1
|
Boulad F, Zhang J, Yazdanbakhsh K, Sadelain M, Shi PA. Evidence for continued dose escalation of plerixafor for hematopoietic progenitor cell collections in sickle cell disease. Blood Cells Mol Dis 2021; 90:102588. [PMID: 34166998 DOI: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2021.102588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
We present data from our study of plerixafor mobilization (NCT02193191) relevant to the question of whether further dose escalation of plerixafor can address inconsistent adequacy of CD34+ mobilization for gene therapy of sickle cell disease (SCD). We found that, in the same patient, higher plerixafor dosing was associated with higher fold increases in PB CD34+ count, but not necessarily higher absolute CD34+ counts. Variation in pre-apheresis absolute CD34+ counts was related to intra-individual variation in baseline PB CD34+ counts and inter-individual variation in responsiveness to plerixafor. Overall, our results support further studies of continued dose escalation of plerixafor for autologous HPC collection in SCD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farid Boulad
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Jiahao Zhang
- New York Blood Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | | | - Michel Sadelain
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Patricia A Shi
- New York Blood Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Sickle Cell Program, Division of Hematology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Doobay GD, Miller ES, Apple CG, Loftus TJ, Kannan KB, Efron PA, Mohr AM. Mediators of Prolonged Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Mobilization After Severe Trauma. J Surg Res 2021; 260:315-24. [PMID: 33373851 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.11.084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2020] [Revised: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 11/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study investigated the molecular mediators of prolonged hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization a trauma and chronic stress and the role of propranolol in modifying this response. METHODS Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized to lung contusion (LC), LC plus hemorrhagic shock (LCHS), or LCHS with daily restraint stress (LCHS/CS). Propranolol was administered daily. Bone marrow (BM) and lung expression of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), neutrophil elastase, stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1)/CXR4, and vascular cell adhesion protein 1 (VCAM-1)/very late antigen-4 were measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS Bone marrow HMGB1, G-CSF, and neutrophil elastase expression were significantly elevated two- to four-fold after LCHS/CS, and all were decreased with the use of propranolol. SDF-1 and VCAM-1 were both significantly decreased after LCHS/CS. CONCLUSIONS The increased expression of HMGB1 and G-CSF and decreased expression of BM anchoring molecules, SDF-1 and VCAM-1, after LCHS/CS, likely mediates prolonged hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization. Propranolol's ability to reduce HMGB1, G-CSF, and neutrophil elastase expression suggests that the mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells was driven by persistent hypercatecholaminemia.
Collapse
|
3
|
Samaras P, Rütti MF, Seifert B, Bachmann H, Schanz U, Eisenring M, Renner C, Susanne Müller AM, Schmidt A, Mischo A, Fuchs I, Bargetzi M, Manz MG, Stupp R, Petrausch U, Stenner-Liewen F. Mobilization of Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells with Standard- or Reduced-Dose Filgrastim after Vinorelbine in Multiple Myeloma Patients: A Randomized Prospective Single-Center Phase II Study. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2017; 24:694-699. [PMID: 29246820 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.12.775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2017] [Accepted: 12/03/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Vinorelbine combined with filgrastim at a dose of 10 µg/kg of body weight (BW) per day is a reliable and well-tolerated regimen for mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) in patients with multiple myeloma. This prospective, randomized, phase II study was initiated to assess the feasibility of a reduced filgrastim dosage. Vinorelbine was combined with either standard-dose filgrastim (10 µg/kg BW per day) or reduced-dose filgrastim (5 µg/kg BW per day). Leukapheresis sessions were planned to start at day 8 and were continued until the predefined target amount of 4 × 106 HPCs/kg BW was collected. The study demonstrated the feasibility of vinorelbine combined with reduced daily filgrastim with a mean of 1.29 leukapheresis sessions necessary per patient (95% confidence interval, .95 to 1.7). All patients could start leukapheresis as planned at day 8, and the collection success rate was 100% for the whole patient collective after a maximum of 2 leukapheresis sessions. No statistically significant differences with regard to the amount of HPCs collected between the 2 groups were observed (P = .99). Accordingly, no differences were seen with regard to length of hospitalization for autotransplant (P = .34) and duration of neutrophil (P = .93) and platelet engraftment (P = .42). Patients receiving reduced-dose filgrastim reported significantly lower peak pain values in a numeric analogue scale (P = .01), and the costs were significantly lower than in patients undergoing standard-dose chemomobilization (P = .001). Vinorelbine 35 mg/m2 plus filgrastim 5 µg/kg BW once per day until completion of HPC collection is feasible and appears to be advantageous with respect to the severity of pain intensity and treatment costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panagiotis Samaras
- Center for Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Markus F Rütti
- Center for Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Burkhardt Seifert
- Department of Biostatistics at Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Helga Bachmann
- Center for Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Urs Schanz
- Center for Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Maya Eisenring
- Department of Immunology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Adrian Schmidt
- Medical Oncology and Hematology, Triemli City Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Axel Mischo
- Center for Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ivo Fuchs
- Center for Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mario Bargetzi
- Center of Oncology, Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aargau, Switzerland
| | - Markus G Manz
- Center for Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Roger Stupp
- Center for Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ulf Petrausch
- Center for Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Frank Stenner-Liewen
