Differences in future life expectancy of testicular germ-cell tumor patients vs. age-matched male population-based controls

BACKGROUND

It is unknown whether five-year overall survival (OS) differs and to what extent between testicular germ-cell tumor (TGCT) patients and age-matched male population-based controls.

MATERIALS

We identified newly diagnosed (2004-2014) TGCT patients within Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database 2004-2019. We compared OS between non-seminoma (NS-TGCT) and seminoma (S-TGCT) patients relative to age-matched male population-based controls based on Social Security Administration Life-Tables. Smoothed cumulative incidence plots displayed cancer-specific mortality (CSM) vs. other-cause mortality (OCM).

RESULTS

Of all 20,935 TGCT patients, 43% had NS-TGCT and 57% had S-TGCT. Of NS-TGCT patients, 63% were stage I vs. 16% stage II vs. 21% stage III. Of S-TGCT patients, 86% were stage I vs. 8% were stage II vs. 6% stage III. Five-year OS differences between NS-TGCT patients vs age-matched male population-based controls were 97 vs. 99% (Δ = 2%) for stage I, 96 vs. 99% (Δ = 3%) for stage II, 76 vs 98% (Δ = 22%) for stage III. Five-year OS differences between S-TGCT patients vs age-matched male population-based controls were 97 vs. 98% (Δ = 1%) for stage I, 95 vs. 97% (Δ = 2%) for stage II, 87 vs. 98% (Δ = 11%) for stage III. OCM rates ranged from 1 to 3% in NS-TGCT patients and from 2 to 4% in S-TGCT patients.

CONCLUSION

The OS difference between NS-TGCT patients vs. age-matched male population-based controls was invariably higher across all stages (2-22%) than for S-TGCT patients (1-11%). Reassuringly, OCM rates were marginal in stage I and stage II patients. Conversely, higher OCM rates were recorded in stage III patients.

Multicenter Database of Patients with Germ-Cell Tumors: A Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group Registry (LACOG 0515)

INTRODUCTION

Germ-cell tumors (GCTs) are the most common malignancy in young men. There is a paucity of data on GCTs in developing countries. LACOG 0515 study aimed to evaluate clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes in patients with GCTs from Brazilian cancer centers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study evaluating male patients diagnosed with GCTs from 2000 to 2018 in 13 Brazilian hospitals. We described baseline characteristics, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 1232 patients were included, with a median age of 30 years. Histology was seminoma in 47.1% and non-seminoma GCT (NSGCT) in 52.9%. The primary tumor site was testis in 96.5%. At diagnosis, clinical stage I was present in 68.1% and 34.7% and clinical stages IS/II/III in 31.9% and 65.2% of patients with seminoma and NSCGT, respectively. Following orchiectomy, 55.2% of patients with clinical stage I were managed with surveillance. The 5-year disease-free survival rates among patients with stage I were 98.0% in seminoma and 92.3% in NSGCT, with 5-year OS of 99.6% and 97.6%, respectively. Among patients with advanced disease (IS, II, and III), the 5-year PFS were 88.7% in seminoma and 68.7% in NSGCT, with 5y-OS of 97.6% and 82.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest Brazilian cohort of GCTs. Our results show a high rate of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with clinical stage I. Although our data demonstrate slightly inferior PFS compared with the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group and other contemporary series, the OS rates were similar.

[Intensification by high dose chemotherapy for germ-cell tumors, still an ongoing subject?]

More than 80 % of patient with metastatic germ cell tumor are cured with first line chemotherapy. Twenty to 30 % of patients will experience relapse or refractory disease with a very poor long-term prognosis. Most of them had metastatic germ cell tumors with a poor prognosis according to the international germ cell classification collaborative group (IGCCCG). The role of treatment intensification by high dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by stem cell rescue has not been demonstrated yet in the first line setting compared to standard chemotherapy. The role of HDCT in first or second salvage is also not yet demonstrated, many studies have been published in this situation with a lot of different regimen. Outside clinical trial, HDCT remains an option in salvage therapy, depending on many factors including prognostics factors, previous therapy, general condition and reference center consideration to select eligible patient who could benefit the most of this approach. Results from the international randomized trial TIGER will provide evidence-based information for HDCT strategy.

Plerixafor-aided Mobilization of Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cells to Support Subsequent High-dose Chemotherapy After a Prior Autologous Transplant

BACKGROUND

An appreciable proportion of patients in need of salvage high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation (PBSCT) fail to mobilize adequate numbers of hematopoietic progenitors, and plerixafor is applied for that purpose. Limited data exist on remobilization of PBSCs in patients who have relapsed after prior HDC + PBSCT. Herein, we report on consecutive patients that had undergone successful prior single or tandem HDC for a variety of malignant neoplasms in our institution, and later required re-mobilization of PBSCs in order to support further HDC cycles.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Plerixafor was administered in combination with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor alone, or after mobilizing chemotherapy. Five patients, 2 B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas, 1 multiple myeloma, 1 germ-cell tumor, and 1 Ewing sarcoma, having relapsed after prior HDC + PBSCT, were deemed candidates for further cycle(s) of PBSC-supported HDC. Plerixafor was applied in a "just-in-time" strategy after low CD34+ numbers were measured on the first day of anticipated hematopoietic stem cell collection (non-Hodgkin lymphoma, germ-cell tumor, and Ewing sarcoma), or pre-emptively in multiple myeloma.

