with the FORS guidewire, in phantom with a new 3D Hub technology and to understand potential clinical benefits.

Methods

The accuracy of localising the 3D Hub and catheter in relation to the FORS guidewire, was evaluated using a translation stage test setup and a retrospective analysis of prior clinical data. Catheter visualisation accuracy and navigation success was assessed in a phantom study where 15 interventionists navigated devices to three pre-defined targets in an abdominal aortic phantom using an Xray or computed tomography angiography (CTA) roadmap. Additionally, the interventionists were surveyed about the usability and potential benefits of the 3D Hub.

Results

The location of the 3D Hub and catheter along the FORS guidewire was detected correctly 96.59% of the time. During the phantom study, all 15 interventionists successfully reached the target locations 100% of the time and the error in catheter visualisation was 0.69 mm. The interventionists agreed or strongly agreed that the 3D Hub was easy to use and the greatest potential clinical benefit over FORS is in offering interventionists choice over which catheter they used.

Conclusion

This set of studies has shown that FORS guided catheter visualisation, enabled by a 3D Hub, is accurate and easy to use in a phantom setting. Further evaluation is needed to understand the benefits and limitations of the 3D Hub technology during endovascular procedures.

Measuring the Internal Stress in Ovine Meniscus During Simulated In Vivo Gait Kinematics: A Novel Method Using Fibre Optic Technology

Changes in stress transferred across articular joints have been described as a substantial factor in the initiation and progression of joint disease such as post-traumatic osteoarthritis and have thus been of interest to biomechanical researchers. However, to date, stress magnitudes within the menisci have not been successfully measured. In this study, a novel method for measuring stress within the menisci is presented. Small Fibre Bragg Grating (FBG) sensors were inserted inside menisci and used to measure mechanical stress during replicated gait cycles. In-vitro stress measurements within the menisci were preformed for healthy gait and gait following surgical damage to the joints. Together with our capability to reproduce in vivo motions accurately, the improvements in fibre optic technology have allowed for the first direct measurement of mechanical stress in menisci.

Three Dimensional Visualisation of Endovascular Guidewires and Catheters Based on Laser Light instead of Fluoroscopy with Fiber Optic RealShape Technology: Preclinical Results

OBJECTIVE

Fiber Optic RealShape (FORS) is a new technology platform that enables real time three dimensional (3D) visualisation of endovascular guidewires and catheters, based on the concepts of fibre optic technology instead of fluoroscopy. Anatomical context is provided by means of co-registered prior anatomical imaging, such as digital subtraction angiography or computed tomography. This preclinical study assesses the safety and feasibility of FORS technology.

METHODS

Six physicians performed endovascular tasks in a phantom model and a porcine model using FORS enabled floppy guidewires, Cobra-2 catheters and Berenstein catheters. Each physician performed a set of predefined tasks in both models, including setup of the FORS system, device registration, and 12 aortic and peripheral target vessel cannulation tasks. The evaluation of the FORS system was based on (i) target vessel cannulation success; (ii) safety assessment; (iii) the accuracy of the FORS based device visualisation; and (iv) user experience.

RESULTS

Successful cannulation was achieved in 72 of the 72 tasks (100%) in the phantom model and in 70 of the 72 tasks (97%) in the porcine model. No safety issues were reported. The FORS based device visualisation had a median offset at the tip of 2.2 mm (interquartile range 1.2-3.8 mm). The users judged the FORS based device visualisation to be superior to conventional fluoroscopic imaging, while not affecting the mechanical properties (torquability, pushability) of the FORS enabled guidewire and catheters.

CONCLUSION

The combined outcomes of high cannulation success, positive user experience, adequate accuracy, and absence of safety issues demonstrate the safety and feasibility of the FORS system in a preclinical environment. FORS technology has great potential to improve device visualisation in endovascular interventions.