- Center for Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Choi E, Branch C, Cui MH, Yazdanbakhsh K, Mohandas N, Billett HH, Shi PA. No evidence for cell activation or brain vaso-occlusion with plerixafor mobilization in sickle cell mice. Blood Cells Mol Dis 2015; 57:67-70. [PMID: 26852658 DOI: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2015.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2015] [Accepted: 12/18/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Gene therapy for sickle cell disease is currently in active trials. Collecting hematopoietic progenitor cells safely and effectively is challenging, however, because granulocyte colony stimulating factor, the drug used most commonly for mobilization, can cause life-threatening vaso-occlusion in patients with sickle cell disease, and bone marrow harvest requires general anesthesia and multiple hip bone punctures. Plerixafor is an inhibitor of the CXCR4 chemokine receptor on hematopoietic progenitor cells, blocking its binding to SDF-1 (CXCL12) on bone marrow stroma. In support of a clinical trial in patients with sickle cell disease of plerixafor mobilization (NCT02193191), we administered plerixafor to sickle cell mice and found that it mobilizes hematopoietic progenitor cells without evidence of concomitant cell activation or brain vaso-occlusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika Choi
- Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute, New York Blood Center, 310 East 67th St, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Craig Branch
- Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave, Bronx, NY 10461, United States
| | - Min-Hui Cui
- Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave, Bronx, NY 10461, United States
| | - Karina Yazdanbakhsh
- Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute, New York Blood Center, 310 East 67th St, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Narla Mohandas
- Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute, New York Blood Center, 310 East 67th St, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Henny H Billett
- Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave, Bronx, NY 10461, United States
| | - Patricia A Shi
- Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute, New York Blood Center, 310 East 67th St, New York, NY 10065, United States; Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave, Bronx, NY 10461, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Salvino MA, Ruiz J. Hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization for autologous transplantation - a literature review. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter 2015; 38:28-36. [PMID: 26969772 PMCID: PMC4786760 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjhh.2015.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2015] [Revised: 06/30/2015] [Accepted: 07/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous support of hematopoietic progenitor cells is an effective strategy to treat various hematologic neoplasms, such as non-Hodgkin lymphomas and multiple myeloma. Mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells are the main source of support for autologous transplants, and collection of an adequate number of hematopoietic progenitor cells is a critical step in the autologous transplant procedure. Traditional strategies, based on the use of growth factors with or without chemotherapy, have limitations even when remobilizations are performed. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is the most widely used agent for progenitor cell mobilization. The association of plerixafor, a C-X-C Chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) inhibitor, to granulocyte colony stimulating factor generates rapid mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells. A literature review was performed of randomized studies comparing different mobilization schemes in the treatment of multiple myeloma and lymphomas to analyze their limitations and effectiveness in hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization for autologous transplant. This analysis showed that the addition of plerixafor to granulocyte colony stimulating factor is well tolerated and results in a greater proportion of patients with non-Hodgkin lymphomas or multiple myeloma reaching optimal CD34+ cell collections with a smaller number of apheresis compared the use of granulocyte colony stimulating factor alone.
Collapse
|
6
|
Samaras P, Pfrommer S, Seifert B, Petrausch U, Mischo A, Schmidt A, Schanz U, Nair G, Bargetzi M, Taverna C, Stupp R, Stenner-Liewen F, Renner C. Efficacy of vinorelbine plus granulocyte colony-stimulation factor for CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2014; 21:74-80. [PMID: 25278456 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2014] [Accepted: 09/19/2014] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
We aimed to assess the efficacy of vinorelbine plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for chemo-mobilization of CD34(+) hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) in patients with multiple myeloma and to identify adverse risk factors for successful mobilization. Vinorelbine 35 mg/m(2) was administered intravenously on day 1 in an outpatient setting. Filgrastim 5 μg/kg body weight (BW) was given twice daily subcutaneously from day 4 until the end of the collection procedure. Leukapheresis was scheduled to start on day 8 and be performed for a maximum of 3 consecutive days until at least 4 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells per kg BW were collected. Overall, 223 patients were mobilized and 221 (99%) patients proceeded to leukapheresis. Three (1.5%) patients required an unscheduled hospitalization after chemo-mobilization because of neutropenic fever and renal failure (n = 1), severe bone pain (n = 1), and abdominal pain with constipation (n = 1). In 211 (95%) patients, the leukaphereses were started as planned at day 8, whereas in 8 (3%) patients the procedure was postponed to day 9 and in 2 (1%) patients to day 10. In the great majority of patients (77%), the predefined amount of HPC could be collected with 1 leukapheresis. Forty-four (20%) patients needed a second leukapheresis, whereas only 6 (3%) patients required a third leukapheresis procedure. The median number of CD34(+) cells collected was 6.56 × 10(6) (range, .18 to 25.9 × 10(6)) per kg BW at the first day of leukapheresis and 7.65 × 10(6) (range, .18 to 25.9 × 10(6)) per kg BW in total. HPC collection was successful in 212 (95%) patients after a maximum of 3 leukaphereses. Patient age (P = .02) and prior exposition to lenalidomide (P < .001) were independent risk factors for a lower HPC amount collected in multiple regression analysis. Vinorelbine plus G-CSF enables a very reliable prediction of the timing of leukapheresis and results in successful HPC collection in 95% of the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panagiotis Samaras
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Sarah Pfrommer
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Burkhardt Seifert
- Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ulf Petrausch
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Axel Mischo
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Adrian Schmidt
- Medical Oncology and Hematology, Triemli City Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Urs Schanz
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Gayathri Nair
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mario Bargetzi
- Center of Oncology, Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Christian Taverna
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Roger Stupp
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Christoph Renner
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|