RESULTS

Successful collection of adequate PBSCs was achieved in all patients, from 1.8 to 3.8 × 10⁶/kg after a median of 2 (range, 1-3) leukaphereses; 4 of 5 patients underwent subsequent HDC + PBSCT and engrafted after a median of 11 days (range, 9-55 days) and 25 days (range, 17-76 days) for neutrophils and platelets, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Plerixafor proved effective to mobilize adequate numbers of PBSCs in individual patients with relapsed malignancies after prior single or tandem HDC + PBSCT. These PBSCs could establish sustained multi-lineage hematopoietic engraftment without any sequelae.

Imaging Features Predictive of Recurrence in Pediatric Intracranial Germ-Cell Tumors

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Intracranial germ-cell tumors (GCTs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors that vary in their response to treatment. Standard treatment consists of chemotherapy and radiation therapy, with the consideration of second-look surgery in resistant disease. The present study aims to inform therapy by characterizing features on pretreatment imaging associated with recurrence.

METHODS

Children with intracranial GCTs treated at a single institution between January 2000 and October 2016 were retrospectively reviewed under an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Imaging variables identified on pretreatment imaging were calcifications, cysts, heterogeneity of enhancement, blood products, hydrocephalus, gradient echo susceptibility, restricted diffusion, invasiveness, and extent of edema. Tumor recurrence was used as the primary outcome variable.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Fifty-two patients (39 males, mean age at diagnosis: 13 ± 5 years, 34 germinoma, 18 nongerminomatous GCT [NGGCT]) were reviewed. Thirty-three percent of the patients reviewed had recurrence (7 germinoma, 11 NGGCT). Recurrence was associated with invasiveness as seen on preoperative imaging (p = 0.0385) and cystic tumor (p = 0.048).

Biennial report on genitourinary cancers

The last 2 years (2014 and 2015) have witnessed major advances in the treatment of genitourinary malignancies. Of note and in marked contrast to previous years, all four major cancers (prostate cancer, testicular cancer, kidney cancer, and bladder cancer) have benefited from this progress. In prostate cancer, it was clearly demonstrated that a local treatment should be administered for high-risk localised disease. The standard of care was changed for patients with upfront metastatic disease with combined androgen deprivation therapy plus docetaxel becoming the new standard for fit patients with multiple bony metastases. In castrate-resistant disease, AR-V7 variants were shown to be predictive factors for resistance to next-generation AR axis-targeting agents and DNA repair targeting emerged as a promising new strategy. In poor-prognosis advanced non-seminoma, a better outcome was randomly demonstrated for the first time when a switch-intensified treatment was used in patients with a slow tumour marker decline. In metastatic kidney cancer, both cabozantinib and checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab) are now associated with improved outcomes in pretreated patients and should soon change the standard of care for these patients. Last but not least, in urothelial bladder cancer, molecular classification is evolving and suggesting that immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors is active, as demonstrated in early trials.

Clinical and pathologic features of patients with non-epithelial ovarian cancer: retrospective analysis of a single institution 15-year experience

PURPOSE

Non-epithelial ovarian cancers (NEOCs) are rare diseases. Despite their overall good prognosis, the best management and current prognostic factors remain unclear. The objective of our study was to assess the clinical and pathological features of NEOC patients treated in our institution in the last 15 years and to explore risk factors for relapse and survival.

METHODS/PATIENTS

All patients with a pathological diagnosis of NEOC referred to the medical oncology department at Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio between 1999 and 2014 were included. Demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment procedures, and clinical follow-up were retrospectively collected. Risk factors for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were included, 33 (58 %) had a sex cord-stromal tumor (SCST) and 24 (42 %) had a germ-cell tumor (GCT). Median age, non-conservative surgery rates and DFS were lower in the GCT cohort; however, salvage chemotherapy led to a high proportion of complete responses in this group translating into a 90 % 3-year OS rate in both NEOC subtypes. The only identified risk factors statistically significant were stage and tumour relapse that associated, respectively, with DFS (HR = 8.84; 95 % CI 1.85-42) and OS (HR = 11.02; 95 % CI 1.76-68.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite their rarity, NEOCs remain a highly curable group of neoplasm. In our series, a more conservative treatment approach in ovarian GCTs revealed comparable OS outcomes to SCST. No new risk factors that would help in patient stratification were identified.